FlashLearn

Пікірлер

@Shadowknightneo 3 сағат бұрын

unfortunately the next video never came.........

@smokeyshosage8939 2 күн бұрын

Very well made video👍

@HypocrisyLaidBare 27 күн бұрын

and 4 years on there is still no next video

@redceltnet 27 күн бұрын

Your video title suggested that you'd show the legal systems of the UK, including England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Not a dicky-bird about anywhere other than Englandshire. FFS.

@paulgibbons2320 3 ай бұрын

Intrigued.

@lucindasanchez2891 4 ай бұрын

Excellent!!

@Bobblenob 5 ай бұрын

Where does the coroners court fit in

@Areebcito 5 ай бұрын

your voice so calming

@Malcolm_99 5 ай бұрын

Thanks for this easy to understand video!

@Malcolm_99 5 ай бұрын

I wasn't even here for this video, but it helped! I liked the court video as well!

@Annikilou 7 ай бұрын

Please note this video is misnamed and misleading throughout. This is the English legal system. The Scottish court system is entirely different.

@debspinny 8 ай бұрын

So helpful 👍🏽

@karengallie9783 9 ай бұрын

Really useful video. Helps explain the court levels. I wish to apply to become a magistrate

@kimballentyne3482 10 ай бұрын

Interesting. Thank you for sharing this news.

@zacbrown7333 Жыл бұрын

Thanks Dave in going’s 🎉

@waimar5457 Жыл бұрын

Is It true the if a defendant appeal one guilty verdict to a superior court and loose the appeal...the previous sentence Is charged with more fine or more jail time?

@Metallica9391 Жыл бұрын

I graduated law school in the US and im sitting for the bar in July. I've always wondered about the differences and similarities. It seems like your Crown Court is similar to the Court of Common Pleas here. We also have the MDJ as well, but it seems to serve as the funnel for the CCP. Good vid!

@ngyuen1688 Жыл бұрын

Very good video. Great video. Thanks

@martakleps7243 Жыл бұрын

Marcin learned a lot thx

@hokouhing Жыл бұрын

I wonder the people's smears even spread to overseas as insults are committed any criminal matters in my life insulted and hurt matters! What people a nation it has what govt it is all are destroying matters for their own mistakes! The people they don't address their own problems own family problems but blamed theirs matters toward govt instead ! How ugliness of such benefits for own but harm to others for a whole! Nature and personality ! Those they have not had their good parents any advantage but stole as the thieves advantages cheaters, their fake roleplay for 64 like in respect of their lacks and grievances blamed for their govt instead of their poor families! Personality! Their excuses to overseas via 64 incidences are proven matters how such personality they are! Truth is always true! People into education previlleges should know how worst the people their minds without such advantages!

@waynezahra9213 2 жыл бұрын

Wow. I know I’m 1 year late but that was extremely formative and direct. Thank you kindly Mr. 🙏🏻

@yusufgazi7 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks

@hannahgibbs1314 2 жыл бұрын

When will you make your never video on the difference civil law and criminal ? Please

@darrenmcintosh8471 2 жыл бұрын

when it comes to criminal justice system workers your dealing with disordered damaged children in adults bodies the vast majority of the time offenders reaction feeds them what should be a person centred approach with offenders is normally a reaction focus interaction they inverted everything in to something it isnt =gaslighting its all reactional response behavior when advertising on indeed for the recruitment process they may as well say calling all narcissist and psychopaths because essentially that what the vast minority of them are narcissist and psychopaths are running the show

@iaincampbellking7760 2 жыл бұрын

This relates ONLY to England and Wales. Scotland has a different structure likewise Northern Ireland

@axl481 2 жыл бұрын

For the criminal law, is the Supreme Court the same as the House of Lords?

@kieracooksey4592 2 жыл бұрын

The Supreme Court came about in 2009, beforehand they were known as the House of Lords, and sat in the same building as Parliament. it was changed to ensure that the two entities were separated!

@axl481 2 жыл бұрын

@@kieracooksey4592 Thnxs ;)

@pottywotty100 2 жыл бұрын

It used to work till the interpretation of law got manipulated,much like science.

@dekapwt5618 2 жыл бұрын

😔

@yungjj2418 2 жыл бұрын

where are the rest of the videos man?

@glasgowmcglasgowfacevotegr7049 2 жыл бұрын

The video deals with the law and legal system in England and Wales and not Scotland or Northern Ireland so it is in no sense referring to the law or legal system of the UK. Scots law is civilian-based [e.g. deriving from Roman/European civil law systems] with some common law elements. England and Wales have a common law system, like many countries formerly in the Empire. So-called 'UK Law' would relate only to the business of the Supreme Court in civil matters and constitutional/public law arising from questions of devolution/legislative competence, and [formerly] matters arising from EU law where domestic legislation conflicts with that of the EU.

@halfbakedproductions7887 Жыл бұрын

And the terminology is different. The High Court in Scotland is broadly the same as the Crown Court in E&W. But England also has a "High Court" which is more like the Court of Session in Scotland (i.e. it hears non-criminal stuff, grants warrants for certain things etc.) Both countries have a separate Court of Appeal which fulfils a broadly equivalent function whichever side of the border you happen to be on. And finally the UK Supreme Court is there to settle disputes and cannot generally interfere in devolved matters.

