Why not just call it council democracy or council republic? Why necessarily be so specific to refer to its communal structure when that’s obvious anyways
@OverthrowMediaКүн бұрын
Fyi phil is a rapist who dodged his accountability process
@KonstantinPauner2 күн бұрын
Hello my friends have you made a video about pannekoek's worker's councils?
@nicolerioflorido44802 күн бұрын
This documentary is such an eye-opener! McNamara’s technocratic approach is fascinating but also shows the dangers of relying too heavily on metrics in war. As the article I read puts it: 'McNamara’s reliance on data-driven analysis often divorced policy from the complex cultural, historical, and political realities on the ground in Vietnam.' Source: TheRamparts Substack
@AudioPervert114 күн бұрын
this is a fantastic book ... kudos SF!
@pavel7700Ай бұрын
Excellent video!
@CircumvenАй бұрын
I liked this two part series, despite your proclaimed lack of understanding I feel like I understand a bit better what communization theory means. I am interested in which episodes y’all engage with some anarchist leaning texts if any? You seem mildly dismissive of the term but also embrace some of the ideas such as unity of means and ends when presented in different language and I’m interested in how y’all square that circle/if you ever do explorations of that corner of theory? Also: what are ya gonna do? 😂
@Tomk6286Ай бұрын
I found some of the analysis interesting. As Burkean Conservative not sure we have the same end vision in mind. Keep it interesting and I may listen again
@KonstantinPaunerАй бұрын
Dont make fun of Anarchism you twats
@PoliticalEconomy1012 ай бұрын
m a socialist. I dont get the obsession with planning. Why would a socialist society need planning? Do you mean rationing? Planning of production? The US is a developed economy. Do you mean for a GND? Who wants to go to a planning meeting every week/month?
@afgor1088Ай бұрын
without a planned economy, workers and society are ultimately guided by the mindless "logic" of the market. this creates immense pressure toward disorderly expansion, maximising profit (or some similar metric) and stratification of different firms and sections of the working class / humanity. the kind of capitalism we have probably makes these trends worse but they exist regardless of whether you call your market economy "market socialism" or "liberal capitalism". the things that make a market economy a market economy are incompatible with a fully realised socialist economy. worth saying socialism isn't just about giving workers more power or having a greater share of the economy go towards social welfare, although those are worthy aims. it's about doing away with the current unstable, self contradicting mode of production built on wage labour & commodity production (meaning goods produced for profit rather than human need). "market socialism" is also probably an unstable system, there are clear signs of that in the Yugoslavian experience. the contradictions of the market aren't done away with just because we start calling it socialist and eventually the choice is either to go on to a planned economy (or at least more planned) or step by step be forced back by the logic of the market into a less and less "socialist" economy. i'm sure i've gotten details wrong here so if you're looking for a more worked out and accurate answer "Against the Market" by David McNally is an excellent resource. it was pretty cheap when i got it and it's probably available as a pirate pdf somewhere.
@PoliticalEconomy101Ай бұрын
@@afgor1088 "without a planned economy" Thats patently false assumption and silly binary logic. Planned production and rationing is just as bad as the market. A better system is neither market or plan, but governance, cooperation, and coordination.
@PoliticalEconomy101Ай бұрын
@@afgor1088 Capitalism has planning, yes there are many different kinds. Markets can be planned. So you are talking about planned markets right?
@afgor1088Ай бұрын
@PoliticalEconomy101 was "goodbye" not clear? Or do you literally never read past the first line? It's pointless to engage with people like you
@EasymodeTom2 ай бұрын
I'd say that quantum randomness doesn't necessarily = free will. If my actions are predetermined or randomly generated, either option is no freer than the other. Both lack agency.
@pavel77002 ай бұрын
Awesome!
@lnhrlnhr48752 ай бұрын
Loren 💪❤️
@erichnk2 ай бұрын
Ellen Meiksins Wood, then Ellen Wood, was George Comninel's PhD dissertation Supervisor, as he clearly states in the 5th and second last paragraph of his Acknowledgements on page viii of this book. I was a student in the PhD course Ellen and her partner Neal Wood co-taught on the state in 1982. (After Neal Wood's death, Ellen formally adder Meiksins family name.) George Comninel was a friend, especially in his support for the strike of graduate students and part time faculty for which I was mobilizing committee chair, and I still have a book of his that I should have returned to him. Please note that Ellen Wood in turn the first person to be acknowledged for his help in her monumental A Social History of Western Political Thought, and also - alongside Robert Brenner - as a "safety checker" of the manuscript of her brilliant The Origin of Capitalism.
