If the Artificial intelligent is not intelligent. what is that?

Aaaaand it gets worse now ..

Ccp china loves Risc V. China will mess it all up 😂. Warning!

Do you accept code from .ru ?

Now, you can get a great gaming and Wayland desktop experience with an RTX 40 series card. My guess, it was Nvidia seeing AMD's dominance in the open-source hardware space which led to companies using AMD GPU hardware in their server spaces and Linux being the top OS for AMD server compatibility.

omg finally someone who thinks like me and that doesnt say that its the end of the word you seem great

This was before C++11 and after 03. No wonder people wanted a way out.

they forgot the "sh" after impI. it should be "impish" instead. 😂 would make the code more accurate to read.

idgaf what this man says. I write code with ChatGPT and it's working better than any code I can ever write. Also Linux sucks lol.

I had an opportunity to write Go for 8 months, it was such an exciting experience. Being a java developer, I felt that I was closer to the hardware while writing Go, no abstractions, no syntactic sugar, just basic code

For a guy who is in his 80's, he's still kickin'

What's "cloud native" ??

When management gets involved it will be chaos.

I sort of like Golang, but the problem is the code executable is so large bloated, a shame. But Golang seems easier to understand than RUST or C++. I'm just so use to C.

I respect Linus. But instead of talking that kinda stuff, why he's not out here helping RISC-V to not repeat those "mistakes" he didn't even explain? Makes him look like the Linux version of Steve Ballmer to an extent tbh.

We have that problem solved in ϕSystem. We don't insert tabs into text files. Three or more repeated characters are compressed into a two-byte sequence.

Languages are invented manely to drive engagement nowadays. His best work was when games were the final product rather than clicks.

Humans today: AI is a tool AGI today: Human is a tool

“Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal: for where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.” ‭‭Matthew‬ ‭6‬:‭19‬-‭21‬ ‭KJV‬‬

Hopefully developing in the open documents why some fixes are made so it's easier to go back and understand the implications and limitations in the future instead of leaving things because we don't know why and when there's a fundamental rework we can not repeat the mistakes for that architecture.

I've literally never had a problem with Nvidia on Linux and I've used it for years

of course, we all agree with every mistakes linus mentioned, aren't we?

As long as people are involved somewhere there is a risk. No MacOS, no Linux, no BSD, no Windows will be secure ever

this poor guy gets bothered all the time to do something he hates which steals him the time to do what he loves.

This year, I had to switch to AMD because updating to certain kernel version would break the Nvidia driver. After several weeks, Nvidia comes with the patch. The drivers are ok for most of the time, but Nvidia is slow to deliver patches even for critical bugs :(

Human nature will cause AI to be used and relied upon in a multitude of situations that are bad. Do I actually engage my brain in this government office, and fact check, or do I just accept what the computer says because it has been a long day and it is just before quitting time. You can bet China is using AI in a massively negative way. Same with other countries. Look, i just input your name in our government computer system and it says you are a criminal. You will be arrested immediately. Fact checking be damned. A handy tool for totalitarian oppressive purposes.

The major advantage of C over Rust is that you can look at the C code and pretty much know what the CPU will be doing since the C code is so close to the machine code that the C compiler generates. The same cannot be said for Rust code.

The future is Subject Oriented Programming!!

IMO the biggest mistake many CPU architectures make is that they focus too much on the CPU and too little on how to build a whole platform/system around it. A big part of the reason why x86 is so successful is that the PC is, for the most part, a standard platform, with standardized buses that can be probed to discover what hardware exists on the system, standardized firmware, etc. Yes you might need specific drivers for various things, but there is a standard way for the OS to discover what hardware exists on the system, what drivers to load, etc. It all just works automagically. You install Windows or Linux (or other OS) on a x86 PC and, as long as you have the drivers you need, it all just works. It autodetects what hardware you have and how to configure the drivers. Not so with Arm and RISC-V. Everyone makes their own bespoke devices and their own hacky forks of the Linux kernel to support them. If you are lucky, support for a specific board/device makes it upstream into the mainline kernel, but the process is often very difficult, because every one of them requires different hacks, workarounds, etc. You need a Device Tree file for each specific product, to tell the kernel what the hardware is and what drivers it needs, because it cannot autodetect that. It's horrible. Yeah, ACPI and EFI are awful ... but honestly needing bespoke device tree files for every product because Arm/riscv don't have any standards for how to build a whole computer around them, is much worse. This recently started improving largely thanks to 1) Microsoft's Windows on Arm efforts, 2) Arm servers. But I kinda hate the fact that the "solution" they came up with is to just adopt UEFI and port over a lot of the x86 legacy. I'd have liked to see a better (simpler, less bloated, more streamlined, less buggy) firmware standard. I guess they just wanted to make it easier to port existing OSs (Windows) to Arm. We need something like the "IBM PC-compatible" (everything in the x86 world is, to this day, an evolution/derivative of the same computer platform that started in the 1980s), but for Arm and RISC-V. Some kind of standard for how all the basic foundations of a full computer system should work. So that different manufacturers can just make computers, and people can just install a standard OS on them and it all just works out of the box. Manufacturers can still have the freedom to differentiate their products and make different chips and boards with different user-facing features, but they should be built on standard low-level foundational tech (buses, firmware, etc) to ensure software compatibility.

