One Body, One Spirit
47:03
19 сағат бұрын
What age is appropriate for baptism?
16:49
Is Pope Francis Correct?
11:18
21 күн бұрын
Пікірлер
@onthego41
@onthego41 23 сағат бұрын
​@1962mrpaul in other words - symbolized the body and blood of Jesus although you imagine that its real.
@AnthonyBohorcus-p3p
@AnthonyBohorcus-p3p Күн бұрын
Andys TRUTH = Demonically Inspired 👹Dribble, time is way Overdue, FLUSH 🚽Andys Perverted, Heretical POO
@mr.e8432
@mr.e8432 Күн бұрын
I don't see how you can step outside the bishop and still claim to be in "the" Church. Paul stresses unity over and over again. Where in the bible do you see anyone tell the Apostles or their successors, "I think you're wrong on X,Y or Z so I'm going to go rent a gymnasium and start my own 'church'? Absolutely nobody thought that nonsense.
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext Күн бұрын
Where in Scripture does it teach "step outside the bishop and still claim to be in 'the' Church?" Elders/bishops are an interchangeable terms in the NT and they serve as overseers. Paul instructed Timothy to "appoint elders..." If a church - specifically a pastor - begins teaching incorrect theology, I'd quickly find another biblically theologically sound church.
@williamchurch9768
@williamchurch9768 2 күн бұрын
George Whitefield, Charles Spurgeon, and James Kennedy were all great in evangelism and were Calvinists. I became a "Calvinist" as a teenager in the Methodist Church, reading the Bible. I asked AI ChatGPT: "According to the Bible, how can a sinner living in hatred of Jesus Christ use her/his "free will" to choose Christ for salvation?" Obviously, voting for Calvinism (Biblical Sovereign Grace Salvation theology, conservative Biblical Reformed Protestantism): ChatGPT said: "ChatGPT This is a profound theological question that touches on the nature of free will, human depravity, and God's grace. According to Scripture, a sinner living in hatred of Jesus Christ cannot, by their own unaided "free will," choose Christ for salvation. Let’s unpack this in light of biblical teaching: 1. Human Nature in Sin The Bible teaches that humanity, apart from Christ, is in spiritual bondage to sin. Romans 3:10-12: "None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God. All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one." Ephesians 2:1-3: Sinners are described as "dead in trespasses and sins," walking according to the course of the world and under the influence of the devil. A person in this state does not naturally desire God or His ways; their will is enslaved to sin (John 8:34). 2. Hatred Toward Christ John 15:18-25: Jesus states that the world hated Him before it hated His followers. This hatred stems from sin and rebellion against God. Romans 8:7: "For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot." A person who hates Christ is spiritually blind and unable to recognize their need for a Savior (2 Corinthians 4:4). 3. God's Sovereign Grace While human beings cannot, by their own free will, choose Christ, the Bible teaches that God works through His sovereign grace to draw sinners to Himself. John 6:44: "No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him." Ephesians 2:4-5: "But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ-by grace you have been saved." 4. The Role of the Holy Spirit The Holy Spirit convicts sinners of their sin and opens their hearts to the truth of the Gospel. John 16:8-11: The Spirit convicts the world concerning sin, righteousness, and judgment. Acts 16:14: The Lord opened Lydia's heart to pay attention to what was said by Paul. 5. Faith as a Gift The ability to believe in Christ is itself a gift from God. Ephesians 2:8-9: "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast." Philippians 1:29:" For it has been granted to you that for the sake of Christ you should not only believe in him but also suffer for his sake." 6. God Changes the Heart Through regeneration (being born again), God transforms the sinner's heart, enabling them to respond to Him in faith. Ezekiel 36:26-27: "And I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you. And I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh." John 3:3-8: Jesus emphasizes the necessity of being born of the Spirit to see and enter the kingdom of God. Conclusion A sinner living in hatred of Jesus cannot choose Christ by their natural "free will" because their will is bound by sin. However, God, in His grace, works to draw sinners to Himself. Through the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit, God grants a new heart and faith, enabling the sinner to turn to Christ for salvation. This truth highlights the depth of God’s mercy and the power of His grace in saving those who are otherwise unable and unwilling to come to Him."
