what about urbanisation around measuring points?

I do like your channel. But im not ready to give up my sun block or my artic winter gear living hear in Canada 🇨🇦 ❤👍PS I have been docking my boat in and on the same pear

Dropping a comment to help fight the Al Gores of the world. 70's we had global cooling. Clean air acts reduced SO2. Now we have global brightening. Greenland on a 19 year cooling trend. You know sun light melts snow. Plus the Arctic is second biggest desert on plant. Lets green the planet. Oh does that mean less moisture other places? We live in an ice age. And they are worried about warming. Shouldn't we celebrate global warming? Last glacial maximum we were only -8*C from snowball earth again. The planet can get a lot warmer. Like when the dinosaurs lived. But they want to move towards snowball earth and mass extinction of the whole planet. Warmer planet grows more food.

How do we the common people. The workers that ultimately pay for this through donation, tax etc... Get the quality and precise information if everyone is lying to us. We get more precise facts from a hobbyest. Even my auto mechanic. We can't trust the dealership. New cars and trucks are designed to fail forcing us to go in other directions. Even restoration and after market upgrades. The world is a peculiar place. Nothing is built on trust. Every thing is built as trash. That relies on huge landfill pits.

Where are the volcano models , which would certainly change the climate?

Thank you gentlemen. I hope the truth will one day be common knowledge, but it may be too late to save the Western World from willful destruction.

During glacial periods, CO2 falls to within 30ppm of the death of all C3 plants. That's 90% of plants. That's a level the earth would eventually hit because of the relentless action of shelled sea creatures turning CO2 into limestone. Humans and their fossil fuels are literally preventing the next mass extinction.

Computer Models! I’ve known they were b s since college in the early 90’s. A really smart grad student/TA in the geology department clued me in. You can not “model” global climate - can’t account for all factors simultaneously bc there are too many unknowns and not enough computing power. It’s still a problem today. Then we get alarmists pointing to the model outputs saying “see!” While not admitting the failure to predict the past. They’re programmed to produce results to support a theory! Water vapor and clouds? “No, we can’t factor those”

Gosh! Youd think that someone had an agenda.....

Don't worry, they will be "correcting" temperature errors, so data will fit the narrative.

It's called pride and arrogance of people. Folks were just fine before admitting they didn't know a thing. Today everybody has to show how self important and smart they are , when they are in fact just as dumb if not dumber than before. But they have computers , right ? Only problem is the forget , computers compute......garbage in garbage out.

Great conversation discussing soooo many variables in the climate and the unexplained climate of the past!!! I’d love to see you conduct an interview with Randall Carlson!!! 👍🤔🍻

From Outback South Australia, I grew up with a small wind tower to supply the house with 32 volt power

turbulent entraainment is something we don't hear enough about in climate transport processes

'Socialist Prime Minister'.....socialism, marxism, islamism, climatism; all the same, or at least very similar, set of ideas; Central control, do as I say, definitely don't do as I do.

Why Venis? Why not Victoria BC Canada 🇨🇦 are we not part of the sea?

Yes. Yes they could. The world could spin off its axis and take off out into outer space. It could spin off towards the sun. It could, it could, it could. 😢😭🤬

There’s lies, damned lies, and then there’s the “climate crisis”

I'm going to try to word this to make sense so Let's say all forms of transportation in the world are electric and the electricity being produced uses no fossil fuel what so ever and the earth cleans itself from all the bad things that causes climate change and it reverts back to the way weather was hundreds of years ago and we have cold and snowy winters places that have not seen snow because of climate change or let's just say the seasons are behaving like they should be behaving . What would be the blame for the weather acting normal because we made the changes and how do they know what normal weather really is .

We shouldn't forget that the distance between the sun and the earth has a variability of at least 3.4%. This has also got to be significant.

