jungynz

Пікірлер

@Son-of-God144 6 күн бұрын

Pefect circular star trails? Weird... thought we were tilting wobblibg and flying thru space.

@folorunshoolusegunsamuel2429 16 күн бұрын

Where are all the Globetards now?

@jamaldeep13 10 күн бұрын

Laughing at you because this proves the globe lol

@DernFool 16 күн бұрын

These southern star trail guys always put in that music.....Got to do everything they can to sell it.

@jamaldeep13 16 күн бұрын

If it's fake you should totally be able to disprove it, right?

@DernFool 16 күн бұрын

@jamaldeep13 Looking south...If there is a star that all the other stars circle around...like Polaris when looking north...that means we live on a ball rotating inside a larger ball...You can NOT have a southern pole star if we live on a ball...that is...if the universe expands limitless in every direction...

@jamaldeep13 16 күн бұрын

@@DernFool You're sending mixed signals here lol

@DernFool 16 күн бұрын

@@jamaldeep13 Unless its two totally independent rotating plain of stars...where some stars converge and diverge at their outer edges...that means there must be some trails that cross, parallel, and then diverge....I just havent seen a vid for that.

@sirretsnom3329 17 күн бұрын

Flat Earth tards can never explain this rotational direction of the stars based on hemisphere location.

@AaronBert1983 24 күн бұрын

It’s a mirror effect of the moon and the sun reflecting on the Firmament The Creator of all handiwork!

@EvenMoreTiniestWizard Ай бұрын

The flat earth believing cavemen from 8000 BC say “great proof” or “photoshop”. They can not comprehend 3 dimensional shapes.

@craigharris4256 Ай бұрын

The only way to proove southpole star spiral on a globe or on a stationary disk world is by having cameramen connected to each other but one sitting in australia, other in south africa and other in Argentina. Australia will get evening stars first then south africa then Argentina. Cameras set still. Cameras film southpole center. Do it over 3 evenings. Then compare the angle of deviation of camera to 'imaginary' south pole of earth. Will australia see south celestial pole spiral more to like righthand side? South africa more 'dead center', and Argentina more to the left of screen as all cameras point to magnetic south pole of earth?! If we see dead center by compass for the pole star spiral on all views then its a globe (No its not a boy!)

@jamaldeep13 16 күн бұрын

Flat Earthers believe the Earth is shaped like a disc instead of a rectangle, with the north pole at the centre. This unfortunately means that south points radially out from the centre. So it is all in different directions. Hence there is not one singular direction where they can face to see the celestial pole. Which would not even exist because the sky would rotate around the north pole and there just would not BE a second point of rotation.

@craigharris4256 Ай бұрын

The only reason a globist sees southern hemisphere sky point center of stars spiraling circle is cause the globe is spinning on an axis so center point axis is dead center in south, Just like north view and its dead center point.. But the problem is many on a flat earth are still thinking earth is spinning on its center pin, north pole, with southern hemisphere moving anticlockwise in a stronger pull direction than north center. And by that assumption the south starpole should relativly move like east to west like other star obeservations, like moon rise. Thus the south polestar should rise in east. But if the disk world is not spinning, then the sky is turning. And if we in a closed globe with a canopy over head, then the canopy is a projected screen. One can project any movement and give the illusion we spinning...

@craigharris4256 Ай бұрын

If the earth is flatish and we in a globe cause the canopy is a video screen, and we actually in a spaceship earth, then they can project any circular ediface or so on that screen. Otherwise it is what it is- we on a globe of sort. But a southern hemisphere can still see the circular move of stars, cause the 'edge' of the wall is still able to see stars move...(.'complicated) The one way to finish argument is to go to Antarctica and see if there truly is a 3 month period of just lights on like sumer months of Northpoll and 3 months pure darkness like at north. The stars can still be seen in circular either way I guess?!