@paulbork7647
@paulbork7647 3 күн бұрын
Perhaps Noah not the best to suggest behavior not part of God’s election. Genesis 6:8b-9 (ESV) Noah found favor in the eyes of the LORD. . . . Noah was a righteous man, blameless in his generation. Noah walked with God.
@patsygabel1062
@patsygabel1062 5 күн бұрын
I hope I’m there too. At 85 it’s 4 yrs I’m stuck on very bad Dr prescribed drugs. I’ve lived thru wat you can’t imagine. I have daughter as caregiver. But when I beg her to not leave bc I feel sick. She goes anyway. I need to get thru today.
@dianejohnson4550
@dianejohnson4550 7 күн бұрын
I was 5 when I was baptized. I remember speaking with the pastor about my faith in Jesus and my reason for baptizing. The church I am in now (at 70) does have baptism classes. One for adults and one for children. We do baptisms in the church probably quarterly....I'm not sure. My daughter in laws pastor wouldn't baptize her as an adult at first because he didn't believe maybe she had truly put her faith in Christ. Then at a later date he did baptize her. I don't know if she has received Jesus as her Saviour or not. I pray for her consistently. My thought is don't suffer the little children to come to Christ. That act or event is something that child can look back on as a commitment, a promise to the Lord which in times of confusion or even sin can be a stronghold.
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext Күн бұрын
Love that your church has baptism classes! While a clear testimony is essential (how I came to faith in Christ and how I know live) is so important, sometimes I fear we combine salvation and sanctification. It is important to understand we all need to keep growing and maturing. None of us has the Christian life clearly in place when we are new or young in faith. Baptism, then, is that important step to "show" we want to be identified with Christ, to follow Him, to grow and mature into His disciple.
@onthego41
@onthego41 7 күн бұрын
No, you are the one that limit God and control Him by thinking you have the power over Jesus body and blood. You think that the priest has a magical, supernatural power to make the wafer to real body and juice to real blood. That's awful! That is idolatry at its best.
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext Күн бұрын
It seems you may not have listened but rather responded to the title of the program?
@onthego41
@onthego41 7 күн бұрын
​@Straight-Outta-Scripture Christ is the Door meaning you need to go through Him but Jesus is not a physical door with frame, hinges, knob or any feature of a door. Jesus is the Bread of Life meaning if you have Him, not by gnawing and swallowing but by faith receiving Him as Lord and Savior, then He is with you and the Holy Spirit dwells in you.
@1962mrpaul
@1962mrpaul Күн бұрын
Apples and oranges, friend. In John 10, Jesus starts out by teaching a parable: "Amen, amen, I say to you, whoever does not enter a sheepfold through the gate but climbs over elsewhere is a thief and a robber. But whoever enters through the gate is the shepherd of the sheep (John 10:1-2)." Then on John 10:7, Jesus explains what the parabolic sheepgate (or door in your translation) means: "So Jesus said again, “Amen, amen, I say to you, I am the gate for the sheep." So, Jesus IS the door in the sense that the door in the parable represents Him. Let's apply that to John 6 and the Bread of Life discourse. In John 6:36 Jesus says "I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me will never hunger, and whoever believes in me will never thirst." Here He uses the word "bread" metaphorically: no one thinks Jesus us claiming to be a matzo of a slice of Wonder bread. Then in John 6:55 He explains what this metaphorical "bread" represents: "I am the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world.” The metaphorical bread represents His flesh. When the Jews begin to grumble "How can this man give us his flesh too eat?" Jesus doubles down by saying: "Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in him. Just as the living Father sent me and I have life because of the Father, so also the one who feeds on me will have life because of me (John 6:53-57)." Like you many of Jesus's disciples found the idea of eating His flesh and drinking His blood hard and unacceptable and began to follow Him no more. So, ask yourself: are you following the Jesus of the Bible or are you following a "Jesus" of your own invention?