Love your wood-burning stove. Excellent choice. Although. I have switched over to Natural gas. When I turned 70 I found at 70 cutting the tree down at the wood lot. Pulling it out to where I could get access to limb cut it into 14" rounds split it into firewood-size loaded it into the truck took it home unloaded it at the woodshed stacked it so it dry cleaned up the area put the saw and fuel away throw a couple of pieces in the heater take my boots off clean up sit down and have a couple shots. My whole day was gone. I still needed to boil some spuds and put a couple of stakes on for me and my sweety. Now after a drive around the great outdoors and a nice walk through the forest. I come home hit the switch the heat is instant. Sit down have a couple of cocktails with the little lady make dinner sit outside for a couple then get ready for bed. 😊❤️west 🇨🇦. But I do miss my wood fire 👍

Brilliant discussion

This was interesting until the statement that the hypothesis presented means the planet is cooling down. I'm about 21 minutes in and I'll see if this changes. If it doesn't the hypothesis fails.. At 25 minutes in and the hypothesis is that Arctic warming means the planet is warming more slowly. All this makes sense but still leaves the question as to why the planet is warming at all unanswered. Solar activity has been declining over the last 50 years. Furthermore more energy from the sun would warm the stratosphere on the way in but the stratosphere is cooling. Nevertheless the heat transfer from the tropics to the Arctic is interesting and goes to show how complex the climate actually is.

interestingly, l value of coastal real-estate continues to outpace inland areas.

Profits ensure good ideas succeed. Subsidies ensure bad ideas are adopted.

im never vulgar, but still noone usually sees my comment..so............#@@?!!>>>>?#

So we are told that in the 1700s , CO2 was at around 300parts per Million…and all was fine and wonderful before the industrial age. Now, we have around 400 ppm, and we are in a climate catastrophe and will all be meeting our end very soon. So, a difference of 100 parts per million of CO2 is the cause of all this misery. If we look at this figure in terms of time, we can visualise it better. 1million seconds equals 11 days, 12 hours and 40 minutes……..100 seconds however equals 1 minute and 40 seconds. So are the experts seriously trying to convince people that..metaphorically speaking…1’40” minutes is going to make a catastrophic impact on 11days,12 hours and 40 minutes? 100ppm is such a tiny amount that realistically it can make no difference at all… it is like peeing in a lake and then claiming you just warmed the water up!

The big problem with the climate debate is that it has become a religion for very many people, and others see it as a way to make lots of money… So, many thanks for keeping it real and grounded 👍

c. 19:30 "whatever we don't know cannot be in a model" - therein lies the fatal flaw of climate models that predict things that are not seen and do not predict things that are measured

Very high quality video. Thank you. Perhaps you could edit a version down to a 5 minute or so highlight reel, for the common man.

Climate change? A while back, the Thames Valley in Southern England was a semi-tropical rain forest, with elephants and hippos. Fast forward a while, and an ice-sheet covered Scotland, Wales, Northern England and the Midlands, as far south as the Thames Valley - with the ice thickness over the centre of Britain about a mile thick - and glaciers were carving out the valleys of Buckinghamshire (just north of London). Yet now, England has a temperate climate. *That,* St Greta (PBUH) and Her Disciples, is what I call climate change.

That Michael Mann can *claim* to be a scientist, yet uses such a ludicrous term as *"climate DENIER"* shows what an utter *M0R0N* he is. I challege him, and the rest of the Warmist Cult, to produce a single verifiable quote of anyone 'DENYING' that the Earth has a climate!

A +/- 1% change in albedo results in +/- 1 C in temperature.

The fundamental engine for Earth's climate and its changing is the Sun. Witness Solar cycles, Van Allen radiation belt and the ionization of of the charged outer layers of the Earths atmosphere (no one is really able to measure) The charged particles construcct (and destruct) the Ozone in the upper layer. Consider the variability of the South Atlantic Anomaly. Theres just too many cultists skimming the fedeeral monies to make up fairy tales to chase after.

PLEASE stop saying "also in the newsletter...." It's really annoying and I'm NOT signing up no matter how much you push.

This guy should get the Nobel Prize. He has the humility of a true scientist. That would go some way to excusing the scandal of awarding the 2021 prize to the inventor of the perennially misleading computer models, which Javier Vinos, among many other things, clearly exposes.

Its the changing the climate via the ridiculous amount of geoengineering that needs to stop.

🤜💪👊🤛😅🤣😂

Really enjoyed your guest John. The variables that constitute our climate cannot be pigeonholed to CO2 and I hope change is in the wind before political ideology takes us to much further down this rabbit hole.

Says Mann who sued EVERYBODY who ever disagreed with him....

