Sure there are so many things to learn from China and its struggle. India has just begun taking stride but already mired with the huge gap between the very few rich and many poor. The middle class are squeezed with high taxes and hence less to spend to keep the demands going.

Wanna hang out cutie?

Excellent presentation on how china is.

Trojan Horse.

So the catalyst for the current turnaround would be the "Mayor Economy" in which the decentralised local government retrains the local inhabitants skill for both new FDI and local entrepreneurs investments..

In other words, we ALL LOVE China and Chinese people who have suffered under their Emperors/ Dictators for 5,000 years. They NEVER had ANY OTHER system. BUT Communist Regime and its ENABLERS, open or hidden, should NOT be our Friends.

The speaker is the DAUGHTER of the President of China Communist Policy Bank (Asian Infrastructure Bank). She CONVENIENTLY forgot EVER to mention this fact. You THINK had her VIEWS on China economy deviate from Commies Talking Points EVEN SLIGHTLY, her FATHER may: 1/ fall off a balcony; 2/ suddenly dies of a heart attack (JUST like the Former Prime Minister LKQ did in 2023); OR 3/ enter into a REHAB program at a (Mental) Hospital (like million of political prisoners there)? Not funny. BUT you got the point. Her views are INHERENTLY Pro-China-biased. Freedom of Speech, right? Right. Disclosure as Measure of Decency and Fairness? Absolutely.

Great China's analyst 😊

No mention of Bitcoin - that gets over capital controls

🗽 Now I defenitely know, the chinese edjucation system is much better than in old Europe... 👍 .

🗽 We in Europe, becoming a third world region, are very happy to get all these great chinese products, Europe is not able to produce anymore. 🙏 .

Stealing Cheating Spying Illegal copying Now There is the reason why China is doing that. Try make money😊

I'm no academic but when I hear Prof Jin suggested that China econ model should somehow echo the West in terms of the contributing factor of the service factor to the shares of the overall economy, I question. For instance, China wants a healthy real estate market but does NOT want to rely on it as a major growth engine in comparison to the developed nations. Another instance, China has learned dearly from the US on the importance of self reliance if not having its own diverse bases and strong manufacturing capability....

Oh god, she sounds like one of those idiots that visits Shanghai, Beijing, Guangzhou et al for a two week tour and think they know anything about “China”.

capital controls make a good macro case for crypto

If her father wasn't high level party member in PRC, her views might be viewed to be more objective.

In dollar terms, China is the most corrupted country in this world. And the sad part is that, the Chinese people have no choice but to accept.

People has no clue about Chinese mindset, so is sad and dangerous to assume that China is on the way globally to make a better world. China only understands domination power. You can see it in their culture, very simple observation 🤔

Chinese Communist Party-funded propaganda mouthpiece.

I kinda feel this professor's goal is not to explain an economic topic, but instead becoming the speaker for the foreign ministry of Chinese government.

The problem with China is the way it organizes its economy triggers unhealthy competition led by governments.

The idea is to have US and Chinese big corporations to invest into each other where technology are shared, markets are shared and people are freely working with each other and learn to understand/respect each other. That's the goal. But it appears the political elites in both countries are doing something to disengage in the fight of influencing power over others. That's the problem. We should gradually reduce the power of governments, reduce the size of the government, reduce the privileges given to government officials, but instead execute more systematically based on laws and common interests. So, it is not a fight US vs China, but instead of the new global market/capitalism model vs the traditional big government-controlled model. Removing the political elites from power is the true revolution of this century.

What we are having now is different from what we planned before we tried to integrate China into the global market. The conflict we are having today is the big-government control over capitalism and free market. The governments are historically given too much power and result into emergence of the class of political elites in each country(both in US and China, and other countries). That's where corruption, low capital efficiency and inequalities are created, human rights/freedom are not protected in these countries. The modern revolution is to have those big international corporations to replace the influence of these political elites and big governments, to engage people of different color, different religion and ethnicities to work with each other to promote understanding of each other and learn to co-exist peacefully. The big international corporations can also help promote competitive welfare packages to replace the usual function of a welfare system in certain countries where high level of corruption usually occurs. That's the idea that would result into overall peaceful and more tolerant world than today. But China's political elites took advantage of this model to acquire wealth for its political elites but later turned against this model when they see the risk of the influence of this idea of global capitalism while democracy weakens the government/elites power. They are starting manipulating with its privileges over the capitalists internal and external and threat to put its power over the entire eco-system. That's a legitimate threat when it has used the wealth it acquired to modernize its navy and military power in an attempt to become the new dominant force over the eco-system. This is why the western are fighting against and the dis-integration of China begins.

