Wegovy is FDA approved for weight loss.

You certainly do object to being recorded. How would like to be a female patient who gets violated or photographed when she is unconscious? I understand these atrocities happen quite often.

The vast majority of doctors support universal healthcare.

I have to ask why this policy is in place? If a patient is recording a conversation with a doctor so they can go back over something At a later point why is it an issue?

This video is about recording. Documentation is best done in written format: chart notes and signed consent forms. There's far less miscommunication that way.

See LegalEagle or LockPickingLawyer for “not law advice “ 😂

True as it would be helpful to record in case you forgot important information that you doctor went over with you

When a patient is unable to make their own medical decisions (for any of a number of different reasons), that's when POA / next-of-kin get to make those decisions.

One-party consent does not mean "record in secret" or invasion of privacy. It means "I'm recording this conversation, you can choose to keep talking or not, it doesn't matter." In the operating room, there is no expectation of privacy so that doctor should've kept her mouth shut.

I strongly disagree. In the U.S. where there are strong protections for information gathering and freedom of expression, recording a conversation is a natural progression of that. I find many two-party consent laws to be blatantly unconstitutional, as there is no expectation of privacy in public forums, which states like MA specifically attribute prison time for recording in without consent. These laws only serve to protect those who historically have had to hide from journalists; they are not narrowly tailored enough to serve any real purpose other than making people feel they can act with impunity.

A lot of doctors will not cover up another doctor's mistakes. Just like a lot of police officers do report other officers' conduct. The public doesn't hear about those cases because they are not as newsworthy. He is not endorsing anything, just providing the information.

I desperately want to see the video of my recent surgery to see exactly who was in the OR and if anything unethical took place or if I was violated in any way. This has been really bugging me lately.

Recording any medical professional without their consent is a crime in my state. Do your research before making baseless claims online

@@m.rosekaup7461 Indeed the laws are complex, and some have been upheld by circuit courts on appeal. It should be noted, however, that the effort required to prosecute offenses is so great that it's essentially a last resort option in super high profile situations. No DA in their right mind is going to ask a judge for, as the state of MA technically allots, 5 years in prison, for recording someone in public without asking. I also doubt the constitutionality of some clauses of the statute, as it states that recording serves as prima facie evidence of a violation, which the USSC ruled was in direct conflict with the Due Process clause and the First Amendment in Virginia v Black. We don't acknowledge "prima facie evidence" because we believe defendants are innocent until proven guilty, so frankly it's just really lazy writing on the legislature's part.

@@m.rosekaup7461In your state. In mine, it’s fine. First of all.. I’m not the kind of person to be recording my doctor. But the hospitals make sure you don’t by taking away your cell phone before you go in for a procedure. The only thing I’m saying is that if the hospital records the procedure and they bury the consent in the 5 page agreement in theory what is wrong with you doing the same? I trust my doctors… and when I woke up half way through a colonoscopy and heard them talking about doing their back yards for the fall, I wasn’t feeling any pain … I didn’t care. I trust my gastrointestinal doctor.

His profession is entangled with these laws. This is not advice beyond “check your state’s laws.”

I concur.

This is directly related to my work.

@@MaxFeinsteinMD You did a very good job researching the issues presented, especially considering your line of work is not legal in nature. The OP should research the "appeal to authority" fallacy: lawyers do not have a monopoly on legal information.

​@MaxFeinsteinMD you could have brought in health care providers on opposing sides of the issue and discussed Why and why not. Keep in mind that even under anesthesia, the body keeps score and the sense of something not right prevails. I asked for an all female staff for my hysterectomy due to childhood abuse but allowed a male anesthesiologist, he gave me versed but apparently not enough because I have flashes of going into the OR and who was there and I was lied to. Why?

It means that different areas have different rules; each county, city, township, etc. may/might have different laws.

But not defending against malpractice claims!

They’re all over KZbin and it’s impossible for big channels to catch all of them. You just have to be smart and not fall for internet scams.

@@sarahfaith316 its not that they pose any danger to someone with a bit of media literacy, its that 1) there are people who are not very media literate, and they are worth protecting too 2) the profile pictures are pretty obscene, and kinda unpleasant to look at. I get that larger youtube channels do not have the resources to remove them, but (no offense max) max feinstein isnt that big, and last i checked there were only one or two of them. Have a lovely day

@@eagle-from-autI agree that they need to be removed, I just meant he may not have noticed them or be able to catch them quickly. I’m a mod for a 750K sub channel and we try really hard to get rid of them when they pop up but it’s nearly impossible to catch them all.

@@sarahfaith316 Oh yea, i totally get that. i didnt mean to be an ass about it at all. Thanks for keeping youtube a cleaner place

@@eagle-from-autme neither. Have a great weekend!