@danieljliverslxxxix11643 ай бұрын
Declining population is the only way your communist utopia can ever work. Better able to grow your own programmable worker robots to spread Marxist propaganda that way. Declining populations is not a political problem. It is a human problem. Stop commodifying people's misery.
@MrxstGrssmnstMttckstPhlNelThot3 ай бұрын
Returning to this in 2024 after seeing footage of huge piles of dead cattle dumped en masse by the road side all *_absolutely_* infected with H5N1 avian flu in Northern California and just thinking "yeesh"
@HeyThereDude00113 ай бұрын
***SPOILER *** Are you thinking Asmodeus was trying to get Michael to kill Marlas rapist? Doesn’t seem like he’d want to support that guys death, and the talk of crushing someone’s chest in, which is seen nowhere else other than the car wreck, seems to be an important detail. thoughts?
@FR3nkly3 ай бұрын
08:30 - clouds unfold is surreal every time i read it. first time the "the book is speaking to you" hits me. In my minds eye, this chapter plays out like a museum guide pointing out the pieces of a painting. Its also our own miniature exploded education and like Earnest, we get our minds blown. 14:46 - like Burt says later, you can delegate upward. 16:17 - I thought it would be god too, and in a sense its a close as we get after the prelude to interacting with the character. On subsequent readings, it makes Mikael's gaze heavier in the earlier chapters. 17:02 18:25 - basking in simple in being calls back to Asmodeus's rant, what it was like before being unfolded. 19:00 - the pantomimes 25:58 - the bits of community we get to see in chapters like Henry George's 27:20 - got it from Mik's vision 28:25 - they're the pond life that the lifestyle eventually gets rid of 29:32 - her moment with the silk worms in the tree was pretty great too 31:38 - wether its the boroughs or Baltimore, we're all saints, we're all sinners. everywhere is Jerusalem. 34:00 - coughed up my coffee there, thank you lol. This chapter is definitely the hardest. Even after reading it, the annotated version(obiwanspicoli Thanks) and listening to the audio, you can still glean new things on repeats. I credit DanikaXIX (comicbookgirl19 on youtube) with getting me through it the first time. Her video breakdown of Jerusalem is right on the money, also did a read-a-long of Dune which was awesome. 37:10 - the most beautiful baby theyd ever seen kinda familiar 38:45 - 2023 saw one book club finally finish Finnegan's wake.. after 28years. NPR had an article. I read, rather tried to read the first few pages and put it down. 46:45 - i see that aspect as moore styling even harder on any remaining doubters. In some other world, the entirety of Jerusalem is encrypted like wake and it takes a generation for anyone to gasp at what the work has progressed to. 49:00 i enjoyed her sparring with jk stephens 50:12 - for every one of us. It takes a villiage 51:39 - the enjoyable portion of psychosis. I agree that its a pleasant state to be in when you believe you're connected to the beyond, not so much when you get wrenched back to reality 56:54 - i think its moore giving love, i haven't read any of Whitney's stuff, i'm looking for a few issues featuring herby specifically, maybe that'll shed some light. 59:22 - reminded me of alma's planned book "we wiz poor, but we wiz cannibals" 1:00:07 - she hears it on the air like a radio out of tune. Id even say you could listen to the song instead of reading the chapter and be almost as confused 1:08:44 - he snags the pool cue and the keys when he leaves the pub. His violence assault is potting balls in pockets. of course he gets away with it, he's the gingerbread boy. The 10/01/24 episode of [The Blindboy Podcast] has an exceptional conversation about the history of money. 1:17:40 - Charles Taylor's campaign slogan stayed with me. I would have liked to see Henry's experience of going upstairs for the first time and seeing that the brand he's been ashamed of his entire life is the very sigil of god. 1:33:10 - its quite the revelation. Both of Henry's chapters are golden. The bit about the zebra was fantastic. 1:35:21 - and for everyone whose life ended up more sour than sweet, you can do like the dead dead gang: Stay out late past a bedtime that will never come. 1:38:09 - I love this chapter too! somewhere theres a world where Jerusalem gets adapted as a stage play and this chapter is a television drama instead. 1:41:23 - one of the great things about this story is the revisiting of scenes from other character's perspective ex- Tommy seeing Celia and Johnny, Benedict and alma being seen by Studs Goodman, Mick and Den running into each other 1:50:08 - i was hoping the first few times that the order of the chapters lined up with a blake poem or something like that, that there would be another message in the words 1:59:20 - great callback to An Asmodeus Flight [“Well, since you ask, no. No, I haven’t always been a devil. When the luminescent halo that is space-time rippled out from non-existence, all at once, then I saw the entirety of my immortal being, which included this benighted period that I must spend in service as a lowly fiend. But how I am now is not how I was back at the start of things, nor is it how I shall be when I’m further down my road. Back at my outset, I was but a glorious part, one of a myriad comprising a far greater entity that basked in simple being, there before the advent of both world and time. I was a builder back then, if you can believe that. Had the white frock and the billiard cue and everything.] 