My understanding of this is that DARPA is basically throwing money at any company which can promise to supply small UAVs in quantity. Unique designs are welcome, but this is really about numbers and cost. What is baffling is that more resources are not being put into X-65, which actually does represent a revolutionary capability. Given that China has a similar program to exploit photomagnetic propulsion, you'd think this is an area where they'd want to remain competitive. LED lights, polarity uniforming layers, glass nanospheres and copper plates are fundamentally easier for us to make than induction motors and rotors and ultimately offer greater top speeds and efficiencies, particularly in rarefied air. Self-refueling hypersonic missiles are looking more practical provided the ingredient of integument heating prevention sufficient to maintain structural integrity. I can see that DARPA is investigating the practicality of both of my proposed methods (not proposed by me directly but proposed by a thief) of preventing integument heating, but that it's not a priority. EM railgun was the perfect booster mechanism for self-refueling hypersonics (powered by high-speed electrical hydrolysis) but the Navy shelved that program entirely. Once you have a missile moving at faster than about Mach 2.5, the water vapor in the air gives you enough energy to keep moving given its hydrogen content. The real issue is preventing integument heating. There are two key things you have to do. The first is to prevent the formation of the type of acoustic wave in the skin which tends to give rise to heating (the friction generates heat acoustically, not through actual scraping as many believe) and you do this through pulsed acceleration which causes air to strike the skin in a great many sheets rather than like raindrops. The second thing you have to do is to ensure the unidirectional flow of acoustic energy and this is done through vacuum vacancies configured literally like Tesla valves in the integument. The entire skin then acts as a resonator which ensures that acoustic energy only passes through the skin once rather than echoing. With these three technologies, you can put something into the air that moves at over Mach 5 and keeps moving for at least 24 hours and can essentially loiter.
@user-ln7gv2bx8v13 күн бұрын
これは日本も採用した方がいい。艦載ISRアセットとしてかなりの可能性を感じる。
@icecai554517 күн бұрын
So great design
@twasbrillig3317 күн бұрын
another for the fkin military and not for civilians
@user-um9sl1kj6u17 күн бұрын
This is precisely what the military needs. Or small FBO’s This needs to replace the Osprey. The thing is, they need better turbo props, powerplants, and ability to carry a lot of weight. Imagine this essentially like a DC9 or bigger, but it can land on an aircraft carrier while being lighter and having better armor
@bozs.r20 күн бұрын
The best drone design I've seen so far. Amazing.
@tonyc735222 күн бұрын
super impression congratulations. This how the V22 should work.
@AhmadDakhlallah126 күн бұрын
All these damn weapons will be used against us
@yagetoo27 күн бұрын
着陸については、どうなの? 何の為の離陸+飛行なの? 目的とした着陸点は? ???
@jang180929 күн бұрын
who needs an infantry, apc & ifv when these little birds which don’t need a runway can do the job faster w/o troop casualties?
@DavidGreen-hp5yqАй бұрын
Are drones are better at killing... 7 out of 10 arse-holes confrimed.
@jang1809Ай бұрын
these birds can replace the infantry.
@surkewrasoul4711Ай бұрын
awesome aircraft, Does it come in any other colour.
@ViCuBaАй бұрын
Американська розробка kzbin.info/www/bejne/oXKUdoGerbGkitEsi=VsaK0vnsEGm-JiZC
@spigot993Ай бұрын
I wonder how this scales up, to say carry passengers and shorten runways...
@alexchu4499Ай бұрын
I love this configuration so much! I know it’s all registered and all that but can I copy the configuration for my own project?
@user-bb9ur9wq3nАй бұрын
Это все про раскручивание военных на бабло , это не для массового производства. Как показала практика , военные это закажут , контора будет им это делать ГОДАМИ , а потом это все сгниет на складах БЕЗ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ ! Потому что чтобы применять надо иметь яйца , но не военным , а их ссыкливым политикам.
@barackeАй бұрын
wow. that's upsettingly dope.
@Shockwave_AppАй бұрын
It looks stable. Any plans for a hoverbike?
