Пікірлер
@user-wb9bw1zx7z
@user-wb9bw1zx7z 9 күн бұрын
My understanding of this is that DARPA is basically throwing money at any company which can promise to supply small UAVs in quantity. Unique designs are welcome, but this is really about numbers and cost. What is baffling is that more resources are not being put into X-65, which actually does represent a revolutionary capability. Given that China has a similar program to exploit photomagnetic propulsion, you'd think this is an area where they'd want to remain competitive. LED lights, polarity uniforming layers, glass nanospheres and copper plates are fundamentally easier for us to make than induction motors and rotors and ultimately offer greater top speeds and efficiencies, particularly in rarefied air. Self-refueling hypersonic missiles are looking more practical provided the ingredient of integument heating prevention sufficient to maintain structural integrity. I can see that DARPA is investigating the practicality of both of my proposed methods (not proposed by me directly but proposed by a thief) of preventing integument heating, but that it's not a priority. EM railgun was the perfect booster mechanism for self-refueling hypersonics (powered by high-speed electrical hydrolysis) but the Navy shelved that program entirely. Once you have a missile moving at faster than about Mach 2.5, the water vapor in the air gives you enough energy to keep moving given its hydrogen content. The real issue is preventing integument heating. There are two key things you have to do. The first is to prevent the formation of the type of acoustic wave in the skin which tends to give rise to heating (the friction generates heat acoustically, not through actual scraping as many believe) and you do this through pulsed acceleration which causes air to strike the skin in a great many sheets rather than like raindrops. The second thing you have to do is to ensure the unidirectional flow of acoustic energy and this is done through vacuum vacancies configured literally like Tesla valves in the integument. The entire skin then acts as a resonator which ensures that acoustic energy only passes through the skin once rather than echoing. With these three technologies, you can put something into the air that moves at over Mach 5 and keeps moving for at least 24 hours and can essentially loiter.
@user-ln7gv2bx8v
@user-ln7gv2bx8v 13 күн бұрын
これは日本も採用した方がいい。艦載ISRアセットとしてかなりの可能性を感じる。
@icecai5545
@icecai5545 17 күн бұрын
So great design
@twasbrillig33
@twasbrillig33 17 күн бұрын
another for the fkin military and not for civilians
@user-um9sl1kj6u
@user-um9sl1kj6u 17 күн бұрын
This is precisely what the military needs. Or small FBO’s This needs to replace the Osprey. The thing is, they need better turbo props, powerplants, and ability to carry a lot of weight. Imagine this essentially like a DC9 or bigger, but it can land on an aircraft carrier while being lighter and having better armor
@bozs.r
@bozs.r 20 күн бұрын
The best drone design I've seen so far. Amazing.
@tonyc7352
@tonyc7352 22 күн бұрын
super impression congratulations. This how the V22 should work.
@AhmadDakhlallah1
@AhmadDakhlallah1 26 күн бұрын
All these damn weapons will be used against us
@yagetoo
@yagetoo 27 күн бұрын
着陸については、どうなの? 何の為の離陸+飛行なの? 目的とした着陸点は? ???
@jang1809
@jang1809 29 күн бұрын
who needs an infantry, apc & ifv when these little birds which don’t need a runway can do the job faster w/o troop casualties?
@DavidGreen-hp5yq
@DavidGreen-hp5yq Ай бұрын
Are drones are better at killing... 7 out of 10 arse-holes confrimed.
@jang1809
@jang1809 Ай бұрын
these birds can replace the infantry.
@surkewrasoul4711
@surkewrasoul4711 Ай бұрын
awesome aircraft, Does it come in any other colour.
@ViCuBa
@ViCuBa Ай бұрын
Американська розробка kzbin.info/www/bejne/oXKUdoGerbGkitEsi=VsaK0vnsEGm-JiZC
@spigot993
@spigot993 Ай бұрын
I wonder how this scales up, to say carry passengers and shorten runways...
@alexchu4499
@alexchu4499 Ай бұрын
I love this configuration so much! I know it’s all registered and all that but can I copy the configuration for my own project?
@user-bb9ur9wq3n
@user-bb9ur9wq3n Ай бұрын
Это все про раскручивание военных на бабло , это не для массового производства. Как показала практика , военные это закажут , контора будет им это делать ГОДАМИ , а потом это все сгниет на складах БЕЗ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ ! Потому что чтобы применять надо иметь яйца , но не военным , а их ссыкливым политикам.
@baracke
@baracke Ай бұрын
wow. that's upsettingly dope.
@Shockwave_App
@Shockwave_App Ай бұрын
It looks stable. Any plans for a hoverbike?
