Mag aquired sana ang sandatahan pilipinas ng karagdagan cyclone class kahit tatlo units ,
@jeffstrong458020 сағат бұрын
Thai Gripen is older version while Philippines FA50 is newer version with new sensors and radar likely have better fire control systems. S Korea is known to have one of the best fire control systems in the world leading electronics. Recent dog fights between Thai Gripen and Philippines FA50 in Pitch Black war exercise prove that FA50 can shoot down other bigger opponents with right pilots.
@djilymbacke969022 сағат бұрын
Presque la copie du mmp français
@tyme5837Күн бұрын
in wwii, the germans had something similar but it is a towed variant
@hardyanpajero69Күн бұрын
👍😎🍺🍩🪖
@koa818Күн бұрын
Very nice 0:14 ❤👍💪💪💪
@p.n75243 күн бұрын
Looks like joke
@hardyanpajero694 күн бұрын
👍😎🍺🍩🪖,,
@jorgeestrada57134 күн бұрын
12 +3 = 15. Where is the 16th. Frigate?
@khaledselim81304 күн бұрын
Trash can
@ibrahemmansour84142 күн бұрын
و مع ذلك مزقتكم أنتم و من خلفكم
@khaledselim81302 күн бұрын
@@ibrahemmansour8414 مزق مين ياجحش انت؟؟ هههههه هذه عربة لنقل الجنود بدأت تستخدم منذ اواخر الثمانينات وحاليا وظيفتها شبه الوحيدة هى "مكافحة الشغب" هههههههه لاتصلح لاستخدام الجيوش من الاساس الحس والعق البيادة حلو يا ك,,,ل,,ب العساكر
@jamessandfield45924 күн бұрын
🙂🙂👍
@user-ch5zy3xd6u4 күн бұрын
the pronunciation is so terrible, the AI voice is much better than this junk
@rodjdhazlee4 күн бұрын
Copy from israeli spike nlos missile😂😂😂
@LIONIQ-foxhound3 күн бұрын
Not a non line of sight the nlos is modernized tammuz pickup/vehicles mounted long range ATGMs, this Chinese ATGMs has the same engagement profile of spike extended range, but the missile comes in different design from the spike...
@Blackbadger554Күн бұрын
No its Different from spike
@LIONIQ-foxhoundКүн бұрын
@@Blackbadger554 the launching container is similar to the zionist entity spike, the designing of the missile in some pictures is different from spike but in the exercise or the trial it's similar...
@No-timeforimbeciles4 күн бұрын
Love these uploads, they always bring out the sad pathetic US & NATO trolls from under their bridges. ! 😊
@FarhanKhan-gr1yc4 күн бұрын
Now China will also give this to Pakistan
@hinduwarriors33093 күн бұрын
Then it misfire on pak army itself 😂 Never ever trust " made in china "
@hardyanpajero695 күн бұрын
👍😎🍺🍩🪖...
@hardyanpajero695 күн бұрын
👍😎🍺🍩🚀
@aramisone71985 күн бұрын
Is it 122mm?
@Jcrp823 күн бұрын
240 mm
@IRBry5 күн бұрын
dung 💩💩💩💩💩
@user-ch5zy3xd6u5 күн бұрын
How long have you learnt English?
@mauricio-wq5lu5 күн бұрын
"learnt" ?????????????????????
@keithmoore53064 күн бұрын
dung started using English instead of that annoying speech program about 6 or 7 years back!!
@user-ch5zy3xd6u4 күн бұрын
@@keithmoore5306 his pronunciation is so terrible, the AI voice is much better than this junk
@koa8185 күн бұрын
Iran BRICS 👍👍👍💪💪💪 0:28
@jamessandfield45925 күн бұрын
🙂🙂👍
@leapdrive5 күн бұрын
China is coying the tow missile, but their missile is too big and cumbersome to be installed, launched and rearm on armored vehicle.
@aramisone71985 күн бұрын
Iran copied them well moniple version.
@mauricio-wq5lu6 күн бұрын
The war in Ukraine has demonstrated that artillery supported by battlefield awareness is capable of not only adapting but evolving to meet new conditions.
@edwardkoopmans566 күн бұрын
Sell it to RF !
@keithmoore53066 күн бұрын
trust me dung it's mainly western tech in it most likely from the javelins Trump gave to kiev in 2018-2019 and they turned around and sold to beijing as far as thermal tracking goes the rest of the guidance seems to be a cross between Kornet and the spike system!!
@tyme58376 күн бұрын
kornets look very different, according to the info provided by dung tran, tl-4 has top attack capability lacking in kornets
@keithmoore53066 күн бұрын
sounds like a cross between a Kornet and a javelin!!
