Delve | Qualitative Data Analysis Tips

Пікірлер

@philipzerubbabel3583 2 күн бұрын

G.T usually clubs two steps - Data collection and Data Analysis and then a theory is derived. How is this so drastically different from the existing research methods?

@KamuhaoKondjumba 6 күн бұрын

Can you please do the same for Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis? I am doing a phenomenological research and will use IPA. There seem to be a lot of similarities between Thematic Analysis and IPA. It will be interesting to learn the distinction between the two.

@DelveTool 3 күн бұрын

We don’t have a video on IPA, but you can read our blog about it here: delvetool.com/blog/interpretive-phenomenological-analysis

@DelveTool 3 күн бұрын

You can also read our blog comparing thematic analysis and ipa here: delvetool.com/blog/interpretative-phenomenological-analysis-vs-thematic-analysis

@thechadstride937 10 күн бұрын

can i use thematic analysis for informal interview method?

@DelveTool 7 күн бұрын

Absolutely, Thematic Analysis is often used for unstructured and semi-structured interviews

@maristeljs8976 13 күн бұрын

Thank you for being so clear! It’s helped a lot❤

@DelveTool 9 күн бұрын

Of course! Glad it's helped.

@BeboElmasry-p8q 16 күн бұрын

Is the way of coding presented in the video Thematic theory or grounded theory and if not grounded how to code using Delve in grounded theory?

@DelveTool 7 күн бұрын

Hi, We have a great blog post on Grounded Theory which includes a webinar on how to use Delve with grounded theory: delvetool.com/groundedtheory Let us know if you have any questions!

@jeusandreiestrada123 16 күн бұрын

Thank you very much, the visual really helps.❤❤

@DelveTool 9 күн бұрын

Glad to hear that! Thank you for watching.

@childrentogether 27 күн бұрын

Knitting the Threads of Consciousness: An Illustrated Guide to Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).

@DelveTool 7 күн бұрын

Tell us more! Is this a book you've found helpful?

@childrentogether 5 күн бұрын

@@DelveTool This book is interesting and quite useful for young researchers. It includes almost everything about IPA, with illustrations to teach the process as close to the experience.

@mjt_00 Ай бұрын

so clear!

@DelveTool Ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@alritzconsultancy9203 Ай бұрын

Simply awesome😮

@DelveTool Ай бұрын

Thank you! Cheers!

@kylegrgecic6754 Ай бұрын

Super super helpful!!! Thank you so much

@DelveTool Ай бұрын

Of course! Thanks for watching.

@evangriffith7638 Ай бұрын

I am so appreciative of your clear and concise explanation of all these complex concepts. Thank you for making qualitative analysis easier to understand and master!

@DelveTool Ай бұрын

Of course! Thank you for watching.

@Staann Ай бұрын

I want to analyse how the stance of a political party on a certain topic developed over time by analysing their political party programs. It seems rather logical to me to do this but I can't find any sources to back up doing it in this way. Could you provide me with some tips and sources regarding this issue? Basically to back up my method of going trough all party programs, coding them using a 3 point scale (positive, neutral, and negative towards the topic being discussed), and then looking how its stance developed towards a more positive, neutral, or negative stance on the subject discussed. Thank you in advance!

@DelveTool 7 күн бұрын

Thanks for your question! Analyzing political party programs to track changes in stance over time is a solid approach. Make sure to define clear criteria for positive, neutral, and negative stances and code consistently. Comparing documents from different periods will help you see the evolution. Also, consider the historical context for deeper insights. Good luck with your analysis!

@Adhiraj654 Ай бұрын

So nice thanks ma'am 🙏🙏

@DelveTool Ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

@rizkiindah479 Ай бұрын

Thank you thank you soooo much, doc for your great talk. I really appreciate it. Finally I can get deeper insight about GT from your amazing explanation that also provided an example. This is very useful for me in doing my thesis as the beginner qualitative researcher. ❤

@DelveTool Ай бұрын

Thank you for watching! We're so glad this was useful for you.

@rizkiindah479 Ай бұрын

Thank you very much for your explanation. Its very clear. Please share about coding paradigm in axial coding and how to implement it in an example. Thanks again.

@DelveTool Ай бұрын

We have an article on axial coding here: delvetool.com/blog/axialcoding

@ljrockstar69 Ай бұрын

What kind of data formats can you upload ? PDF, Word, Excel?

@DelveTool Ай бұрын

Delve currently supports PDF, word, and text files. For PDF and word Delve will extract the text from those documents and bring it into Delve. We have limited support through Excel files. I can send you more information if you chat us via the chat bubble on our website: delvetool.com

@sulekhachandra7066 Ай бұрын

Incredible informative video. Thank you so much

@DelveTool Ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@LostMerkaba Ай бұрын

Great video thank you and subscribed. I like how grounded theory is being renewed in post-qualitative approaches. In fact I've found the differences between grounded theory and post-qualitative methodologies are often few in practice and philosophy. I'm writing this comment because you might be interested in viewing your final theory as an 'entanglement, 'actor-network', 'situation', or 'arena' and other such ontologies of post-qualitative researchers which can be constructed through grounded theory.

