amazing, thanks.

topology in microeconomics very intersting videos i wish the author still remember those and produce a new version for this content

Thank you for the series, it really helps 🙏🙏🙏

Thanks so much

How do You solve the Condorcet paradox???

Thankyou

mam where did u study from?

❤ thank you

You are a life-saver!

Tanks

You made my life much easierrrr. I can’t thank you enough. You explained everything very welllll. Thank you so much. If you were my professor, I would not have struggled with this course

Thank you. Great video!

Thank you for enlightening me!! Really of great help

Genius🎉

Thank you

Thx for your help didn’t understand game theory at all

Thx for your help didn’t understand game theory at all

Where is 3.4 ???

Briliant explanation.

Good illustration, hope you can produce more of this. Our professor is terrible on explaining this topic!

Thank you sanjay!

Your videos are very clear and very useful, thank you!

Awesome video. Worked much better for me than the others on this topic

Thankyou professor.

Thank you so much

Thank you so much... You have beautifully explained this in an easy way...

My quest for the proof of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem ends here :) It's surprising how so many advanced books have just peddled around Condorcet paradox as a proof of Arrow's theorem. Thanks for making this video

Why should we think that preferences are intrinsic and essential to persons? We shouldn't, why? Suppose that bob is a socialist,here,bob prefers gouvermental regulations over laissez faire policies,now suppose bob was presented to a proof for laissez faire capitalism and bob is convinced by that proof,as a result,bob became a laissez faire capitalist,hence bob prefer laissez faire over regulations. We conclud,it's possible (sometimes) preferences depend on how people think about things. Now,suupose bob was presented with a powerfull argument,and bob still assessing the argument,now we can see that due to the lack of information,bob has no preference,which's our first conclusion.

But a choice is under a person's control,thus it's a act,now suppose that person is x and x is rational,now suppose x had choosen y over g at t-1,now suppose we're at t contemplating x's choice,that's x's act,can we say that x's choice which was under x's control and x is rational,is irrational (x's choice is irrational),it seems not.

thanks!

dosent chooser preference defy the completeness requirement of preferences

Very useful. Thanks!

Hands down the best/simplest explanation on KZbin. Finally got it, thank you! :)

why we have to multiple the price effect DpX(p,w) with dp ?

Thank you mam so much

Thank you for the video :), IWD is always hard for me

Thank you

Got it after you explained it - thanks for the help!

Thank you mam,these videos helped alot ❤

The Author is catalan Senior Mas Colell? I believe that he's being harassed by Spanish jutdes and politicians in an unfair way.

Is a good channel why you dont do new videos?

Could you do some example of kuhn-tucker conditions please?

great explanatión, it would be great if you could do some video about kuhn-tucker conditions. Best regards

I am pursuing Masters in Economics. I was facing too much difficulty in following Mas-Collel Whinston Green Textbooks... But with your lectures.. Even advanced microeconomics seems so easy and enjoyable... Now I feel more confident.... I am so glad that I have found this channel... I am so greatful to you... Thank you very much

please continue with your work, it is great for all who study this topics. Thank you

Thank you for being a saviour.

Can you please share the title and author of the book you used please

Thnx! Could you please explain why in the case of positive externality you say that consumer 2 has a marginal disutility from the actions of consumer 1?

thank you professor kindly can you share the book in pdf

Thank you very much Madam for uploading this video, You don't know Mam to what extent this has helped me in my academics. Thank you once again.