@8REAL88 Ай бұрын

This Video At The Very Least Proves Earth Is Stationary/Immovable ..💯🙏🏽

@EvenMoreTiniestWizard Ай бұрын

Howz

@jamaldeep13 Ай бұрын

No it doesn't

@2nd_Exodus 16 күн бұрын

It does because the constellations never change we always see the same stars. If the earth revolved around the sun each quarter of the year we would see totally different stars.

@jamaldeep13 16 күн бұрын

@@2nd_Exodus The constellations actually do change throughout the year this way (see the Zodiac, for example). However, the ones that change are the ones towards the equator, not the ones towards the poles. The farther from the equator you are, the more constellations you're gonna see year round, AND the more constellations you're never gonna see at any time of year, because the Earth is in the way.

@Phaneron201 Ай бұрын

To all flat earthers this is textbook esoteric spherical 🌐🗝️🔐 astronomy I'm about to unlock the secrets of. A dome is but HALF a true sphere by geometric definition. Logically a dome above a disc world has only 90° degrees of declination between zenith (the highest apex) above the central north pole and the ice wall at 0° ground zero. In reality there are 180° of declination matching 180 parallel circles ⭕ of latitude meaning that on a flat earth the south circumpolar constellations would reside beneath the disc for no one to see. In reality, the divinely simple symmetry of the celestial orb 🌐 is the object modelled by spherical astronomy where it is translated into an astrolabe or illuminated star globe which accurately plots the stars and constellations with respect to their positions relative to one another. The celestial sphere is an abstract 360° field of view (24 hours of Right Ascension) surrounding the globe 🌎 It is infinite in diameter and a kin to your cosmic horizon. At any given time 180° of declination is visible above the horizon with the remaining 180° buried beneath the horizon. Both halves of the celestial sphere 🌐 are geometrically symmetrical, and play host to entirely unique sets of stars and constellations that cannot be seen by observers in the opposite hemisphere. The southern cross is not visible in the northern hemisphere. However, ALL 360° (24 hours of Right Ascension x 15° per hour rotation = 360° of longitude) rolls into view east to west by just under 1° extra per day due to sidereal time caused by Earth's orbit around the sun ☀️ This process of cycling 180° in 180 days (6 months) from upper culmination high in the sky down to lower culmination beneath your feet is called heliacal rising. In just over 360 days the celestial sphere completes one EXTRA additional rotation compared with daily diurnal rotation. If it was exactly 1° in 24 hours our years would be 360 days (360°) not 365. Leap years correct for this and compensate by resyncing. Like Polaris in the north, the SCP pivot point down under doesn't budge or displace horizontally left or right or east to west whatsoever no matter how far east or west you travel and regardless of how much earth 🌎 rotates. It only ascends and descends vertically up and down in accordance with the observer's latitude, which we accurately predict and expect on the globe. For instance if the observer is on the 34th parallel south like in the moving GIF below, the SCP pivot point will reside 34° degree above the horizon. Where 45° is half way diagonally between the horizon and zenith, and 90° being directly overhead at zenith. At the south pole the SCP pivot point resides directly overhead at zenith, while the NCP and Polaris are vertically down 180° beneath your feet at nadir (the lowest point). Meanwhile, on the 34th parallel south Polaris will reside 34° beneath the horizon. 1° degree on earth = 111.12 km or 60 nautical miles; 69.04 standard miles. 60 nautical miles because 1 nautical mile represents 1 minute of latitude; 60 minutes per degree. Traversing 1 circle of latitude or 111.12 km (60 nm) north/ south will result in both celestial poles ascending and descending by 1° against the sky. Multiply this by the total sum of Declination between the poles; 180 circles ⭕ of parallel latitude on the terrestrial globe 🌎 perfectly matches and corresponds with 180° degrees of Declination on the overhead celestial sphere 🌐 to give us the distance between the 2 poles: 111.12 km x 180° deg = 20,001.6 km from pole to pole. Now simply double to yield circumference: 40,003.2 km (360° x 111.12 km) or 69.04 x 360° = 24,854.4 miles. My prediction using spherical astrometry is only 4.8 km shy of the official value of 40,008 km. That's 360° x 60 nm per degree = 21,600 nautical miles. How astonishingly accurate. 40,003.2 km ÷ 60 nautical miles = 666.72 just as 666.72° degrees = 40,003.2 minutes of arc Latitude. This is because earth is spherical and south is the same convergent direction for everyone on the globe as opposed to diverging radially outwards in an omnidirectional geometric abomination all around the 360° panorama of the alleged ice wall. Having said that, the day Crux and Pointers along with the south circumpolar constellations of Octans, Hydrus, Mensa, Chamaeleon, Carina, Centaurus and Apus drift horizontally and stray from their concentric arcs of declination around the SCP so that they are no longer south of New Zealand 🇦🇺 is the day I'll concede earth cannot possibly be spherical. Until they abandon their predictable positions orbiting the SCP so that we can no longer use Crux and Pointers to navigate and converge on cardinal south, I can assert with a great deal of practical and pragmatic certainty that earth is definitely spherical. Until then they are always south of New Zealand all night long, all year round. This being the case, how in the world does Crux i.e. The southern cross find any time at all to appear south of literally anywhere else, like it does in reality?! They never set and are visible above the horizon always, up to a whopping 16 hours in some regions in midwinter. The SCP and Crux is visible simultaneously to myself and an observer in Chile at the same time. And both of us agree that it's due south for both of us. On the azimuthal equidistant projection which is the flat earth map, Chile is depicted as directly NORTH of New Zealand, on the near opposite side of your precious disc world. The separation is something outrageous like 35,000 km apart or so, as opposed to the far more modest 9,300 kilometers that reality prefers 🤣 Only off by a factor of like three. And because all meridians, lines of longitude below and right ascension above all converge in on BOTH geographic and celestial poles respectively, we can never leave the axis of rotation and objects embedded in the 3D field of the celestial sphere 🌐 never approaches or recedes or change their apparent angular diameter. They never optically grow or shrink because on the globe all objects remain essentially equidistant to the observer on the celestial sphere. The celestial sphere effectively pivots around YOU in the center throughout the day. Raise your 👓 glasses to the celestial sphere 🌐 the most divinely simple proof of Earth's rotundity. j.gifs.com/86lm1j.gif?fbclid=IwAR18RIhab1ujnhyN9XdaxWtIt8DCQn1kxwwa9KEjYEhI0qaIDrnoFNJUbF8

