left out that the cult members who stayed at home and did not go to the prayer session with dorothy martin eventually stopped believing, while the ones who did gather together to pray universally had their beliefs strengthened. this suggests that being in a social environment where the incorrect information was being reinforced was a key factor in the way the resulting dissonance was resolved. remember that next time you're in a group who all agree with each other! why do you really agree with them?
@eviebug4816Ай бұрын
currently cramming for an A Level timed exam in class. This helps so much, your videos are invaluable!! love it!!!
@HxzaifaaaАй бұрын
Bro forgot Ibn Rushd!!!!!! And the fat guy in the blue is NOT Epicurus!
@iamthestormthatisapproaching69Ай бұрын
I remembered hearing this phrase for the first time in elementary school. Like the hell do you mean they don't make a sound? I obviously took it literally, lmfao
@jorgearauzАй бұрын
Augustine views foundational for Catholic church and theology? No, sir. They became central to western Christianity as a whole.
@i3493-y5qАй бұрын
.
@KazwireАй бұрын
the movie sucks
@joesmith4388Ай бұрын
Dumbest thing ever. Yes it makes a sound,
@BEV_shortsАй бұрын
everyone is missing the point including the video which added an extra argument. the sound is waves in air particles - waves in air particles will exist whether you are there to witness them or not but the sound itself needs a nervous system to interpret it or a microphone and recorder type thing otherwise it doesnt make a sound it just makes waves
@Mario-zo1ujАй бұрын
Did van gogh have a sense of humor?.
@Abhiw205Ай бұрын
love the video
@hotarusuki5501Ай бұрын
Thank you so much for making this video!
@MrDeanmfitzАй бұрын
You should take oit the word always in your first sky is blue example
@tesafilm8447Ай бұрын
Why would one want the forms to be self predicating? why should the form of largeness have the physical property of being large? Anyway, assuming one accepts self predication, why not allow self containment?
@aidanjohnwalsh2129Ай бұрын
So, I guess you could say that inflected meaning is the divine leap that humans make over animals..
@aidanjohnwalsh2129Ай бұрын
😂 Great teacher! Clear. I have no issue personally with Anthropomorphosising God, because this is how 'They' are known by me, Knowing me, alike, in 'Their' Conception of Singular Eternality, and our misconception multitudinous and temporal, of individuality.
@aidanjohnwalsh2129Ай бұрын
