21 күн бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@Moving_Metrics 22 күн бұрын
Are you an 😎?
@Moving_Metrics 24 күн бұрын
In your opinion, which country has the most beautiful girls? 🤔
@Stan-jq8jr 29 күн бұрын
Notice that Western media portraits Russia as such a terrible place, yet it is 2nd most migrated to country in the world
@Moving_Metrics 29 күн бұрын
Most of them are prolly from China, but People ≠ Politics/Country Decisions
@stephengrimwood7435 Ай бұрын
This is rubbish in great Britain 7000 a day😮
@Moving_Metrics 29 күн бұрын
They started to register it now, you can notice that the number of migration is higher in previous years. Also Data is up to March/April.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
About Preteens (10-14): kzbin.info/www/bejne/mXfUq4F9qbWBotk Hope you enjoy ❤
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
How often do you fly by plane? 🤔
@Kudretli_maymun31 Ай бұрын
War of Independence?
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Which one? There is a lot War of independence, in the video I included those with the greatest impact/biggest one.
@Kudretli_maymun31 Ай бұрын
Türkiye is everywhere
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Video about GDP per Capita: kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3zXeGlmrtR1a7M 👊
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Is it easier to protect your children these days than it used to be?🤔
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
What country, in your opinion, is the best place to live right now? 🤔
@MrCarlosMoya Ай бұрын
according to this day , one of the best place to live is scandinavian islands [Norway , Sweden , Finland] due to economical stability and geological location , low density and quiet area.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
@MrCarlosMoya Beautiful countries with beautiful views, I was once fishing in Finland, wonderful experience.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
New Video about Net Migration, if you like to watch here's a link: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qInRaGiHn6aWptk
@tynome63 Ай бұрын
Climate change has become a vary complicated interaction of various natural phenomena which "experts" don't actually agree upon. It would appear that nature is still the best to controll and adjjust according to needs and also the interference of man.
@holgernarrog962 Ай бұрын
There is since >30 years the green NGO that promote their dogma of "climate change" with the help of some scientists. On the other hand there are a few scientists that have the bravery to call it a "pseudo scientific nonsense" like the physcist noble price winner J. Clauser. There is a majority of scientists that keep their mouth shut or doesen`t care.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
@tynome63 Agree, but everyone/everything has its limits.
@holgernarrog962 Ай бұрын
There are the green NGO that promote the "climate change" since more than 30 years with some scientists. There are some brave scientist that open their mouth like the physics noble laureate J. Clauser who called it pseudo scientific nonsense. And there are plenty of scientists that better keep their mouth shut.
@MrSensible2 Ай бұрын
Why would anyone have their opinions on climate change swayed by some no-mark numpty that can't spell the most basic of words??
@MrSensible2 Ай бұрын
But experts DO agree on climate change. They have agreed on it for decades. You haul out one contrarian scientist whose sole claim to fame is that he disagrees with everyone else on all things & risk the future of mankind on the rantings of a crackpot! As arguments go, it's pretty pathetic isn't it?
@Chris-op7yt Ай бұрын
it's not people that do the majority of the emissions, it's huge industry. stop making it a personal problem
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Not making it as personal problem, because there are not many people living in the country and industrys you mentioned produce a large amount of co2, the statistics are like this. That's simply the average for co2 per capita, and that's it.
@Chris-op7yt Ай бұрын
@@Moving_Metrics : that's what i thought. to me a per capita specification does that unintentionally. it could have been (arguably better) per GDP dollar ot something more related to industry/economy, but instead it's per person. this does make it a us vs them on a per person basis, when reproductive rate has many factors, and not much to do with policies of a region. anyhow, what you say with graphs is all intentional, as in you construct it, so what people get out of it is on that basis.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
@@Chris-op7yt Comparison to GDP or GDP per capita wouldn't change anything (people and companies together build GDP, and GDP per capita, as the name suggests, is the GDP divided by the number of people in a given country). Separating these statistics individually for institutions and people is practically impossible and would require an unimaginable amount of time (if it were even possible at all). Unfortunately, it can't be done differently, and it is not intended to offend anyone 🥰.