2:03:03 - well said 2:04:03 - reminds me of the swan realization. see 2:09:47 2:15:02 - youtuber @EveryoneWhoReadsitMustConverse introduced this chapter as a look into the mind of a rough sleeper and I completely agree. His stepping down and the repeated "cause tony blair.." is the start of his impending self torment in the ghost seam. 2:20:40 - him describing the classic ghost story without accepting that he's in one is funny too 2:27:15 - i found his sleuthing very easy to visualize, maybe im a sucker for noire. the car changing every time to match his mood made it feel surreal. I like the idea of moore deciding "yeah, i can do a noire" 2:32:58 - maybe ended up with the rest of the town in the destructor's maw 2:39:46 - And suddenly, poetry. I liked the bit where seeing what poets look like (hello Benedict) he immediately nopes out of it 2:47:30 - benedict has the revelation after alma criticized his work. 2:52:35 - fair criticism though ill admit i cant picture it working any other way. Sexual violence is deplorable, no one will deny that. the density of the descriptions in each character helps you inhabit a very specific space of the mind during reading. to then contextualize each episode with "even this eventually balances out to good" is a real test of eternalism as you hold it. The visceral discomfort intensified the experience. I dont think its as gratuitous as, for example, Tender is the Flesh though thats not the point. It would have been gratuitous to have this level of detail with regards to the violent acts in [Forbidden Worlds] would have been gratuitous . Also agree that after 1200 pages the "wow look at moore doing something different" feels more like "wow you didn't have to do that, man". 2:56:15 - the rapist getting raped. Technically we've seen that happen twice already in the novel, most recently in Den's chapter. Given how time works in the ghost seam, what makes you think that Derek James Warner,42's punishment ends there? or soonafter? We also get to see the carcrash again (we saw it in [Atlantis] beachtoys and all). 2:57:49 - Marla is reborn with that new awareness as Kaphoozelum. 2:59:08 - The Audrey reveal was fantastic! in retrospect, who else would it have been?? Care in the community. The name just waiting for the right person to put it on. 3:05:10 - ends with Freddy going upstairs for the first time. now he feels he's worthy, made up for what he did in life. at peace with who he is. Reggie had the others dragging him up, at the end of his chapter he still tears up, still cant believe he's worthy. 3:07:21 - It winds up being Phyllis Painter, his mom. The paper mashie model of the boroughs with buildings from different time periods i think is the map shown prior to the novels opening. 3:09:44 - The great fire of Northampton gets her to ignite the model's destructor. The two old ladies disappear, the fire has finally run its course. 3:14:44 - The picaso punchline was great! after reading clouds unfold i looked it up its a wild painting! The book two shout to picaso was good, but not like this. 3:21:07 - "I thank the deaf, mute stones of what is left of the Boroughs for all of the work that they have done across the centuries, and all that they have borne. When they at last slump, exhausted, into the dusty sleep of rubble, I hope that this may serve them as an entertaining, vindicating dream. And lastly I thank both the Meaningful Concept of Death and the English Novel for having been such thoroughly good sports about all this. You guys are the greatest." 3:23:35 - psychopathy confirmed
@auxiliarystatements3 ай бұрын
As always phenomenal notes! Thanks again for adding these to the project. Great point about psychosis and being wrenched back into reality. It's that disconnect that the chapter is about in retrospect, really good call. Also love the point about Jim Cockie's chapter being a look into the mind of a rough sleeper, albeit one who hasn't quite started rough sleeping yet. makes his interaction with Benedict that much better. I wonder if Ben ever finished his poetry. And you make a good point about the violence at the end too. It certainly made for an intense chapter, and Moore is obviously doing it to show just how deplorable this type of violence is. Not for the weak of heart though! Going to have to check out all the youtubers you mentioned, I didn't realize there were more! Thanks again for the help getting through the book
@FR3nkly3 ай бұрын
I like the idea of Benedict finally being able to produce something in that short poem about absences. And Alma, after hearing it can tell that it's like authentically him so she doesn't Razz him the way that she did for the Atlantis. It's also great to see that his character makes the choice not to give up to put it off for another day to stop, but to try again and find his passion.
