Understood, there are two electrons.

we find no positron doesn’t mean they are no exist

BECAUSE NOBODY EVER SAW ONE.

Very interesting channel, could you also do this for chemistry? I would appreciate it a lot.

Because space is a media with consistent qualities throughout. Eo. Uo.

The universe doesn't contain only electron and photons, it also has nucleons. So what about inverse beta decay aka positron capture? What if all those missing positrons just turned a bunch of neutrons into protons? We have about the number of these as electrons. Somehow, the nature would have to preffer to only keep positive nucleii and negative leptons, some kind of broken symmetry that would explain the lack of antiatoms.

How do you know theres more matter than antimatter? If the universe is infintiely big, then all you know is that the OBSERVABLE universe is mostly matter. Of course for lfie to exist we have to live somehwere with almost exclusively one or the other, because all other places would be unstable, wipe itsekf out of existence, or be bombarded by gamma rays

But….but…. It’s so much cooler if it’s 1 time traveling electron! :p

Perhaps all the matter and energy in the universe is actually borrowed - creating a cosmological debt. There is this terrible abyss of negative energy and matter waiting to be paid off. And pah-pah - all things suddenly and without warning disappear! I have a lot of crazy ideas, but someone else probably already thought about it and possibly proved it to be false. :V

Are titles on ATLAS and CMS plots swapped? It seems like the CMS plot matches the ATLAS plot on CERN website.

What if the One Piece is the Electron?

then it would be the "entire universe"

This guy is an idiot.

what is the music that starts at 1:15?

the theory does not say that the electron travels back in time midway between the begining and ending of univers. the theroy takes in account the moment of creation after bigbang and its complete path till the end, where it is funneled back to the moment of creation again. so any point in the "world line" you meassure the electric charge for us it will be constant relative to the number of electrones are there, becouse we happen to live in this world line. BTW i came here with hopes to entertain myself and got realy disapointed at your cheap take on this matter.

Yeah I mean it still isn’t something we can scientifically prove or disprove. Even if we decide this ideas is useless and we find another way of solving our problem, you wouldn’t actually be able to prove that it isn’t all one electron existing outside of our current Understanding of time. One moment would become infinity and the moment electrons started about 10 seconds after the Big Bang, would be enough time for a single electron to replicate itself unto infinity, or till a another force steered it in a different direction. Also, wouldn’t explain quantum entanglement? It could possibly. Hard to say, impossible to know, lovely to think about. Fucking sick all praise the omnipresent electron god

Thanks for your interesting video. Area under a curve is often equivalent to energy. Buckling of an otherwise flat field shows a very rapid growth of this area to a point. If my model applies, it may show how the universe’s energy naturally developed from the inherent behavior of fields. Your subscribers might want to see this 1:29 minutes video showing under the right conditions, the quantization of a field is easily produced. The ground state energy is induced via Euler’s contain column analysis. Containing the column must come in to play before over buckling, or the effect will not work. The sheet of elastic material “system”response in a quantized manor when force is applied in the perpendicular direction. Bonding at the points of highest probabilities and maximum duration( ie peeks and troughs) of the fields “sheet” produced a stable structure when the undulations are bonded to a flat sheet that is placed above and below the core material. Some say this model is no different than plucking guitar strings. You can not make structures with vibrating guitar strings or harmonic oscillators. kzbin.info/www/bejne/raOlpKSfepWpfZYsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3 At this time in my research, I have been trying to describe the “U” shape formed that is produced before phase change. In the model, “U” shape waves are produced as the loading increases and just before the wave-like function shifts to the next higher energy level. Over-lapping all frequencies together using Fournier Transforms, can produce a “U” shape or square wave form. Wondering if Feynman Path Integrals for all possible wave functions could be applicable here too? If this model has merit, seeing the sawtooth load verse deflection graph produced could give some real insight in what happened during the quantum jumps between energy levels. The mechanical description and white paper that goes with the video can be found on my LinkedIn and KZbin pages. You can reproduce my results using a sheet of Mylar* ( the clear plastic found in some school essay folders. Seeing it first hand is worth the effort!

DUDE WHAT IF THE POSITRONS ARE ALL SOMEHOW HIDDEN INSIDE THE PROTONS? No, I did not come up with this idea. How can you not read the entirety of the conversation between Wheeler and Feynman before writing, animating and editing a 9-minute video? Too much output with insufficient input from your brain

The problem with the imbalance of matter and antimatter debunk is that we only observe much less antimatter in comparison to matter... however, the observable universe is much, much less than the entire universe, over the period where humans have been observing it. It is hubris to say that the Observable Universe is a truly accurate representation of the entire universe... any more than the Milky Way galaxy is a truly accurate representation of the entire universe. There are not nearly as many stars per cubic parsec between the Milky Way and Andromeda as there are within either of those galaxies themselves. The undeniable truth is that we DO NOT KNOW how much antimatter there is in the universe, because we have never and can never observe the entire universe... not even a quarter of it, and statistics is not a good tool for declaring something impossible.

