exactly the link no longer exists :(

so wait... the company was profitable because it was abusing its workers. They finally got their comuppance through actual enforcement of fair labour laws and had to shut down because they were stealing from their workers all along.... And government is the bad guy here??

@nzbozza The workers were not getting abuse. Ppl chosen to work hard to have big fat checks. Under Obama the federal agencies became a lot more aggressive. Their aim was to shut down coal. Make it non profitable by over regulations.

I see that I have better luck talking to a wall lol.

@nzbozza Do you hav experience working in the coal industry?

A solid argument. Ok thanks bye

Caring about women is a demented fantasy? Your poor mother doesn't deserve such a heartless son.

You’re a fool

Brother mr modi is not dalit he is obc and suraj yengde is bringing solidarity between two oppressed communities there's nothing wrong in that

What are your reasons for opposing this system?

@@thephoenix756 You want to replace people who I voted to represent me, And replace them with some randoms, Who will do things “in my interest” and not things that I ask for. How does it pick people at random? That’s going to be so corrupt. It’s really going to hand pick people. And if at first it does choose people at random, eventually it’s going to hand pick people. Next, It seems to be based on “expert opinions” any real expert will tell you that they work with knowledge known today. Not fact. As you know, the earth was assumed flat according to “experts” based on the knowledge they had at the time. A more recent example, the North Pole will be ice free by 2020. 😂 so accurate. Next problem, what happens if there is no consensus? Government becomes useless? If I’m selected, and they want to ban petrol cars to save the planet, I will vote no. I want petrol cars! No expert will change my mind. Now I’m at risk of assassination, I’m at risk of abuse and being an outcast. How will this system protect against stubborn people like me who will not change their minds?? Does the system collapse? Am I removed for not going with the flow? Am I imprisoned? This system is totally flawed on every level. It’s an abomination of thought disguised as intellectual thinking. In reality this will be the most corrupt political system ever created. It stinks of dictatorship. I will gladly take part in any citizens assembly experiment and vote no, just to be a dick, and watch the system crumble. And that’s the point, the system will not crumble, instead I will be removed for not having the “right” opinion. This is a dictatorship, and anyone who thinks otherwise is living in a fantasy.

Instablaster.

You should take into account cumulative emissions, not current yearly emissions. This is because emissions have accumulated in the atmosphere. It's a property of the climate system.

Actually this is a very arrogant position considering the so called solutions which the climate hypocrites offer are likely more damaging to the environment and puts a heavier burden on poor nations. Consider electric cars, where are the two main elements used to make lithium batteries mined…mainly in Africa, specifically the Democratic Republic of Congo😮! The greens are the new reds and they love to exploit inhumane working environments which includes child labor! Not to mention these are the countries you sympathetically refer to as victims of those evil colonialist. It seems they are also victims of the modern day environmental movement as well! When you consider the destructive impact which occurs when obtaining the elements needed to produce solar panels and lithium batteries, we must also take into consideration how to safely dispose of these hazards once their life span ends. I rarely hear these concerns even attempt to be addressed. The truth is there are no solutions, there are only trade offs. The trade offs for the future your purposing comes at a high cost to poor countries and benefits genocidal regimes like the Chinese Communist Party, all while bankrupting the countries who gave you the freedom to offer such criticism. Continuing to use oil, coal, natural gas, and nuclear, as we continue to explore new sources of energy which are smarter, more efficient, and is safe to produce is a much more rational approach. The state of the earth has been way overblown, the earths been through much worse. After all no one truly knows what the optimal temperature actually is, so let’s stop hyperventilating and start acting like adults.

Well explained? how lol. We already have a citizens assembly, it's called parliament 😂 Only in this version normal people don't get a say, where in parliament i can vote for people to represent me, in a citizens assembly i am not given a say, but have to accept it. How can you represent all opinions? will you have Neo nazi and members of the KKK in the citizens assembly? Or will you only have far left representation? because the truth is, you only like citizens assemblies because you think thats how you will get your own way. What if on the first vote we vote to exterminate all communists? You support that? or we vote to end citizens assemblies? lol because you only like the idea because you think it will support you bull shit backward politics

Hi, sorry for a 3-year late response, but I am the illustrator from the video and would be glad to help!

Hello, I think the point of this example is not to deal with climate justification as said in the video, as we could not compare nuclear or hydrogen plants their carbon emissions job to energy ratios and so on ..., yet the global economy is transforming to a more sustainable one, and the purpose of these examples is about letting no one behind ensuring jobs & global empowerment through the ''sustainable'' side of the transition. The global balance whether regarding energy production, steel making, etc is made through more innovative processes and global cross-boundaries distribution. Inspiring examples to support effective (re)developments at scale.