Gem of a video . What youtube should be all about

Beryllium 10 increases corresponds to the maunder minimum and the mini ice age.. that’s point one. Point two. 63million years ago we had the Tethys sea that was nearly an un-impeded equatorial flow around the earth which held vast amounts of heat.. this is when the artic was ice free.. and it’s certain that atmospheric mechanisms were responsible for the transfer of heat and water with its massive latency.. Anyway I have my set piece below!! Just for your benefit. If you firstly examine Paleolithic records of the co2 levels vs recorded temperatures, you’ll note that there is no observable correlation between these metrics. In essence they plot two independent unrelated scribbles on a graph. Secondly, examine the Hawaii records of co2 otherwise known as 'The Keeling graph' and you'll note that this graph is unable to detect any variation in co2 levels during/following either the Covid lockdowns or the large industrial uptick in and around the year 2000 from both India and from china.. The graph just sailed on along the same trajectory and the curve was unperturbed . However, when we zoom in we can see the seasonal fluctuations related to winter Spring summer and fall yet two of the largest shifts in anthropogenic co2 output remain hidden.. . These are two simple facts that should set of alarm bells in any one willing to think for themselves. So in 1990's ice cores were taken at either end of the planet at the poles. Dansgaurd and Oeschger were the scientist who conducted this field work and these findings were very insightful.. When you examine the data from these Dansgaurd Oeschger oscillations which they established as occurring during the quaternary period, you'll see huge anomalies in temperature data and co2 levels wherein temp rose by 5-15 deg in as little as a few decades while co2 rose from circa 180ppm to 330ppm over the same period and this occurred several times over the 700k year records examined in the ice core data and this is the DO oscillations .. It is this data that Alarmists use to prop up the Al-Gore theory and yes.. there seems to be a synchronous duality between co2 effect and earths temperatures but the facts are THIS.. This is a relationship uniquely linked to ocean gyres/currents which has only become omnipresent since the closure of the Tethys sea.. (The Tethys sea was a equatorial body of water that nearly encompassed the entire mid-drift of the earth wherein warm water permanently resided at the equator and it is believed that Hadley cell styled atmospheric systems of air currents were the prime driver of the heat flux or heat transportation and the main means by which thermal equilibrium was achieved across the globe . When this equatorial sea existed the dual rise and fall of co2 was not evident. Incidentally 63million year ago is when the Tethys sea began to disappear, India slid into Asia and closed the first portion of the TethysSea with last major closing occurring only 3.5 million years ago when Central America was formed via plate tectonic upheaval. But when this sea closed we see DO oscillations. This closure created a new dynamic earth system which was forced to find a new route to equilibrium or a new way to distribute heat evenly over the planet. The oceans where now more restricted or blocked from their east/west travel and currents started to flow north and south along the great continents. This effected the earth's deep waterbodies but it took several thousand years to see the effects.. The effect seen this new equilibrium mechanism heat the oceans and produced the tell tale signs of co2 pulsing with temperature, but again this is only present in recent geological times or since the Tethys sea closure. The principle cause is outgassing of co2 by warming oceans as co2 is less soluble in warmer water. The DO oscillations show this and show that in most instances, it is temperature rise that leads co2. But not always and this leads us to the Milinkovic .. milankovitch cycles. The milankovitch cycle are in essence a geometric function of our position and ordination in space Its mathematically represented by a series of synodal sine waves that captures the earth ‘insulation’ relative to the earths orbit, procession and tilt etc etc.. These waves overlap at different times depending on the earths physical position/ordination. This cycles are somewhat linked to rhythm of DO oscillations but milankovitch cycle only became effective at governing earths climate when the planet had sufficient cooled to allow such a minor effect manifest itself as the great glaciations, previous tho this one might expect that it was more evident in simple weather systems but snow has a lasting effect.. We cooled and snow became more critical to the formation of a new climate structure and the new equilibrium was cemented. However, this equilibrium does change and is susceptible to chaage or external influences by other far reaching forces from deep space. Finally we are led to examine the beryllium 10 isotope data, It is formed in the atmosphere when earth was bombarded with sub atomic particles from deep space. The qualities within the geological despots allow us to ascertain the level of bombardment relative to the geological timeframe. This too was found in the same ice cores and the deposits found show a perfect correlation with known events. One such event being the Mini Ice Age, This was a time when we suffered a near return to deep glaciation which by the way, is the norm for 9/10th of this particular epoch in earth’s history. It is now understood that the sun controls more that first understood. As the earth has a magnetoshear, so does the sun have a heliosphere, the first being a magnetic shield and the later being a plasma based shield that extends out past the Ortt cloud. Solar output energy and the subsequent health of this heliosphere is one in the same. This heliosphere shields the solar system form incoming material from interstellar space, being material most likely ejected from supernova and other large cosmic phenomena . This heliosphere is pivotal to the solar system’s ability to deflect GCR (Galactic cosmic rays:-aka deep space particles travelling at 50k km/sec) as these partials ionize the upper atmosphere and set the stafe for excessive seeding of cloud formation which in turn blocks sun light and increase our reflection or earths albedo.. The levels of beryllium 10 which was found tied in perfectly with our written meteorological records of this time. This finding was further verified via sun spot records, which were recorded in earnest by generations of astronomers who were, at the time, unclear of the relevance of the observations and how it related to climate. A weakening sun over this period was illustrated via the sun spot number or the complete lack there of, this was known as the Maunder minimum. The bigger picture tells us that as the sun weened in output, sun spots activity lessened, the heliosphere weakened and GCR's created more ionized particales in the atmosphere and subsequently more cloud cover formed and earth cooled and this is what was witnessed.. The milankovitch cycles original hypothesis suggested that ice ages were exclusive to only one pole at any one time however, the DO data told us that ice ages occurred simultaneously at both poles thus we were able to see that it's the sun that causes the world wide effect and not 'earth-insulation' The milankovitch cycles were still felt by the relevant poles and this was evident in the order of the aforementioned sequence of events attributed to the time-lines of the rise and fall of co2 and temperature or in other words 'which rose first' The cycles could advance or retard the development of polar ice cap formation but only by around 1000years or less. So it clear now that co2 is just an observed effect of a warming earth and not a driver of climate change.. Remember that the political elite are generally the group of peropel that failed in the real world and they fell into politics. Now they set rules based on an A,B C understanding of climate. Additionally the problem is compounded now as the earths magnetosphere is weakening and it is not entirely clear as to the reasons why.. As such we know it’s weakening because we are detecting Aurora lower latitudes, even though the Sun has not been particularly active.. The one this that clear is that we dont understand what is exactly driving the sun and subsequently the earths climate. We know that we have energy field in space connecting stars, these are known as Burkeland currents and as such it is thought that a stars proximity to a burkeland current drives the stars output and its subsequent plasma field strength. if you are wishing to remain attached to the views of 200-year-old scientific beliefs under misunderstood concepts, then please do so! But anyone who believes that CO2 has the ability to do the heavy lifting of climate change is a clown... I have given you all the facts here! You need now to go and examine these facts for yourselves don't let Dark Green or Deep Green as I like to call it, try and ride the last profits from humanities endeavors. People, please educate yourselves, don’t take my word for it.. co2 is a religious concept to many who are too blinkered to accept flaws in their thinking. Regardless of this or any efforts by the earths populations, nothing will stop our return into the full ice age which is what n our doorstep.. Ice sheets from the poles to 50deg latitude north and south.. wake up ! You're being manipulated by the UN and its unelected bodies.