@HeyThereDude00113 ай бұрын
Has anyone read anything similar to Jerusalem? I’m looking for similar recommendations, especially in regards to this idea of eternalism and mind bending things like that.
@jesusvergara43883 ай бұрын
Yes!!!! It is here!
@auxiliarystatements3 ай бұрын
Sorry this took six months to make lmao
@HeyThereDude00113 ай бұрын
man that was epic, thank you!
@HeyThereDude00113 ай бұрын
Yes! 3.5hrs… YESSS!!!!!!
@YX991ueie3 ай бұрын
Its mainly because you can never reach the utopic period of "workers owning the means of productions" so all they can do after killing wealthy and taking their land and factories, is making them belong to the state, and operated by the state. Which usually ends up getting controlled by one dictator anyway. So in practice, economic and political system of Soviet Union, end up no different than ancient Egypt, where the God/King owned all the land, and gave orders to all population about where they will work, and how much will they get.
@jcrios19173 ай бұрын
According to David Laibman- Chapter 8 of Western Marxism and the Soviet Union, "In Lieu of a Conclusion," The notion that the Soviet Union was capitalist, in van der Linden's view, rests on superficial understandings of Marx's theory, in which capitalism "constituted a unity of several 'moments" (311). So one can, if one likes, single out the form "wage labor," make the "observation" that that form obtained in the Soviet Union, and conclude, from this superficial correlation, that the USSR was "capitalist," ignoring the equally important moment of commodity and competition. van der Linden pointedly - quotes Marx's view of commodity production as "general prerequisite of the capitalist mode of production" and "the generalization of commodity production ... by capitals". Capitalism, in Marx's theory, has rich specificity, multiple determinations. Some capitalism theorists (e.g., Resnick and Wolff) remove that richness from the theory and go in the opposite direction. They treat "capital" as a disembodied force that floats above its arbitrary historical guises of private vs. state property, the commodity form of wage labor or its absence, and market vs. planning. This view also ignores the capitalist character of the technology, and political and legal institutions that guarantee the reproduction of the entire ensemble of capitalist social relations. It amounts to an essentialism that separates capital's essence from its concrete determinations, and in effect capitulates to the bourgeois view in which the categories of capital are de-historicized, rendered eternal. The alternative, best represented among van der Linden's corps of capitalism theorists by Tony Cliff and Charles Bettleheim, is to try to hold onto comprehensive Marxist categories of capital and class, and read those categories into Soviet reality. So if there is to be a Soviet bourgeoisie, it must be shown to be engaged in elemental (unregulated) competition. Where is this competition to be found? In the arms race (Cliff); this is almost too far-fetched to warrant serious consideration. In an interpretation of the Soviet enterprise as an individual unit of capital (Bettleheim); but this, as van der Linden notes, flies in the face of reality, since enterprises in the USSR were clearly part of a hierarchical planning process in which crucial decision elements (over prices, wage rates, assortment of output) were not under their individual control. van der Linden concludes: ". . . not a single theory of state capitalism succeeded in being both orthodox Marxist as well as consistent with the facts" (313). The ‘State Capitalist’ and ‘Bureaucratic-Exploitative’ Interpretations of the Soviet Social Formation: A Critique By David Laibman The Structure of Soviet Socialism: Recent Western Theoretical Approaches David Lane 1984 The Western Left, the Soviet Union, and Marxism review essay By David Laibman Science & Society 2009
@Yingele3 ай бұрын
Bougie stuff man
@descieuxx3 ай бұрын
Baizuo garbage.
@masteroftheboomiverse82283 ай бұрын
Where can I get the source text?
@auxiliarystatements3 ай бұрын
libcom.org/article/ll-men-two-texts-defining-communist-programme there ye go
@MrxstGrssmnstMttckstPhlNelThot3 ай бұрын
Oh more LL Men, Hell yeah.
@cash_burner3 ай бұрын
Every “socialist” country maintained wage labor, commodity production, and capital as a social relation
@smo-king65043 ай бұрын
No don't you get it we are just taking care of the Workers Capital, while giving them their fair share and reinvesting the rest into bigger projects for them so they don't have to hassle with them and taxes are included!!! Wdym we just vertically integrated the capital into the government and created a burgeois bureaucrat class?