@onthego41
@onthego41 Күн бұрын
So when did the bread become a literal body of Jesus and when did the grape juice become a literal blood?
@1962mrpaul
@1962mrpaul Күн бұрын
@@onthego41 What was promised in John 6 was fulfilled at the Last Supper. First of all I would hesitate to use the word “literal” because it’s imprecise and can lead to erroneous conclusions. Christ’s “literal” body remained standing (or reclining) at the table. His body and blood began to be also present in a real, true and substantial way under the figures of bread and wine - fermented grape juice. This happened when Jesus took the bread and said “this is my body” and then the cup full of wine and said “this is my blood.” Because the words of the Word are “spirit and life” they create reality and so we can be confident that, though our senses may tell us otherwise, faith tells us the Incarnate Lord is truly, really and substantially present.
@noragarcia252
@noragarcia252 7 күн бұрын
Thank you this is so helpful.
@terrytube777
@terrytube777 8 күн бұрын
Enjoyed the discussion. Informative, but lighthearted.
@36CatsHeavenRescue
@36CatsHeavenRescue 8 күн бұрын
Thank God (he’s sovereign) the pope said what He did…. His statements show he is of the antichrist. He’s not the Holy Father He’s a sinful false teacher. I pray he accepts the true gospel.
@davidbailon1218
@davidbailon1218 9 күн бұрын
The Muslims can’t because of the Quran! Muslims that don’t interpret the Quran and take it for face value, know that they can’t accept the Jews to exist in order for the end days to occur.
@williamburych2136
@williamburych2136 9 күн бұрын
At the moment of TRANSSUBSTANTIATION, we are transported to the foot of the Cross. When Jesus looked at John, He was looking at US, and said "Behold your Mother". Mary is our Heavenly Mother.
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext Күн бұрын
Mary is a wonderful disciple who believed in God and bore the Christ. She is not our "Heavenly Mother." Transubstantiation is simply not taught in Scripture. 1 Timothy 2:5-6a (NASB95) "For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself as a ransom for all..."
@williamburych2136
@williamburych2136 9 күн бұрын
"Unless you eat the Body of the Son of Man and drink His Blood, you shall not have [Eternal] Life within you.". The Catholic Eucharist gives the most grace. There have been many "Eucharistic Miracles over the centuries, and even in current days, prove that the Catholic Eucharist is the True Body and Blood of Jesus. !!! Very recent Miracles have occurred where Blood has oozed out of a consecrated Host.
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext Күн бұрын
Again, having been raised Catholic, I understand their teachings. Re. the so-called miracles of bread and wine being literally transformed as miracles are suspect. It is hard to find the Catholic bishops even acknowledging these so-called miracles however, they see no need to negate them. This is terribly misleading. Christ died - once for all - was buried, was resurrected, and ascended into glory. There is no need to re-sacrifice or turn wine or juice into blood and unleavened bread into flesh. His sacrifice was once for all and He accomplished His work. Christ no longer hangs on a cross. He ascended into glory.
@BavidDigg
@BavidDigg 9 күн бұрын
The bible doesn't say this, if you're Christian the New Testament is quite clear gentiles and jews who believe in christ form new israel. The land and temple become unimportant compared to the new covenant.
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext Күн бұрын
That is a fairly standard "replacement theology" view often held by those who call themselves "reformed." The Scripture clearly teaches about the land, from the Abrahamic Covenant (Gen. 12 et.al.) as a unilateral covenant God made with Abraham. Attempts to "replace" Israel with the church are more tied to historical positions by reformers than a clear understanding of God's promises to Israel. Read Dr. Dyer's book for more insight into this matter.
@BavidDigg
@BavidDigg Күн бұрын
@Michaelincontext reformed people struggle because they have to try and understand these clear writings in the context of the modern day, as do you. At the time it was quite clear, the covenant still stands, and only a remnant of Israel is faithful the way it always had always been. The gentiles are grafted in. Then Jesus would return and renew the world.