Excellent.

Unfortunately until the climate nutter's are willing to read actual data and not computer models, they will not change on their views.

The interview reminded me of Lindzen's frequent reference to the Tropics to Poles temperature gradient and how the B-D circulation acted as a partial barrier to mass atmospheric transport of heat poleward from the tropics (but not transfer by ocean circulation) ... I need to reread his excellent work. I think Svensmark's cosmic ray-cloud theory is intriguing and has significance. My guess is that greatest effect occurs mostly in low aersol density regions (eg lower Sthn Hemisphere oceans with little human pollution and low to moderate plankton release of sulfated compounds). In more polluted areas, and areas with high plankton growth, existing CCN density would limit additional cosmic ray effects. I also wonder about cosmic ray-cloud effects at height. That is, does cosmic ray incidence alter vertical structure of cloud type and density. With effect determined by water vapor concentrations and aerosols.

Chicken Little in Ottawa wants to control you , your freedoms, and your money.

I am glad to see that somehow science is still alive. Thank you for your intelligence 🖖🏼🫶🏻

"This issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution." James Lindsay

Anybody that correlates weather events with climate change is completely missing the point. Climate change can only be correlated with overall averages on weather events over time. Similarly, cherry-picking individual counter-examples from history is pointless. Post industrialisation climate change is real. Fossil fuel combustion, among other greenhouse gasses is the main factor. You don't get bunches of countries together to agree on a plan to reduce emissions without some good evidence. There's no collusion, or delusion. It's real. Stop listening to "the news", and self-affirming opinion pieces. Read up on the actual work done to come to these conclusions, and the arguments against them, and rebuttals... all referenced and multiply reviewed.