5 ай бұрын
10 ай бұрын
10 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@samareshdas369 Күн бұрын
I am a student of English literature from India. Bunch of thanks ✨ ✨ ✨ for making such an awesome video on this essay. My doubts got cleared because of this.
@Yodakaycool Күн бұрын
Ty. You make it so easy to understand.
@cosimosidoti5694 Күн бұрын
according to you, can we apply any of these concepts to social media images? I see many similarities and I am thinking to do so.
@JasonKay-tm2qj 4 күн бұрын
Ty
@HiLaToya 4 күн бұрын
This was soooooo good!
@TheSoho1981 5 күн бұрын
Thank you for your videos. It is just very ironic that Ari Folman's (the director) words about the ongoing war in Gaza oppose his thesis in this film about fact and documentation. When he talks about October 7th, he refers to beheaded babies, which has been proven to be misinformation by several investigations. It seems that the filmmaker is not truly honest in his narrative in the film. The film is emphasizing the importance of accurate historical documentation, personal accountability, and truth but it seems the director himself doesn't believe in it. See the Guardian article on what he said on November 3rd, 2023.
@x16881 6 күн бұрын
Here an extract of an article in The Economist about her last book "Who's afraid of gender": The problem is that pretty soon, the author leaves the path of gay-rights advocacy and disappears down an ideological rabbit hole. Soon after critiques of “the so-called facts of sex”, the tq+ overwhelms the lgb. The result is a stir-fry of disingenuous provocations, served up with a large portion of post-modern word salad. The reader is left wondering how Butler ever became so influential. Butler smears the growing army of liberal-minded women who oppose these views on sex and gender, including J.K. Rowling, as hysterical right-wingers allied with the pope, Mr Trump and Vladimir Putin. Soon the author descends into the quicksand of intersectionality, where all oppressions overlap, accusing people who criticise the Butler perspective of buttressing “white supremacy”. By the end, all opponents are extremists. The words “fascism” and “fascist” appear nearly 70 times. The book is a lesson in how well-meaning activism can overreach. The author has lent intellectual credibility to a theory that has, as recently revealed in the Cass Review commissioned about England’s youth-gender services, caused harm to many young people, some of whom are autistic, depressed or simply gay. Channelling Butler’s theories, some activists are labelling those who oppose giving minors cross-sex hormones as “bigots”."
@craigjohnson4063 8 күн бұрын
WHAT EFFECT IS USED ON THAT VIDEO OF THE TRAIN THAT TURNS IT ONLY BLACK AND WHITE?
@filmandmediastudieschannel 7 күн бұрын
that's a powerpoint filter that you can apply to still images and gifs.
@Marshmallow_ladle 9 күн бұрын
Thanks dude 👍
@leafsounds8263 10 күн бұрын
Gender cannot be separated from biological determinism, as a product of reason. Intellect is an instrument of nature's will, gender is simply a combination of what we have historically expected from gender, what things we are most attracted to, and in this we can still see with the greatest certainty the power of nature's will and evolution. Lust speaks for itself, we can see the same patterns of beauty throughout the ages that were related to the sign of genetic health and strength, if we are not talking about the gluttonous baroque nobility. See what's still in the spotlight. Intellect does not stand at the pinnacle of existence, but blind will. We cannot think of the intellect and its products apart from the motive power of everything. Lies and sophistry are not opinions and must be condemned as such. This is not philosophy, but politics.
@facusmendoza1061 11 күн бұрын
I like the way that pops spins John Goodman did a great job there
@t1ago 11 күн бұрын
your videos are amazing man
@filmandmediastudieschannel 9 күн бұрын
thanks!
@amafirenze-vi1uh 12 күн бұрын
Hi from Italy. While its obvious that neorealism was influenced by soviet and franch movies (authors like Eisenstein, Pudovkin, Renoir and Carnè), some say early Yazushiro Ozu also influence d it. Since Ozu's movies were not released in Italy not even in Venice film festival, main authors like Rossellini, De Sica or Visconti never mentioned watching them and also no Italian essay reports Ozu's influence, I think there's no connection of them with neorealism. What do you think?