Patience is key per the speaker. China is a massive country with a huge population. Change will take time and leaders are taking note of the need to change.

there is a study done (wish I could find it again) which shows the failure in some of his projections. It shows how converting away from fossil fuels will have a compounding affect as much of our mining and transport requirements are in support of the fossil fuel economy itself. When the consumption is reduced so it the inefficiencies of energy conversions and the energy consumption of the transport. His calculations assume no improvements in material demands or efficiency improvements in green energy generation. Just the redesign of the electrical architecture in EVs has reduced its copper needs by 50%. Cobalt has been nearly eliminated. Solar panels were converting about 12% of the suns rays to electricity, now they can reach 20-25%. Wind power improvements include the recycling of blades, new designs which are quiet and have no blades making them safer for birds, safe to put between buildings, and fewer moving parts making them last longer. The bias in his reporting showed early when he talked about machines wearing out and needing to be replaced within the conversation of us needing to continually increase the mining of materials for these new machines. No where did he account for an offset in demand by the recycling of these worn out machines.

Jin is good at puting big words together to show off her grasp of the current situation in China. However, she would stay at that level becaused of her rich-family social status in China that determined her superficial understanding about that country but not about how ordinary people live.

美国人在近二十年里用在战争及其衍生问题上的资金=中国高铁投资+光伏投资+风电投资+电动车企业的研发投入。 美国援助乌克兰的美金=华为近十年所有的研发投入。

So much better than the typical western propaganda that keeps slamming China over the same tired issues that had been regurgitated for many years

that didn´t age too well, did it?🤣

This lady doesn't know about china economy ,no political reform,the success of economic reform has been lost，you already seen that,if anyone want to invest in china again,you will be done by the stick.

68 bric countries out of 180 or 200.dr jin when the shah asked noxon how to pay for his military nixon said raise the oil price.350 income is horrific to say

Since I was born in the 1960s, I have observed no issues regarding minority rights in China. In fact, minorities enjoy various privileges, such as preferential policies in employment, education, and tax benefits, etc. For instance, public institutions are required to provide halal canteens as a gesture of respect for the Muslim faith.

glad to see China now have more voice worldwidely.

I live in China because its miles ahead of the west societally and economically. Forget political comparison too. Central politics devolved business makes sense

Well Jin being Chinese what did you think she’s going to say .

Chinas collaps is imminent. China does and can’t even production enough food for its people relying heavily on imported foods .

👍 Do your homework before you say you know China

As long as the CCP controls China, this country will continue to decline!! As long as the corruption of high ranking bureaucrats continues!! The gap between rich and poor is widening to an abnormal extent. The same is true in America!! As long as the CCP controls China, it will be even worse than America!! She is not telling the truth about this!! Because she is already in the wealthy class!!

예쁘당❤

Frankly speaking， Prof Jin，you will be better off to stay doing your economics teaching, and don't bother with this sort of public talks stuff. You may have good connections within China and know a lot of things happened there, but it seems that you are still lack of the necessity of the understanding on traditional Chinese culture to interpret them appropriately, nor you have the necessity understanding of the Western culture sufficiently to be able to clarify the misunderstandings of the people here about China and Chinese neither (as they are not a result of a naturally occurring economic phenomenon - Just think about the impact of that the US has been passing bills to spend billions over the past a few years on funding negatively reporting on China worldwide - bear in mind that saying "you cannot wake up people who intend pretending being in sleep").

Tell US to Stop meddling with other countries internal matters, Stop supplying arms on the pretext of being friendly, Stop attacking countries according to their wishes

Why don't you say, US is spending 1.5 billions just to smear China 🇨🇳

Tik tok is not owned by China 🇨🇳

He did not talk about Russia and Bitcoin

I go out of my way to buy chinese tech because its cheaper and the quality is just as good! I bought a tablet from temu and it only cost me 85$ and it has been top notch for two years so far whereas my ipad was glitching after its first year and was much more expensive! I am also going to buy a phone and possibly even laptop from Temu now because the quality is wonderful and the stuff is so cheap! Good for china to not only sell cheap clothing and food but even technology now!

this lady doesn't have the economy sense for giving a speech at this.topic

More!

Stealing sensitive data and propriety information is a big part of it!

China speaks to my country- New Zealand. Trade and diplomacy is the way of the future. "The Cold War" ended 40 years ago. We must look forward to trade and peace on the planet. kzbin.info/www/bejne/on2ufYSfrsuob5I

she has family in China, she can't criticize the government and its actions. We all know how famous businessmen "disappear" after such criticism, only to reappear all apologetic and stepping down from their executive functions at their companies. I agree with her that China has a lot of potential, but under democratic rule, like the countries she is trying to compare China to. Under Xi, the investments in unproductive infrastructure projects and overcapacity will continue. China can have so much more innovation and progress, but only when free thought is allowed. In their current societal model, they are very limited, and their chances of further success and progress decrease every day. China was supposed to surpass the US in terms of GDP in 2027 or sooner as some predicted, but that is no longer the case. Without substantial reforms, China is on a declining trajectory and eventually they will need to go through a painful adjustment down.