@montazmeahii6029 2 ай бұрын

The only reason a person believes the earth is flat is because it’s what they WANT to believe.

@EvKrev 3 ай бұрын

IF JESUS IS THE MORNING STAR WHY DOES EVERY OTHER STAR GO AROUND POLARIS?

@jamaldeep13 2 ай бұрын

Common misconception: Polaris itself isn't the point of rotation, it just sits very close to it. Also you do know that _Venus_ is the morning star, right?

@ducksndogshomesteaddoggroo2706 4 ай бұрын

Stunning!

@johnnydasilveira9001 4 ай бұрын

Beautiful Video. If the Earth is a spinning ball rotating 1000 miles an hour, how do you explain the North Star being stationary and the other stars rotating around it? If the Earth were spinning, wouldn't the North Star also be moving across the sky overnight? But it doesn't. How do you explain this? How do you think the ancient navigators sailed their ships at night if the North Star moved?

@jamaldeep13 3 ай бұрын

The north star happens to sit very near the axis of that rotation so it barely moves at all. That's kind of what makes it the north star, dude.

@peeperleviathan2839 3 ай бұрын

Maybe because it’s above the North Pole, but why would a dumbass flat earther use basic logic

@max5250 2 ай бұрын

"how do you explain the North Star being stationary and the other stars rotating around it?" Polaris is not stationary at all, since it makes1.5 degrees circle on the sky during 23 hr 56 min 4 sec. "If the Earth were spinning, wouldn't the North Star also be moving across the sky overnight?" That depends. The closed a star is to the axis of Earth's rotation, the shorter circle it makes. If there was star at the axis of Earth's rotation, it wouldn't seem to rotate at all. But not a single naked eye visible star on the sky is that close to axis. "But it doesn't." If you really believe Polaris is not circling on the sky, then you never cared to actually observe it.