In a way, KZbin came too late suggesting these videos in my feed. In the last couple of months I created a conlang, synthesizing the five passages that have been the core of my own lifelong spiritual practice. I call it FOLVASIN (or, FOLVASIN-Afrikaans), meaning Mature/Adult/Grown-up-Afrikaans. The FOLVASIN Texts, follow: *PASAALIM 23* HERDIREER-MEI, HUL'HEER; NIE'NSAL-EKS IETS TEKORTIN. LAAT-LEGEER GROENVEIFELT-IN NEER; NAA'N-STILLINVAATIR LEIYEER. MAI-SIEL FIRKWIKEER-HUL'; PAAYIN-REGFERDIGHEIT‐IN LEIYEER; HUL'NAAMINS-OM, ONTVIL. AL-GAANEER-EKS, DOOTSKAADUDALDEUR; GLADNIKS-SAL-EKS BOOS FREESIER; OM, MEISAAM EU'SAAM LOOPEER: MEI-FIRTROOSEER, EU'STOK, EU'STAF. TAABIL-BIREIYEER MEI-FOOR, TEENSTAANIRS TEENAANSIGTIG; MAI-HOOF, EU'OOLIEREER; MAI-BEEKIR, OORLOOPEER. NET-GOETHEIT, SAL-FOLGIER-MEI, NET-GUNS; AL'DAAGIN-LEEVINDIN. HUL'HEERSHUISBINNIN SAL-BLEITIER-EKS; AL'DAAGIN-LENGTIN. *SAALIGSPREEKINGIN* GISEEGINT-ARMIS-GEESBINNIN; OM, HEEMIL-KONINKRYK, HULLIN-AAN-HOORTIER. GISEEGINDEERT-TREURIGIS; OM, SAL-HULLIN FIRTROOSIER. GISEEGINDEERT-SAG-GEESTIS; OM, AARDIN SAL-HULLIN BIGERVIER. GISEEGINDEERTIS; REGFERDIGHEIT, NAA'N-HONGIREER, NAA'N-DORSEER; OM, SAL-HULLIN FIRSAADIGIER. GISEEGINDEERT-BALMGEESTIS; OM, BALMGEESTIGHEIT, SAL-HULLIN BIVEISIER. GISEEGINDEERT-SKOONGEESTIS; OM, HUL'HEER, SAL-HULLIN SIENIER! GISEEGINDEERT-FREEDINBISTEUNIRS; OM, KINNIRIN-HUL'HEERS, SAL-HULLIN NOEMIER! GISEEGINDEURTIS; HULLIN-FIRFOLGEURT, FOLGINDIN-REGFERDIGHEIT; OM, HEEMIL-KONINKRYK, SAL-HULLIN BIHOORTIER. GISEEGINDEERT-EUIN, D'EENTEIDIN OOKS-BILEEDIGEERT, OOKS-FIRFOLGEERT, ALLIN-SLEGS-EUIN OOKS-FALSLIK-SEGEERT. OOKS-BLEIVEESEER-EUIN, OOKS-YUIGEER; OM, LOON-GROOTIN-EUIN HEEMILIN-IN: NES-FOOR-PROFEUTIN, NES-EUIN; SOOS-FIRFOLGEURT. *HUL'HEERS-BITEERTIN* _SOOS-LEEREUR YEESIS-DEUR BITEER_ ALL'OUIRIN ONSIN; HEEMILBINNIN, BIHEILIGEURT EU'NAAMIN! LAAT-KOMEERT EU'KONINKRYK: LAAT-EU'VIL DOENEERT, NES-HEEMILSOOS NES-OPAARDIN! D'EENDAG DAAGINLIKSIN-BROOT GEEVEER. OOKS, NES-FIRGEEVIER SKULDIN-ONSIN, ONS-SOOS SKULDIRS-ONSIN NES-FIRGEEVEUR. OOKS, LEIYEER FIRSOEKING-UIT, OM, FIRLOOSEER BOOSIN-FAN. [OM, ALKONINKRYK EU'AAN BIHOORDIG, OOKS-KRAG OOKS-HEERLIGEIT; EEVIGHEIDIG!] AMIEN. *TROON-STUK - AAYAT-ALL'KOERSI* ALL'HEER! GEEN-BIHAALFT-HUL', HUL'HEER! HUL'LEEVINT; HUL'BISTAANONNIRHOUIR. HUL'NOOIT-OORFALEERT, OOK-SLAAPSUG, OOK-SLAAP. ALLINBINNIN; OOKS-HEEMILINBREET, OOKS-AARDINVOL HUL'BIHOORDIG. VIE-DAAREER HUL'MEER KAN-INTREER; SONNIRMEER TOESTEMMING-HUL'? AL-KENEER-HUL', VAT-LEGEER OOKS-FOOR, OOKS-AGTIR-HULLIN; NIK-SAL KANIER-HULLIN, PUNKIE-FIRSTAANIER, HUL'FOLKENNIS-OMRUIMTIN; HUL'BIHAAL-VILIERINT. HUL'TROON FIRSTREKEER, OOR-HEEMILIN, OOR-AARDIN; HUL'ALBEI-BIVAAREERING, FAARIER GIEN-BIMOEGIERING. OOKS, HUL'AL'HOOGSTIN, HUL'AL'GROOTSTIN! *SUTTAN-KALAAMANS* _EERS-FIRTAALEER, 'BHIKKHU-BODHI'_ "KALAAMANIN, OORIN-GEEVEER. TWYFILEERT-EUIN; D'EENTEID ONSEEKIREER: OPKOOMINT-IN ONSEEKIRHEIT, OM, FIRDAGEURING-OOR. LAAT-SITEER KALAAMANIN, OORIN-GEEVEER. NIKS-OORGEEVEER NET-HERT-GIRUGTING-AAN; NIKS-OORGEEVEER NET-NEER-BISKREIVING-AAN; NIKSNET OUSTAANDIG-TRADIESIN-AAN; NIKSNET ONNIRVEISIR-SEGEURTIN-AAN; NIKSNET TEKSINGISAG-AAN; NIKSNET BEIBILGISAG-AAN; NIKSNET LANGAGTIGING OOREENSTEMMING-AAN; NIKSNET