Oswald had plenty of time to "tell what he knows." Why did Ruby wait so long?

It's an AI created bs with no text, just amount of words per minute. No harm if you skip it

@lifetimes,, firing pin was bent in the handgun that LH Oswald had in that incident

Yeah I heard that but also heard in the scuffle that one of the arresting officers got his thumb wen caught in the hammer

Parkland doctors are seen at their first press conference speculating wildly about the wounds, unable to conjecture about numbers, trajectories, etc. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors later had no particular problem with the autopsy photos. Connally's said the shots all came from behind. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Kennedy's massive exit wound seen exploding at the right temple is consistent only with a shot from behind. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Anybody firing a rifle behind that flimsy knoll fence would have been absurdly obvious and very visible. It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would successfully frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions. Oswald never made the slightest attempt to blow any conspiracy to anybody.

Malcolm Kilduff (Kennedy's Press Secretary) stating where Kennedy was shot at the Hospital same day of the shooting, Kilduff points to his right temple. More than twenty Doctors and staff stated the back lower right side of Kennedys head was blown out. Kennedy clearly moving back and to the left after being shot from the front in the Zupruder film. Both films are on KZbin and easily found.

@@robwwhit3453 a) Kilduff was merely and dazedly pointing to his temple in reference to the massive exit wound. b) You are lying about the doctors: they are seen at their first press conference speculating wildly about the wounds, unable to conjecture about numbers, trajectories, etc. Nor were they conducting an autopsy on the body rushed into their emergency room. They had no particular problem with the autopsy photos - demonstrating a cratered entrance wound on the back of the skull - when they examined them. c) Direction a person's head goes is meaningless regarding what direction the bullet came from and the limo abruptly sped up at the same time. d) You know what is ALSO "easily found" on KZbin? That same Zapruder film where you can plainly see a massive exit wound exploding at the right temple and nothing at all happening at the back lower right side of the head.

In this video, you can see where JFK was shot in the high, right forehead, as pointed out by his assistant press secretary Malcolm Kilduff: kzbin.info/www/bejne/hZfZgKt7a715mKs

@@aaronz7056 Trained doctors, with years of experience in treating wounds, making observations about what the encountered would not be considered wild speculations. They all made their initial observations before they had any idea about the circumstances of the shooting. Their statements only began to be questioned when it was determined their observations were in conflict with the preconceived conclusion. Years after, McClelland calmly sketched what the wound looked like in the rear portion of the head. That is not wild speculation. Dr. Perry described a small neat wound in the throat. He described the wound as an entry wound. That observation only was questioned once he was told the bullet passed through JFK. When Perry was questioned by Spector, Spector started his questioning with "assuming facts not in evidence", if a bullet struck JFK from behind, and the bullet passed through the body and a wound occurred in the throat, under those circumstances, would you expect the throat wound to be an exit wound. Perry says, under that hypothetical you described, yes the throat wound would be one of exit. The WC then concluded that Perry said it was an exit wound. Also Perry, made a small incision through the wound to insert a tube. The autopsy photo shows a large gapping wound that Perry stated he did not make. That proves the wound was altered. Wild speculation is the WC assuming the bullet passed thru JFK. That is a theory only. It was never proven

3~6~9

​​@@urbanhesse6084 His own 3-6-9 didn't work for him. Superstitious beliefs.

This is very interesting, I will definitely read about it.

Kenneth Maher, yes CiA rogue Covert ops very Heavily involved., went higher up than David at. PHILLIPS. Plus ➕ @BradBrassman Amongst the real shooters were Mac Wallace, in TSBD, Mac hit JfK right Back/shoulder, Backup shooter for Mac was Frank Sturgis in TSBD, Sturgis hit Conolly. !Within !Dal Tex building, was Charles Nicoletti, mafia, his backup shooters from side grassy knoll, in case Nicoletti missed,; :Nicoletti missed 1 time hitting back seat an 2nd shot missed n hit chrome frame around window, : foiled official narrative here. Jerry Hemming, overpass culvert- embanked, made shot_ hole in front windshield:, plus 2+ -3 confessed shooters from north grassy knoll , 1 mob, Guy, 1 ex-military from storm drain, caused some head shot wound.

The only theory that makes sense!

Thank you❤️

Yes they do and it was revealed within 10 months by the Warren Commission

Mark Alexander,,,,, and @BradBrassman Amongst the real shooters were Mac Wallace, in TSBD, Mac hit JfK right Back/shoulder, Backup shooter for Mac was Frank Sturgis in TSBD, !Within !Dal Tex building, was Charles Nicoletti, mafia, with his backup shooters from side grassy knoll, in case Nicoletti missed,; :Nicoletti missed 1 time hitting back seat an 2nd shot missed n hit chrome frame around window,limo, : Jerry Hemming, overpass culvert- embanked, made hole in front windshield:, Harrelson,CV, shot jfk right front throat shot wound, from grassy knoll area, plus 2+ confessed head shooters, 1 mob hit-an-run guy from north grassy knoll, a side-frontal head shot, using new weaponry, 1 ex- ex-military shooter from storm drain.

@thomasprince7487 The unreleased "documents" were already examined 25 years ago by the ARRB who, after their study was done, reported there was nothing in any of them to suggest much less prove a conspiracy in the Kennedy case. The "unreleased" documents argument is the last gasp by conspiracy kooks who have nothing left., no evidence of a conspiracy and no clue who or what else to blame.

They have released millions of pages already, and nothing changes the Warren Commisson findings. Keep waiting on it though

That's the problem. The 4500 pages could reveal something,or why is everybody treating them like a hot potato.

Some other content is also not accurate- the “civil right speech” was not part of the inaugural address. But, I couldn’t create a KZbin video like this, so I am thankful at least that President Kennedy’s memory is kept alive.