Thanks for the insight. Please I just want to know how come it's just the 3d and 4s electrons that are responsible for the weak bonds? How about the Valence electrons? And also the process is it mere adsorption or chemisorption?
@monisamujawar22323 жыл бұрын
Valence electrons are the one present in the outer most shell of an atom. Therefore, in case of transition metals the valence electrons are present in the outer shell and that's the 4s and 3d shell. And it won't be adsorption because in adsorption a substance is interacting physically with a solid surface. Whereas here, the substance is chemically interacting with the solid. Thus chemisorption. Hope this helps
@andrei192384 жыл бұрын
<3
@oogity-swoogity4 жыл бұрын
Fun
@bryanadab71344 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much this was so helpful
@NM_is_live4 жыл бұрын
Which language you are speaking
@YoshiroWendy4 жыл бұрын
The video is in English
@azharhussain38494 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@Intubrew5 жыл бұрын
You guys don't upload anymore but these are some thoroughly useful videos. It's been hard finding some concise OCR B Salters resources. Thank you very much!
@gdog22210 ай бұрын
I know this reply is very late but I do OCR B Salters aswell and barely any other sixth forms do it - my sixth form is the only one in the area which is so annoying! Also, I hope you did well in your exam!
@Toni-rt7xv5 жыл бұрын
thanks bro
@AmayaW35 жыл бұрын
Can I use these videos for the new A level exams?
@chemistryqmc18604 жыл бұрын
Yes - pretty much everything is still necessary for the reformed specification.
@fatmasoso64885 жыл бұрын
great explanation 👍
@ethanm91915 жыл бұрын
Do you enjoy chemistry?
@shafzkay5 жыл бұрын
is this for the new spec?
@lightninglorenzo21215 жыл бұрын
3:34 how does the nitrogen have a bond angle of 120 when it has 2 bond pairs and 1 lone pair and lone pairs repel as far as possible by 2.5 degrees so wouldn't it be 117.5 degrees
@M02Gaming5 жыл бұрын
Why does it sound like this person is being forced to do this?
@colleensdan6 жыл бұрын
Fantastic revision tool. Thank you
@mariosantosoo61186 жыл бұрын
Speak louder and actually explain
@pancakeman9196 жыл бұрын
good vid but pls try and sound less dead
@JesseIson7 жыл бұрын
wheres the sound??
@kejingwang3087 жыл бұрын
Super organized and totally makes sense. Good review of intermolecular forces
@WyanFisser7 жыл бұрын
Your voice is basically monotone
@chemistryqmc18607 жыл бұрын
Make a more expressive one - we'd love to post it for the benefit of all :)
@gilliancollins33247 жыл бұрын
v helpful..thanks
@Mastercheif-ok6ps7 жыл бұрын
But as the electrons are dropping back down to n=1, that makes it part of the Lyman series. So it emits UV light. Why do you say it emits different colours?
@skempster42766 ай бұрын
its only AS I guess so maybe you don't need that much detail
@dayelee61907 жыл бұрын
I've watched all your videos since mid February, one every night and some rewatched if needed and my exam is finally tomorrow. Thank you,I've learnt so much from your videos:)
@drjosuesimo7 жыл бұрын
shouldn't the water have a state symbol of (aq) because it is in solution, not pure?
@chemistryqmc18607 жыл бұрын
No, the water is present in the reaction mixture as liquid water so the state symbol is (l). It doesn't matter that there are other things present too, the state of the water is liquid.
@dayelee61907 жыл бұрын
Hello, This is quite unrelated to this specific video but are you not doing videos on the Oceans topic?:)
@lawrenceelsavage56268 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for making these videos, but i would much appreciate it if u could give the answers to the questions in the end please, but i love ur videos thank you
@lawrenceelsavage56268 жыл бұрын
you are great sir, you made me love chemistry once again. Thank you so much
@dayelee61908 жыл бұрын
If the total abundance added up to 93, would you do sum of (isotope mass x abundance) / 93 or would you still do 100?
@chemistryqmc18608 жыл бұрын
Normally the abundance is given as a percentage scale, so everything should add up to 100 - or something is missing. Check the question carefully to be sure you aren't supposed to assume that the rest is due to some other isotope. If the values really do add up to some arbitrary total, other than 100, then you would just divide by that total.
@oliverlowe41828 жыл бұрын
Slow and painfull but still so much better than reading the knowlage pack.
@Smiley-lf5tk8 жыл бұрын
For the people that disliked the video, try watching the video at the 1.5 speed.
