?Im student..im look for user tutorial.I am a little confused. You looking at a optic prism reflector on a theodolite that does not work with a prism refector? Out on the field this type of theodolite is used in conjunction with measuring staff and read off stadia line. True?? Any who thank you. Liked and subscibed..
@applied-maths15 күн бұрын
Yes this theodolite can be used with the stadia lines on a survey staff. Typically the distance from the instrument to the rod can be determined quickly by subtracting the bottom stadia reading from the top reading and multiplying the difference by 100. However please pay attention, the stadia distances have a low level of accuracy, a one mm error in staff reading gives a distance error of 0.1 metre
@opal11_1820 күн бұрын
Whattttttttt so much to remember
@applied-maths20 күн бұрын
I had cramped a lot into 60 seconds. Remember - take your time, practise using your own calculator and this short is there to help.
@EpicShowDailyOfficial27 күн бұрын
amazing
@applied-maths23 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@jh_mahatoАй бұрын
Thankyou sir 🙏🏻
@applied-maths23 күн бұрын
Glad you found this useful.
@kalimuthu.m9213Ай бұрын
Station 2 wrong
@lucypeterson9764Ай бұрын
Thanks
@applied-mathsАй бұрын
Thank you
@MineSwan1Ай бұрын
I am from now on a subscriber
@applied-mathsАй бұрын
Thank you.
@MineSwan1Ай бұрын
This was sooooo helpful. Before I had to go through a really long method of square then square root but now I know a fast method😊
@applied-mathsАй бұрын
Fantastic! It still amazes me how many views this series of videos get.
@lordballybogeyАй бұрын
Really useful! Helped me so much
@applied-mathsАй бұрын
Thank you.
@sthabilejaca7601Ай бұрын
Thank you so much 🥺🧎♀️
@applied-mathsАй бұрын
Thank you.
@JamesFHarrison2 ай бұрын
Thank you for breaking this down and not over explaining it. You've made it much easier to wrap my head around.
@applied-maths2 ай бұрын
Thank you for your feedback. Hope it was useful for you. If you want my teaching notes on this topic and several more, they are available on my website www.applied-maths.co.uk
@foxtrot42572 ай бұрын
Thanks man .i was gonna fail my teat otherwise ong
@applied-maths2 ай бұрын
Thank you - hope you have passed that test.
@YonasLema-pz9kl2 ай бұрын
❤❤
@applied-maths2 ай бұрын
Thank you
@alycelim58313 ай бұрын
How about Syntax Error? How do we fix that?tks
@applied-maths3 ай бұрын
A syntax error means that the command used contains an error. Look for misplaced functions, parentheses, commas, or arguments. Re type your calculation paying attention to the functions used to ensure none are missing or mistyped or misplaced.
@jamesstewart41373 ай бұрын
Great video, very clear in explaining 👍🏻👌
@applied-maths3 ай бұрын
Thank you. Glad it was helpful!
@kelebogilesedio3 ай бұрын
Why Ah (squared) not added on each formula? Since we have to also look for the area and h (height)
@applied-maths3 ай бұрын
The Ah2 is part of the parallel axis theorem and is not needed in this application. This is because the axis of the two shapes coincide together at the same point which is at the overall centre of the shape. The parallel axis theorem is only applied when you have this offset.
@kelebogilesedio3 ай бұрын
@@applied-maths Ohh now I understand. When you can please do a question that includes the Ah2 because it is more complex. Thank you so much.
@applied-maths3 ай бұрын
There's an example here kzbin.info/www/bejne/oJrTcquCYtGqrdU My student notes are also available here www.applied-maths.co.uk/home/structures#h.hz86l7d22dzv
@justingabrielbaldonado51884 ай бұрын
What kind of bar did you use?
@applied-maths4 ай бұрын
Young modulus works out as Stress/Strain and this example you can calculate it as 0.166 N/mm2. This would indicate that the bar is composed of a mild steel material. The bar is 500mm long and 8mm in diameter.
@Adam-fg7ph4 ай бұрын
Thank You for the type of work you do. I enjoyed and learned how contour work is done.
@applied-maths4 ай бұрын
Thank you. Glad it was useful for you.
@lisbon43254 ай бұрын
😊my slide is completed here
@applied-maths4 ай бұрын
Thank you
@M.H3124 ай бұрын
What model theodolite is this ❓
@digitalsurveyor4 ай бұрын
Topcon Digital Theodolite DT-106
@applied-maths4 ай бұрын
Topcon Digital Theodolite DT-106
@naf4xr_5 ай бұрын
the strain is 1.428 times 10 to the power of negative 3
@applied-maths15 күн бұрын
Calculated, the strain is 100/70,000 = 0.0014238 or 1.4238 x 10^-3. A small rounding error on my part.
@kiranhassan90065 ай бұрын
Thank you it was helpful❤
@applied-maths5 ай бұрын
Glad it helped! Thank you.
@NotAnAccount4605 ай бұрын
Square root Ans = 420
@NotAnAccount4605 ай бұрын
what’s the square root of Ans?
@caravanlifenz5 ай бұрын
Nice
@applied-maths5 ай бұрын
Thank you
@DaviesMusonda-g2i6 ай бұрын
How did you come up with 3 change in length???
@digitalsurveyor6 ай бұрын
The original length is 500mm and the bar was stretched to 503mm, therefore the change in length is 503 - 500 = 3mm.
