Yes, its better keep in the fridge before applying, you can use some paper and its better using tape to remove the protecting film. lol

The thing is, I don't know what size I buy, what size is a CPU?

@@rafa2657 Loof for your CPU model online, you can easily get the measurements.

It last forever. I put it in an old laptop and after 4 years temps seem to be as good as day 1. Before that after 1 hour of office work fans were running always at full speed but since i put it in, it never goes full speed. You can check Linus review, it' seems it gets better with more use.

​@@j2352bro I have a question. while applying the ptm 7950 on my cpu I accidentally tear the ptm. It breaks into many pieces. I rearrange it and make sure it covers the whole die of CPU. is it okay to use it like that?

@@kanekiken8609 I'm not sure but i think it will be ok because when you uninstall it, it look like a paste. I belive that the pieces will fuse together with the temperature and the pressure of the heatsink. Check and compare CPU temperature to see if you are in a normal range after installing. And then check after 1 month to see if it stays normal.

@j2352 I think it will become a paste too after making the laptop hotter. I try to test it on Dota 2 game and my temperature was 70°C from 90°C (old thermal paste - kryonaut). Do you think its good?

@@kanekiken8609 70°c gaming for a laptop is very good. Keep checking a few weeks later if it still the same temperature. If it's stays the same then you can forget about repasting, just general maintenance aka clean the dust that can clog the little airvents of a laptop and you are good. I did this over more than 4 years with my old laptop and no problem of overheating since i put PTM7950.

There's also the population problem. Unneutered cats will contribute to dozens of kittens ending up as strays, getting unalived at shelters, etc because there's too many of them. Not all of them will be lucky enough to find a good forever home. And of course it decreases their risk of cancer neutering them. As a responsible owner, neuter and spay your pets please.

Good question, truthfully because I can never predict what might happen in slow motion, explosion, fire, crazy 3D like reaction stuff I always try to shoot at f4-5.6 to try and catch details, but if it's very 2D or staged like left to right then I'll go around f2-2.8

@@harrisontheeditor got ya! Thanks!

@@hurleygreen927 i honestly still like the focal range, not too wide and not to telephoy

@@michielbuse4386 thank you and didn't know that information, wonder if i could combine the front part of the ef mount with another adapter that's closer to the sony sensor?

@@harrisontheeditor My estimation is, (looking at these Petri breach mounts) they are longer. Best is to try and find out their true length, else the problems of not being able to focus at infinity keep occurring. I can try to find out if you like me too?

@@harrisontheeditor why go thru the hassle when you can get a Petri to Sony adapter for $45?

@@michielbuse4386 not sure why my earlier comment was deleted but here it is again - the registration distance of the Petri breech lock mount is 45.5mm, which makes it really close to the Pentax K and M42 mounts at 45.46mm.

This makes wayyyyy more sense and I'm glad at least I don't look completely dumb. Thank you!

Yaaaa i knew I forgot to mention something. One was the Godox VL 150 and the other was the baby ML 30

@@harrisontheeditor pretty good for that power

I agree, but for only 11 stops, it's actually wayyyyy easier to control/use than the Wave. The plan is sooner rather than later do test with the Beta HLG option.

@@harrisontheeditor cool can't wait to see. Thanks!

ZV1 has way worse resolution/aliasing/moire and compression than the Freefly and Wave.

In truth there was a lot of limitations for the ZV-1 or little vloggy as we call it. But little ZV-1 isn't what I'd classify as a highspeed camera, but more a camera that has highspeed settings, which is why it wasn't on the list. If i were to include this camera, then I would also probably include the other Sony cybershot that does 1000fps, the Sony FS700, and that one Canon that did 1000fps, as well as some of the newer Sony's that do higher fps. But these two cameras were specifically designed to getting into highspeed shooting specifically, which is why both companies are special as they each took a different approach. Top reasons is it doesn't have a global shutter, interchangeable lenses, more selective frame rates and the quality isn't really there. I'd compare the ZV-1 to more of the FS700, which is something I had for a short time. Idk if that answered the question, but it was a good question you asked and if someone else wants to hop in and correct me or yell at me, go for it!

There will be an updated video sooner or later on that with some Wave footage 👍 The clip i used definitely wasn't the best looking, but I sadly ran out of time

@@harrisontheeditor thanks! How much better are the 1440 fps clips after running through Topaz? I heard there is a lot of aliasing and moire in that mode.

​@@chinitopinoy1726 i did a video AI-ing the more compressed 2k Wave mode in the video where I compared the Wave and Chronos

@@harrisontheeditor i did see that. But could you do more footage that has lot of fine detail outside. That is where the Wave struggles. The example of the coke is not that challenging with the Wave at 2K. Try filing grass and high detail areas and you’ll see that’s where the Wave struggles.