@Chris-op7yt Ай бұрын
@@Moving_Metrics : yeah, well just saying...because the carbon heavy industry thinktanks do put out information that does try to shift the conversation. they talk about footprint and such things, which are all human/person centric.....when the people with most influence over these things are CEOs of a few dozen companies, that dont want to change. i figure it's actually a situation they (companies and governments) want, to be the ones in control of scarce resources that are made necessary for civilization. Having cheap and ubiquitous access to energy by all is not at all what tickles their fancy.
@holgernarrog962 Ай бұрын
@@Moving_Metrics The industry produce the products we need for our life. It`s not producing for itself. It produces cars, construction material for homes, appliances. If you believe in "climate change" you (person) should avoid air travel, motor vehicles, heating ac, elctricity and things made of metal and plastic. Then the industry will not emit any religious CO2 for you!
@Chris-op7yt Ай бұрын
it's not people that do the majority of the emissions, it's huge industry. stop making it a personal problem
@MrSensible2 Ай бұрын
@@Chris-op7yt Simply not true...
@Chris-op7yt Ай бұрын
@@MrSensible2 : not true according to industries that want to make it our problem
@MrSensible2 Ай бұрын
@@Chris-op7yt Sorry but you're not making any sense. This is what happens when you buy into conspiracy theories...
@Chris-op7yt Ай бұрын
@@MrSensible2 : what conspiracy theories would that be? it's established fact that big industry has been spending money on think tanks to push the problem of climate change onto individuals, with receipts and internal memos. before that they were spending money on spreading climate change denial, whilst they had known for decades and did the research with scientists. if this is conspiracy theories to you, then it is obvious which side your bread is buttered, as none of this is remotely controversial and is mundane knowledge. i thought it was an understandable mistake, but you take it to next level
@holgernarrog962 Ай бұрын
The industry produce the products we need for our life. It`s not producing for itself. It produces cars, construction material for homes, appliances. If you believe in "climate change" you (person) should avoid air travel, motor vehicles, heating ac, elctricity and things made of metal and plastic. Then the industry will not emit any religious CO2 for you!
@clausbuhlsrensen602 Ай бұрын
Remarkable, that countries having a warm climate, and thereby the least demand on energy for survival, has the biggest consumption of energy per capita. A UN mandatory decision that air condition and cooling of houses are only to be driven by solar power, would chance the world to the better. - It´s an easy fix, all the technology has been invented, we know the cost. Only problem is that something as simple as using known small scale technology for the single household, is not as sexy as big projects funded by big money, and paid (capitalized) through consumers payment. Let start now. Let us start whit whatever simple and known technology we all ready have.
@MrSensible2 Ай бұрын
When your only natural resource is the vast lake of oil that your country sits upon (eg Saudi, Iran, Iraq) they're always going to make the most of it. They'll extract it, sell it, refine lots of it for export, convert as much of it into chemicals for export & use it to generate power to, amongst other things, run air-con & operate water desalination plants. It's unrealistic to expect them to install wind turbines & solar farms any time soon. The only sway we have over these nations is not to buy their oil & cut down our own consumption. On this, Europe, the US, Japan & China are having some success. Here in the UK, we have halved our CO2 emissions since 1990 & dropped our per capita energy consumption by 30% in the last decade.
@holgernarrog962 Ай бұрын
Why shall they use dirty solar for cooling their homes, offices and cars? Dirty solar produce a valueless electricity according to the coincidences of weather, daytime & season. Most electricity is used in the early evening when solar power is already low. Why not using a grid powered by nuclear, coal and gas? Why not livong such green, woke believes like "climate change" more symbolic?