@filmandmediastudieschannel 6 күн бұрын
I haven't done any research on the Italian reception of Ozu, so you certainly would know better than me based on what you're saying here. But I'd say there's a big difference between saying that Ozu is an 'influence' - which is a historical/empirical claim - and saying that Ozu is a 'precursor' to Italian Neorealism, which is merely a claim about aesthetic similarity. Ozu's "An Inn in Tokyo" is a good candidate for a 'precursor' given its themes. And the philosopher Gilles Deleuze will imply that Ozu and the Italian Neorealists were doing something similar in terms of how they overturn classical Hollywood narration. But also I'm kind of interested in questioning the legacy of thinking of Ozu's movies as slow, meditative, spiritual, undramatic, etc. that we get from folks like Paul Schrader (and in a sense, Deleuze). There's this recently translated book on Ozu by the famed critic Hasumi that, I've heard, kind of critiques some of these aspects of his Western reception. www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520396722/directed-by-yasujiro-ozu
@amafirenze-vi1uh 6 күн бұрын
@@filmandmediastudieschannel thanks for the very detailed answer. I do think Ozu's movies represent the real essence of Japanese way of life more than Kurosawas dynamic movies or Kenji Mitsoguchi stylish period dramas.
@MiaoHaoFilm 12 күн бұрын
This is really inspiring! Thanks for sharing :)
@El_papa_de_Rambo 15 күн бұрын
Why a photo of a thing is different than a painting of the thing? It doesn't make sense.
@anitarook3318 18 күн бұрын
Hello friend, i'd like to ask where are Althusser quotes from? specifically the ones at 10:53 and 11:10
@bashattack2414 18 күн бұрын
I am working on my final assignment (we're calling it a home exam but it's the same thing) as we speak, you've been such a massive help ever since I've discovered your channel this semester. <3 Also it caught me so off guard hearing someone talk about a Hebrew film - hearing Hebrew in the middle of an English lecture made me double take for a second - and then giggle at how polite the English translation of how rudely Ori describes the 80% of the test subjects in that experiment HAHA (he calls the other 20% the normal/more sane ones, and the subtitles just gloss over that) - it's very interesting how Israelis can be so casually rude in their speech but it is often translated so nicely in the subtitles, and for no reason too, making it quite charming in my opinion :)
@filmandmediastudieschannel 14 күн бұрын
that's really interesting! thanks for letting me know about the translation in the subtitles. I always assume subtleties are missing in the subs so it's nice to hear what's really being communicated.
@simran19951000 22 күн бұрын
I really needed this video! Thank you so much for explaining this so simply!
@user-dg8qh4zg2w 22 күн бұрын
More cavell please !,!
@djpokeeffe8019 23 күн бұрын
Where are the women?
@filmandmediastudieschannel 21 күн бұрын
Oh who were you thinking? I think Lynne Ramsey would be a really interesting example.
@firecrotch9190 25 күн бұрын
Photogénie is what separates film from theater
@fluffymcdeath 27 күн бұрын
Theory doesn't seem to mean much in philosophy beyond "I think ...". How exactly did Judith propose we test this "theory"?
@fluffymcdeath 27 күн бұрын
Classic example of intellectuals thinking themselves into a hole where scientists ( and just about everyone else ) had figured out centuries before.
@bananenbrot958 9 күн бұрын
Scientists are intellectuals??? And mostly prescribe to Judith Butler
@inbfu1513 27 күн бұрын
Pleaseee make a video more particularly about Affect theory also, Like Massumi and Sara Ahmed on image ... thanks!
@MEKON17 28 күн бұрын
How does this apply to Taylor Swift
@pritampatowary5812 28 күн бұрын
Please create more content 🤍 We need YOU
@poloshirtsamurai Ай бұрын
Who cares. Feminists hate the "male gaze" but women look at themselves and get turned on too.
@nadirhatali8113 Ай бұрын
6:41 isnt it first level=camera and second level=character in the text? Without identifing firstly with camera/image/screen, spectator can not identify with a character.
@filmandmediastudieschannel Ай бұрын
Yes I kind of think you're right. I remember coming back to the passage and thinking I had gotten it mixed up. But when I did return to the passage, I remember finding the wording confusing. After all, it's really Christian Metz's use of first level and second level identification in film that is referenced much more, and for Metz it is very clear that fist level = the camera/image and second level = character. If you're reading the Baudry and see a clear articulation of this, please do paste in a comment!
@filmandmediastudieschannel Ай бұрын
ah ok i see now that i had reproduced the passage in the video. the phrase "the character portrayed as a center of secondary identifications" makes it sound like Metz's primary and secondary ID. the sentence that makes me confused is what follows: the second level permits the appearance of the first..." Can you tell what is meant by "'first' and 'second' level, and which is the referent of 'that is the transcendental subject..."?