Before the thing even starts, it's a whole minute devoted to a painful little routine, torturing one lame gag... That's probably a habit to avoid if you value engagement and views.

Breaking News! James Webb has done it again it has proved there is only 1 electron. Don't ask how, if James says so it is so. 😂 ❤&✌️

But even if all electrons share the same quantum field and therefore have the same basic properties they don’t share the same location in spacetime. So they are different entities after all, aren’t they?

Except it has nothing to do with time travel. A one electron universe means that particle is traveling so fast that it appears to be traveling forward and backwards in time. There is no sure method of knowing how much anti matter there is in our known Universe, especially when they've just discovered our known Universe is much bigger than originally thought to be. Also, one electron universe is quite literally the only explanation for spooky action at a distance !

zhina

3:04/9:13 Just how can thee be JUST ONE ELECTRON? Very SIMPLE: The BIG BANG simultaneously CLONED the One and Only ELECTRON into its own Infinite Set, that from the Frame of Referance of HOMO SAPIENS (Or HOMO STUPID-Iens) these Electron Clones got recognized as separate Identities!

Maybe the theory isnt well known, your audience is just too niche in itself

2:00 welll, electrons have different energies(one almost at the event horizon of a black hole has less gravitational potential energy then one electron 1000 km away). E=mc^2, so electrons have different masses. Explain.

Spoiler: we don’t know

so you are right and everybody else is idiots. we get it.

Excellent Excellent Excellent. After listening to hundreds of other videos, this is the only one that has helped me further understand the concept of wave particle duality. I have subscribed to your channel and look forward to listening to your other videos.

The electron must have infinite speed for work and go back in time as positron 😊 but its an Stupid funny idea😊

You know, like other physicists, nothing about what an electron actually is! No body under stands what is happening in double slit experiment well yet.

What if all positrons are located in the unobservable part of our universe which already expanded beyond our detection?

What if the lines extend infinitely to the past and the future?

So what your saying is, the only evidence it isn't is because we can't see the same amount of antimatter?? Hmm... i dunno, maybe there is an equal amount and we can't observe it...

5:45 I always have bunch of questions for every double slit experiment explanation, like why do we not "observe" our kids in the same way we "observe" electrons, that would mean you take one of your kids and throw it really hard at rough direction of the other kid and then you see where and how far they bounce off so you conclude that your kids do not have precise position if you "measure" it. But disregard all that, explain who and how decides when exactly and where precisely the electron becomes a wave, asking because we claim we are firing one electron at the time from our electron gun, that means we are sure in the moment of firing it, electron is a particle, so it becomes a wave apparently somewhere and sometime after we fire it from the gun? At the end let go the explanation of what happens later at the slits, at the screen, in between,..... tell me when and where does electron become a wave, because it seems we do know precisely where and when it is a particle? If we do not know that than how can we claim we are firing one electron? Are we really?

Yeah, but then there's always that ONE electron who thinks the laws don't apply to him and is the black sheep of the family.

fun fact, antimatter is the most expensive thing in the world.

we DO know that antimatter mass doesn't flip, because if it did, it wouldn't produce any energy since antimass means antienergy so the total net energy would be zero

another fact that would disagree with one electron universe is that electrons don't all have same spins, they can be in spin +1/2 or spin -1/2 and if you placed them in magnetic field they can either be in high energy state or low energy state, so if all electrons are one electron, that would constantly for no reason at all switching its spin, and that would violate conservation of energy law.

This resesrch is obsolete already

Hear me out. What if it's 2 electrons instead?

I don't understand, doesn't uncertainty mean the electron can have any mass at all?

Aren't all protons the same too?

Absolutely beautiful content!! Thanks dude!

Nice and clear explanation. Einstein described Quantum as "Spooky". Yes, I am waiting for Another "Einstein" to tell us WHY this Spookiness is due to this and that and therefore nothing mystery to it! Hooray. Oops, remember to award a Nobel price to HIM, the last time, no Nobel Price for Einstein theory on SR or GR.

but what if half±1 of the electrons we're observing are actually positrons but due to quantum dynamics we can't tell unless measured?

Very clear to understand Thanks

I love your videos cuz they give out qualitative knowledge basically without any math even tho thats not what physics is but I cant help it but be obsessed

Just wrote a whole physics report for school on the conclusiveness of the CMS and ATLAS Higgs Boson data and this video saved me hours of understand the statistical analysis. Thankyou very much.