@stolek69086 күн бұрын
Kornet dont need top attack it goes throu tank anyway
@tyme58376 күн бұрын
impressive
@hardyanpajero697 күн бұрын
👍😎🍺🍩🪖
@AndrewLambert-wi8et7 күн бұрын
LOOKS LIKE A COPY OF.INDIAS ANTI-TANK SOLUTION. DONT BELIEVE IT IS TRUE.
@user-yp1xu6ed7j7 күн бұрын
The second one is being built in Thailand.
@sorryociffer7 күн бұрын
If it follows the "trajectory" of other current Chinese weapons, it will be near worthless. Many countries buying Chinese weapons are not satisfied and are regretting it. Poor design, quality control, and after sales support is giving the Chinese a very bad reputation.
@toma30256 күн бұрын
On the contrary, this ATGM uses an uncooled IIR sensor, which is a significant upgrade over the US-produced Javelin ATGM, which uses a cooled sensor. Many Ukrainian soldiers complained that the Javelin was extremely unreliable (defective batteries) and cumbersome to operate (it takes 3 minutes for the sensor to cool down, before the weapon is operable, for example).
@sorryociffer6 күн бұрын
@@toma3025 That doesn't prove ANYTHING to the contrary. A verifiable track record will, and the Chinese have a poor record. I would be money that these have made it to the Ukraine conflict to act as a real life demo for potential purchases. Time will tell.
@matovicmmilan5 күн бұрын
@@sorryociffer Which Chinese weapon in particular??
@toma30255 күн бұрын
@@matovicmmilan He doesn't have an answer, as China hasn't been involved in a war since 1979, so it's utterly stupid to talk about a poor Chinese track record. Regarding countries buying Chinese weapons, their biggest customer, Pakistan, has shown absolutely no signs of dissatisfaction and has actually spent the last decade moving away from US-supplied weapons to Chinese ones across the board, whether it's submarines (Hangor class), tanks (VT-4) or stealth jets (FC-31). You only have to look at the performance of drones in the Ukraine war, where the performance of Chinese *civilian* products (DJI) actually proved superior to that of US *military* suppliers (Skydio). I don't understand why people find the fact that the country with the largest annual cohort of STEM graduates, largest manufacturing industry and largest economy (in real terms) has a sophisticated and world leading military industrial capacity, so shocking or difficult to believe.
@MyPapapapa-qt8cb5 күн бұрын
Look like Look like you said what you heard or reader from bias news with out evidence, can you give me one example what you said😁
@underworldguardian7047 күн бұрын
Looks like a Chinese version of the Kornet Missile.
@skinnyg22686 күн бұрын
It looks nothing like the kornet
@koa8187 күн бұрын
Fantastic Design and Amazing ((( not for Myanmar MMC)))
@dejankm7 күн бұрын
Looking like copy of Serbian “alas rocket”
@godandglory21448 күн бұрын
if its made in china, it means a pile of shit
@user-ne6xw1sv4u8 күн бұрын
Only two anti-tank weapons on the vehicle. It must be a joke!
@khaledselim81308 күн бұрын
cope
@khaledselim81308 күн бұрын
up to 8 missles you clown
@CG_CA7 күн бұрын
Learn to count kzbin.info/www/bejne/jYKYqJVnjNGVqZo
@keithmoore53067 күн бұрын
it's chinese of course it;s a big joke!!!
@fernandofernandito30557 күн бұрын
How many projectile is needed to a tank? Their anti tank can be mount in a Toyota truck like you see in middle east or any MMV...
@hardyanpajero698 күн бұрын
👍😎🍺🍩🪖🚀
@hardyanpajero699 күн бұрын
👍😎🍺🍩🪖,,,
@abeyscene73089 күн бұрын
It is a good choice
@wwclay8610 күн бұрын
At least its not based off the max series!!!
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm10 күн бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm10 күн бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🤲💪👍🙏🔥❤
@内田大貴-o1k10 күн бұрын
航空母艦とは戦闘機を発着させる
@user-fi9ej2zr3g11 күн бұрын
He is trying his best not to expose what Israel is doing to Gaza
@punchtalestudio11 күн бұрын
🤡
@hardyanpajero6911 күн бұрын
👍😎🍺🍩🪖,
@koa81811 күн бұрын
👍❤️👏👏👏🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖Top ✈️✌️✌️
@koa81811 күн бұрын
Very good Edition Also good for Mndaa 💯 Tnla 75 types Requirements will be different 👍👍👍😍😍😍 TRA Version 👍
@hardyanpajero6912 күн бұрын
👍😎🍺🍩🪖🚢
@antoniocarlosvdasilva10013 күн бұрын
o chengdu não precisa ser um avião no estado da arte. uma boa atualização de hardware é suficiente para muitos países, com um espaço aéreo de baixa intensidade de luta.