@tomislavpuklin16763 ай бұрын
Angloid brain rot devoid of dialectical thinking. Every process reduced to a binary form. You do not understand, and have probably never read Marx either. Your thinking is that everything is or is not, whilst to Marx and Marxists, everything is in a state of becoming. Everything, everywhere is always happening. Nothing is. You are stuck in an anglobox.
@jcrios19173 ай бұрын
@cash_burner Western Marxism and the Soviet Union: A Survey of Critical Theories and Debates Since 1917 by Marcel van der Linden 2007
@jcrios19173 ай бұрын
@@smo-king6504 Chapter 8 of Western Marxism and the Soviet Union, "In Lieu of a Conclusion," The notion that the Soviet Union was capitalist, in van der Linden's view, rests on superficial understandings of Marx's theory, in which capitalism "constituted a unity of several 'moments" (311). So one can, if one likes, single out the form "wage labor," make the "observation" that that form obtained in the Soviet Union, and conclude, from this superficial correlation, that the USSR was "capitalist," ignoring the equally important moment of commodity and competition. van der Linden pointedly - quotes Marx's view of commodity production as "general prerequisite of the capitalist mode of production" and "the generalization of commodity production ... by capitals". Capitalism, in Marx's theory, has rich specificity, multiple determinations. Some capitalism theorists (e.g., Resnick and Wolff) remove that richness from the theory and go in the opposite direction. They treat "capital" as a disembodied force that floats above its arbitrary historical guises of private vs. state property, the commodity form of wage labor or its absence, and market vs. planning. This view also ignores the capitalist character of the technology, and political and legal institutions that guarantee the reproduction of the entire ensemble of capitalist social relations. It amounts to an essentialism that separates capital's essence from its concrete determinations, and in effect capitulates to the bourgeois view in which the categories of capital are de-historicized, rendered eternal. The alternative, best represented among van der Linden's corps of capitalism theorists by Tony Cliff and Charles Bettleheim, is to try to hold onto comprehensive Marxist categories of capital and class, and read those categories into Soviet reality. So if there is to be a Soviet bourgeoisie, it must be shown to be engaged in elemental (unregulated) competition. Where is this competition to be found? In the arms race (Cliff); this is almost too far-fetched to warrant serious consideration. In an interpretation of the Soviet enterprise as an individual unit of capital (Bettleheim); but this, as van der Linden notes, flies in the face of reality, since enterprises in the USSR were clearly part of a hierarchical planning process in which crucial decision elements (over prices, wage rates, assortment of output) were not under their individual control. van der Linden concludes: ". . . not a single theory of state capitalism succeeded in being both orthodox Marxist as well as consistent with the facts" (313). The ‘State Capitalist’ and ‘Bureaucratic-Exploitative’ Interpretations of the Soviet Social Formation: A Critique By David Laibman The Structure of Soviet Socialism: Recent Western Theoretical Approaches David Lane 1984 The Western Left, the Soviet Union, and Marxism review essay By David Laibman Science & Society 2009
@jcrios19173 ай бұрын
In his 1940 essay ‘State Capitalism or Totalitarian State Economy’, which played a decisive role in the discussion, Hilferding stressed that in contemporary totalitarian states, state planning replaced self-regulating market mechanisms, use-value was produced in lieu of exchange-value, the primacy of politics toppled the primacy of the economy and the power motive took precedence over the profit motive: A state economy, however, eliminates precisely the autonomy of economic laws. It represents not a market but a centrally administered economy. It is no longer price, but rather a state planning commission that now determines what is produced and how. Formally, prices and wages still exist, but their function is no longer the same; they no longer determine the process of production which is now controlled by a central power that fixes prices and wages. (Hilferding, 1962[1940]: 334) Rudolf Hilferding regarded state capitalist theories as conceptually incoherent, because - he argued - the law of value presupposed market competition among private enterprises. If the allocation of resources was performed by a state dictatorship, there was no capitalism at all. - “State Capitalism or Totalitarian State Economy". The Modern Review, June 1947. In his book on Bolshevism in 1930, Karl Kautsky no longer called the USSR capitalist, and three years later he states specifically that "of course, capitalism has been destroyed." (1933, p.207). By this time he takes the view that Soviet society