@BavidDigg
@BavidDigg Күн бұрын
Also I'll add your theology is particularly poisonous because it is causing the mass killing of thousands of women and children because you think settler colonialists have a divine right to the land (even though as a Christian your own religious texts say no such thing).
@---zc4qt
@---zc4qt 10 күн бұрын
It is a fact that that are MANY English Bible translations. Such as: Ampl., Anderson N.T., ASV, AV-7 N.T., Beck, Berean (L.B.), Berean (S.B.), CEB, CEV, CLV, Darby, Disc. N.T., EHV, E-R-V, ESV-2007, ESV-2011, the Faithful N.T., GNB, Godbey N.T., Goodspeed N.T., GW, Holman, ICB, ISV, JST, Jubilee, KJV, KJV-2000, KJ-21, KJ-3, Lamsa, Lexham, LSV, MASB, MEV, MKJV, MLV, NASB-2020, NASB-95, NASV-77, NASV-63 N.T., NET, N.Ev.T. N.T., NIV-84, NIV-2011, NJV, NKJV, NLT, NOG Bible, NRSV, NWT, OJB, the Org. N.T., Pickering N.T., Power N.T., Q-JV, Recovery!!!!!!!!!!, Rotherham, RSV, Sawyer N.T., the Scriptures, Stern, TLV, TNIV, Tyndale's N.T., U-ASV, Understandable N.T., the Unvarnished N.T., U-KJV, Vic N.T., Williams N.T., Worrell N.T., Wuest N.T., Exp., YLT, R-YLT, and others. How can one narrow-down all these translations and find the ones that have the MOST of what one believes has the MOST in it- of what makes for a good/faithful translation?
@johnmott887
@johnmott887 10 күн бұрын
If you posit that Christ died for all universally, then God's intent is frustrated by the unwillingness of sinful men. I am convinced this is not in keeping with God's sovereignty over his creation.
@onthego41
@onthego41 10 күн бұрын
In John 6, Jesus was not holding a bread and said this is my body nor carry a grape juice to say this is my blood. The eating and drinking is symbolical. The Jews thought that Jesus was talking of literal body and blood like the Catholics.
@Straight-Outta-Scripture
@Straight-Outta-Scripture 9 күн бұрын
He was in Matt 26:26-27.
@onthego41
@onthego41 9 күн бұрын
@Straight-Outta-Scripture That makes it more clear that it is symbolical rather than real. In John 6, Jesus said that he was the Bread of Life without carrying a bread. The Jews wanted Him to perform a miracle again and be fed with bread. In Matt. 26, he refers to the bread as His body. 1. If we believe that the bread is the literal body of Christ, then the Jews were right in thinking how they can eat Jesus. 2. Jesus said: Joh 6:54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. But Peter said in verse 68 that Jesus has the words of eternal life, not flesh or body of eternal life. That was after the big discussion about Jesus being the Bread of Life. Joh 6:68 Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life. Clearly, Peter understood what Jesus meant about being the Bread of Life. Otherwise, he doesn't believe Jesus' words.
@Straight-Outta-Scripture
@Straight-Outta-Scripture 9 күн бұрын
@@onthego41 Maybe in your bible it says something different but Matt, Luke, Paul, Mark all say the same thing. When combined with John 6, it's clear it isnt symbolic. Paul even attaches a punishment, to your condemnation. He obviously thought it way more than just symbolic.
@Straight-Outta-Scripture
@Straight-Outta-Scripture 9 күн бұрын
@@onthego41 Peter believed that he must in some way actually consume Christs body. He didnt understand but knew Christ would show him and he did. At the last supper.
@onthego41
@onthego41 9 күн бұрын
@Straight-Outta-Scripture definitely symbolic. When did the wafer/bread becomes the literal body and the juice the literal blood of Christ during communion? Who has the magical power to change it? Paul was chastising those partake communion unworthily. He said the body and blood of the Lord doesn't mean he was showing them literal raw flesh dripping with real blood.