@8REAL88 Ай бұрын

@@peeperleviathan2839Let Go Of The Globe Is Not Guna Get U Anywhere.. But Innerstanding Where U Truly Are Will..🙏🏽💯

@michaelglendinning1738 4 ай бұрын

So that steeple is right directly under Polaris. I don't think so. 😂

@jamaldeep13 4 ай бұрын

The church is in Guernsey, I don't know what your point was supposed to be

@michaelglendinning1738 4 ай бұрын

@@jamaldeep13 I'll cut through the bull here. The stars rotate around Polaris......and ONLY Polaris. The Antarctic wraps around us. Although there is a group of stars called the Southern Cross, that is not a star like Polaris is; it rotates around Polaris with the rest of the stars. There is plenty of tricks and CGI that will show it being a southern pole star, but it is not that in reality. Navigators only ever used Polaris as a way to navigate. They only ever wrote about Polaris when it came to navigation. I've seen the northern lights. You don't ever hear Australians talking about Southern lights, although the false narratives claim that Southern lights exist. They would all have equal attention if they existed. But the only time those Southern things exist is when they are lied about. The planes that take off for long destinations always travel across the equator to the northern regions before heading back to a distant southern destination. The only map that makes sense on is the map where Antarctica wraps around us; seeming to hold the water in like a cup.....or Holy Grail. It has already been proven to be flat, but how far it goes or even what the hell it is still needs to figured out. I know the group......I know the liars. The enemy is not the mystery here. Whether you have seen the evidence or not yourself, I just wanted to inform you that the Globe is a very old lie. This is why banks and secret societies need to be demolished, and all those involved need to be punished. It's not a ball......and that Austrian painter who became prominent in Germany got the enemy correct.... 💯.

@peeperleviathan2839 3 ай бұрын

@@michaelglendinning1738do you think it’s banned to go to the southern hemisphere?

@jamaldeep13 3 ай бұрын

@@michaelglendinning1738 I didn't get a notif for this, but to explain all the stuff you're getting wrong here: 1) The stars DON'T rotate around Polaris specifically, Polaris just happens to sit very close to the point of rotation, the north celestial pole 2) This only applies to the stars in the northern hemisphere, 2:43 shows the southern hemisphere stars rotating around a completely different point in the sky, directly opposite the one in the north. It's a totally different set of stars (you can see the Magellanic clouds right there) and they rotate clockwise instead of anticlockwise. No CGI required. 3) Navigators could only use Polaris to navigate north of the equator. Going further south, Polaris is _no longer visible,_ so they use the southern cross, since it points to the south celestial pole. 4) Australia and New Zealand are not as far south as Europe and the US are far north. Learn your latitudes, man. 5) They don't. I have personally flown Sydney - Santiago long haul both ways and can confirm we never had to go north of the equator. The flight that connects in LAX is not the only one that exists. 6) The map is the only one that makes sense to YOU because you STRUGGLE to understand the globe. 7) There is no proof of the Earth being flat, just a bunch of lies you have been fed. You DON'T know who the liars are, and that's the sad part about all this. 8) Aaaaaand you end it with H*tler apologism, okay

@PlusVK22 4 ай бұрын

This doesn't disprove flat earth. Go to the north pole axis and show the stars in the background and film the earth rotating on its axis with the stars in the background. Film the earth from 'outer space' (not from the ground like this) spinning on its axis with the stars in the background. Show the axis spinning with the stars STILL. Like how you spin a ball on your finger. That point where your finger would be is the axis. We’ve NEVER seen that. And there's not ONE video like that. That is the only thing that can truly prove a spherical rotating earth. And I guarantee you we'll never see a video like that.

@jamaldeep13 4 ай бұрын

What about the SOUTH POLE AXIS? The one you're conveniently ignoring?