@americanbrandonАй бұрын
So how much
@pilettАй бұрын
Imagine Being able to press a buton and it will track down where someone lives
@hans-peterbrugger8963Ай бұрын
Fascinating swing wing design. Compact, efficient as a plane, no landing gear (problems). If that can be made in scale... "Bye bye helicopters" 🖐 (say that as a former pilot)
@aurorauplinksАй бұрын
pretty cool :) I appreciate its design of the wings following the engines, thats a pretty smart design. keep it up :)
@dwiharjanto5134Ай бұрын
Kalo di perbesar untuk kepentingan sosial bisa
@Moreda64Ай бұрын
Imagine how many of these things crashed before the succesful flight.
@luciustarquiniuspriscus1408Ай бұрын
"change the world for the better" Translation: line our pockets with rich military contracts.
@snowwhite7677Ай бұрын
Play your cards right PteroDynamics, maybe this is what the next gen C130 will look like. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nGi9nJJ-rtqAr7csi=hdjr4xi6jgHhYsLv&t=482
@massivecumshotАй бұрын
With 4 propellers, it'll kill Marines twice as fast as the Osprey.
@ITubeYouKАй бұрын
Fucking amazing.
@user-db2fb1db1mАй бұрын
That’s dum P51 better
@dougharding5231Ай бұрын
Look up the Boeing X-50 Dragonfly. I was there for the tests at Yuma Proving Grounds. It didn't work.
@stockfootagezАй бұрын
that blue electric tape
@andrewkonopka1152Ай бұрын
2 seater please AK
@gravity00xАй бұрын
i love how you put "VTOL killerdrone" and "we believe to change the world for the better" in one sentence!! bravo!
@shamancredible8632Ай бұрын
arms manufacturing company acting altruistic in their promotional material, and people think we don't live in a cyberpunk dystopia
@Uvoted4thisАй бұрын
Pizza Pizza
@michael121212ifyАй бұрын
no more long airport runways.... just landing spots, and small airports on many small towns...
@shamancredible8632Ай бұрын
They've been saying that for decades. They thought helicopters would accomplish what you just said, but it'll never happen. You still don't get it. They're going to make it illegal for us to have nice things. We'll be forced to walk while they fly private jets for a 7 minute trip while our taxes pay for it.
@brownj2Ай бұрын
I wonder if it can land on 3 motors
@shamancredible8632Ай бұрын
Only way that'll work is if it reduces thrust on the opposite engine, which essentially means unless they have it programmed to reverse prop directions in that case for that particular engine, it loses attitude control along that axis. Can it land on 3 motors? Theoretically yes, but I have no faith that they'd make it actually work. The bare minimum is usually where they stop.
@MarkusaurАй бұрын
all that amazing innovation and technical design and the first real idea you get for it's development and intended use is military.. this thing will probably kill ppl GGs
@alfredotrejo6593Ай бұрын
Tremendo dron con una capacidad de combinación de helicópteros a aeronaves muy buenas
@jayhome2715Ай бұрын
One future improvement would be the speed of the liftoff and transition from drone to plane. Now can we upscale that to a one seater so I can avoid the traffic in my commute to Toronto.
@walzegorgo5849Ай бұрын
hurra neue waffen wird ja auch zeit🤮🤮🤮
@davidgardner5230Ай бұрын
Skynet is going to be fucking terrifying
@rhoefferleАй бұрын
Not a smooth transition, is it?
@mirdallke2Ай бұрын
kiedy amerykance sie naucza ze dorony maja byc poprostu tanie
@nigelwest3430Ай бұрын
The Harrier Pegasus thrust vectoring engine did basically the same thing in 1967
@tweakradjeАй бұрын
Clever
@IndependantMind168Ай бұрын
Flight controller going nuts during the transition. Lol. Still pretty smooth.
@FroggyTWriteАй бұрын
looks cool, now ya just gotta try to get the DOD to pay 250k per bird 😅🤣
@LokiDaFerretАй бұрын
Are you sure you're trying to make the world better because it's sure looks like you're trying to do something for military application.