get a top of the l9ine 243 insted of some 50 year old , flogged out 243
@tiputipu7774 сағат бұрын
Comparing a long action caliber to a short action and being surprised the long action is more powerful, shocking. Whats next, being surprised a 300 win mag is a better caliber versus the 270 win?
@wmeyer828 сағат бұрын
But they didnt wanna replace it with the 6.8 spc years ago. 🤨
@Paul-q3m7k17 сағат бұрын
It’s not a better deer cartridge .
@mfallen202317 сағат бұрын
.277" for the .270win.
@Idrinklight4423 сағат бұрын
I'll always like the old ones!! All the new crap won't stand the test of time....... ....
@ThebankfisherКүн бұрын
270 went deeper than the 30-06 and 300 win mag
@kurtwpgКүн бұрын
Which one has the advantage in making a larger hole?
@jchristopher2031Күн бұрын
Virginia won’t allow you to deer hunt with anything smaller then .24 caliber
@scottlopez7622Күн бұрын
For deer hunting neither
@knifelover73Күн бұрын
Why are we comparing 22 creed to 243. Instead of ya know, 6mm creed.
@gspgsp100Күн бұрын
Do the comparison again with the 243 not hamstrung with an 87 gr bullet
@dondoncatchpole35842 күн бұрын
All the creedmoor cartridges are garbage 220 swift smokes the 22 cm and thr 6.5 x284 smokes the cm all novelty cartridges tend to be garbage.
@sammy0807982 күн бұрын
I bought the DiscoveryOpt 5-25x56 ed-prs scope and mounted it on my 6.5 grendel AR. It's almost as good as the premium long range tactical scopes I've used in the past, but a quarter of the cost. I'm building a 556 spr and plan on buying another DiscoveryOpt to put on it.
@LiggerNA2 күн бұрын
The fact that the 277 is doing all of this out of a 13" barrel and the 308 out of a 20" and this guy doesn't mention it tells me to never trust another word out of his mouth
@robertoaiello93422 күн бұрын
Yes. Just stay away from match grade bullets. Stick bonded or expandable solids and you're good.
@aaronbest7473 күн бұрын
6.8×51 verses 30-06
@skipmitchell32003 күн бұрын
Military Industrial Complex getting paid
@MeatPopsicleAK3 күн бұрын
One point that makes all other moot. AMMO AVAILABILITY.
@highpoweredsupernova3 күн бұрын
243 with that exact round. Federal Barnes tsx
@thunder_mountain_muleys4 күн бұрын
Apples n Oranges. Bolt gun ammo compared to AR-15 gas gun ammo. Bolt guns can handle 10,000psi more chamber pressure. 6mm ARC can be loaded with 62gr up to 112gr projectiles. Outperforms is not how I would describe the 22needsmoor. How much powder does it take to get the velocity you speak of? Is that out of a 24" or 26" barrel? The ARC cartridges were designed for 18" barrels. Again I say. Apples to Oranges. I've never seen a Orange Apple. Just my 2 pennies. I'll take the ARC.💯🇺🇲. 🐑🚫
@bawbremy4 күн бұрын
Sooo… 7mm-08?
@dakotakozachenko80924 күн бұрын
Doesn't the 6mm arc come in an 80 grain eld vmatch? Wouldn't it have been better to use the same grain when comparing?
@MezzMcGillicuddy14 күн бұрын
Take that, ya zombie sonofagun!
@ag70154 күн бұрын
And a 7 mag is better than 270. You can always compare a bigger round and find advantages
@GreenWolf704 күн бұрын
A 6.8 will always penetrate more than .308 if bullets are same weight. Try bullets of same Sectional Density for a fair comparison.
@boogiemorgan4 күн бұрын
That is correct! Now compare the .243 win.with rfe 6.5 creedmore!
@SilenceDoGood4th4 күн бұрын
I hunt with soft points and the 243 win would be my personal choice.
@PFM08094 күн бұрын
Hey, when you compare ballistics, match bullet sectional density, not grain weight. It will give a closer comparison across different calibers
@thomasstahley77954 күн бұрын
243 But then I'm a survivalist stocking for the end of the world so ONLY common calibers are in the list
@LelandDeLeon-z5w5 күн бұрын
No one talks much about the 6.5 PRC
@BENJI_THENINJA_5 күн бұрын
30-06
@MTMILITIAMAN7.625 күн бұрын
You're comparing a long action cartridge to a short action cartridge. You should expect the long action cartridge to offer better performance, at least initially. Note, however, that the 6.5 has a higher BC. That means it is only a matter of time before it catches, then surpasses, the .270 Win. The .270 can beat the Creedmoor, but it requires a fast twist barrel with longer, heavier projectiles, and even then, it's still a long action compared to a short action.
@Engb32595 күн бұрын
This would be a lot more informative if we knew the distance that your shooting from.
@jeffreymiller53365 күн бұрын
Yeah, but who said otherwise? 65 Creedmoor will still do the job and is also in a short action and has just as many off the shelf ammo options as a 270 I like them both, but why make an argument on something that nobody arguing about?
@1971hayes5 күн бұрын
Love my 270
@billbertagnoli42266 күн бұрын
Recoil, recoil, recoil.
@corvetteman07146 күн бұрын
Wouldn’t the 40 be in the lead, since it’s dumping all its energy in each target? I thought over penetration was a bad thing.
@nunyabusiness33496 күн бұрын
Those 350 grain round nose do about 1750 fps. You can get 400 grain Beo ammo from AA that does 1800+ fps, as well as extreme penetrator rounds.
@jaredmatthews94036 күн бұрын
Thanks for the great information
@badmonkey2236 күн бұрын
Two seventy is a barrel burner
@luwettecolter63076 күн бұрын
Savage axis 7mm 08
@actionjacksondan7 күн бұрын
Well sounds like we need a 270 necked down to .264
@arronsmith38137 күн бұрын
.277"(6.8) vs. .264" (6.5)
@jonahlitz34028 күн бұрын
I think it is perfectly suited for deer
@jonahlitz34028 күн бұрын
I'm not going to lie I've seen some pretty crazy exit wounds with the 6.5 creedmoor
@richardbaker52488 күн бұрын
30-30
@SupraBdub8 күн бұрын
It kinda depends where you live, the area and such. If you have no neighbors and a long driveway with gate closed and no one ever goes there that's different from living in some neighborhood.
@NealKennedy-t6q8 күн бұрын
Definitely want to get one of these for my son (really for me tho!). He’s small for his age (7 year old, only 40 pounds). I think this round when a can would be a great combo for him, and can double as my predator/pronghorn gun.