Well-done and concise explanation of a complex set of operations. Thank you.
@TheOverlyHackeled2 сағат бұрын
I’m thankful they’re innovative. Ideas eventually had no impact on the outcome of the war and that they were imperial Japanese navy and the imperial Japanese forces were soundly defeated in the world was saved from their tyranny.
@pom4408Күн бұрын
Your animation (2:04) shows the the smoke/vapor was going 'upward' (i.e. against the wind) - since the carrier is supposed to sail against it ; Shouldn't it going this other direction (and the pilot would have to see which white line is 'alligne' with the stream of vapor ?
@x-planedКүн бұрын
It is sailing against the wind. Don’t get confused by port placement of the island. It’s Akagi
@Hashashin_FidayinКүн бұрын
I like this type of presentation and would like to see more!
@KiwiKaosAgentКүн бұрын
Had thought this already from historic footage. But nice to know that my thoughts had been correct.
@marcneef7953 күн бұрын
That is indeed a very clever system. I guess it is only a small hole covered with a grating, so it does not take away any space from the runway
@larrysfarris3 күн бұрын
Oh the irony of this video being narrated by a guy with a Russian accent ‼️🤣
@x-planed2 күн бұрын
LoL I am not Russian and my accent is far from this language
@280StJohnsPl3 күн бұрын
Very interesting...thank you
@SK-nx1qe3 күн бұрын
OBOE wasn't most accurate in WWII. Most accurate blind targeting system was SHORAN.
@ferminromero26023 күн бұрын
Excellent video!
@Valicroix4 күн бұрын
Thank you very much. I always suspected they were to aid in landing or take off but I never knew how. Using steam was indeed very clever.
@RayW8084 күн бұрын
Rewatched this after your explanation and finally saw it at 0:55 lol, good job.
@chrismulligan69875 күн бұрын
Good job. The system worked so simply & effectively.
@chrislong39386 күн бұрын
You'd think a lot of this footage, the C-130 and especially the U-2, would be all over the internet! This was great!
@chrislong39386 күн бұрын
Excellent, as always!
@cardinalbob16 күн бұрын
Thank you for explaining this. I have heard this terminology on JAG and other shows, but didn’t fully understand what they were doing and talking about until now.
@koobuck6 күн бұрын
Great video but narrator accent kind of distracting
@dimitrijensk28457 күн бұрын
Love this video! There is seemingly never ending info about American carriers but it is very difficult for an American who does not know Japanese to find highly detailed info about Japanese carriers.
@FrankReddick7 күн бұрын
Nope.
@るるむ-r6d8 күн бұрын
空母用カタパルトが実用化されなかったせいでもある。
@G0OD10048 күн бұрын
PEOPLE! SUB TO THIS GUY NOW! We need more of this kind of concise style of content!
@JackJohnson-o4t9 күн бұрын
Damn that CRAP constant music is annoying AF... MORON
@Anolaana10 күн бұрын
I think you should cut 2:20 - 2:53 or so showing the parts of the system and the various banks of lights and turn it into a short. The algorithm greatly favours that type of video and spreads it to a wider range of viewers.
@x-planed9 күн бұрын
Thanks for the heads up😉
@Divadosaurus11 күн бұрын
Almost 40 years. That's how long it's been since I watched Top Gun for the first time and said to myself "what's the ball?" Now I know everything!
@David-p9p1z11 күн бұрын
I use IFR navigation ( I follow railroads ) .
@b.griffin31712 күн бұрын
Clever lads.
@soopahsoopah12 күн бұрын
1:20
@SH4WW13 күн бұрын
No closed captions.
@gregp140913 күн бұрын
I've seen several videos that do a horrendous job "explaining" what is going on during a launch. Most of the time you can tell that the person never worked on the deck and tried to explain what was going on after reading a book or maybe watching a video. There were a few errors in what you said but overall you did an outstanding job!
@MrPathx13 күн бұрын
Excellent video and great content! I would like to add a small note. The carrier units always operated in mixed formations of fighters and bombers, so single-seat fighters mostly relied on two-seat and three-seat bombers with dedicated navigators for guidance. Of course, during the chaotic battles over the enemy carriers fighters would naturally get separated. However, a couple of bombers were typically assigned at specific pre-arranged gathering locations with respect to the enemy carriers (e.g., southeast) to wait for any stray fighters and be guided back. There are cases when fighter pilots missed that opportunity as well and were on their own. For example, PO Komachi Sadamu during the Battle of the Eastern Solomons was one such case where all he could do was roughly head in the general direction where his carrier was when he took off. Since the battle took place in the late afternoon, the sun was also rapidly sinking toward the horizon (imagine the stress) but luckily he was heading somewhat west which saved him some crucial daylight time. Still, he could not find the carriers before the dark but miraculously found some friendly destroyers where he ditched his fighter and was picked up. We can only guess how many fighter pilots found themselves in a similar situation but were not so lucky. Regarding land-based naval units in the Solomons, most operations also included mixed formations where the bombers took care of navigation for the fighters. However, sometimes when fighter sweeps were sent and navigation was deemed challenging, they allocated a couple of bombers to handle the navigation. For ferrying operations, twin-engine bombers typically guided single-seat fighter units between islands (that is of course, when ferrying was not done by an auxiliary carrier).
@sepel712513 күн бұрын
Dankeschön toller Bericht
@tobingallawa332214 күн бұрын
Elegant solution
@mikestonne14 күн бұрын
A foreigner talking about the American military? 😂😂😂😂😂
@operator801414 күн бұрын
Oh. I bet that would work really well. Thanks!
@bwhog15 күн бұрын
Nifty! Simple and effective!
@AngryMarine-il6ej15 күн бұрын
Just what I like to see in a historical piece, no 'unnecessary additives'.
@tltnation87815 күн бұрын
Information i didn't know i wanted. Thanks 😊
@山良-p2p16 күн бұрын
Wind direction knowing method. pilot in canopy thats can't know wind situation.
The title was specific and the video was direct. You deserve so many more subscribers than 16K. Keep it up man.
@Xico-x2l16 күн бұрын
1:55 During landing, shouldn't the aircraft come against the wind?
@x-planed16 күн бұрын
It is
@harrykane384017 күн бұрын
Gee, I wish we had us one of them steam/wind direction finders!
@donjones471917 күн бұрын
Did the USAAF have a similar system for their long range fighters? P-51s flying from Iwo Jima had a loooong trip to Japan over the ocean. Or was a simple ADF sufficient since the island was stationary?
@drache44444417 күн бұрын
shouldnt the steam go off the ship in opposing direction to the markings as the ship is moving into the wind and not with the wind?
@x-planed17 күн бұрын
The ship is moving into the wind. Don’t get confused by the port side island
@damirblazevic482318 күн бұрын
Pacific war?
@unbindallgaming755618 күн бұрын
the best solution is often the simplest one. Super interesting
@LuxLux-k3o18 күн бұрын
Pepejeh nu jadi anak tere kehed (sarua)tetep kehel ka duanana ngan pepejeh jaga adek jeng di ulur ,ken ari pajauh mah moal naon naon.
@nomercyinc678318 күн бұрын
there is nothing interesting or meaningful about anything the axis did in ww2. no axis supporting nation should have descendants today. nazis and the japenese are some of the worlds worst war criminals. there is no excellent information about shitty people and shitty nations
@TheInfiniteSheldon17 күн бұрын
"no axis supporting nation should have descendants today." Pump the hate brakes, Eren Yaeger.
@rdistinti18 күн бұрын
I think it was also an aid to help the ships pilot to keep the carrier heading into wind as well