Very clever! But G isn't one of my favourite constants. I like the Euler-Mascheroni constant and Chaitin's omega. 🙂
@lih339113 күн бұрын
Why though
@rishabhhappy13 күн бұрын
mindblowing question sir and ur approach was fire..
@yusufdenli936313 күн бұрын
Why did you calculate to G??
@HakiMaths14 күн бұрын
interesting. Nicely done. However, you could also take f(n) = 1/(n+5)(n+4)(n+3) and show that your sum is -1/3 sum (f(n+1)-f(n)). Then, using telescopic relation, you get the sum is 1/180.
@jaimequerol2718218 күн бұрын
Incrrdible
@dogukanbirinci209923 күн бұрын
3.14 de verdiğiniz formülün kanıtını nerde bulabilirim
@mathematicsmi23 күн бұрын
Read the description. I added the link.
@Enthusiastic674Ай бұрын
Helpful
@sniperyt7092Ай бұрын
A much Easier method would to convert them into integrals and then solve it .
There's a problem with this proof! You are trying to prove the Euler's Reflection Formula. You used the prior result that the integral_0^infinity of x^{m-1}/(1 + x^n) = (1/n)*pi / sin(m*pi/n). However, you forgot that this prior result was proved by utilizing the Euler's Reflection Formula itself. You cannot use this result if you are trying to prove it. Perhaps you forgot, it happens to everyone once in a while. I have the proof of this formula by leveraging both the Gamma function and Residue theorem from Complex Analysis.
@yoav613Ай бұрын
Noice
@mathematicsmiАй бұрын
😊
@zh84Ай бұрын
Very tidy.
@mathematicsmiАй бұрын
😊
@MuhammadYogavasАй бұрын
Hola Informàtic 23' We didnt get the Beta function yet, but we need to solve this problem, is it possible ?
@khiemngo1098Ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing this problem! At 5 minutes into the video, when you changed the summation index from 0 to 1, in order to get e^n/n!, you effectively set (n - 1) to a new variable, say, t. And when n = 0, t = -1. If so, shouldn't the index of the new summation go from -1 to (x - 1) instead of 1 to x ?
@AbhaySingh-uz3zlАй бұрын
This is some strange coincidence. Today , in our final paper of Integral Transforms, this question came. I think even our professor watches your videos
@khiemngo1098Ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing! I understand your proof but what I don't understand is where you got your version of the Beta function which doesn't look like anything I have seen. The Beta function, by definition, is the integral defined from 0 to 1 but yours goes from 0 to infinity. In addition, the integrand doesn't look familiar. Can you please point me to a resource where you got the formula B(a, b) = int_0^infinity x^(a - 1)/(1 + x)^(a + b) ? Many thanks!
@nehasingla18Ай бұрын
Pls share link where you have solved it by Laplace transform ...
@khiemngo1098Ай бұрын
Thanks for this video! I wonder how you got the Beta function B((1 + i)/2, (1 - i)/2) based on the definition of the Beta function which can be found on Wikipedia at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_function. Can't make that connection. I'll appreciate your clarification!
@mathematicsmiАй бұрын
Check today’s video
@trelosyiaellinikaАй бұрын
This could be calculated very quickly if you remember the derivative of Γ(1/2) Γ ' (1/2)= - √π(γ+2ln2) and then ψ(1/2)=Γ ' (1/2) / Γ(1/2)
@sanjaysurya6840Ай бұрын
👌💯
@holyshit922Ай бұрын
I would use substitution x=(1-u)/(1+u) but x=tan(t) is still OK, not as great as x=(1-u)/(1+u) but OK
@PunmasterSTPАй бұрын
Wow, you made solving that integral seem like a sinh!
@PunmasterSTPАй бұрын
That was definitely feyn, man! 👏
@PunmasterSTPАй бұрын
You definitely went off on a tangent, but it was great! 👍
@ahmadtariq3960Ай бұрын
Amazing
@yoav613Ай бұрын
Nice,elegant solution.
@ahmadtariq3960Ай бұрын
Your content is unique❤
@giuseppemalaguti435Ай бұрын
Posto coslnx=Re(e^ilnx)=Re(x^i),,si arriva facilmente a 1/2-3/10+5/26-7/50+9/82-11/122...ah,ah,deve vedere come sintetizzare la serie...goodnight
@MathFromAlphaToOmegaАй бұрын
This is a nice one! I think you could also compute it by writing it as a sum of two geometric series and integrating term-by-term.
@user-or9fo5ym6hАй бұрын
Repeat?
@ShineiNouzen7Ай бұрын
I have a suggestion for video for this integral , int 0 to pi/2 x²cotxln(1-sinx) dx , Try it.
@oksanasavenko554Ай бұрын
Please, give some explanation on exp(-x)/(exp(-x)+1) expansion, because it dosn't look like Taylor series and this final stop for me 😅
@giuseppemalaguti4352 ай бұрын
Con le sostituzioni diventa un integrale gaussiano
@giuseppemalaguti4352 ай бұрын
Ho usato feyman, ma non sono sicuro della costante Di integrazione nel passaggio da I'(a) a I(a).. Comunque a me risulta pi^2/12...io ho fatto come te,ma al 4:30 non potevi integrare direttamente la Σ?passi subito da s^(-3)--->s^(-2)/(-2)
@yoav6132 ай бұрын
Very nice😊🙌🙌
@GSAGARGI2 ай бұрын
Sir can we apply L-hospital rule in this sum by limit as a sum?
@romdotdog2 ай бұрын
And the only integration you had to do was ∫dx. Awesome.
@yoav6132 ай бұрын
Nice😊
@giuseppemalaguti4352 ай бұрын
Intanto è funzione pari..I=2..poi uso feyman con I(a)=..arctg a/coshx..I(0)=0..I=2I(2024)...risulta ,dopo aver svolto i calcoli,I=2*(π/2)*arcsh(2024)=πarcsh2024
@Anonymous-Indian..20032 ай бұрын
Simply (eˣ +e⁻ˣ +eⁱˣ +e⁻ⁱˣ)/4 coz 1, -1, i, -i are the roots of x⁴ - 1 = 0 Just those IIT-JEE things 🗿
@Anonymous-Indian..20032 ай бұрын
Good one
@williammartin44162 ай бұрын
Great example
@MathFromAlphaToOmega2 ай бұрын
Very nice! I wasn't aware of that representation of the beta function before.
@juandanielespinozaloayza63792 ай бұрын
Is posible resolve: int 0 to infinite of (cos(ax)-cos(bx))/x dx