As soon as I hear an AI voice, I’m out. ✌️

I feel like the word quantum is being use as some kind of supernatural thing as if it would grant the key to the universe when really it may just give us a new brick to build stuff out which will lead give a broader perspective the same way relativity finely tuned the law of motion especially at a cosmic scale

Telling many things but nothing..

This video is very similar to the intro CGs of wasteland games, the tech is awesome and can lead us a whole new life, and then some disasters happened 😂

Quantum Tuning, Alignment, Calibration and Navigation

Cosmic Playground sounds exciting

An open sourced, gravity driven, continuous motion, free energy generator: Power Multiplier Device, medium.

Zeta is static, Time not 2. Diskussion falscher Ansätze Falsche Ansätze Überbewertung von klassischen Konzepten: Ansatz: Viele Konzepte in der Physik stützen sich stark auf klassische Theorien, ohne die Quantenmechanik angemessen zu berücksichtigen. Diskussion: Dies führt oft zu Missverständnissen in der Interpretation von quantenmechanischen Phänomenen. Determinismus vs. Zufälligkeit: Ansatz: Die Annahme, dass das Universum deterministisch ist, widerspricht den Prinzipien der Quantenmechanik, die Zufälligkeit und Unbestimmtheit betonen. Diskussion: Eine unkritische Übernahme deterministischer Modelle kann zu fehlerhaften Vorhersagen führen. Vernachlässigung der Rolle des Beobachters: Ansatz: Viele Modelle ignorieren die Bedeutung des Beobachters in quantenmechanischen Experimenten. Diskussion: Die Rolle des Beobachters ist entscheidend für die Interpretation der Quantenmechanik und kann nicht vernachlässigt werden. 3. Ergänzende Ansätze Interdisziplinäre Ansätze: Konzept: Die Verbindung zwischen Physik, Biologie und Philosophie kann zu einem ganzheitlicheren Verständnis von Bewusstsein und Realität führen. Ergänzung: Indem wir verschiedene Disziplinen integrieren, können wir die Komplexität des Universums besser erfassen. Kritische Überprüfung und Zusammenarbeit: Konzept: Der Prozess der Peer-Review und offene Diskussion sind entscheidend für die Validierung wissenschaftlicher Ergebnisse. Ergänzung: Durch den Austausch von Ideen und die gegenseitige Überprüfung können wir die Gültigkeit und Zuverlässigkeit unserer Schlussfolgerungen sicherstellen. Mathematische Rigorosität: Konzept: Höchste Standards mathematischer Rigorosität sind erforderlich, um solide Hypothesen zu formulieren und zu testen. Ergänzung: Eine präzise und sorgfältige Prüfung jedes Schrittes in der Argumentation ist notwendig, um Fehlschlüsse zu vermeiden. Fazit Durch die sorgfältige Analyse und Integration dieser Konzepte sowie die kritische Diskussion von falschen Ansätzen können wir ein umfassenderes und fundierteres Verständnis der komplexen Zusammenhänge in der Wissenschaft erreichen. Die Betonung auf Zusammenarbeit und rigoroser Prüfung ist entscheidend, um Fortschritte in der Forschung zu erzielen.

Fascinating and intriguing "traditional quantum computers ", as they have been invented 100 years ago, so amusing, the future indeed has crash landed into the past

New Kurzgesgat and Vertasium just dropped 🔥

α = 1꞉ ᴾᴵ√ ̅̅ ̅̅ ̅̅(2⁴+5⁴)ᵠ · e⁵ ̅̅ ̅̅ ̅̅ (fractal ratio) fine structure constant α = 1/(641^φ*e^5)^(1/π) = 0,0072973525677660... φ = 1,6180339887... golden ratio, e = 2,7182818284... (Napier's constant, Euler's number) The universe is a fractal with dimensions = π The singularity of black holes is the point of contact between a fractal and its self-similar fragment. If we assume that the mass is the result of energy trapped in the fractal part of space, then from this formula we can easily find the shares of individual energy masses of the universe (visible baryonic matter, dark matter and dark energy). This formula shows that baryonic matter constitutes [(PI/3)-1]*100% of the total mass of the Universe (4.72%). To calculate what percentage the mass of baryonic matter constitutes in the total mass of matter (baryonic matter + dark matter), it is enough to substitute the formula [(PI/e)-1]*100% = 15.57%. 100%-15.57% = 84.43% (share of dark matter in the total mass of matter). 84.43% / 15.57% = 5.42 (There is over 5 times more dark matter than visible matter). 100%-4.72%-(5.42*4.72%) = 69.7% (the mass of dark energy in relation to the mass of the entire Universe. Baryonic mass 4.72%, dark matter 25.58%, dark energy 69.7%.These results agree with current data.

Knowing that it may affect the entire humanity, still some humans are developing an advanced version of it. Are they gone extremely stupid or greedy.

Is this real ?

The fundamental phenomenon of dilation explains dark matter. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". This doesn't mean mass increases, it means mass becomes spread throughout spacetime relative to an outside observer. A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. A time dilation graph illustrates the same phenomenon, it's not just time that gets dilated. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. In other words they have normal rotation rates. All binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.

Dear Chris, are scientists currently working on implementing time travel?

