Good.

This is fantastic! I’m working on a project on the incompleteness theorems as a small part of my Master’s and I’ve been struggling to formulate simple but accurate explanations in round table discussions - you’ve provided some fantastic inspiration for me, thank you! It’s very difficult to talk about these somewhat pedantic mathematical concepts without getting lost in the weeds, very well done:)

¡Excelenteeeeee!

Very helpful! Thanks

It’s lies and bullshit 😂 nothing more. Just nonsense propagated by genocidal liberals

fire

SURPLUS IS DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE GIVEN THE SUBJECTIVE IMPACT OF MARKETS ON PRICE AND, THUS, THE IMPACTON THE CONCEPT OF VALUE. WHAT IS REALLY UNDENIABLE IS THAT THE CAPITALISTS ARE OUT TO PAY THE LEAST POSSIBLE WAGES POSSIBLE GIVEN THE DEMAND FOR LABOR IN THE LABOR MARKET. THIS IN TURN MAKES IT DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE WAGE EARNERS TO BUY THE HUGE AMOUNT OF CRAP PRODUCED BY THE CAPITALISTS. THE ONLY WAY TO PURCHASE IS DEBT AND DEBT ACCUMULATES AND DEPRESSES CONSUMPTION. THIS, IN TURN, CREATES ECONOMIC CRISES OR DOWNTURNS. THIS IS THE BASIC INTERNAL INCOHERENCE OF CAPITALISM. THE OTHER BASIC CONTRADICTION IS THAT THE COMPETITORS IN THE MARKET SEEK TO ELIMINATE COMPETITION AND BECOME A MONOPOLY WHICH CAUSES INFLATION. THE THIRD MALFUNCTION OF CAPITALISM IS THAT THE FINANCE BUSINESS IS A RENTIER ACTIVITY THAT CAUSES ASSET BUBBLES THAT BURST AND INITIATE DOWNTURNS. CAPITALISM HAS SO MANY DANGERS THAT IT IS NOT EVEN FUNNY.

Enjoy. You'll become an emotionally numb zombie 😊

Yes, please... and more.

Late stage capitalism is what happens when your capitalism gets infected by marxism and socialism. Capitalism however, worked fine before all that jazz.

Writing an article that touches on this subject! Thank you so much for a solid synopsis on these! Great refresher!

it's important to note that "postmodern" thinkers were generally describing and critiquing postmodernity, not promoting it. calling Jean Baudrillard or Frederic Jameson "postmodernists" in the latter sense would be like calling Karl Marx a capitalist for describing capitalism

Very helpful video,thankyou so much🙏

Thank you. One can't ask for a better overview of this book.

Marx wuz a trust funder, he's decrying the fundamental relationship between having and havenot-ing, which he had'th not. Ground already covered see Smith vs. public works.

great video thank you

Yerre

Thank you

I resemble these observations.

thank you

Nice explanation. Very well explained. Thanks 🙏👍

This video is old ahh hell but I wanted to say that your style of talking is perfectly fine and this video very genuinely helped me understand in a way others did not! hope you still make content and have a great day if you ever read this!

thank you for the uploading the vedios

Using a few pictures and graphics will get you more views. Your content is good, but it needs to be told a bit more interestingly. Unfortunately viewers on youtube expect that.

Good👌👌👌👌

Good👌

Great work

Was brought her because I am trying to read John Zerzans, A People’s History Of Civilization. First few pages this symbolic/real concept is used assuming the reader already knows these things…

Also about this video: when someone says certain structures, like basic reasoning are innate / a priori, could't you respond: yes, but those structures arose from evolutionary processes in which structures that constituated reasoning better responded to the environment - in that sense they arose from a long evolutionary "experience" (not necessarily conscious experience)

Hello Andrew, I really like your videos. I am currently writing an interdiciplinary thesis on feeling connected - in parts I want to link phenomenology, psychology and neuroscience. A video about phenomenology, new phenomenology and its difference but also potential links to neuroscience and psychology would be a dream come true for me!

Feminist philosophy is a novel idea that attempts to describe real world phenomenons, it's a modern example of "creative" ideas like the principle of impetus

It's a sexist, irrational, incongruous, self contradictory, bias, ideologically possessed, unethical and self-serving set of believes that is pretending to be philosophy so it can gain some legitimacy to spread its destructive (and self-destructive) political agenda.

good video, if you are open to criticism, I'd recommend not skipping over the points you wrote in your slides. The difference between a 7 minute and a 9 minute video is not too large that people won't click it.

How can a normative distinction be true or false? If something ought to be like this isn't that the way you want it to be? If not, how can it be objective instead of subjective?

Well discussed by both of them. Bryan Magee puts up a good fight.

Postmodernism exists to obfuscate by attacking the very foundation of truth, called the Logos, the Word, Jesus Christ. Your video is excellent. Very clear and informative. Thanks for the listen.

Nederland is a cool little town!

Interesting. This is not quantum computing though...

Appreciate the detailed breakdown! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (behave today finger ski upon boy assault summer exhaust beauty stereo over). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?

Happy morning Sir... V r expecting more videos on literary theory in updated version Sir..

Dr Chapman,could you please do a video on Sartre's totalization in regards selfhood.

I can't thank you hard enough and the attached PDF is just the chef's kiss. Underrated!

Johnson Michael Jackson Steven Miller Elizabeth

All words are twice removed from the truth

Soooo... are you still a moral realist?

PS What about Jean Baudrillard? Or Lyotard? Or are they decidedly different? What is the difference between post-modernism and poststructuralism?

Finally! Someone explained Postructuralism without getting it wrong. Thank you. Saving this vid for anyone who asks.

I hope who ever comes and finds this video reads this and knows they are enough and things will get better for you , it’s hard but we all need to keep fighting day by day

What's the difference between (enlightened) fascism and (unenlightened) Catholicism? Kinda makes you think.

thank you - most grateful for your clarity in explaining each theory - new sub :)