@1962mrpaul
@1962mrpaul 11 күн бұрын
If you want to know what the Catholic Church teaches, ask the Catholic Church. His slip-shod and confused explanation is cringe-worthy.
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext Күн бұрын
I work overtime to be "slip-shod." 😉
@peachstate2223
@peachstate2223 11 күн бұрын
Your narrative of acts 15 is incorrect I recommend that the viewer read Acts 15 for themselves. - the church did not call for Paul and Barnabus in from their mission - there was a conflict that arose that was not resolved in the Bible yet - paul and barnabus were appointed to meet with the council to solve the matter You will find that this resolution was resolved in the manner in which the church was instituted
@5dayMovingAverage
@5dayMovingAverage 11 күн бұрын
Church of Christ is not an institution or a building.
@peachstate2223
@peachstate2223 10 күн бұрын
@@5dayMovingAverage who said it was?
@kevinyono5210
@kevinyono5210 11 күн бұрын
The Entire Church and Every Bishop and the all the Apostolic Church's Believe in the Literal interpretation of John 6. This why Jesus established and Church and those with authority without that you lose the most important gift which is Jesus Literal Body Blood Soul and Divinity. Only a person who recieved Apostolic Succession by the laying on of hands can consecrate Bread and Wine hence all of these people have lost all the graces that God intended them to have how sad is that. God have mercy on us.
@johnKey-MaieLoboroCorpala
@johnKey-MaieLoboroCorpala 9 күн бұрын
🤔itulahhhjh ATHEISH AETENH YUEALL ITS 👌EASY BUT YUEALLL EATH WOOHSSSS. 🤔👏👏AYO AYOOOOOOOO
@johnKey-MaieLoboroCorpala
@johnKey-MaieLoboroCorpala 9 күн бұрын
TIDAK MUNGKIN YUEALL SHOUEWH tohallh LIKEH then befouh On PRAYH ohehwn yuh SELFH AHND eatehn. AYOOO ayoooooooooo
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext Күн бұрын
This is the heart of Roman Catholic teaching. Apostolic succession is a key departure between Catholics and Protestants. Protestants do not hold to apostolic succession. 1 Timothy 2:5-6a (NASB95) "For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself as a ransom for all..." We have no need for an OT priesthood nor apostolic succession. Heb. 10:19-22 for e.g. we have a "new and living way, we have a "great high priest," Jesus Christ.
@josegamboa4918
@josegamboa4918 11 күн бұрын
Christ is Real Present. Take and eat. This is my body..... is very clear
@deborahwolfe1681
@deborahwolfe1681 11 күн бұрын
Oh, dear Joni, what a testimony you are to me, to continue in my pain!!!! Thank you!! You will get a big hug from me in Heaven, when we are FREE of all pain, all tears, all hardship. We will run together!! ❤
@jamespowell_km_kchs
@jamespowell_km_kchs 11 күн бұрын
He’s “the man” to explain this? Get a Catholic who knows the Church’s teachings on this. It’s not a reenactment, it’s a representation. Christ does not get crucified again in the Mass. Read St Ignatius of Antioch on the Eucharist. John, Chapter 6. This guy is a former Catholic. He wouldn’t have left the Church if he understood it.
@edwardmarculewicz5140
@edwardmarculewicz5140 11 күн бұрын
The Catholic Church is the magisterium the teacher. The church is teacher and the Catholic Church is the universal teaching. Why would anyone deny this truth. We enter in the crucifixion.
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext Күн бұрын
This is one of the central distinctions between Catholics and Protestants. The Catholics maintain only they have authority to interpret Scripture where Protestants maintain Scripture itself is God's word, authoritatively. In other words, do you trust what Catholics "say" about the Scripture or do you trust the Word of God as it is written.