involved a new kind of despotic "state economy." The regularity observable in the functioning of the capitalist economy Marx has called the "law of value." In his lucid exposition of Marxian economics Paul M. Sweezy explains very clearly the meaning of this term: ". . what Marx called 'the law of value' summarizes those forces at work in a commodity producing society which regulate (a) the exchange ratios among commodities, (b) the quantity of each produced, and (c) the allocation of the labor force to the various branches of production. The basic condition for the existence of a law of value is a society of private producers who satisfy their needs by mutual exchange." Now clearly this basic condition for the operation of the "law of value" does not exist in the Soviet Union. The Russian society is anything but "a society of private producers who satisfy their needs by mutual exchange." The exchange ratios among commodities' are "set by the state." "The setting of prices takes into account the tasks of socialist accumulation as well as the task of raising the standard of living and the cultural level of the toiling masses. The social costs of production serve as the starting point in the setting of prices" (p 523). What relation do prices established in such a fashion bear to the "exchange values" in a capitalist economy, which in Marx's theory are determined by the socially necessary quantities of labor required for the production of a given commodity, and by the process of equalization of the rates of profit? It is equally obvious that the quantities of individual commodities produced in Russia are not determined by the operation of the "law of value" or, what is the same, by autonomous decisions of independent, competing producers catering to a market in order to earn a profit. As the authors of the article themselves state (p. 524), the state's national economic plan directs strictly what quantities, qualities and types of commodities are produced. Nor does the economic plan attempt to gauge what allocation of resources would have resulted from the free working of the "law of value." ". . . The Soviet State broke the law of capitalism-the law of average rate of profit ... and was thus able to create a heavy industry which at first was running at a loss or at least did not yield a profit." "If this country had had a bourgeois system [governed by the "law of value"] instead of a Soviet system, we still would be without a backbone of any heavy industry" (p. 526). The allocation of the labor force, finally, is certainly not subject to the operation of the "law of value." How indeed could it be, all productive resources being controlled and apportioned among different uses by the central planning authority? And how could the "law of value" determine wages which are the main mechanism of allocation of the labor forces since the most important condition for its functioning-an industrial reserve army assuring that the price of labor power oscillates around the value of labor power' -is lacking in the Soviet Union? To quote Dr. Sweezy: "in so far as the allocation of productive activity is brought under conscious control, the law of value loses its relevance and importance; its place is taken by the principle of planning.... Value and planning are as much opposed, and for the same reasons, as capitalism and socialism."' New Trends in Russian Economic Thinking? Paul A. Baran The American Economic Review, 1944 Sweezy (1971), agrees that the Soviet Union and China are neither socialist or capitalist, but are best understood as transitional forms between socialism and capitalism. Mandel (1978) agrees with this and terms these countries "bureaucratized workers' states" which "while no longer marked by generalized commodity production, they are still characterized by partial commodity production. While no longer under the domination of the law of value, they cannot yet completely escape the effects of that law" (1978: 148). Marxist Economic Theory Volume II by Ernest Mandel 1968 pp.548-593
@chromiumbook-marx44173 ай бұрын
I can't stop hearing "ass pay day", bruh
@jesusvergara43884 ай бұрын
This was really, really good. Loved it! I can't wait for the next part!!!! For other occult Moore readings there is an essay he wrote called Fossil Angels floating around on the internet about magick and the occult. There is a comic by him as well called Promethea, which is really cool and is all about Western occultism within Moore's framework. Neither go into his eternalism perspective, but IMHO you can see a somewhat evolution about that idea. I'm waiting for his new book on magic to see if this idea has evolved even more. Thanks for the video. Again, great work! Looking up for part 3!
@auxiliarystatements4 ай бұрын
Thanks so much! Will check it out. Part three is kicking my ass haha it's taking forever, but halfway done with it now. Hopefully soon! Just so much to get through with it
@lexw534 ай бұрын
Tony Pancakes time!