@nadirhatali8113 Ай бұрын
@@filmandmediastudieschannel i read this article 20 years ago and maybe because of reading Metz at the same time or maybe my teacher misleaded or inhibited me.
@nadirhatali8113 Ай бұрын
@@filmandmediastudieschannel now I read the previous and next paragraphs with footnotes... Very very ambigious or "intellectual" French way of writing... Anyway, i think there is nothing about identification with characters. Level 1 is about seeing images, that are shot for an "imaginary" spectator/transcendental subject Level 2. Keyword here is"repetition", the last word in the previous paragraph. Spectator sees images in projector that are shot with camera/looker for Transpectator so what spectator sees is his own Look. in fact it looks like, elementary school maths, basic Transitivity but they write as if they are writing a puzzle, not to be understood. Maybe it is better to read original French. But how much can it be meaningful to theorize with Neo-Marxist, Husserlian and Lacanian in the same article.
@lazyacademic Ай бұрын
thank you!
@user-ib5jg1jr4x Ай бұрын
Thank you SO much!
@Satao254 Ай бұрын
😮😮😮😮let me rewatch all these movies
@siamaksoltani982 Ай бұрын
Perfect
@seun-ohm Ай бұрын
Awesome!
@TeresaDatzer Ай бұрын
What an incredible video!! Thank you so much!
@Iguana_slayer Ай бұрын
Anybody know where that Maurice Merleau Ponty quote came from? I have been trying to cite it for my essay due Monday and have been looking for the source for two hours.
@777Rowen Ай бұрын
The boy and brain can’t be seperate it’s Al interconnected regardless of a person’s sex! No! Sex isn’t a spectrum, and yes I’m including intersex people because they’re intersex male and female. This sounds like passion-science!
@777Rowen Ай бұрын
This is ridiculous! This is not direct towards you, it’s towards her discussion/ideas. They’re muddling everything. Sex is real, gender is part of sex, based on sex, our our gendered roles and due to these expectations, people, men & women are expected to live up to those roles. However, not everyone expresses themselves into these harmful stereotypical categories of boys and girls; meaning the person is usually homosexual or enjoys cross dressing. There sex is still there, and I can’t support queer theory.
@lordtains Ай бұрын
Wasn't sex already frowned upon in Christian doctrines? The suppression of lust and sexuality is already mentioned by ancient Greek philosophers (i.e. apathea).
@freya1681 Ай бұрын
thank you so much for making this video! i'm learning about this in my course and i was so happy to find this as i didn't really understand. keep it up!
@cgpcgp3239 Ай бұрын
What is a woman? An adult human female. Roles of women. Roles of women. It’s the societal roles of women that women rebelled against. Butler intentionally conflates roles of women with what is a woman.
@caciocavallo420 Ай бұрын
nice analysis man, I really loved the movie and really loved what you said about it!!
@Omicronthewiperofyouknow... Ай бұрын
Read somewhere that one can't have the concept of heterosexuality without the concept of homosexuality. That is a strange thing, mainly because one can have the concept of gravity without the concept of anti-gravity. And many concept don't have an opposite, because those concept don't necessarily refer to a quality of something. The concept of sky doesn't represent a quality. In the same way, heterosexuality is not necessarily a quality.
@user-zp1kt9ur7g Ай бұрын
Barthes' life span 1915-1980 in 02:11
@charlesbrown1365 Ай бұрын
But female is a necessary condition of women gender . Also, humans have heterosexual instinct .
@evewu-ex5id Ай бұрын
Thank you so much for these videos! These are great learning materials for a beginner in film studies. You explain all the concepts so clearly that they are easy to follow, yet touch on the important and complex concepts and theories in film and media studies.
@karimkimmu549 Ай бұрын
but why zac on the picture XD
@exe_ Ай бұрын
Honestly, when I was adolescent I saw the first minutes of the movie and thought it was cheap garbage, until I was an adult and understood that the whole thing was carefully crafted I enjoyed the movie for what a great experience it was.
@pascalmassie4706 Ай бұрын
Barthes was not born in 1915 and died in 1918. Or else he would have died at the age of 3....
@pascalmassie4706 Ай бұрын
Saussure was Swiss, not French.
@DixieChris-ow6zi 19 күн бұрын
lol
@borakurt13 Ай бұрын
Love your videos! Can you make a video about "paracinema". Thanks a lot!