@max5250 4 ай бұрын

"Film the earth from 'outer space' (not from the ground like this) spinning on its axis with the stars in the background." That's physically impossible since start are to faint to record with overexposing the Earth. "And there's not ONE video like that. And I guarantee you we'll never see a video like that." Actually, there is a video showing exactly that (Earth spinning on its axis, and orientation of that axis changing in relation to the Sun during the year) and it was recorded with EPIC camera on DSCOVR satellite.

@peeperleviathan2839 3 ай бұрын

“I know nothing of what I’m talking about so it’s fake!”

@davidmoss4095 5 ай бұрын

In Sun time lapses, the stars follow the path of the sun like a lateral curve, but in night time- lapses it's a spiral with no sun and moon should be in the path of the spiral right ?

@jamaldeep13 5 ай бұрын

That's not a spiral, and they may have chosen moonless nights for these.

@kenkirchhevel4177 5 ай бұрын

Nice! Clockwise looking south, counterclockwise looking north, straight westward above the equator

@Kinnor.Home.Studios 5 ай бұрын

Absolute proof that the earth is flat and North pole is the centre.

@jamaldeep13 5 ай бұрын

What about the south celestial pole?

@shamaYahu8635 5 ай бұрын

What does sky does above doesn't prove what the ground is.@@jamaldeep13

@jamaldeep13 5 ай бұрын

@@shamaYahu8635 Yes it does, especially the way your _specific location_ changes the sky in some way. Like, for example, heading south until Polaris is below the horizon.

@peeperleviathan2839 3 ай бұрын

@@shamaYahu8635make a coherent sentence please

@shamaYahu8635 3 ай бұрын

@@peeperleviathan2839 I don't understand.

@d.wahyudi 5 ай бұрын

Nikaaaaa

@50Pluskeepactive 6 ай бұрын

Nice, to record it and play it back, see it with your own eyes. Hopefully i will get an opportunity in the South Island nz to capture star trails.

@Eric-mc6hn 6 ай бұрын

So is there two different polestars?

@jamaldeep13 5 ай бұрын

Two different celestial poles. The pole stars are just the bright stars that happen to be closest to each pole. In the north that's Polaris, and in the south the best we got is Sigma Octantis

@Electro_Sabotage 6 ай бұрын

Clearly this has been edited. I never see the sky make swirls like that. 😊

@FFC231 6 ай бұрын

I think those are long exposure shots

@Electro_Sabotage 6 ай бұрын

@@FFC231 like solargraphy?

@50Pluskeepactive 6 ай бұрын

You can achieve this with lots of patience, if your phone has pro option in camera app it allows shutter to stay open for 30secs, or actually has a star trail option. Time-lapse will work, but no trail. You will atill see the stars spinning circular.

@shamaYahu8635 5 ай бұрын

I've never seen that many stars and galaxies in the sky

@jamaldeep13 5 ай бұрын

@@shamaYahu8635 Light pollution is a thing. You need to go out into the countryside to see all those stars.

@darkijah-andersjehovahsn7893 6 ай бұрын

No higher resolution?

@feforscher 7 ай бұрын

Wir werden maßlos belogen und die Menschen erkennen noch nicht einmal die Form unserer Welt, in der wir tagtäglich leben. Alle Wissenschaftler, die an der heliozentrischen Sonnenkult Agenda mitgewirkt haben, waren Freimaurer: Kopernikus, Newton, Galileo, Einstein usw. Heutzutage werden die "Wissenschaftler" wie Harald Lesch und Neil deGrass Tyson eingesetzt, um die Heliozentrisches Weltbild und Weltraumpropaganda am Laufen zu halten. Es gab und gibt keinen Beweis für den Globus!

@datbarricade9995 6 ай бұрын

Willst du damit sagen, dass sich der Nachthimmel nicht bewegt? Oder glaubst du nicht, dass sich der südliche und nördliche Nachhimmel nicht in zwei verschiedene Richtungen drehen? Weil das ziemlich einfach selber zu Filmen ist. Die Drehung des Himmels lässt sich als einzelne Momentaufnahme vielleicht noch mit einer flachen Erde erklären, aber mehrere simultane Beobachtungen des Himmels auf Nord-, Südhalbkugel und am Äquator mit den entsprechenden Sternenbewegungen... das macht leider nur auf einer Kugel Sinn.