@forevern2dust4 ай бұрын
hell yeah
@auxiliarystatements4 ай бұрын
From user @fr3nkly who was unable to post these - really useful comments! This whole thing taking place in the 10 minutes of Michael being rushed to the hospital is a thing i hope gets the inception Picture-in-picture treatment. re: moore and eternalism. this was good www.reddit.com/r/AlanMoore/comments/f3f9nv/hermeticism_and_eternalism_two_of_moores_central/? re: The Jewelry during the flight when sam and michael are on their way out of the attics, they see the 'tanks' below play out like film reel. continuous like the cascading cards when you win solitaire, or when your computer crashes and you can drag the window. ill change it when i find the link for the original, for the moment extrapolate from these: www.threads.net/@fritzh8u/post/C0ngiTTun9v instagram.com/reel/C0OwzB4OQeV/ www.reddit.com/r/AlanMoore/comments/194d5vi/perhaps_jerusalem_readers_will_appreciate_this/?share_id=8mPKs4if50XpGs2uOBS9J& 15:32 - Just wait till you get to Round the Bend :) 17:20 - Phyliss losing patience with Michael over the course of that segment. 19:20 - all of mixed up sam o'day's segments in the book are great. when he describes the devils state of being is wonderfully capped off in the first chapter of book 3. 21:30 - protection from "knowing the true name of a thing gives you power over it" while simultaneously being technically honest. 22:18 - literally and figuratively being taken for a ride lol 24:00 - during [ATLANTIS] when Benedict's asks for whom the bell tolls lol 24:51 - During an acid trip iirc. The painting ends up being kind of like the floor tiles in the works, where the pattern is repeated over and over. 26:12 - [ASBOS OF DESIRE] "I’ll tell you, hell for me would just be being stuck in Bath Street here forever, and he’d said, Precisely, and that really fucking freaked her out." Marla's scrapbooking ends up being prophetic. 27:12 - the numerology of digital roots. Tori are dangerous. 28:48 - Like a library or a liminal space. I like to think that you could pop in and out of your life from time to time across the linger. After doing that a bajillion times perhaps the only thing left is [Te wysh folm updint]. As to the demographics of Mansoul, [THE TREES DON’T NEED TO KNOW] has some insight into that. 31:02 - Its us. 33:33 - their arrangement and humors are elaborated during [CLOUDS UNFOLD] 36:39 - Im inclined to agree. I wish the map on the inside cover was more flushed out as to street names, would make it easier to follow the characters around. Linton's Annotation had street maps on some of the chapters. 40:46 - the rest of us, vernals, death mongers, saints (like doderidge), builders, master builders, frit burr. As to saints though, the ending of [THE STEPS OF ALL SAINTS] suggests that all of us are in that category. I think its another level of acceptance. They think saints are above them because they cant accept that they are saints themselves. 42:09 - the two-dimensional reality of Sam's appearance was really cool. *"Perhaps because it had a bull’s head and a ram’s, she found herself reminded of the toy farm animals she’d played with as a little girl. These had been lovely painted illustrations of fat roosters, pigs and cows, printed on shiny paper and then glued to sheets of wood cut to the right shape with a jigsaw. Standing on their slotted wooden bases, they’d been absolutely realistic if you only looked at them side-on. You barely had to change the angle of your view, though, and they’d start to flatten out and look all wrong. " 45:00 - pretty sweet, huh? The idealized version of yourself. Cuts both ways. 46:29 - Much more apparent on the second time round. 47:12 - Tracers while tripping that stick around a little bit longer. Very cool imagery { kzbin.info/www/bejne/h3vIqqZ5ZpyDr6s } is more like a trip, while #1 in that video is how i pictured the tracers in the book. Especially after the description in [ROUGH SLEEPERS] when freddy sees the trilliards game, the Pidgeon comparison. 57:33 - given his meandering, i initially thought that the vernal at the corner was going to the product of one of Snowy's extramarital affairs. Was very pleased with the surprise. 1:00:08 - I really enjoyed [Flatland] the humour in the horror is very well done. The 'faeries' in the corners of Doddridge church was eerie. The end puts me in tears every time I've read it. 1:06:00 - The earwig bit is a fun callback to the end of [UPSTAIRS]. munch, munch, munch... creep, creep, creep. 1:09:29 - And just like that From Hell hops on the TBR. 1:12:30 - Pattsy too i think. 1:17:13 - Mighty's response to Uriel's shot (“Uoricyelnt.”) precipitates Uriel's challenge. The gang burrows up to see this after watching the fight between the Master Builders at the Mayorhold. The chronology of Jerusalem is tangled up. 1:18:43 - And then, suddenly, Cromwell. 1:19:30 - His holy burning glory. 1:21:18 - The walking fireball. John's musing on that in the following chapter I believe point us in the right direction. Its all determined. Everything good or bad all has its place in the tapestry. The same rules get the good kids upstairs. The moral unease we have regarding suicide bombers or any other perceived evil is a consequence of our attachment to this world, a need for Justice. But justice isn't here; Justice is above the street. 1:25:20 - I like the idea that Phyllis digging straight up to John's hobby is her way of soothing him but who knows. 1:25:20 - "Now Snowy noticed that a later branch, the next to last, was also cut short some few decades sooner than his girl-child’s own demise, and wondered if these losses might account for the deep melancholic colouration he could make out at the human tunnel’s furthest end." I think this is the earliest clue about John. 1:32:45 - them calling it 'The twenty-fives' was confusing. Echoed from earlier with Michael not recognizing a digital clock, this time seeing the sardine can thing that Kaph is talking into. 1:33:50 - I read it as climate change. Hints later the J.G.Ballard reference in [CLOUDS UNFOLD] and weather references later in [EATING FLOWERS]. 1:37:48 - I like to think that the picture in [CHOKING ON A TUNE] is Jack. "There was a third picture also, of another man, but Mick had never bothered asking who it was and nobody had ever bothered telling him. Instead, he called to mind the face of the anonymous chap in the picture as a stand-in if somebody mentioned a dead relative he hadn’t known. One week the man might be Gran’s brother, Uncle Cecil, and the next he could be Cousin Bernard, drowned during the war whilst trying to rescue others from a sinking battleship."
