Wonderful analysis. Thank you

Thank you so much for the great lecture! Super helpful!

Thank you for the clear and precise break down of the case.

thank you for your video!

In the 4th week of 1L right now and these case explanations are god sent. Keep it up man!

wonderful video! very helpful as a 1L 😄

Thank you for your case briefs! Seriously I watch your videos every morning before my torts class!

One correction: trial court decision was overturned by the intermediate appellate court, then further appealed to highest court of appeals who affirmed the intermediate decision.

Thank you for this video! This made so much sense to me! Sincerely, 1L Student ;)

Isn't it contradictory to the capture rule in Pearson fox case??

Want more of your analysis on cases

You’re literally my favorite person ever this is so helpful ily

thank you! in law school now & you are helping me understand so much

Cant just hide someones property alnd evidence then take over all of their as

Please correct me if I am wrong. So, basically, the plaintiff sues both tortfeasors and says I don't know who but one of you caused my harm. Now, the case proceeds to discovery and it becomes obvious that it was defendant 1 whose bullet struck the plaintiff because they match the gun with the bullet found stuck in the victim's body. Then, defendant 2 moves to dismiss the case against him. But if the bullet is untraceable after the gun fired, the defendants remain jointly and severally liable because they cannot prove whose bullet caused the injury. Am I getting this right?

Great video! The juxtaposition of the MPC-analogous Tenn code and common law confuses me though still. You said the Tenn code was more liberal than common law, but wouldn't labeling an act as an attempt further from its expected commission make it less liberal? Wasn't the defendant arguing that Tenn purposely omitted part of the MPC that defined a substantial step when writing their own very similar code? Thank you.

😢

The counts I have charged have private right of action, does that matter

Sooo helpful thank you

Can a city or town give a permit to a citizen to take your property for an outdoor event without your permission? By "Take", I mean to allow the citizen's patrons to park personal vehicles, park show semi-trucks, allow patrons free access to walk upon, build temporary tents, sit in lawn chairs upon the property. The city's permit did not specifically permit the taking of the property, but this was the 2nd time this occurred, and they knew the property would be taken. Who is liable? The city, the citizen, or both?

What laws or statues give any landlord or his broker and management company the right to use for any kind of Purchases including investments or additional real property or etc. by using tenants personal or financial credit while the tenants is leasing and paying as agreed with on time payments paid?

Where does it's states without notice or emergency that Management ,staff or HOA management can go into tenants place of residence after request of no entry without permission or call before entry when there is no emergency when A Tenant is not Home and Has written No Request or Permission is given for extermination without notice ahead of estimated time given to and from a resident.

Help

Hi, you make great videos, really interesting stories well explained. I do not have any background in law yet I am able to comprehend most of it. Imagine I am an officer in a firm that is a significant purchaser (lets say the biggest purchaser) of goods made by publicly traded firm. My firm is about to cancel the vendor agreement, which we know is going to hit the publicly traded firm hard, as it will lose their biggest client. Can I trade their stock/options/… based on that information? Since it is not any information obtained from the publicly traded firm, I am not sure whether we have duty to that company. Disclaimer: I am 23 and not an officer in any company lol

Its crazy thst now our federal. Representatives now just wait for bribes and ignore these laws but make up laws to attrack tgeir opposition

This was very helpful, thank you!!

Cali 2024 Bar prep brought me here. Good vid

SO helpful! Thank you so much for laying it out so clearly :)

I like the court's decision. It is more black and white when one can rely on a definition of assignment is the rest of the whole lease versus a sublease where only a portion of the remaining lease. This method limits ambiguity issues of word definitions. In this case Conditt took on the rest of the lease therefore an assignment.

An awesome coincidence. On the day I studied this case and watched this video I saw a lady wearing a t-shirt with the Haunted Mansion written on it in the style of the sign. I was able to explain the case much better and the importance of chipping away at Caveat Emptor. Ex Ante Rocks!

you've saved me multiple times from 1L through 3L

Wow I didn't know this, just lost respect for scallia

Thank you for your great analysis!

I'm glad Im found this video- I was very curious with why the judge awarded only $750, and Im glad he took it to appeal court and was granted the correct amount eventually. Thank you for explaining this so well!

Obligation to mitigate brings up a question if the tenant offers a substitute tenant. What would be the landlord's obligation to accept replacement tenant? Can a landlord use a higher level of scrutiny in accepting new tenant? Is the landlord required to accept a new tenant with equal qualifications? What if the landlord accepted original tenant based of a good feeling even though some requirements were not met but replacement does not convey same good feeling?

its crazy how this is a relatively important doctrine for practicing law, yet there is so little about it online. thank you so much!

So how does this effect statute mandatory minimums in the Federal system? Does the judge have to sentence the mandarory minimum and the defendant has to appeal or do the mandatory minimums stand regardless? Does the judge have the ability to disregard the mandatory minimums?

Of course. Let’s destroy the 4th amendment because some people might get drunk. Won’t someone think of the children?

so helpful, thank you!!

Thank you for this, just saw this for the first time. Very useful

Does such same standards also applies to Prosecuting States Attorneys representing Victims?

Thanks so much!🎉

Self help breaking an entry Assault and battery violence, robbery,violation, content , and illegal, unlawful, actions Legacy At Cypress 77429

literally saving my ass from my ass corp. prof. who cannot teach for shit. thank you so much for the great explanation!

Thank you ex ante! Good summary and analysis. Very easy to understand for a design student who's studying media law!

Why do you use the earphones when recording?

I like this guy not only is he straight and easy to understand he has a Thomas Kinkade painting in the background.

I don't normally comment on youtube, but I have to tell you that this was THE most helpful thing I've seen in understand demand futility - thank you so so much!!!

Thanks for helpful video

Could you do a video on the erie doctrine? Byrd v blue ridge, hannah v plumer. Your videos are very helpful.