@SivieSuckerman Ай бұрын

I'm still struggling to fully understand the difference between thematic analysis and grounded theory. It feels like they should be used together or that they overlap.

@DelveTool Ай бұрын

Great question! Both thematic analysis and grounded theory are inductive approaches, building insights from the data itself. They share similarities in structuring insights, where grounded theory uses open, axial, and selective codes, comparable to the codes, themes, and core themes in thematic analysis. However, thematic analysis focuses mainly on analyzing data, while grounded theory covers the entire process, including data collection. For instance, theoretical sampling in grounded theory involves collecting and analyzing data iteratively using the constant comparison method, which is core to its approach. Grounded theory also has the concept of theoretical saturation, which is the point where no new insights are emerging from the data. While thematic analysis can use iterative data collection and analysis, it doesn't traditionally use the concept of theoretical sampling or saturation. There are many variations of both thematic analysis and grounded theory, so their similarities and differences will vary based on which exact method is being used. But to summarize Thematic Analysis really is a analysis method, while Grounded Theory has a larger scope as a methodology.

@asmaasalima5289 2 ай бұрын

You didn't provide a clear example

@DelveTool 2 ай бұрын

Thanks for your feedback! This is our quick 8 minute overview of Thematic Analysis. If you want more in depth examples please check out our 30 minute video on thematic analysis. You can find it here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fH7LkGWHZ9lpoaMfeature=shared

@aQueDog 2 ай бұрын

Thank you. This was extremely informative.

@DelveTool 2 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@guerra_dos_bichos 3 ай бұрын

what is a code?

@DelveTool 3 ай бұрын

A qualitative code is a label used in qualitative research to categorize and identify themes, patterns, or concepts within textual data. These codes help researchers systematically analyze and interpret non-numerical data, such as interviews, observations, or documents, to extract meaningful insights.

@chantycandy5679 3 ай бұрын

Very helpful. Thanks ☺️

@DelveTool 3 ай бұрын

You're welcome 😊

@1980nikolov 3 ай бұрын

Great

@DelveTool 3 ай бұрын

Glad you think so!

@DantePerezUPOU 3 ай бұрын

How to possibly use the software in non-supported languages like Filipino?

@DelveTool 3 ай бұрын

Good news! Delve supports Filipino transcripts

@DantePerezUPOU 3 ай бұрын

@@DelveTool Fantastic! Will there be a package for students or academic staff? Please send a link. Thank you!

@DelveTool 3 ай бұрын

@@DantePerezUPOU we do have an education pricing option, you can read more about it here: intercom.help/delvetool/en/articles/3805420-education-pricing

@selunyct 3 ай бұрын

Does thematic analysis only work with interviews? Or can it somehow be applied with surveys as well?

@DelveTool 3 ай бұрын

You can definitely use thematic analysis for other forms of content. Thematic analysis can definitely be used for open ended survey results!

@kamal92606 3 ай бұрын

Thank u❤❤

@DelveTool 3 ай бұрын

You are welcome! Glad it was helpful

@learningspecial3005 3 ай бұрын

It's very informative and helpful video thanks

@DelveTool 3 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@user-nv1yq6nw9q 3 ай бұрын

how i could apply these approaches in order to analyse text ?pls help me i have an exam😥

@DelveTool 3 ай бұрын

You're in luck, discourse analysis is often used to analyze text! Let me know if you have any other questions!

@scarlet-qc4lx 3 ай бұрын

What's the difference between narrative and interpretative phenomenological analysis?

@DelveTool 7 күн бұрын

Narrative analysis focuses on the stories people tell to make sense of their experiences, whether it's one person or a group. It's an umbrella term covering various methodologies for exploring the story itself and the meaning behind it. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) also explores personal experiences but dives deeper into how individuals perceive and interpret these experiences. There's overlap between the two, but while narrative analysis looks at the story itself, IPA focuses more on individual meaning and interpretation.

@keishi_keiii 4 ай бұрын

Thank you so much for this video

@DelveTool 4 ай бұрын

You are so welcome!

@user-jl5gx8kf6r 4 ай бұрын

Thank you so much! Very well explained, extremely useful.

@DelveTool 4 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@nirbanC 4 ай бұрын

I was searching for a KZbin channel that focuses on qualitative research and I found one. Keep up the good work!

@DelveTool 4 ай бұрын

Welcome to the channel and thanks!

@cydmets25 5 ай бұрын

Thank you for this! Helped me a lot in my class

@DelveTool 5 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@NigelBeard-mx2nf 5 ай бұрын

From G.T. you gather the data- THEN derive theory. BUT If- for example one was to start a dissertation etc. how do you start with a theory, the focus of you r Dissertation- if you have to gather data first? chicken/egg - or am i missing something?