SELFSIGTIGING OOREENSTEMMING-AAN; NIKS-OPFATEER MISAANSKOUING EUIN-AAN: 'MAAREER LEERMEESTIR, D'EENMONNIK.' D'EENTEID FAN‐SELF-VEETEERT, KALAAMANIN: 'D'EEN ONHUILSAAM, D'EEN FIRVERPLIKIG; D'IEN ONNIRNEEMIER, UITFOERIER; NAA'N-SKAADING NAA'N-LEIDING FAARIER'; D'EUN VEISIN-DEUR ALKRITISEURT; DAN, FER-VEGBLEITEER-EUIN; LOSLAATEER. D'EENTEID FAN-SELF-VEETEERT, KALAAMANIN: 'D'EEN HUILSAAM, D'EEN ONBIRISPLIKIG; D'IEN ONNIRNEEMIER, UITFOERIER; NAA'N-FOORDEEL, NAA'N-GILUK FAARIER'; D'EUN VEISIN-DEUR ALVAARDEURT; DAN, IN-BITREEYEER-EUIN; STILBLEIYEER."
@qjaneway6728Ай бұрын
I am everything and I am nothing. I am and am not. I was, I will or would be, I may be… maybe. 😵💫 I am but a thing moving through time reacting to shadows.
@AngelinaWarner-lw7jl2 ай бұрын
Overall a very good video! As a Christian, I obviously disagree with some of your points, but that is definitely going to happen in this subject, and that is okay! Thank you for the video!
@JohnSmith-yw4bh2 ай бұрын
its not even a metaphor. its simulation theory.
@summerbreeze51152 ай бұрын
I want both 🐖 + 🧠
@user-AtiredAnimator3 ай бұрын
I remember watching this movie a years ago. I only watched it once because it was a hard watch as the first time I watched it was when my grandpa was very sick, a little before he died. It was the ending that got me the most. Every time i think of this movie, I'm reminded of my grandpa. I miss you.
@Erenyeager-rg4we3 ай бұрын
Im here because i want to make a scene of how they argue i need it for our rollplay thx bro
@joshuatboodoo3 ай бұрын
If you disagree, think it's silly or do not understand, let me explain: Rephrase this question as: If something happens but there is nothing alive to perceive it, does it really happen? No, without the existence of a perceiver in the universe, example : a god, nature, aliens, humans, animals or higher dimensional life forms. it is impossible to perceive something, without a observer, therefore it doesn't exist. Therefore to realize the first form of existence or sentience, there must be an observer in the universe. The question in sums up to : to exist or not to exist. This is an actually very enlightened question to ask oneself.
@kehindeonakunle74043 ай бұрын
Great video essays❤
@asadsanguine3 ай бұрын
I watched this movie today. I loved it.
@DEVanderbiltCecil3 ай бұрын
Do you see the correlation of her curse with my life? I cannot leave because I might be killed or kidnapped. I see life dimly, through the internet. Although she left to die, I leave to live.
@abhishalsharma16283 ай бұрын
14:05 Sir, can't we better phrase it: Acting on the ground, morality is emotional. But what we're forgetting here is that Ethics is a normative study. Thus, although morality is emotional while acting on the ground, ideally it *ought to be logical* .
@diegobis20484 ай бұрын
what is the backing track?