@americanbrandon
@americanbrandon Ай бұрын
So how much
@pilett
@pilett Ай бұрын
Imagine Being able to press a buton and it will track down where someone lives
@hans-peterbrugger8963
@hans-peterbrugger8963 Ай бұрын
Fascinating swing wing design. Compact, efficient as a plane, no landing gear (problems). If that can be made in scale... "Bye bye helicopters" 🖐 (say that as a former pilot)
@aurorauplinks
@aurorauplinks Ай бұрын
pretty cool :) I appreciate its design of the wings following the engines, thats a pretty smart design. keep it up :)
@dwiharjanto5134
@dwiharjanto5134 Ай бұрын
Kalo di perbesar untuk kepentingan sosial bisa
@Moreda64
@Moreda64 Ай бұрын
Imagine how many of these things crashed before the succesful flight.
@luciustarquiniuspriscus1408
@luciustarquiniuspriscus1408 Ай бұрын
"change the world for the better" Translation: line our pockets with rich military contracts.
@snowwhite7677
@snowwhite7677 Ай бұрын
Play your cards right PteroDynamics, maybe this is what the next gen C130 will look like. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nGi9nJJ-rtqAr7csi=hdjr4xi6jgHhYsLv&t=482
@massivecumshot
@massivecumshot Ай бұрын
With 4 propellers, it'll kill Marines twice as fast as the Osprey.
@ITubeYouK
@ITubeYouK Ай бұрын
Fucking amazing.
@user-db2fb1db1m
@user-db2fb1db1m Ай бұрын
That’s dum P51 better
@dougharding5231
@dougharding5231 Ай бұрын
Look up the Boeing X-50 Dragonfly. I was there for the tests at Yuma Proving Grounds. It didn't work.
@stockfootagez
@stockfootagez Ай бұрын
that blue electric tape
@andrewkonopka1152
@andrewkonopka1152 Ай бұрын
2 seater please AK
@gravity00x
@gravity00x Ай бұрын
i love how you put "VTOL killerdrone" and "we believe to change the world for the better" in one sentence!! bravo!
@shamancredible8632
@shamancredible8632 Ай бұрын
arms manufacturing company acting altruistic in their promotional material, and people think we don't live in a cyberpunk dystopia
@Uvoted4this
@Uvoted4this Ай бұрын
Pizza Pizza
@michael121212ify
@michael121212ify Ай бұрын
no more long airport runways.... just landing spots, and small airports on many small towns...
@shamancredible8632
@shamancredible8632 Ай бұрын
They've been saying that for decades. They thought helicopters would accomplish what you just said, but it'll never happen. You still don't get it. They're going to make it illegal for us to have nice things. We'll be forced to walk while they fly private jets for a 7 minute trip while our taxes pay for it.
@brownj2
@brownj2 Ай бұрын
I wonder if it can land on 3 motors
@shamancredible8632
@shamancredible8632 Ай бұрын
Only way that'll work is if it reduces thrust on the opposite engine, which essentially means unless they have it programmed to reverse prop directions in that case for that particular engine, it loses attitude control along that axis. Can it land on 3 motors? Theoretically yes, but I have no faith that they'd make it actually work. The bare minimum is usually where they stop.
@Markusaur
@Markusaur Ай бұрын
all that amazing innovation and technical design and the first real idea you get for it's development and intended use is military.. this thing will probably kill ppl GGs
@alfredotrejo6593
@alfredotrejo6593 Ай бұрын
Tremendo dron con una capacidad de combinación de helicópteros a aeronaves muy buenas
@jayhome2715
@jayhome2715 Ай бұрын
One future improvement would be the speed of the liftoff and transition from drone to plane. Now can we upscale that to a one seater so I can avoid the traffic in my commute to Toronto.
@walzegorgo5849
@walzegorgo5849 Ай бұрын
hurra neue waffen wird ja auch zeit🤮🤮🤮
@davidgardner5230
@davidgardner5230 Ай бұрын
Skynet is going to be fucking terrifying
@rhoefferle
@rhoefferle Ай бұрын
Not a smooth transition, is it?
@mirdallke2
@mirdallke2 Ай бұрын
kiedy amerykance sie naucza ze dorony maja byc poprostu tanie
@nigelwest3430
@nigelwest3430 Ай бұрын
The Harrier Pegasus thrust vectoring engine did basically the same thing in 1967
@tweakradje
@tweakradje Ай бұрын
Clever
@IndependantMind168
@IndependantMind168 Ай бұрын
Flight controller going nuts during the transition. Lol. Still pretty smooth.
@FroggyTWrite
@FroggyTWrite Ай бұрын
looks cool, now ya just gotta try to get the DOD to pay 250k per bird 😅🤣
@LokiDaFerret
@LokiDaFerret Ай бұрын
Are you sure you're trying to make the world better because it's sure looks like you're trying to do something for military application.
@jaekamei
@jaekamei Ай бұрын
*Unfixed-wing