Who are you to tell us what is will of God? Have you a hot line to God? And deciphering the bible to say what you believe, is an old trick.

Israel of God = Jewish believers They are the "true Israel" because they are Jews who have accepted their Messiah.

Good to see you back brother!

"Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed." Romans 9. you will lose this debate handily. Galatian, Romans 9, and several other texts make it clear. Enough with the Zionist garbage.

Very unfortunate. Galatians 3, Romans 9, and other scriptures explicitly say that those who believe on Jesus are the children of God and NOT the physical nation of Israel. Also, I agree Israel has a role to play still but its not a good one. They are mystery babylon/the harlot. I recommend Chris Whites mystery babylon series on this.

Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I WAS an husband unto them, saith the LORD: Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.

Compare These Verses of Scripture from the Old Testament and the New Testament. In the Old Testament in Exodus 19:5-6, God told Moses to say unto the children of Israel, Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine: And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel. We know that later on God rejected OT Israel for not keeping his covenant and when Jesus came he said to the rulers of the nation of Israel in Matthew 21:43. Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a NATION bringing forth the fruits thereof. What other nation was Jesus talking about? in the New Testament Peter while writing to Christians in 1st Peter 2:9-10 wrote. But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an HOLY NATION, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light: Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy. Is not this the same promise that was given to Old Testament Israel?

Is Revelation 3:9 connected to Revelation 3:10? Who are the people who say they are Jews and are not and who are the people Jesus loves and whom he considers to be the true Jews? (rev 2:9 and 3:9) Rev 3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee. Rev 3:10 Because thou (the true jews whom Jesus loves in the previous verse) hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. Are The people whom Jesus loves written in Rev. 3:9 the same group of people Jesus is addressing in Rev. 3:10 (The church of Philidelphia/Christians)?

Welcome back! Looking forward to the series. Just like old times! It’s both apostolic and prophetic teaching that the physical nation of Israel will be saved. They shall look upon him, whom they have pierced. Christ shall take away their sin.

You have a AE map on wall! Nice!😊

Notes in the CMR Bible supposedly were written by a Ruckmanite - I have verified this - but it is worth checking.

Flat earth is a lie - it is obvious from the space station the earth is a globe. Bury your head in the sand and believe the lie if that makes you feel better. People deny the obvious in every past century and probably will in the future as well.

He is the rock sorry prot

Please read hebrews 1:5. God never called any of the angels His son. And no where in the Bible can you read that it explicitly describes angels as "sons of God". But you can read a lot of verses that describes righteous men as sons of God. And take note that the whole passage of Job 38 was in metaphor or symbolical. You can read that God laid foundations and cornerstones of the world, which if we take literally would contradict how He made the world with His word.

Once you go flat you never go back but yes you’re right there are more important topics. Especially the blood of Christ (:

Jesus did not surnamed himself Peter, it was Simon barjonas whom he called peter

The Petra is the revelation given by God, not the confession of Simon barjona

it was Simon barjona whom Jesus said was the rock

Sun revolves around us. Created day 4

Can a born again Christian become reprobate

In conclusion, people who are saved can do stupid things like loosing your salvation or falling back into sin....?

Basically, it comes down to IFB acting like IFB. It often can blind someone from seeing legitimate interpretive options on the table.

I'm a son of God... and believe me, I'm no angel. consider Abel and Cain presented offerings to God... the sons of Adam.. who was the son of God. from my perspective, you are making a mockery of the word of God by suggesting sons of God are angels.. and this fits precisely what the Bible warns us of. Jude 18 How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts. you're not just suggesting sons of God are angels.. but also.. fallen angels. therefore those of us who are born of God are to you... evil. Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

Nice timing! Looking forward to the next video.

What did Jesus say in Matthew 16:18-19? In these verses what Jesus said is important and not what Paul or Peter said. Read the grammar of the passage. When Jesus said, 'on this rock', he was referring to the preceding verse where he changed Simon's name to Peter meaning rock. Without this meaning, the whole passage becomes logically ridiculous.

Would you like to come on my podcast and talk about this?

So Xtians must repent of their sins But Jews are Gods chosen no matter what. Why just become a Jew and for get Jesus..

This is a great video. Thanks for taking the time to make this. You explained things very well!

It is a strange doctrine, to say the least. Probably to take out the emphasis on the blood.

Why would Jesus suffer in hell?? The devil even listened to Jesus when he told him to go away at Matthew 4:10. No, Jesus didn't suffer in hell

Hell is monstrous nonsense.

What’s it mean when the Holy Spirit no longer convicts you?

Do reprobates lose their emotions and can they still function?