@kevintessier3760 Ай бұрын
By 2024 almost the entire top 10 of the list is dominated by oil producing countries because the process of extracting and refining oil and natural gas releases lots of CO2. Though it's true that many of the Middle East countries there also use their abundant oil as their primary energy source for everything rather than just transport. The only major oil per capita country missing is Norway, and they're not on the list largely because they have extensive carbon offset programs. Bahrain is a bit of an outlier in this regard, as they don't extract much oil, though they do a lot of refining of oil imported from neighbouring countries instead. Australia and the USA are the main exceptions to that oil rule of thumb in the top 10, as they don't produce that much oil per capita. They both have a lot of work to do regarding de-carbonizing electricity generation and transportation, and Australia in particular has large emissions per capita from their livestock sector.
@holgernarrog962 Ай бұрын
I hope that North America can increase its CO2 footprint again when woke communist politicians like Trudeau, Biden become replaced. Inexpensive energy is prosperity!
@jeffreygroen9191 Ай бұрын
Is Qatar air conditioning the streets or something?
@MrSensible2 Ай бұрын
Qatar has the world's biggest natural gas-to-oil conversion plant. The process 'ejects' a lot of CO2 which probably accounts for their high per capita numbers.
@holgernarrog962 Ай бұрын
@@MrSensible2 They have as well gas liquifidation, aluminium and ammonia production.
@GigaCraft-420 Ай бұрын
They are also a small country, with less than 3 million habitants, that's why they are so high
@rickkwitkoski1976 Ай бұрын
The physically large countries, US, Canada, Australia, Russia... use a lot of fuel for road transportation of goods. None of those have a good railway network. The Gulf oil countries burn fossil fuels for electricity and to desalinate water. What's up with Luxembourg.
@arthurdvs Ай бұрын
no excuses, by your logic, why isnt brasil there for example?
@holgernarrog962 Ай бұрын
Luxemburg was once a big steel producer and exporter with about 400k inhabitants in 2000. Today Europe imports steel from Asia. A lot of the energy intensive industries left the UK and Germany to Asia. This is to keep some prosperity and enjoying the green religion at the same time. Another topic is that the gas and diesel prices are quite low. That`s why poeple fill their cars and trucks in Luxemburg.
@MarkusWitthaut Ай бұрын
Actually, the share of goods transported by rail is in the USA (with 27%) much higher than in the EU (17%). However, the fast majority of transport by rail is on non-electrified tracks. On Luxembourg: They have a small population (around 600k) bur many people working in Luxembourg (almost 50%) live in France, Belgium and Germany.
@sandraslutz9489 Ай бұрын
No one cares. There was a time in Earth's past when the CO2 levels were 1000 times what they are now, and the average temperature was - wait for it - 76 deg. F.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Do you think that such conditions were suitable for life and development?
@ordenax Ай бұрын
Now, do one Per Capita. That would be interesting. And show Europe isnt as Clean as they claim.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
It is done!, here is a link: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z4TOdHSVaa54fJY
@ordenax Ай бұрын
Nuclear is the answer. Its wastes, Barely any. Trust me. And they are easily contained. Modern tech will not allow another Chernobyl. Also, Coal, Oil and Gas, even Wind and Hydro kill more people than Nuclear does per KWH generated.
@ayushagarwal8079 Ай бұрын
Why it starts from 1990? Start it from 1900
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
It's hard to find reliable sources for this data. I'll try to expand it in the future 💪
@camillokusa982 Ай бұрын
Great!
@camillokusa982 Ай бұрын
this is useless as it should be emissions per capita
@ordenax Ай бұрын
Agreed!
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Newest video is about co2 emission per capita, hope you enjoy it ❤️
@chaganlaltiwari Ай бұрын
The countary which do production is doing it for developed countries. So tell developed countries to reduce consumption or put penalty on developed countries it will automatically reduced.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Agreed, but how am I supposed to tell them? They won't listen to me either 😅
@MrSensible2 Ай бұрын
I did an annual energy usage balance for me & wifey, here in the UK... Natural gas: 3,500 kWh Electricity: -300 kWh (solar export) Petrol: 3,000 kWh Jet fuel: 22,000 kWh As someone that considers himself to be green, I was somewhat staggered by just how much CO2 gets emitted by going on holiday a couple of times a year!!