@max5250 4 ай бұрын

"There was and is no proof of the globe!" Sure.. sure... try to navigate around the world using your flat map of your flat world, and a compass, and tell us what happened... if you succeed to find your way back home.

@ziride150 7 ай бұрын

Where IS the south time laps

@jamaldeep13 5 ай бұрын

Read the description of the video Unless you meant when in the video and not where on Earth, in which case listen for the kookaburra calls lol

@astroniko 7 ай бұрын

Hello i would contact you to use parts of yout video to make a video on mu channel :-) thank you !

@FlatEarthJay 7 ай бұрын

Flat earthers love this video. The southern time lapses don't even have star trails showing that they are not going around any one point. There all just moving in unison. 🤣

@jamaldeep13 5 ай бұрын

2:44 Are you sure about that

@FlatEarthJay 5 ай бұрын

@@jamaldeep13 since the video doesn't indicate in words which one is north and south I don't really know anymore but it all works on a flat earth

@jamaldeep13 5 ай бұрын

@@FlatEarthJayNo it doesn't. The Flat Earth can't have two celestial poles. It 's not geometrically possible. And sure, the video itself doesn't specify filming locations, but it does name them in the description, and it changes the ambient noise from one location to the other to let you know when it has changed. Do note that the one in the north is the one that rotates anticlockwise, and the one in the south is the one that rotates clockwise.

@FlatEarthJay 5 ай бұрын

@@jamaldeep13 you don't have to believe me, but I've seen it done in stellarium. The stars will rotate different directions based on perspective and maybe dome perspective and which direction you're looking while on each side. Have a nice day

@jamaldeep13 5 ай бұрын

@@FlatEarthJay The Flat Earth dome is ill-defined in how it looks, in any case, but it is pretty telling that it has to be incredibly complicated for the Flat Earth to replicate something that's much simpler on a globe. Either way, the south celestial pole always looks the same to everyone south of the equator and it's always due south. I really don't see how this could be replicated with a simple hemispherical dome, especially if the north celestial pole is at the very centre, and the dome rotates around THAT.

@eduardengel2589 7 ай бұрын

Die Erde ist flach!!!

@jamaldeep13 5 ай бұрын

Nope

@CGMaat 8 ай бұрын

Wow ! ❤

@JeshuSavesEndTimeMinistry21C 8 ай бұрын

PSALM 19 1 The Svastika FE Circa Polaris Big Dipper, A Vortex Year Is Finalized All, The Seasons

@lessermook7608 9 ай бұрын

thx

@vizvizvizvizviz 9 ай бұрын

Why are those trails circular? Shouldn’t they be oval? Also the ones on the edge seem to be coming up from the horizon. Doesn’t look like “perspective” to me. Hey, maybe the sun does set after all.

@JohnHazenhousen 8 ай бұрын

Why would they be oval?

@vizvizvizvizviz 8 ай бұрын

@@JohnHazenhousen Well, they'd be oval if they were on a ceiling a few thousand miles up. Unless you were directly underneath them, you'd be looking up at them at an angle. The fact that they are not oval suggests that they aren't on a ceiling, but in space.

@TheJewfishKing 9 ай бұрын

No proof. Just more edited rubbish

@max5250 9 ай бұрын

Still to complicated for your two working brain cells to understand we area not living on a pizza?!

@jamaldeep13 9 ай бұрын

Man you are fucking lazy, both if you're for real and if you're a troll

@philhogan5623 7 ай бұрын

Yeah southern stars don't really move like that. Every astronomy book ever written is lying. It's obvious the entire southern hemisphere is in on a huge conspiracy. And anybody who has ever visited the southern hemisphere and looked at the stars is also in on the conspiracy. And nobody has ever taken video footage of what southern stars really do, either. You flatties really amuse me.

@bbtbnwjdfotsyk4 10 ай бұрын

i wonder what the really bright star at 2:25 was

@katmai90210 10 ай бұрын

crazy idea. but as i was looking at this, i was thinking that that's also how a vynil disc looks like. wouldn't it be something if we could listen to the music of the stars?