What conditions must you & I meet to enter Heaven ? Thank you

Great video! As God is omnipresent, the scripture states these things: That Jesus' spirit went to the Father after he gave up the ghost (Luke 23:46). His body remained in the tomb. His soul went to the lower parts- plural (Ephesians 4:8-10). Abraham's Bosom/ Paradise and Hell. He preached to the spirits in prison (devils/ unclean spirits) He made a shew of them openly and triumphed over them- spoiling the principalities and powers (Colossians 2:15). While it is possible that he could have triumphed at the cross, Psalm 22 seems to hint that the wicked had no such idea in verses 6,7,11,12, and 16. Does not seem that Jesus triumphed over them "openly" at Calvary. 1 Cor. 2:8 states that the "prices of this world" were ignorant of what the crucifixion would do for the sinner. If Jesus went to Hell (which he did) why would he burn or be tortured there? That is a strange conjecture to make. The passover lamb was to be without blemish. (He was questioned by Herod and Pilate and three times no fault was found in Him.) The sprinkling of blood on the doorpost was fulfilled. (It was on the cross as the letter (t) [also corresponds to the Greek "tau" and the Latin "t", as the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet is a ת.) The superscription was written in Hebrew, Latin and Greek. ת can be outlined on the upper post and side posts of a door. If Hell was created for the Devil and his angels, Jesus Chrit created it (John 1:3). Did God create a place he could not escape? He has the keys (Rev. 1:18) As far as suffering when he was there, consider the movie Shawshank Redemption. The warden can enter any cell to look for contraband, interview a prisoner and so forth. When the warden is in a cell, he is NOT incarcerated for he has the key.

Welcome back brother, you should do more videos.

Greetings Rick! Do you have an email address you can be reached at?

Welcome back!

So you basically have no response to the actual verse in question and it’s corresponding context? You just simply go to a completely different verse with a completely different context and apply that to the original verse in question? Thats wildly dishonest

I got rid of this Bible as soon as I found out he was a flat earther and I didn't even have the flat earther edition. Sad!!

My pastor is a tithing guy, he’s got a lot of errors he picked up from watching Jack Hyles and Vineyard.

Bullshit! Jesus plainly said that Simon is a rock...did he mean Simon is a rock singer!😂

I know this comment is several years past, but brother I thank God I came across this video.I feel like it was made just for me in a sense although I know it's for anyone to watch. For years I have seen videos on this topic, read commentaries and studied it out. I understood it was obviously dealing with a physical salvation/deliverance and I knew historically about the destruction of the temple in 70 AD but I just couldn't piece it all together, but when I listen to your video it all came together. Thank you for making the video and praise God for guiding me to it. I've been praying to figure out how it so ties together for years and when I wasn't even specifically looking I found the answer. Needless to say, I'm very happy :)

What is meant by "the end" exactly? The end of what?

Are you saying if I just believed the gospel and put my trust in Christ as my savior with out prayer I'm not saved?

Looking for some help here - This video made sense to me, but I gotta say that it doesn't give me a satisfying answer to the Catholic position explained here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/nWa5hKlngdh0o8k . Also, it doesn't seem that Jesus referring to Peter as the "rock" is as consequential as our Lord and Savior giving Peter the keys to the Kingdom. I can't seem to find any Protestant response to the Catholic position here, that Jesus gave Peter this authority that has been passed down ever since. Any recommendations? This passage is a huge attraction to being Catholic for me, as succession of this authority given to Peter would seem to trump just about anything.

Of course Peter is under Christ The first Pope and the titles of the Popes ?? "Servant of the servants of Christ" ........Petros--- rock -- Petrus -- JESUS did not speak in Greek !! In Aramaic -- kepha -- there is no distinction between small rock and large rock in Aramaic !!! .... You ended up rejecting the most comprehensive case for the bible .... AND the GOD appointed authority of his servant the Pope ...... Although Jesus’ authority as the Son of God is unique to him, he chose to associate human beings with his mission and gave them a share of authority. Thus, when he appoints the Twelve, we read: And he called to him his twelve disciples and gave them authority over unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal every disease and every infirmity (Matt. 10:1). The authority he shared was not just that to work miracles. The twelve disciples were his students (that’s what “disciple” means), and he prepared them to become teachers and sent them on preaching missions: These twelve Jesus sent out, charging them, “Go nowhere among the Gentiles, and enter no town of the Samaritans, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And preach as you go, saying, ‘The kingdom of heaven is at hand’” (Matt. 10:5-7). Later, when sending out an even larger group, he underlined the teaching authority he had given them, stating: He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you rejects me, and he who rejects me rejects him who sent me (Luke 10:16). Jesus also gave the Twelve the authority to govern his Church. He first gave Peter the authority “to bind and loose” (Matt. 16:19), and later he shared this with the other disciples (Matt. 18:18). As the Church grew, authority to teach and govern was transmitted to others in the local churches. Thus Paul writes, “God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers” (1 Cor. 12:28; cf. Eph. 4:11). It is because of its teaching function that the Church serves as “the pillar and bulwark of the truth” (1 Tim. 3:15). Similarly, there are those with governing authority in the Church. The letter to the Hebrews exhorts Christians to “obey your leaders and submit to them; for they are keeping watch over your souls, as men who will have to give account” (Heb. 13:17; cf. 1 Thess. 5:12). Teaching and governing authority are therefore intrinsic to the structure of the Church.

Only in Pauls epistals do we understand the walk and destiny and future of the body of Christ. None of this information can be found anywhere else. No church patterns themselves after Acts 2 to 4, selling all they had and giving away all they owned. How can something be in existance to follow its pattern if its hidden from sight. The understanding of the body of Christ was not known in Acts 2 and 3, so how could the church in existence then pattern itself after the doctrine of the body of Christ. Thry were following Christ's earthly ministry of selling all they owned. Paul says he is the pattern for those who believe after him

I’m so glad you said it

I mean this verse that confuses everybody because they think it’s Peter that Jesus build his rock on well no, I agree if you read the whole context of the whole conversation and you use the right version and you also go that extra verse or two down and Jesus literally goes off on Peter Calling him Satan I don’t think Satan is going to be the rock foundation for Jesus‘s church…