@stevebanks1971
@stevebanks1971 11 күн бұрын
I think It starts in John 6:53 where Jesus says "unless you eat this flesh and drink His blood" and many walked away from his teachings. convert catholic here.
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext Күн бұрын
While Catholics understand this passage as sacramental, Jesus is speaking metaphorically not about the "elements." The NT teaching is on remembering / commemoration of His life, death, burial, and substitutionary atonement for our sins. Context is key. Carefully read Jn. 6:v. 35, 40, 50, & 51. Jesus is clearly declaring one must believe in Him. (That is the key theology in the Gospel of John.) Jesus taught of manna (Jn. 6:41ff) and He declares "I am the bread of life" and be sure to compare Jn. 6:35. He explains the miracle of God giving manna yet they died. Christ is the living bread, i.e., we "eat" or identify with Him understanding we will live. His point is clear in vv. 53-58, "...this is the bread which came down from heaven, not as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live forever." He is speaking of believing in, trusting in Him who gives eternal life not like manna. If you want, I recommend reading George Beasley-Murray's excellent exposition in "Word Biblical Commentary: John."
@timfisher8707
@timfisher8707 12 күн бұрын
It might be helpful to also explain 1 Cor. 10:14-17...that text has always been a conundrum for me :)
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext 12 күн бұрын
Will do!
@Straight-Outta-Scripture
@Straight-Outta-Scripture 9 күн бұрын
Also 1 COR 11 22:29
@josephmario9231
@josephmario9231 17 күн бұрын
I only have one problem with this teaching.. its not addressing the cause of sin in general..The reason Jesus went to calvary is not because King David had many wives... its also because of many other sins people had committed and blood of sheep and goat couldnt be enough to save mankind from Sin (Again which Sin in Particular) The sin that relates to man's overall fall... Jesus specifically is asked a question relating to divorce and He says In the beginning it was not so.. Beginning Refers to before the fall of man (1st Convenant btn God and man), We also know that in the first covenant man did not have sex with woman.. Job 14:16 Man that is born of a woman is of few days and full of trouble. 2 He cometh forth like a flower, and is cut down: he fleeth also as a shadow... So after the fall we know now man's nature is polygamous (fallen state) and this includes monogamists too.. Sex Law is by Polygamy in man.. If any man is against his own nature then he should go back to the beginning before the fall..
@isolafitness
@isolafitness 16 күн бұрын
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander
@stephenolive970
@stephenolive970 17 күн бұрын
Agreed!
@ya-diggs
@ya-diggs 17 күн бұрын
So what's the best translation? Top five
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext 16 күн бұрын
Really hard to say as you need to determine your use/preference. My preference remains the NASB95 for English Bible readers/students. In no particular order or preference (each have pros / cons) Lexham (Logos Bible Software), NET, NKJV, CSB (formerly HCSB).
@sexyeur
@sexyeur 18 күн бұрын
This was absolutely unclear to me. It's disturbing that anyone claiming to be formally educated can't clearly articulate a meaningful position.
@ACTS931
@ACTS931 20 күн бұрын
Michael what are your thoughts on the NASB 2020?
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext 20 күн бұрын
I used it for a while but prefer the NASB 95.
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext 16 күн бұрын
BTW, John Dyer has done a great job showing changes j.hn/nasb-1995-nasb-2020-every-change/
@haleylewis9587
@haleylewis9587 20 күн бұрын
Awesome content
@1861olesamule
@1861olesamule 24 күн бұрын
There is no earthly authority for a local congregation belonging to Christ higher than their local Eldership. They too are just as under the authority of a 'thus saith the Lord' of the word of God as any other member. Christ is the head of the church and all authority is under him. Congregations of the Lord's church are to be autonomous and independent, while they can cooperate with each other. Use to be windows were made with individual panes of glass. You break one you don't break them all. They are independent. So, if the devil wanted to try and destroy the Lord's church, he would have to attempt to do it one congregation at a time. But if there is a fountain head of authority over multiple congregations, all he would have to do is corrupt those overseeing multiple congregations and could destroy hundreds with a single effort. God's design is better no matter how much man thinks they can improve on the organization of his church.
