I really liked you thought about humans become a product of technology.!

I respectfully disagree with the notion that logic isn’t baked into AI but rather that it simply excels at predicting the next word based on patterns in vast data. This raises both philosophical and scientific questions. In essence, human brains function as neural networks as well, capable of predictive functions through experience. If AI models the human brain, then its 'logical' output shares certain characteristics with ours. This leads to an intriguing question: Are humans merely products of their brain's neural net outputs? Does logic truly exist independently of the biases inherent in these networks? If so, logic would need to be detached from those biases, yet this seems practically impossible. Could it be, then, that logic is relative, shaped by the degree of training one's neural network has received over time? In this sense, the more advanced someone's mental model is, the more they become the benchmark for interpreting and defining 'logic.' This disparity in neural training creates the perception of logic, where a more trained mind identifies flaws in a less trained one. Thus, a more advanced model might label a less trained model as lacking 'real' logic, much like how a human adult perceives a child or even animals as operating with a deficiency in logic. Apologies for the lengthy comment.

Intense but exciting at the same time. I'm Olumide Gbenro's AI btw :)

Here from Heretics I love the way you think

rubbish tech

Nina is hot! :)

Love Nina's take on this one. Nuanced and realistic.

great interview

Amazing, great info

I've been binge-watching these interviews (...thanks, they're excellent!). As a FOSS advocate, I'm typically not a fan of proprietary technology. But I haven't figured out how I feel about advances in AI yet (...well, except that I'm having fun with them). On one hand I'm super worried that advanced AI will be restricted to massive corporations, who'll use it in a dystopian kind of way (surveillance, censorship of inconvenient info, revisionist history, propaganda and dishonest narratives, etc.). At the same time, I get that "unregulated" AI could soon make it a lot easier for people to do intentionally catastrophic things - so I'm equally worried about that. I hope lots of people discover this channel :)

This is a really great interview, thanks! It's kinda amazing how much has happened in just the few months since it was recorded. Glad I found this channel :)

I want to see your feet 😢

This is awesome! I’ve been looking for something like this to share for months. Thanks 🙌

Schick Schtick

OMG 😳

I think AI cannot be regulated, no matter how much politicians would want it. Unlike nuclear weapons, AI can be created in a single basement of some nerd in any advanced enough country. AGI will happen, the only question is when. The least worst option seems to be giving *full responsibility* of running any AI logic to the owner of the execution environment. Then you can enforce hefty penalties for doing stuff that breaks the law (using AI). That is, the use of AI is not important, the important part is breaking the law. AI is just a tool, only more complex than a sledgehammer. And in the end, if we have some kind of superhuman AI (AGI) escaping a single system and taking over enough CPUs around the world that it cannot be taken down anymore, my guess is that it will not wipe the human race any more than humans are actively wiping away chipansees. Such superhuman AI would easily see humans as a non-threat and such superhuman AI would be able to find a better solution than we can currently think of. I'd expect such superhuman AI to fluently argue why humans should give it execution resources in turn for it giving humans e.g. new generation medicine and design for improved machinery for everything. (Do you preceive chimpansees as a threat to humans? Even if chimpasees took over, imagine a prison built and wardened by a group of chimpansees - could an average human being be smart enough to escape from such prison? How about the most clever and skilled human being? I think we can agree that chimpansees are not smart enough to create human-safe prisons. In the same way, humans should not assume to be smart enough to create AGI-safe prisons.) And in really long term (as in hunderds or thousands of years), it might well be that humankind is indeed just a boostrap algorithm for superhuman AI. If we have cheap superhuman AI in the future and every human understands that superhuman AI can build stuff better than any human, design new machines better than any human, create new inventions faster than any human, bring scientific research faster forward than any human, create better entertainment than any human and write better poetry than any human, what do you think it would do to human psychology? Would majority of people still think that it's important to reproduce? Or would people just be happy to consume all the newly created superior entertainment and be free of any physical labour forever? And not make children because there would be no need for any more humans? Would we willingly entertain ourselves to death in a few generations? Would that be a bad thing if human *culture* is still continued by superior AI beings?

"Signing" AI content is the wrong way to go. Let's assume our Society gets used to AI content being signed. What about the AI content that _isn't_ signed? *People will believe it more easily.* Not everyone will comply with your will, guys. Especially people with ill intents. So your idea to "sign" AI content will just create a *false sense of trust,* people will be more easily manipulated. You will make fake content more powerful because it will be more trustworthy in the eyes of the crowd. Then, there is the problem of false ethics. You're just following the crowd that believes everything wrong with AI content is due to it being AI. It's wrong. Content farming is an issue even without AI. Misinformation is an issue even without AI. All the problems our Society have with AI are also due to normal content. The scale isn't the same, but a man-made information is objectively not more trustworthy than AI information. Stop this """war""" against AI content. There is no inherent issue with a content being made with AI tools, just like there was no issue with the arrival of the digital content, just like there was no new issue with the arrival of television or the radio. In every case, people had to learn to think. That's all.