@George83_Thomas 10 ай бұрын

pretty but dizzy now

@pandjnixon 10 ай бұрын

How to debunk the Flat Earth dogma, in one easy lesson !

@RosieMegan_official 10 ай бұрын

Yes, we are able to see the stars moving bc us on flat earth are still

@jamaldeep13 10 ай бұрын

What about the south celestial pole? It shouldn't exist if the Earth is flat.

@andredelgado2511 10 ай бұрын

Dumbass

@waitpu4817 Жыл бұрын

Our flat Earth must be flip-flopping like a pancake. 😀

@thakurpankajnsscba Жыл бұрын

Wow

@Ashtonscreative Жыл бұрын

Flat earthers DON'T have 1000s upon 1000s of online videos and photos of varrying evidence constantly confirming their THEORY(including things like this that can be tested by everyday people) BUT people who believe the earth is a globe do.

@JimmiDale Жыл бұрын

Proof that the earth is still and everything spins above us and not around us

@christianege4989 Жыл бұрын

Nope, roof that the earth rotates. No matter how often and desperately you flattards claim otherwise. Earth is a globe, was a globe, and will be forever a globe. You can't change reality.

@BEATNIXX1 Жыл бұрын

2:23 that’s Two rotations right there folks. Two hemispheres side by side.

@dmitryno4819 Ай бұрын

Flat Earthers knocked down by this.

@AJLane73 24 күн бұрын

Wouldn’t this suggest that each hemisphere was spinning in different directions?? Having a hard time with this one….isn’t it all just a matter of perspective? And if that’s the case you could absolutely see this if the earth was flat…

@dmitryno4819 24 күн бұрын

@@BEATNIXX1 how is it possible on a flat earth, only if thew believe that universe is spinning above them like this :) It is possible only near equator to see stars rotation around north and south poles, yes, in different directions

@Mayan_88694 18 күн бұрын

@@AJLane73no it isn’t

@Mayan_88694 18 күн бұрын

@@AJLane73no it’s not, because the earth rotates on its axis

@cristinabutasimon9159 Жыл бұрын

I see. Would that not mean that in the southern hemisphere the Sun is rising in the West and setting in the East? Also wouldn't the clock go anti clockwise? What happens on the equator? If I stand on it and look north the stars move counterclockwise and if I look south clockwise? Asking for a friend

@jamaldeep13 Жыл бұрын

To answer your questions: - no it wouldn't, you're just facing the other way. - no it wouldn't, clocks don't magically mirror when you cross the equator - yes that is what you would see

@milesaway3699 Жыл бұрын

Stellardrone brought me here.

@thepeargeniuspodcast Жыл бұрын

Proof of a geocentric model. They count on people not understanding what is supposed to be happening in the sky under the heliocentric model

@JacobLM42 Жыл бұрын

🤡🤡

@GuardianSoulkeeper Жыл бұрын

Show your work.

@jamaldeep13 Жыл бұрын

What is supposed to be happening in the sky under the heliocentric model is a tiny amount of stellar parallax throughout the year. Which is exactly what we observe

@Forgottenl Жыл бұрын

That’s terrifying

@nickelcitybear Жыл бұрын

sure doesn’t look like we’re falling backwards on a spinning ball .. seems like the universe is orbiting around us, the centre of the universe, and the home of God’s children

@jamaldeep13 Жыл бұрын

What would "falling backwards on a spinning ball" look like to you?

@jamaldeep13 Жыл бұрын

Still waiting for an answer

@turtle6401 Жыл бұрын

the sky literally rotates in the opposite direction in the south than it does in the north. makes no sense on a flat earth. makes perfect sense on the ball earth.

@ImieNazwiskoOK Жыл бұрын

What is this, 15th century?

@doodoo2065 Жыл бұрын

There is absolutely 0 proof of any sort of god existing lol Cant believe we still have cultists go this day

Ең жақсы KZbin

Пікірлер