@5dayMovingAverage
@5dayMovingAverage 11 күн бұрын
Lol thats insane. No man had any authority over man. Jesus is Lord and King.
@1861olesamule
@1861olesamule 9 күн бұрын
@@5dayMovingAverage Elders or Shepards or Overseers are charged with the spiritual welfare of a local congregation. They must meet certain qualifications as laid out in scripture. However, they too are just as subject to God and scripture just as every other member as well. They are limited on what they have authority to do as it can not supersede Christ authority. They only attend to that local congregation as each congregation is autonomous from each other.
@graceantonio3573
@graceantonio3573 25 күн бұрын
YES, GOD IS GOD FOR ALL, GOD IS CREATOR OF ALL HUMAN BEINGS, ALL LIVING THINGS.
@irritated888
@irritated888 25 күн бұрын
Religion that is pure is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world.
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext 16 күн бұрын
Not to be too picky 😇or technical but the term here is thrēskeia), can be translated "religion or worship." James is saying caring for the most vulnerable (And very importantly, "widows and orphans" are not two groups in particular. Rather it's like saying, "from A to Z" or "from New York to LA" as a literary device.) James is saying God views pure religion/worship, not a system of do's and don't's, but rather ministering to any and and all who are vulnerable. We can understand and apply this like, "God views our care for the most vulnerable as an act of service, indeed, an act of worshiping. But this is not about religion or a system saving us.
@canoeman621
@canoeman621 25 күн бұрын
Dr. E does not speak the truth.
@williammarinelli2363
@williammarinelli2363 26 күн бұрын
1. Scripture is from God and God cannot lie. (2 Tim. 3:16; Tit. 1:2) 2. Predestination is of existing saints to adoption/glorification, not sinners to conversion. (Eph. 1:5, 11; Rom. 8:23, 29-30) 3. Election is to service, calling and purpose, not to salvation. (Isa. 42:1; Acts 9:15; Rom. 11:28). Eph 1:4 says, "According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:" The Calvinist reword is "chosen TO BE in him unto salvation." "Holy and without blame" describe quality of service, and the word, "should" involves an exhortation to be such, not a decree. Salvation is not mentioned in Eph 1:4. 4. Adoption is the future redemption of the body, not conversion. (Rom. 8:23, 15-17; Gal. 4:1-6, 1 John 3:2) 5. Sinners become sons of God through the new birth, not through adoption. (John 1:12-13) 6. There are two callings: Gospel and vocational, not inward or outward or effectual or general, etc… (2 Thess. 2:14; Eph. 4:1; Rom. 8:28; 2 Cor. 5:20) 7. Atonement is not synonymous with salvation. Christ’s death reconciles the world in universal atonement but Christ's life is what saves. (Rom. 5:10; 1 Cor. 15:17; Col 1:20) 8. It is a false dichotomy to assert that the universal set of theological thought is divided into Calvinism and Arminianism. We Bible believers reject both. Arminianism is Calvinism light. False dichotomies are used by the Calvinist to map the opponent to an unpalatable label and thus infer that Calvinism is the only alternative. 9. God is pleased to save those that believe, not cause belief in those he saves. (1 Cor. 1:21; Rom. 10:9-10) 10. Grace is a ubiquitous reality, not a selective force. (Tit. 2:11-13) 11. Grace is just fine on its own as found in scripture. Any modifier other such as "sovereign," "irresistible," "common," or "prevenient" indicates superimposition of an ideology by someone who is either confused or attempting to confuse. (Rom. 3:24; 5:15; Jn. 1:16; Tit. 2:11-13) 12. If one is born with total inability to receive God's life-giving truth and then passed over by the calvigod who unconditionally elected not to extend the gnostic spark of regeneration to that one to enable/cause faith, then there is no better excuse (Rom 1:20.) And the author of this post is more compassionate than the Calvinistic caricature of God, calvigod. 13. God's Word and God's life-giving truth of the gospel are the enablers of faith - "...the holy scriptures, which are ABLE to make thee wise unto salvation..." "But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name." The 2nd person "thee" and "ye" apply to YOU, whoever you are. 14. The gift in Eph 2:8 is eternal life, not faith (Rom 6:23.) 15. God is all loving, He loves all (without exception.) (John 3:16).