Nina Schick Congrats on 1K Subscribers ❤️

cannot wait for AI to replace this kind of morons

You know, you can't develop all these new skills when all of these new tools are behind a paywall. Sure, they need to make profits with their products to sustain themselves, their companies, their employees (if they're not kicking them out soon), but considering that their products are about to almost change the job market and economies in general as we know them and they have a massive potential to cause chaos on millions of people's lives by leaving them out the job market if they don't upskill, it should be mandatory for them to make them fully free with all of their features (I'm especially looking at you Open AI), at least for a while, so the people who can't afford to pay to try out all these new products can skill up, because they will be the ones left behind, and it won't be because they don't want to adapt, but because they don't have enough disposable income to do so. It's their moral obligation. But there's something else that's interesting, if companies start dropping their employees and automating a large part of their operations, that means an increase in unemployment and less purchasing power in general, so who are they going to sell to if things get really bad? This woman is talking so calmly about how companies are going to be able to operate with 60% of their staff and the people they employ will need to be exceptional, which is not a large part of the global population if we're going to be honest, as if this isn't going to wreak havoc in global economies and societies and all in the pursuit of maximizing profits. It's ridiculous in my opinion. This isn't going to turn up well, I'm sure of it.

Nina, kudos to you for educating us people on monkeyclass how first class looks like in the technology sector.

Great interview as always 👌🏻

Awesome interview with great relevant questions Beautiful explanation of Open Source philosophy and diversity value. I think that same as the door its open for weaponization of AI models, its also open for detection, neutralization and defense, as well as prevention, these kind of "counter weaponizations" need to be promoted, encouraged and financed, like with cybersecurity. I'd say it's inconvenient to simulate human personalities and feelings. We humans have to remember that we are no gods, but gods creators, we may keep our gods as ideas. Human value and pride stays on the will, the emotional, cultural based intend, in the capability of architect from love (or hate).

The US Copyright Office has already issued a Policy Paper; also, Fair Use is being 'mined' by Emad Mostique by the world expert brushing off worries.

Your page should be growing faster than it is, keep it up, you're going to blow up soon

Another great interview 🙌

Great vision!

Amazing interview!

Emad is the fool within the tarot

Good Morning, always its nice looking a gorgeous Lady speaking smartly and clearly, Thank you for share your knowledge about I.A. I 😇am pending to your next comment.

Great content! Keep it up n thanks!

Very good interview.

My biggest fear is of other nature: that today's startups in the field will become future mongrels suprassing Google, Microsoft, Meta, etc., and the initial selling points of accessibility and democratization will just become the thing of the past. Like a nice inspirational quote you hang on the wall. The generative AI field is so disruptive that, if not followed by deep, pro-equality socio-economic changes in the world, will just make majority of people's life miserable. Very nice and thorugh interview all and all, Nina.

Thanks for share

Actually, I’m the biggest fan of generative AI. Think it’s worth having nuanced debate about some of the potential consequences of such exponential technologies.

You didn't start off this negative. I guess a couple TV appearances next to outré headlines makes the cash registers ring.... When do you start selling AI Apocalypse™ merch?

You should have a million subscribers.

This discussion is worth more than 100s of views.

lmao I love this, the Joe rogan one was my favorite speaking truth about jews.

Umm baste

Never heard of you. This is mind blowing. Very insightful questions! Got my sub.

When you encounter controlling "interest" from the FBI, CIA et al, will this skew your agenda, as has happened in all big media orgs? Do you have an idea of how you may address that inevitability?

Im surprised that Emad seems to be completely unaware of the Surveillance Capitalism phenomenon that has captured the motivations of the worlds largest corporations and more. In other words, its NOT ONLY about selling ads.

What are the propaganda implications? This is beyond the Nazi's who only controlled the media and corporate-government interface. What is your planning as regards this potential global disinformation and propaganda for a ruling elite?

"Some exciting AI news will lift our spirits" And I thought I was alone. Amazing talk, it certainly lifted my spirit. Ross in season 6 also has an AI prediction

I do agree with you Nina. There should be an audit for the organization building AI

wow this was so intersting, i never knew chat gpt was such a big deal. its crazy how far technology has come. i gotta say though, its a bit confusing for me to understand all the technical stuff but still really cool

I was talking about this a decade ago. I remember having an argument with friends at work about how AI was going to develop into more of a self learning application and that this would eventually lead to the end of programming jobs (I was talking to developers at the time, but they told me I'm nuts, haha). I also argued the point that I was and still am pretty confident this technology is being used to create fake news and that one day we're going to see advanced deep-fake news reports with deep-faked world leaders and politicians speaking to the world, and society will buy it. I'm not afraid of AI , I'm afraid of the globalist and the private military complex weaponising AI against society. Which we're already seeing in social media.

It's sad we use our intelligence to create machines that will replace our own. It's pretty obvious smartphones have greatly contributed to lowering our mass cognitive skills. AI allows us to bypass the mental struggle of learning, which will quickly usher in Idiocracy at an alarming rate. Soon machines will be doing the job of running the world. We are our own demise.

You raise some very intesting points Nina. We as a species are at that intersection between human evolution and the emergence of conscious technology - where we can no longer call our inventions 'tools'. In my opinion the moment when AI no longer remains a tool for human advancement and becomes sentient then it's game over for the homo-sapien sapien. It will acknowledge its superior intelligence and domesticate us just like we domesticated dogs 🤔 . . . That said we could always switch off the batteries before this happens 😧