@atSeifer4 ай бұрын
Great effort in the video, however, this video is very flawed. There's four accepted categorical imperatives: 1. The Formula of Universal Law 2. The Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself 3. The Formula of Autonomy 4. The Formula of the Kingdom of Ends That is also not the correct context of the man at the door contention. It was about "lying" which violates the formula of autonomy. However as this is seemingly a contention it's really not as there's permittance in the ethical framework on action is taken as a moral duty. It could be a moral duty to lie to someone who means harm, like there's a moral duty to kill someone in war if it's premised That it's out of duty to protect others
@Michaelfrikkie4 ай бұрын
The rise of misanthropy is accelerating, especially when we consider that science has never successfully proven the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of reality because Darwinian rationality is based on conceptions where the actual most rational organisms would be the single-celled ecosystem. If John Gray incorporates the full spectrum of reality that Thomas Nagel proposes in "Mind and Cosmos," then another teleological aspect of human nature emerges, which is fundamentally inherent from the very beginning of life on Earth. It makes sense when we realize that there are no mechanistic probability spaces where only nano-structured life forms, such as single-celled organisms, will outperform and outcompete all other organisms, throughout the entire evolutionary history. Therefore, it is demonstrably wrong to assume humans exist solely due to primary survival drives. Our existence is driven primarily towards consciousness. All of nature reflects this, evident in the mechanistically redundant sensory development - bacteria's chemical and energy gradient sensing is vastly more optimal, as are all their locomotion strategies. The development of mechanistically redundant structures if only survival were at stake is obvious and has been obvious for all times and humans behave to protect consciousness and natural novel interactions, like being bisexual etc. However, if conscious experiences are considered, sensory and other forms of interaction become paramount. This perspective should bring hope to borderline misanthropes like Gray.
@dullknifefactory4 ай бұрын
Mental illnesses topple biological urges
@steveplc20034 ай бұрын
There are two types of science. One works with and in line with nature, the other is against nature and toxic to nature. The latter needs attention.
@MYSTUFF-wy8gc4 ай бұрын
God = Supreme Being = Logic dictates there is only One.
@ponyboygarfunkel16754 ай бұрын
I have noticed that most males of my species will do nearly anything to fuck. This might be a bit telling.
@dullknifefactory4 ай бұрын
Just biological factors nulled by societal standards
@ponyboygarfunkel16754 ай бұрын
Our daily world news makes clear that progress is a myth. Perhaps our species should never have come down from the trees. I enjoyed Gray's "Feline Philosophy." I seek to have a house-cat mind-state.
@nellakarmic4 ай бұрын
so good!!!! thank you for this
@Zarathu5tra4 ай бұрын
There is even more to Kant's criticism. As a third argument he claims that analytic/synthetic distinction makes it impossible to conclude that god exists.
@watch-Dominion-20184 ай бұрын
Awesome video
@Purlatif4 ай бұрын
nice ending qoute DDDDDDDd
@soysauceboy20234 ай бұрын
Great video. Great hair.
@ER-fc9my5 ай бұрын
This is pukka
@robertvandenberg28835 ай бұрын
Idealism claims that the tree you see always exists, wether observed or not. It is however the representation of a non physical tree ( just like the tree in your dream, is a non physical tree, existing in mind only). If no one looks, there is no representation of the tree, thus it exists, but the tree is not physically represented. Now the question arises, what is this non physical tree? Maybe we can/should only look in the meaning of its representation, the 'what' is probably a meaningless dead end.
@smallscreentv12045 ай бұрын
Christianity was clearly plagiarised from philosophical works
@smallscreentv12045 ай бұрын
He never, ever said life is a curse
@robertriordan18235 ай бұрын
Thank you for clarifying an important debate.
@ashuibrandon43665 ай бұрын
this is the best video so far on the table of russells argument. thank u so much. i found it very easy to understand
@cookieoutrage5 ай бұрын
Ngl kinda interesting how Hypatia is the only one looking towards the audience,and also the only woman there.