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Yea, transport, especially air transport, burns large amounts of gasoline, which translates into the production of CO2. Can you explain to me what (kWh) value for natural gas, gasoline and jet fuel stand for? Is it a form of equivalent in electricity?
@MrSensible2 Ай бұрын
@@Moving_Metrics Hi. I'm a retired chemical engineer. Translating everything into kWh puts all the different fuels into comparable units of energy. 1 kWh is simply 3,600,000 Joules of energy. I work on... 11kWh per m³ of natural gas 9kWh per litre of gasoline 11.95 kWh per kg of jet kerosene
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
@MrSensible2 Thanks for your reply, explanation and sharing your statistics regarding co2. I hope you spend your retirement in the way you dream ❤️. Regards MM
@BarnicleBill Ай бұрын
Did you devide the jet fuel between all the diffrent passengers? @MrSensible2
@MrSensible2 Ай бұрын
@@BarnicleBill Yes. According to what I found online, a Boeing 777-200 in long-haul mode consumes 2.9 litres of jet kerosene per 100km per seat. I just worked it out from there for wifey & me to do two return trips per year from London to Cape Town. Interestingly the fuel cost of a return trip works out at about £507 per seat which is not too far off the £800 cost of a return economy ticket. TBH, the only reason that most people can afford to fly anywhere is because jet kerosene, unlike virtually every other transportation fuel, is COMPLETELY UNTAXED. Compare that to gasoline. Here in the UK, for every £100 you spend on petrol, £58 pounds goes straight to the Chancellor of the Exchequer.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Do you at least separate your garbage?🤔
@MrSensible2 Ай бұрын
A nice chart but perhaps it's not that relevant in the greater scheme of things. The world's future isn't going to be impacted by what Luxembourg (population 653,000) does however wasteful they are on an individual basis. Also China & India, two of the world's biggest CO2 emitting nations have per capita numbers that are actually quite low, it's just that with a combined population of 2.83 billion (36% of the global total), well that's a lot of CO2! PS - and yes, I do sort my rubbish
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
New video related to this one, but about co2 emission per capita (inspired by you guys, thx for great engagement❤): kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z4TOdHSVaa54fJY
@thespamdance311 Ай бұрын
So, the more people (with a reasonable standard of living), the more emissions. Got it.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Somewhat true, but it all depends on the type of person
@michaeltoma9329 Ай бұрын
China’s pollution by population is lower than the US.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
You're right, interesting observation
@eliadbu Ай бұрын
India population is about as large as China is, but it produces more than 3 times less than China. US is no good in CO2 emissions, but China is not great either.
@antonsmith1497 Ай бұрын
Worth to note, that there ar probably 0 trustfull statistics that got postet by the chinese government.
@JFJ12 Ай бұрын
but China's population is also way too big, thanks to Mao in the fifties and sixties.
@jester5ify Ай бұрын
CO2 is not the problem, more co2 means a greener world. Dumping plastic in to the water systems is what will ultimately kill us.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Agree, that's also part of the problem
@ledlight1487 Ай бұрын
So why are we in the EU getting propagandized about this constantly? 🤔
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
None wants to take responsibility and someone has to start the "movement". I hope that other countries will also start acting.
@romariorosso9502 Ай бұрын
Because lefts - enemies of Europe - will use any excuse to raise hate against honest hard working people, because lefts jealous of their dedication and talents and hate these honest talented European people. Thats why they are raising taxes and letting savages inside - to change population and get votes. But lefts dont understand - Europe is people, without people they all will be gone. Look up Eugene Ponasenkov - he predicted that in 2002.
@ledlight1487 Ай бұрын
@@Moving_Metrics They won't, their economies depend on it, as they aren't only financial/services sectors. Btw, you know it's all a scam, right?)) The CO2 neutrality, etc.? Hint: it's what plants "eat"....
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
@ledlight1487 maybe it's a scam or not, I don't know that much, but the amount of gasoline burned, forests cut down certainly doesn't affect the planet's benefit. I'm not a propagandist, but the average temperature of the planet increases from year to year...