How do you know a developer uses Rust? They’ll tell you.

0:42 new people involved, in every domains even political, sociological.

Bascially today LLM is the junior dev who writes a lot of code and you're the senior dev that makes engineering decison, archtecture decisions, and does code review to make sure everything works. Some cases like SQL and regex where llms are likely much better than any human. I think a lot of dashboard, lo-code people are going to be in a lot of trouble.

Torvalds is and has always been a clown. He did something relevant 40 years ago and he's been farming clout for the rest of his life without doing anything but imposing his eccentric ideals on others. He won't name any of the so called "mistakes" because he's just a professional hater, he's doing the same shit he did with Rust except that time the community, which are the people actually doing the work, said no to him. Absolute AAA tier irrelevant clown boomer.

What a lame video given that people who clicked want to know what those mistakes are. "Mastery Learning" More like "mystery learning".

Finally someone who makes sense. All this "but AI isn't there yet" and "I don't use AI" BS is so idiotic

Remember the Transmeta Crusoe processor?

I certainly can’t explain why, but I dislike most of Torvalds’ opinions. It’s as though he doesn’t have some different to say from the average.

sorry, I love Linux... Just wanna say that we need Linus Torvalds v2.0... How more time does he need to figure out that Rust is the future??

what's "calgnated"?

Rust developer of PopOS! Jeremy Soller's recent comments regarding his relationship with the Linux kernel developers is of extreme concern with the future of Linux.

Tabs or spaces? Whichever way it's been pasted from StackOverflow.

seems like he is still writing in assembly - I use to think he is a visionary

4:31 - It’s crucial to remember that the current state of LLMs is the worst they’ll ever be. They’re continually improving, though I suspect we’ll eventually hit a point of diminishing returns.

The main problem is that RISC-V is a real RISC-architecture in the sense of the early RISC-CPUs. It has a minimized instruction set and misses a lot of instructions which are naturally for nearly any current contender. F.e. a conditional move is just a extension-proposal. And there's no DWCAS-operation which is necessary for fast userspace memory-management.

My take on RISC-V is that, despite being open-source, it might not see widespread success due to its licensing model. We can draw parallels to software like FreeBSD, which is a fantastic Unix-like operating system. Many companies use it, modify it, and incorporate it into their products, but hardware and driver support remain poor. This is largely because companies aren't obligated to contribute their changes back to the main project. As a result, FreeBSD doesn't thrive, but rather crawls along, kept alive by commercial interest. In contrast, the Linux kernel's GPLv2 licensing strikes a balance. It ensures that any changes made to the kernel must be open-sourced, encouraging companies to share improvements without having to release their entire codebase. This setup creates opportunities for contributions to be pulled into the main repository. On the other hand, GPLv3, used by most GNU tools, is more restrictive, requiring all code in a project to be open and free. This makes it tough for companies to include proprietary code alongside GPLv3 software, often forcing them to maintain separate repositories and install proprietary components separately. RISC-V seems to be more in the FreeBSD camp when it comes to licensing, which could hinder its growth and lead to fragmentation. For RISC-V to truly flourish, it would need a licensing model more like the Linux kernel's, which incentivizes contributions and collaboration. Otherwise, much of the innovation will remain siloed, and the ecosystem will struggle to advance.

*RISC-V may repeat the same mistakes, BUT* its attracting investor BIG BUCKS. And that's what really counts.

Why does it matter none uses Python?

It's easy - really. 1. One tab can mean more than one space - so it takes less disk space which matters on devices with limited space like electronics or when you need that extra network request speed. 2. Besides tab has semantic meaning - intendation while space is universal so parsing space without context is a little slower Both doesn't matter much in modern times with strong hardware we have today. So do as you please

Modern C++ rocks

AI is a tool not replacement unless you treated like a tool, AI wont replace you