@applied-maths4 ай бұрын
The original length is given tin the problem as 500mm and the bar was stretched to 503mm, therefore the change in length is 503 - 500 = 3mm.
@ngangakantony6 ай бұрын
Great vid 🎉
@applied-maths6 ай бұрын
Thank you - glad you found it helpful.
@MuzzammilKhan38 ай бұрын
Thanks
@applied-maths8 ай бұрын
Your welcome
@lolernator11579 ай бұрын
Exactly what i was looking for
@applied-maths9 ай бұрын
Thank you. Hope it was useful.
@craig78789 ай бұрын
But apart from that, your videos are very very good
@applied-maths9 ай бұрын
I appreciate that!
@craig78789 ай бұрын
The final angle shown on the total station was also 179 degrees... but when you were doing the calls, you wrote it as 180 degrees. the minutes and seconds were also different.
@applied-maths9 ай бұрын
Apologies for any errors - I was one of my first videos to upload to KZbin. Check out my other video for booking the angles from a 4 point closed traverse using measured values. kzbin.info/www/bejne/n5ipfaSpetqHfrcsi=8Ot7bHyg17HX1EwD then there’s part 2 for calculating the mean and then corrected angles. kzbin.info/www/bejne/r5vMfZWVnLaci7Msi=4sMVddJJQjJABK88 - there’s a playlist with all the series of videos needed to complete the coordinate calculations as well. Thank you
@craig78789 ай бұрын
You said the third angle is 118 degrees... It shows 218 degrees... ?
@applied-maths9 ай бұрын
218deg is the correct angle. It is used at the end to calculate the average angle.
@craig78789 ай бұрын
Could you tell me if you are recording the angle when you retake the measurements? When you rotate and flip the total station... That's what I'm unsure about.
@applied-maths9 ай бұрын
If you watch my other video, it shows you which angles to record and how to book them correctly and also the calculations necessary at the very end. kzbin.info/www/bejne/h5_FhmigiZuDgbssi=VIJuwhayVSTyzzym
@craig78789 ай бұрын
@@applied-maths Thanks! So if we are measuring the internal angles of a triangle, I would set my initial angle as 0 from vertex A to B, then turn to the next vertex C, and record the angle, then change face and record the angle at vertex C again? Im confused about turning it 180 degrees to change face, how is doing that giving an accurate angle? Is it using the line AB as the reference still? Does it matter if i rotate it left or right when turning it 180 degrees? And when turning it to another point, does it matter if i turn it around left or right? Wouldn’t turning it one way measure the internal angle, and the other way measure the external angle?
@digitalsurveyor9 ай бұрын
The face left and face right measurements are to do with the accuracy / errors of the instrument. This explains it - The “Left” “Right” readings will tend to cancel out errors in the alignment of the telescope with the verniers or in more modern instruments the encoder disks. What this means is after a proper shop adjustment, the centerline of the telescope and the “Zero” mark on the verniers/encoders will be in as near perfect alignment as practical. There are ALWAYS systematic errors we must deal with. In this case, if you sight a line turning an angle and read 23 degrees 42 minutes 30 seconds with only one face. You will never know if your instrument is properly aligned - if you are very careful and do both faces you might see 23 degrees 42 minutes 30 seconds on the right face and 23 minutes 41 minutes 50 seconds on the left face. This 40-second difference would show that the centerline of the telescope is about 20 seconds out of alignment with the verniers or encoders. But the average of the two faces should give a fairly true reading. I measure angles in the clockwise direction. It does not matter to turn your instrument clockwise or anti-clockwise when taking the next set of measurements.
@craig78788 ай бұрын
@@digitalsurveyor thank you! So turning the UTS around the long way to the next point won’t actually record external angle?
@digitalsurveyor8 ай бұрын
No it shouldn’t. Just make sure that you zero your instrument looking at your first station and then turn to look at the next station and record your angle. Just beware then I used an older theodolite, it could measure an angle as an acute angle in both the clockwise and anti-clockwise directions or rotation - there was a specific mode - this may or may not apply to your equipment.
@kyrstenfayetenefrancia54419 ай бұрын
it was really a great help, thank you!
@applied-maths9 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@rainbowchap69739 ай бұрын
I thought this was a stats hack
@applied-maths9 ай бұрын
Sorry but no hack - just how to use the powers or order function on your calculator
@abbasdodiya30799 ай бұрын
Can't use scientific calci in exam in indian school 😅
@applied-maths9 ай бұрын
Sorry but I can’t help you with that one.
@abbasdodiya30799 ай бұрын
@@applied-maths yes sir
@sirkiller17339 ай бұрын
Thanks ❤
@applied-maths9 ай бұрын
You're welcome 😊
@astrar710 ай бұрын
what is XX ia not at the centre of the object? what if it's at the centroid of the object instead?
@applied-maths9 ай бұрын
If you need to calculate the second moment of area about another axis not through the centre of the shape, then you would need to use the parallel axis theorem. This is calculated as the second moment of area of a given shape about its own centre + Ah^2, where h represents the offset between parallel axis. There is some info on this on this website. www.applied-maths.co.uk/home/structures#h.hz86l7d22dzv
@francoalves313911 ай бұрын
Please brow again stress because I don't understand
@applied-maths11 ай бұрын
If you don’t understand- try to review my lecture notes for this topic which are available here. www.applied-maths.co.uk/home/structures#h.qpdb0qwbaupr