I imagine Dylan is returning those groups to a pair of channels and then routing those out to the master drum group

Man - that DAW is insane with the amount of functionality. Got a workflow problem? Yeah, just create a solution. Crazy.

@@dylanmaudioexactly! Your mind is the limit with Reaper. I've been having so much fun with the CSI 3.0 extension and customizing how my X Touch integrates with custom actions

Yeah! I like to cheat my way through group-to-group mixing - on any console!

And this is the part i dont understand! Group to group in dlive is not posible!! Thanxs for your replay.

Hello, Dylan! I'm trying to do the same with Reaper and an A&H Avantis, could you share your Reaper project or make a specific video? Thank you so much!

@@dressink you just have to think outside of the box a little bit - or even like an analog signal flow mentality! Plug the output of a group into an input channel, then route that input channel into a group again :) Be aware though, this will add a small amount of latency (as it does for other consoles that DO allow bus-to-bus routing such as Digico)

@@phantomkik yeah cool! Maybe I can do a video to explain the methods I ended up with. I’m still learning but Reaper is very useful given all the custom commands you can make.

Yes you’re right. My drums pass through UAD 3 times before outputting through the master. Low latency protocols help, along with running at 96khz. I’ve been running this same mix setup for quite a while now, with no perceivable latency. I should really measure it! But I would imagine total RTL is 10-15ms

Both excel at different things IMO. UAD is better at emulations and ‘flavours’. Waves has better audio tools and effects.

But uad live is discontinued right ? How to use it in a proper way ? Need a old macbook with a specific version of Mac OS ?

@@yannd3b yep - I have a Mac mini 2012 running High Sierra, alongside a Mac mini M1 for Waves

Yeah - High Sierra is the only OS! I'm running a 2012 Mac mini.

I haven't used that setup for a while - but ballpark I think about 12ms with a number of round trips through sub-groups/master bus etc. In LP, you can 'time align' your inserts into groups if you like. For this particular setup with such little input count, it wasn't so important.

@@dylanmaudio Thanks! =)

Thats why I use it so much, I should pretty much own shares :)

PCI card let's you go down with latency.

It is to lower the latency. PCIE card allows 0.15ms minimum latency each in & out, per round trip Dante virtual Soundcard is 4ms minimum latency each in & out, per round trip. If you have multiple round trips - ie signals go through a channel chain, a subgroup chain, and a master bus chain, the latency stacks up every quickly.

SQ Mixpad! Very handy for high-res meters for this console with a v simple metering system!

No too slow of live at all.. any thunderbolt Dante interface will allow low enough latency for a couple of round-trips in a live setting IMO. Hardware Inserts through the Apollo is a great idea, just means more I/O and analog cabling required but it's a very robust solution.

No I haven't! I should give it a run..

You should, rock solid and way more flexible in every way

For live? Invest in a good sound person who can make you sound great anywhere.

Advantages are that it is rock solid with minimal configuration and computer strain. Less flexibility than LP though.

touch-base.com!

I don't use Dante Virtual Soundcard in this setup

Its lots of fun!

If I had $1 for everyone that asked me that question... Unfortunately they are discontinued. I've managed to locate 3 of them (2 in-use now, and 1 spare), and they were VERY difficult to find. They are excellent, cheap screens.

And how did you secure it to the console ?

The brand is Innocn. They are discontinued. Using Dual-Lock to clip it onto the console.