@DelveTool 5 ай бұрын

Good news, there's no chicken and egg paradox in grounded theory (GT), as you should start with a topic of interest (the focus of your dissertation), however, you should not start with a theory. It's the data you gather that guides how you will explore your topic of interest. This method ensures that the theory you develop is genuinely informed and shaped by your findings, allowing for a more organic emergence of theory directly from the data itself. It's worth noting, though, that there's a methodological debate within the GT community on how much you should allow existing theories to influence your thinking. Classical grounded theory advocates for minimizing prior knowledge to avoid bias, emphasizing an approach closer to a blank slate. On the other hand, constructivist grounded theory acknowledges the inevitability of researchers' preconceptions and sees value in letting existing theories inform the research process to some extent. Despite these differences, both approaches agree on starting with a topic of interest, ensuring the research remains grounded in the data collected.

@divinarsquadruplets5431 5 ай бұрын

Great

@DelveTool 5 ай бұрын

Thanks!

@user-zu4qt4en1r 5 ай бұрын

hi po, pwede po pasagot kung pano nagamit ang grounded theory

@DelveTool 5 ай бұрын

Pakitingnan po ang aming blog post para sa mas malalim na talakayan kung paano ginagamit ang grounded theory: delvetool.com/groundedtheory

@tahanancinema 5 ай бұрын

Hi! I have a question. Is it possible to do narrative analysis when the only participant is the researcher himself/herself? Or does it really require the researcher to look for other people to do this method? Thanks!

@DelveTool 5 ай бұрын

Certainly, narrative analysis can be effectively conducted with the researcher as the sole participant, particularly through autoethnography. This method involves the researcher analyzing their own personal experiences to uncover broader insights. It emphasizes the importance of reflexivity, where researchers critically examine their own biases and perspectives to ensure their analysis transcends personal narratives to touch on universal themes. While this approach provides rich, detailed insights, it requires careful consideration of subjectivity and ethical concerns, making reflexivity crucial for meaningful analysis. Some of this video may be as relevant, particularly the parts where you are finding patterns across narratives. So the approach may need to be adjusted some as it's presented here. This video assumes that you are interviewing more than one person

@tahanancinema 5 ай бұрын

@@DelveTool Thank you so much! Can the same be done to thematic analysis if the sole participant is the researcher thru autoethno?

@DelveTool 5 ай бұрын

@@tahanancinema yeah you certainly can. Narrative analysis tends to work with less data. With thematic analysis with authoethno, you'd want to probably collect a fair amount of data. And maybe even across a number of different mediums. You may also want to collect information over time. Thematic Analysis is quite a flexible methodology so it definitely can work. Full disclosure I don't have direct experience with doing autoethnography and Thematic Analysis, but it definitely could work. You may want to put a heavy focus on reflexivity, and may want to consider recruiting someone to be a peer debriefer

@jennicaivy2024 5 ай бұрын

Really helps me to understand what is Grounded theory. Thank you!!

@DelveTool 5 ай бұрын

You are so welcome!

@MayraCristinaGomez 5 ай бұрын

Excellent and clear explanation! Thank you.

@DelveTool 5 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@mahdehassan9702 6 ай бұрын

Wow! I've learned so many new things from this video. Thank you so much. ❤

@DelveTool 6 ай бұрын

So glad it was helpful!

@applejanemande9746 6 ай бұрын

a very concise explanation, thanks for this!

@DelveTool 6 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@emmanuelameyaw9735 6 ай бұрын

I think AI can do this now.

@DelveTool 6 ай бұрын

I personally would disagree with you there. AI can definitely help with certain parts of process and I'm curious how this will evolve over time. But the researcher brings a lot of their own insight and life experience to analyzing data. Two different people will analyze data in two different ways, and to abdicate all meaning-making to AI would imply that there is one correct answer. When in fact both ways can valid forms of analysis. I've played around using AI to analyze data, and by itself it tends to find surface level themes from the data. With some guidance from a human it can be nudged to discover some more nuanced and insightful themes. But a human is still critical to the process. That's my take at least, I'm curious what you have found in your own experience!

@GrumpySalmon 7 ай бұрын

Thanks mate

@DelveTool 6 ай бұрын

Happy to help

@toxo_wb 7 ай бұрын

very informative and helpful content! thanks a lot!

@DelveTool 6 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@jerichotundag8659 7 ай бұрын

what graph could i use to show the frequencies of themes? i was thinking of pie graph to represent the frequencies of themes in my 90 respondents. however, there are a lot of cases where one respondent can show 2 themes. i wonder how should i present the data in terms of graphs/charts?

@DelveTool 6 ай бұрын

So I personally avoid trying to show frequency of themes in thematic analysis. As frequency does not necessarily equate to relevance in Thematic Analysis. (this is not a hard fast rule, but just our preference for TA)