It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with only primary consciousness will probably have to come first. What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461, and here is a video of Jeff Krichmar talking about some of the Darwin automata, kzbin.info/www/bejne/gGi4mWymnchkhdk

It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with only primary consciousness will probably have to come first. What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461, and here is a video of Jeff Krichmar talking about some of the Darwin automata, kzbin.info/www/bejne/gGi4mWymnchkhdk

Nice video. As our brains, well certainly mine at least, can't comprehend where it all started or if there are boundaries or not, it seems reasonable to think there could possibly be some thing else beyond the limits of our knowledge. liked 👍

The noospheric future envisions a world where collective intelligence plays a pivotal role in human progress. Emphasizing collaboration and interconnectedness, it challenges us to create frameworks that harness this potential while addressing the associated risks. The sustainability of this future will depend on our ability to foster an inclusive and ethical digital ecosystem.

Cool! If time travel is possible,I’d like to meet 26-year-old Henry Cavill after becoming his dream girl or perhaps travel into the future with him and be young again together 😍

It won't be through neural inks, though. Our bodies and lives already function as high-bandwidth interfaces, an advanced AI could shape us more profoundly by orchestrating our lived experiences than through direct neural links, leveraging our inherent qualities as organic computational systems within broader ecologies!

Thank you This actually resonates with my attempt to understand and explain my current intuition

Faith hope love

Any desert planet we find orbiting that binary star system is going to have to be named “Tatooine”

Great theories

Interresting video! Just as a note Alpha Centauri A & B are distant by around 10 AU at their closest approach, that's the distance of Saturn in our solar system and Saturn's environement is very cold! it receive only 1% of the light/warmth the earth receive that's why for exemple Titan is very cold (around 100°K) All this to say that the influence of the other star will be minimal on any planet on a habitable zone and life is still possible without an extreme environement. Another point: A study have shown that orbits up to 2 AU are stable and the orbital dance of the 2 stars won't affect it. Also having a planet seems to be the rule not the exception, the primordial nebula that form the star will always have some leftover that form the planets which themeselves may have leftovers that form their moons ! the bigger the object formed (star, giant planet) the higher the leftover. So stars Always forms planets, they may end up being kicked, but they intially form ! Last point: on top of having roughly the same size as the sun, Alpha Centauri A&B have also around the same age ! and more importantly they have a high metalicity! and they are the only one to have that of all the stars in a 100 light years radius. Having a high metalicity (like the sun) means the system have all the heavy elements needed for life ! That's why the Alpha centauri system is so fascinating and captivate our imagination and hopes !

A.I already is using it, it is a integral part of A.I and how it multiplies it's intelligence in everything it meets and internalize.

Is the MicGindy Equation beneficial for daily life activities..

Very interestingly engaging intellectual conversation of the century. Thank you algorithm ❤

Ligth years away 😮

Two thumbs up

Two thumbs up

Two thumbs up

Quantum Kaleidoscopes bi 010 picosecond.

Images learning is the gateway sharing

How much is actually a proven scientific established understanding

Show the equation

Newton's equations are not incorrect they where incomplete, Einstein's are correct yet incomplete. If this is testable it certainly will be done.

I've heard the term quantum foam now, a few times in different presentations. Although, no one elucidates, just what that is ? In the early days of physics, they utilized the term Eather. Yet that was ultimately to be refuted by the physics community at large. Now we are going to call Eather, Quantum Foam ? 😮

you deserve more recognition👏

The fundamental phenomenon of dilation perfectly explains dark matter/galaxy rotation curves. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. A time dilation graph illustrates the same phenomenon, it's not just time that gets dilated. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. The "missing mass" needed to explain galaxy rotation curves is dilated mass. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter, in other words they have normal rotation rates. All binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.

Grateful

Grateful

Suppose we were able to “improve” Michelson’s experiment (1881) so that it determines; Aircraft speed is 300, 350, 400 meters per second. Question for you: what will change in BIG SCIENCE?

Hypothesis and speculation does not climb the ladder. Clickbait for the gullible. Using a fake Attenborough voice really takes credibility to the limits.

New technologies, new research tools. BIG SCIENCE doesn't want to eliminate the *BIG MUD* of noise in fundamental optical experiments. WHY?! Let me suggest for schoolchildren and students on one's own to measure the Universe, dark energy, black holes, etc. To do this, I propose two practical devices. «laser tape measure *+reference distance* 1,000,000 m”» and «Michelson-Morley HYBRID Gyroscope». I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 250000 (In a laser tape measure, the length of the optical fiber is fixed at 1000000 ) meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 84/84/84 cm, and the weight is 24 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta) The result is a «theory of everything» in a simple teaching device and a new tape measure for measuring the universe.

Fascinatingly amazing video!👍👍👍

Quantum science is one of my favorite 😍 topics! Nice 📹 video😊. And now I'm excited to see more about your channel. You attracted my focus. Keep it up!

As a kid who watched snow on my TV become cmb background it's not easy to come from that excited backgrounds to question it's horizon paradoxes . Im sure 40 & u it's nearly impossible to do so since it's all they know. These stress points that's found on every scale all the qay down and even witnessed in the cambrian explosion of life which points to the grand unified evolutionary theory. Which points to the dualistic umbrella hierarchy and cmb being miss interpreted. The categorical issues would be fine if for whatever reason it didn't structuraly align to cause trouble in society. Inability to place humans shared subjective properties with animals and that which unites us with bots .this triangulated judgment of sciences readable judgment of legible thermodynamical system in the universe has been blocked for a long time. It's been funded with the most money in human history. Given all the ancient worlds time to try and unify. It's also been given precision instruments tools of its opposition to try and force the universe to fit that order.

What is the Thumbnail? Where is the source? Looks interesting.