@himanshubhushan39278 жыл бұрын
man you talk alot, instead you could have told it by writing, i.e., the video would not have been that long and people would watch full
@chemistryqmc18608 жыл бұрын
With all due respect, if you just want to read something I'd suggest you get a book. These videos are here for people who value some extra explanation.
@himanshubhushan39278 жыл бұрын
i'm just giving my opinion. it's your wish idk. i was telling that as you talk explain also on paper.
@ryanthecodgod8 жыл бұрын
you just got PARRED
@NataniaJackson5 жыл бұрын
@@himanshubhushan3927 Some people learn better by listening, hence why they're watching a video rather than reading straight from the textbook. If you didn't understand this you probably learn differently and shouldn't be using videos, but rather something else.
@dawitdereje26908 жыл бұрын
Thank you, it's very clear explanation
@AA-ew9qf8 жыл бұрын
u say u don't need to know about how mass spectra works. but bro trust I do alevel and we doooo
@chemistryqmc18608 жыл бұрын
Hi Trevor, the videos are made for students studying the OCR B A' level Chemistry course. The new specification no longer requires them to know how the mass spectrometer works. In fact I think AQA is the only course left that still includes this. If you're not doing the AQA course, check that your teacher has read the new spec :)
@chemistryqmc18607 жыл бұрын
You need to know how to interpret the spectra that mass spec produces, but you don't need to know how the machine works. Look at the current specification if you don't believe me. It used to be in EL before the change to linear A' levels a couple of years ago, but was removed.
@jordanrutherford37718 жыл бұрын
Excellent video, thanks.
@bedayme168 жыл бұрын
please how do you calculate molecular formular when c=55.81% h=7.02% o=37.17%
@chemistryqmc18608 жыл бұрын
C: 55.81/12=4.65 O: 37.17/16=2.32 H: 7.02/1=7.02 Dividing each by the smallest gives... C = 2 O = 1 H = 3 That ratio gives the empirical formula. The molecular formula could be any multiple of the empirical formula; C2H3O or C4H6O2 or C6H9O3 etc. To decide which it is, you would need further information - e.g. the molecular mass or the number of carbons in the molecule etc.
@ikeoluwaolagunju48578 жыл бұрын
What's the answer to the question?
@chemistryqmc18608 жыл бұрын
+Ikeoluwa Olagunju From lowest to highest, the order will be B-C-A. 'Substance A' will have the highest boiling point out of the three as it is the longest (6 carbons) and straightest out of the carbon chains shown. This gives the most opportunity for instantaneous dipole - induced dipole intermolecular bonds to form between the molecules of 'substance A'. As a result, more energy will be needed to break the intermolecular bonds between the molecules when 'substance A' moves from the liquid state to gas state than will be required for either substance B or C. B and C both have 4 carbons, but C is a straight chain whereas B is branched. This means molecules of C will pack more closely, allowing stronger instantaneous dipole - induced dipole intermolecular bonds to form between the molecules of 'substance C' (compared to B). As a result, more energy will be needed to break the intermolecular bonds between the molecules when substance C moves from the liquid state to gas state than will be required for substance B.Hope that makes sense.
@annabanna67869 жыл бұрын
where can i find the animation elsewhere ?
@sobi10639 жыл бұрын
Are all these videos for the new spec or the old one?
@chemistryqmc18609 жыл бұрын
We've been developing these videos for a few years now, so mostly they have their origin with the old course. However there hasn't been a lot of change with the new course, and we are adding, changing and removing things as we go along to make sure they reflect any differences as far as possible. There are still more to make, but life is busy.
@sobi10639 жыл бұрын
+Chemistry QMC Ok Thanks
@alaaatef63669 жыл бұрын
thank you so much you saved my life
@TheStereo9419 жыл бұрын
Information-Great Physical Presentation-great Verbal presentation- clear but quite boring
@chemistryqmc18608 жыл бұрын
+TheStereo941 This was one of my first videos, done before somebody pointed out that going really slowly was unnecessary as it is quite easy to go rewind and watch again if something doesn't make sense! The pace is way too slow - but the content is fine, so I'm leaving it as it is for the moment.
@sordshhasan86279 жыл бұрын
It's good thanks
@ibrahimwarsame81629 жыл бұрын
hi there just found your channel now, I was wondering if you will be making videos for the f335 modules before the exam. that would be really helpful
@lishx30639 жыл бұрын
Thank you, very clearly explained ! Much better than my textbook.
@parinetapatil61412 жыл бұрын
Yup really great 🤠👍
@bossiestmule10 жыл бұрын
Hi, could you please explain why the solubility in water decreases as you descend down group 7? Thanks