@HeyThereDude00114 ай бұрын
These are awesome, thank you so much! I’m excited for Part III
@auxiliarystatements4 ай бұрын
@@HeyThereDude0011 cheers! Working on it now - taking much longer than expected!
@elisabethstabel20825 ай бұрын
I really enjoyed the content. But its difficult to focus on it if you laugh all the time. I enjoy sarcasm, but the frequency is a bit disturbing and makes it hard to concentrate
@alokdas62725 ай бұрын
Hello sir I'm a student of Political science can you help me to understand some concepts.
@pedroalvarez7135 ай бұрын
At 24:11 u guys are mirroring the way christians talk about the imminent apocalypse lol. Great ep btw, u guys should do even more council communism stuff
@32kuba325 ай бұрын
fun video you guys ! do you perhaps know any other books or essays covering similar topics (escapism under capitalism, "inherent" problems of fiction media, etc)? im writing an essay on escapism (and making art, specifically games, that have a real tangible maybe radicalizing effect on recipients) right now and just found out about michael moorcock and your video was the first that popped up. Ill def look into his 2 essays and probably read up on marx theory of alienation but other than that im kind of lost in all the pro-escapism essays on the internet, thanks! :3
@josephanthony28656 ай бұрын
Just finishing up the last 20 pages of this million+ word behemoth. Yer analysis is superlative and indispensable to bring an enduring coherence to this epic marvel of storytelling. What a ride! Looking forward to yer thoughts on book 3. Totes!
@auxiliarystatements6 ай бұрын
@@josephanthony2865 it’s absolute madness - just finished last week. Hope will have the final ep done soon!
@astrophela6 ай бұрын
Begins at 26:02
@MYTAccount6 ай бұрын
I wonder why haven't you made any content about Palestine after nine months of genocide against Palestinians.
@MYTAccount6 ай бұрын
Thank you for saying it out loud, that how stupid McNamara was. So tired of hearing people calling him "an IBM computer with legs" for his intelligence!!!! While the only similarity between him and a computer might be lack of humane intelligence and vision.
@AcidCommunistAachen6 ай бұрын
Too bad this didn't touch on viability as a concept. A clock is also a system, but a *viable* system can respond to its environment, usually trying to maintain some kind of homeostasis. Also, many viable systems are autopoietic systems, i.e. they reproduce themselves.
@Kilroy3226 ай бұрын
I think your definition of a state as "An administrative structure that helps reproduce the social relations of a mode of production" is probably better than the traditional Marxist one, which often twists people into knots over how an advanced communist society would work.
@auxiliarystatements6 ай бұрын
Yeah it's something worth considering for sure. It certainly can be used as an excuse for why there should be coercion in communism otherwise.
@paulussturm65726 ай бұрын
Great podcast and a critically important topic
@AlienPsychoPacifist6 ай бұрын
I found your channel through this interview (still the best Jason Moore video around so congrats), started over from episode 1, and now back up to 85...
@AlienPsychoPacifist6 ай бұрын
Thanks for covering this topic, been meaning to explore it for a while
@joeyrufo6 ай бұрын
38:43 I'm totally into scientific socialism. But I also think a necessary part of scientific socialism is "free your mind, and the rest will follow"! That'll give you the tools you need so that even if you don't live in socialism, for now, you'll at least be able to build/grow pockets of socialism in your own environment! And then you can link these to other people's "pockets." hey, could be a start! 🫣
@joeyrufo6 ай бұрын
18:04 hey! I'm a member of the masses! All members of the masses can be AN expert in A field! There's room for all!