PALIO TCT

Thank you! Glad you liked it. We have countless videos that are similar in nature. Hope you enjoy them too!

+

1.1mm

You mean me. :) You are right, it is a bad habit. It has to travel 16" not only going up, but also coming down. Sorry about these old serves...

@@WeeklyFreshTableTennis hey, at least you realize it and don’t deny it.

@@XulSolarBand Whoever calls himself a TT player must get the serve right! IMHO, it has to be not only legal, but also look good! Like this (kzbin.info1ppLVvXjHJk) Many of my older serves (like these in my early videos in my channel ) unfortunately suffer from this angle big time. Thanks for bringing this up anyway.

:). Karadenizli cok arkadasim var, onlardan ogrendim. Durumu cok iyi ozetleyen bir deyim. :)

Gionis Feint Long 2 ile oynuyor. Bu video'da da Feint Long 2 performansi var: kzbin.info/www/bejne/envLmWNogp2Ul7s

I did not try VKM Offensive. I only had VKM Regular but both are nice. And I enjoyed that blade until it got damaged. In this video, I was comparing Diode to Palio I had. It's just that Diode V and Feint Long 3 were a stronger combo in terms of generating more backspin. Diode grabs the ball better I guess.

@@WeeklyFreshTableTennis kzbin.info/www/bejne/h3bVdqujiceqeKssi=6LTbKRZ8kDX760Ix My bad. Got confused with this video. Which do you prefer? VKM or Diode V?

@@ragnadumdum8762 both very good, makes no diff to me. you can get any one of them, both are reliable options.

Hello, it is Victas 401 with 1.5mm sponge thickness. Most of my videos have this black rubber, though the blade could be different.

Thank you for the answer. I actualy use tenergy 05 and tenergy 05 hard in two different rackets. which of the two might work better using Diode 5 in your opinion please ?

@@moncefb.5927 I do not want to mislead you. You may want to ask people who use those rubbers and the kind of blade that they are happy with and see if diode v has common characteristics with those blades.

I appreciate your feedback, Diego. Could you explain a little bit more about "the interaction with the space"? Also, if you have any ideas to improve these videos or practices, please do not hesitate to share it with us.

@@WeeklyFreshTableTennis I mean how you move according to the amount of space that you have around. Sometimes, in close shots, you can not see how big is the space around the player. When you can see it, like in this case, is easy to get how you use the space around for your advantage. I think this is even more important for defence players that use to play far from table. About the video for me seems fantastic, of something appears in my mind, I will comeback to write it. Regards

Thank you.. I wish we had a better camera set up and more light. There is so much to demonstrate and analyze things with slow motion views.

@@WeeklyFreshTableTennis Yes, this is something that we use to play against all the time, this camera vs. light, but you are doing amazing

Could this video ( kzbin.info/www/bejne/mZfPgZ6riqygfaM&ab_channel=WeeklyFreshTableTennis-HalukKaramete ) be something you'd be interested in for the chop blocks?

Thank you for your comment Dieg-OX.

@@WeeklyFreshTableTennis 👍

International Izleyici "ne alaka" dese de, bence de iyi oldu. :)

There are a few other LP players that twiddle very actively ... One that I recently started studying is Manika Batra ... Commonwealth 2018 Gold Medalist... She is a close to table player, so faster reaction times !

Tesekkurler. Masa tenisi bu hizda izlendiginde bambaska bir sey oluyor gercekten. Film gibi sonunu merakla bekliyor insan. :)

Thank you for your comment. This is a debate-able thing but something not that important. All half-long intended serves could end up a tiny long or right on the white line or a little before it. They clearly differ from what we know as an intended long serve. Plus, with the backhand flick revolution, even short & very loaded serves can be attacked too. From this perspective, so yes, this half long (or whatever-it-is ) serve could have been attacked too, but it takes guts to do so. Regardless of the fact whether it was long or half long or half short, the points I'm trying to share in these videos are the set ups... To me, this serve is not sent in the vacuum. It was served with the aftermath in mind. So it is part of a set up, and too easy to miss when we just watch these games. I shared it as I found it valuable & easy enough to be studied / practiced and brought to our personal toolbox. This video was all about highlighting this aspect of table tennis in an effort to help making a mental revolution in our minds ( especially in my own ) so that we start internalizing that a point is not always about the current strike we are about to execute, but many times, it could be about a planned combination with the previous strike. When we start playing TT with this mind set, then strategies start developing, unforced errors are lessen, and a deeper dimension into the game starts developing. With these videos, I try to aim only that. As we all know, there are countless of combinations in this fantastic sport, and if/when we start paying attention to these strategic combos and trying to understand them and practice them in our drills, we should surely gain some mileage.

Excellent question... something I am trying to settle too... I think one would eventually figure this out after enough exercise... and the answer to this question may differ from one person to another. I started realizing the following though: if the ball is too fast then it is better to do a vertical-encounter and let the pimples do the job. this is safer and I score more success in applying this then trying to go underneath the ball and then try to horizontally chop . There are two problems with the horizontal chop here. First, it is more challenging to make that perfect timing with a fast ball and second, there is no need to add more energy to a ball that already has energy. I think this is what JSH does in those situations too. Though his regular chops is already employing a more vertical angle (than what I ended up adopting for my self ), he goes more vertical when the ball speed ( and angle ) gets more serious. It's just more logical I guess. So the simple answer to your question, IMHO is vertical encounter is better as the ball gets speedier.

Thank you so much. You're the best! You should do online coahing!

Sagolasin Kamer. Seni de cekeriz insa-Allah.

inşallah abi@@WeeklyFreshTableTennis

Videonun son kisminda zeminin buyuk bolumunu engelleyen bugulu yer meselesi tamamen bir dikkatsizlik. editleme hatasi... Digerlerindeki sebeb ise arka planda ustunu degistiren arkadaslar... onlarin mahremiyeti acisindan bugulandirmistim. Yorum icin tesekkurler..

Kontak point itibari ile bos olabilecegini soyleyebiliriz tabii. Ama rakibinin 00:40 da gordugumuz topa giris acisindan ve topun o aci ile yukselmemesinden bos olmadigi yorumunu yaptim. Ama heavy back spin dememem gerekirdi.