@glasgowmcglasgowfacevotegr7049 Жыл бұрын

@@halfbakedproductions7887 Unless its to say the Scottish Parliament can't hold an Independence referendum without some man in London consenting in which case the UKSC absolutely will interfere and say "No!!!!" (and for any Americans seeing this (1) There is no comparison at all between a US State and England/Scotland, (2) There is also no comparison between the UK Government and the US Federal Government, (3) The use of words like secession to describe countries leaving the United Kingdom is also not really accurate, it is by no means the same as the USA where there is a written constitution subject to limits on amendment, which spells out the prohibition on unilateral secession. The UK does not have a written constitution, nor is the idea that individual countries can leave the Union dealt with in any constitutional conventions or norms beyond a vague consensus that the UK is voluntary and the countries absolutely can leave it if they want to (but not necessarily whenever they like - hence why there *was* a 2014 Independence Referendum in the first place). The UK does not really have a comparator in the world, it would be more like if Canada, the USA and Mexico decided to form an American Union to be the new independent sovereign state, but still kept their own legislatures to deal with everything other than like Defence, Foreign Policy, key or high level Economic powers, immigration etc but not 99% of the day to day law that people actually encounter in their life.) I would actually say the situation with China is possibly closer to the UK Model (e.g. the realtionship between PRC, Hong Kong and Maccau).

@Louiebeats 2 жыл бұрын

Where’s the next video

@Altapetens 2 жыл бұрын

Really happy with how this video breaks down the basics. Thanks! Ready for the next one!

@radoslavbuda3879 2 жыл бұрын

thanks much :)

@joshuaknight311 2 жыл бұрын

State uk have state courts

@chubbyBunny94 2 жыл бұрын

everyone's talking about law and I'm here just trying to get a flipping british passport.

@mirshahid9871 3 жыл бұрын

Please share videos about law….thank you

@Lachi2061 3 жыл бұрын

Very helpful and easy to understand. I cannot find the other videos you mention though.

@mrtns3422 2 жыл бұрын

Me neither lol!

@thefiestaguy8831 3 жыл бұрын

A few things to note. Firstly - all cases start in the magistrates to my knowledge, by start, I mean where the accused goes for their first hearing & plea. Secondly - it may surprise some people to know that you can actually go on trial in the magistrates court, the only differences being that the threshold of evidence required for conviction is lower, it's "on the balance of probability" as opposed to "beyond all reasonable doubt" in crown court, and that a trial in magistrates court does not have a jury, and is heard usually by several magistrates, or a district judge, usually referred to as a "DJ" in legal context. If you are sent to court for a summary offence, and plead guilty, they will hear it and decide the punishment, or sentence, they can only hand out a maximum of 6 months imprisonment for each offence, BUT only for a total of 12 months imprisonment no matter the amount of offences. If you plead not guilty, for a summary only offence, then you will go on trial in the magistrates court. If you go to magistrates for first hearing, for a serious (indictable) offence, such as rape, kidnap, murder, GBH (with or without intent) and plead guilty, they refer the case to crown straight for sentencing, if you plead not guilty, they refer the case to crown court for trial, with a jury and a judge. Finally, magistrates are not paid, and are volunteers, often being local teachers, shop workers, etc. They often have little or no knowledge of law which is why they have a court clerk present at hearings that can advise them on the relevant points of law or the legislation that is in play in relation to that specific offence or offences. Judges, on the other hand, are legally qualified and most know the law very well, having been hearing cases for many years, many crown court judges are of older age, typically 40-60 and have been in the industry a long time.

@thefiestaguy8831 3 жыл бұрын

@James Mack I'm fully aware of triable either way, I didn't mention those for simplicity's sake as it can get complex. I've always been under the impression it was on the balance of probability, which is why you are more likely to be convicted of an offence at magistrates court where there is no jury, than you are at crown, where defence barristers can convince the jury of the most unbelievable things, or undermine the prosecution, to the extent that you are less likely to be found guilty, but of course with more severe consequences.

@harryj95 2 жыл бұрын

@@thefiestaguy8831 I agree with James, for any criminal case it is always 'beyond reasonable doubt'. 'Balance of probability' only applies to civil cases.

@gavinl4807 2 жыл бұрын

And they've forgotten the Divisional Court which has supervisory jurisdiction over the magistrates' and Crown Courts. In the case of the former, that might be by way of "appeal by way of case stated". In the case of the latter, that might be because there is a dispute not relating to a matter concerning trial on indictment such as grant/refusal of bail or custody time limit extensions.

@differentwavelength6553 2 жыл бұрын

@@thefiestaguy8831 Fear of the trial penalty is why thousands of innocent people have to plead guilty. Better to accept a lighter guilty sentence than risk a heftier one if you have to audacity of trying to prove your innocence. The system is broken and rigged from top to bottom. Crown Court = CC (33) Magistrates Court = MC (33), County Court = CC (33) Court Judge = CJ (Christ Jesus) "His worship", "All rise", "His lordship" ... a very masonic chess game playing with peoples lives