@dominiquecharriere1285 Ай бұрын
It's not about CO2, it's about basic freedom of move. The EU is more and more totalitarian.
@mateuszpomianowski7501 Ай бұрын
EU far left commie state promoting their overlords from China by destroying local production under all those "green policies". Good job ursula I bet you got a nice paycheck for this.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
When money is involved, everything changes...
@gavanwhatever8196 Ай бұрын
Utterly predictable. US creating the majority of the problem only to be overtaken by China because the US moved all their manufacturing to China because there was more profit to be made exploiting chinese labour than exploiting US labour.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Isn't it the transportation (tankers and airplanes) that produces the most CO2? So even if you move it to another country, it would replace it and will be in first place.
@telmomoreira7616 Ай бұрын
China after 2000 be like: *Gas, Gas, Gas!* Meanwhile im like: *chuckles* im in danger.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
😅
@dmor6696 Ай бұрын
breath less
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Copium
@partya11night20 Ай бұрын
Looks like china doesn't give a heck. Until they take carbon reduction seriously there is no hope. Bought seems like the only way.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Sad truth, tankers produce a huge amount of CO2. On the other hand, each of us orders products from China, and how else would they be delivered?
@sargfowler9603 Ай бұрын
Just remember people, your country probably isn't even on the list, yet protestors insist you're part of the problem.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Every country, to a greater or lesser extent, contributes to the production of CO2.
@sargfowler9603 Ай бұрын
@@Moving_Metrics Some more than others it would seem!
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
True
@SPECTORMANZ Ай бұрын
Nuclear
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
What about radioactive waste?
@donmeisner4438 Ай бұрын
@@Moving_Metrics Look at Finland for the answer
@eliadbu Ай бұрын
@@Moving_Metrics it's not that of issue if you safely bury it, if has been safely disposed for decades, and can still be disposed for decades and centuries to come. It's the best watch to reduce emissions, much better than renewable sources.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
@eliadbu Ok, but you have to prepare special barrels for this, space and these "materials" also wear out over the years. Let's assume that we can store such waste infinitely, what if someone blows it up or a leak occurs, unfortunately it can cause a huge disaster.
@eliadbu Ай бұрын
@@Moving_Metrics if they are deep inside the ground no "disaster" will happen. Remember that the same materials were dug out from the ground.
@braddevon1283 Ай бұрын
Get rid of money all together
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
To get rid of money, you first need to have it 🤣
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
What do you think are the most effective policies for reducing CO2 emissions?🤔
@tomaskling2429 Ай бұрын
None. Since CO2 doenst have any negative effects.
@MerlynMusicman Ай бұрын
Build things to last beyond the point of sale or 2 year warranty.
@lullaby218 Ай бұрын
Can we get some information on the cloud seeding that's been going on?
@lullaby218 Ай бұрын
My country still had 2-3 feet high snow until the planes started spraying those weird clouds, then it went down to barely 2-3".
@telmomoreira7616 Ай бұрын
It accounts for over 75 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions what do you mean it "doenst have any negative effects."
@kindred3259 Ай бұрын
all i see over the last 20 years is oil price = productivity lol
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
No job is shameful, every job is a job, but sometimes it looks like this...
@kindred3259 Ай бұрын
@@Moving_Metrics ah bot account ok
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Haha, atleast this "bot" has an pfp ;)
@ayanned Ай бұрын
Trash Content. Do better and site your sources.
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Instead of hating, tell me what could I improve. Maybe I should do an "AI content" like half of the youtube... (sarcasm)
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
What was your first job?
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Wonder if any countries will beat India or china ever again?🤔
@AKSEDUCATION28 Ай бұрын
Maximum viewer think that the niger flag is Indian
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
Would you survive without access to electricity? 🤔
@moodlethenoodle Ай бұрын
whoever replies after this is gay
@Moving_Metrics Ай бұрын
@@moodlethenoodle 😑
@Moving_Metrics 2 ай бұрын
Do you prefer to give or receive money? 😅