@johnmott887
@johnmott887 10 күн бұрын
Grace = unmerited favor. Romans 9:16
@BR-ds3yl
@BR-ds3yl 27 күн бұрын
Nope, the “doctor” in the vid is lying
@isolafitness
@isolafitness 16 күн бұрын
You just don’t want to believe the truth
@Jericho-xs3ju
@Jericho-xs3ju 15 күн бұрын
ISO fitness What is the truth ?
@markgoff7076
@markgoff7076 Ай бұрын
Until the pastor falls into sin(exposing your churches to lawsuits) then the true modern church elders ( those who determine church policies and doctrines and practices)....accountants, public relations experts, lawyers, marketing directors...we teach sin not a big deal. This may seem scattered, the point being that we don't emphasize holiness until it affects our pocketbooks. Then we get " legalistic " and remove offensive predators. But isn't it possible child abusers are merely living out their false beliefs ( at least sometimes). Some of these people brag that they are advanced spiritually past "fearing God " to loving God and people....They teach God is their " buddy" and even ask their advice. Interesting times we live in.. I believe ...from scripture ....maintain holy fear (respect) for God ....even applies to the ministry. Be sure the Lord delights in mercy....He resist the proud, but gives grace to the humble.
@markgoff7076
@markgoff7076 Ай бұрын
Interesting discussion...didn't really answer. The question has been reframed by modern antinomian reactionaries . Why does Jesus say you must seek the kingdom of God and His righteousness.....seek to enter the straight gate...(.Paul ) be holy as God is holy...( revelation;Jesus)wicked people excluded from heaven. I believe that it is because true faith is born out of repentance not to be repented of. ...it is an informed way of living..certainly hard to articulate without being labeled a legalist. Considering this that Paul taught that all who would live Godly in Christ Jesus would suffer persecution. I think the modern preachers in America know they have to play nice to get paid....however, when we fall to communicate the truth of God and what He expects of us we are complicit in people's spiritual shipwreck....even our own. You won't get persecution for telling people that we can continue in sin that grace may abound....you more likely will be appointed chief elder. (See continued part ).
@McBigFisher
@McBigFisher Ай бұрын
He’s not really a brother in Christ
@marksorenson5871
@marksorenson5871 Ай бұрын
Dont beat around the bush- Andy is an apostate
@Myhomeisheavenbutfornowonearth
@Myhomeisheavenbutfornowonearth Ай бұрын
Wow thank you
@changefly
@changefly Ай бұрын
A Pastor's role is to teach the SCRIPTURE. The Bible makes countless references to avoiding the pressure of the culture of the day and requires a STRICT ADHERENCE to the truth of the WORD. God's word is HOLY and should not be mixed, mistaken, or muddled with the common counterfeit messages of our time.
@kafizola5695
@kafizola5695 Ай бұрын
Enjoyed this teaching. Where can I find more studies on the Bible. Proverbs. Ecclesiastes. Etc.
@Michaelincontext
@Michaelincontext Ай бұрын
We have messages on each book of the Bible - an overview in one message - followed up with an interview with a "subject matter expert" who may have written a commentary on that particular book. All free to access michaelincontext.com/series/thebigbook/ Thanks!
@neilchristians
@neilchristians Ай бұрын
Actually, wasn't it commanded that the brother would do this rather than a provision?
@kjk0128
@kjk0128 Ай бұрын
Trust and obey Jesus as my Savior!
@gordonteats298
@gordonteats298 Ай бұрын
CHRISTMASNITE by APOLOGETIX a great song for everyone to look up