Una pregunta cómo desbloqueate personaje de Valkiria chrolines y 4 sale aquí pensaba qué salía los Valkiria chrolines 3

In this game: ATT > REC > LIFE > STA > ARM Attack should pretty much be maxed out for every invizimal. Recovery should be minimum 9. Preferable 11 / 14 / 17 / (22 on Mutant Tigershark is perfect. Even not upgrading stamina whatsoever, you never rly run out of stamina). You mostly don't need to upgrade stamina at all. Just the recovery. To explain, Rec upgrades are a minimum of 2, even on the lowest base. This means every Rec upgrade gets you an extra 2 stamina per second. The highest base stamina stat (160) increases your max stamina by 32. So if a battle goes longer than 16 seconds (32/2 - which they always do), then stamina should not be increased at all. Recovery is much more significant. Life should be at least 180 in my experience. Invizimals with higher base life can pump a couple more levels in to get added benefit, but generally the range of 180 - 300 is ideal). Invizimals with base life of 100 shouldn't upgrade it more than 2 or 3 times. Stamina should only be increased in certain cases where Invizimals have 100 stamina. In the case of Mutant Tigershark, increasing recovery by 4 every level is a much better deal than increasing stamina at all. In my opinion I think increasing stamina from 100 to 120 might be a bit preferable than recovery from 17 -> 20, as because the recovery is quite high, you will frequently cap out at 100 stamina throughout the battle and are essentially wasting stamina. So increasing the cap means it also kind of increases the range of the recovery. But perhaps if you had 20 recovery, 100 stamina wouldn't matter (similar to 22 rec with mutant Tigershark - not tried it). Armor is a controversial one I think because it scales well against basic attacks, but most of the benefit is at the peak of the stat. Gaining 6 armor per level vs (in the case of the lowest base life stat) 40 life per level is really a bad deal. Not certain about the damage calculation but I think it's just a flat reduction of the damage. So 35 damage (the base heavy attack) - 6 armor = 29 damage. If you have 100 life and 6 armor, you can take 4 heavy attacks. If you have 140 life and no armor, you can take the same. Iff we take the weakest attack base and max it out, a heavy attack does around 78 damage. Let's upgrade 1 invizimals with lowest base life to max (300) with 0 armor, and 1 invizimals with base armor 0 to max (30), and keep it at 100 life. Max life invizimal can take 4 hits, but the max armor invizimal can only take (100/48) 3 hits, and after the second there's pretty much no life left, so what if one of those attacks was a perfect hit? And that's just the lowest possible max heavy attack. If we go with any higher than 22 damage, the result is even worse for armor maxi. However, when it comes to quick attacks and basic attacks, armor seems to scale in between, where the cut off point at which a quick attack can kill a minimum life (base 100) max armor (base 0) invizimal quicker than a maximum life (lowest base life btw, not even considering higher base life) no armor invizimal is around 18. This means if you are going against an invizimal with an attack rating of 18 or more (most, seen as invizimals with higher attack also happen to be the better ones, in big part because of their high attack), then life > armor. And each additional point in attack of your enemy widens the gap between how much more significant life would be than armor. 33 armor vs 300 life, cut off point is 21 (both killed in same number of hits). For 36 armor, cut off point is 22. These cut off points are lower for heavy attacks. In the cases where invizimals have higher than 100 base life, the above cut off points would then be lower and lower. However, what makes this controversial is because the enemy is AI, so whether armor can outplay life depends on rng of whether the enemy uses more basic attacks than quick or heavy attacks. This is because the cut off point for when a 300 life 0 armor invizimal and a 100 life 30 armor individual would be killed by basic attacks is at 30 attack! The only invizimals with that much attack in the first game are Flameclaw, Selma (probably the best basic invizimal in the first game imo), and some of the dragons. Any basic attack damage from an invizimal with 20 or less attack would become 0 if defending invizimal has 30 armor. 22 for 33 armor, 24 for 36 armor, and 26 for 39 armor. An invizimal with 36 or 39 armor could not be damaged at all by the attacks of a level 1 invizimal with 10 base damage (ignoring the existence of weaknesses and perfect hits). So the armor scales a lot better against basic attacks than quick and heavy attacks, the latter of which are better defended against by upgrading life (even if life is base 100). If each attack is used equally then the average base damage would be 22.5, which is just a bit below quick attacks which have 25. So the previous paragraph would be the same in this situation except a little bit less skewed away from armor. However vs AI, due to rng, a higher armor invizimal could have a much better time than a higher life individual, but from what I can tell the probability is more skewed in favour of life. In this case, armor is not worth upgrading AT ALL. Not even once, because armor gets most of its benefit towards maxing out the stat. Before 18 or so armor (which would take 3 upgrades), even for basic attacks life might be more preferable. So the two options are 0 armor, or maxing out armor for an invizimal with maybe 6 or 9 (only Skeletail) armor. Anything in between is really not worth the probability outlined above. Having said all this, the "min-max", quickest and best way to level nearly every Invizimal is focusing on attack only until level 4, then focusing on 3 things: maxing out attack or 1 level before it's maxed, upgrading recovery at least 3 times, and upgrading life to your desire. Stamina only upgraded in the situation outlined previously, where having such a low base stamina might harm you more than not. Armor completely untouched, unless you are trying to make a maxed armored invizimal. I did this with Furmin, and only levelled attack 3 times instead of recommended 4 or 5. It can take quite a bit, but without having high enough attack or recovery, the battle is long and if the enemy chooses the right attacks you don't have much chance. The objective best stats for a basic invizimal will be: 120 / 100 / 8 / 13 / 0 100 / 120 / 8 / 13 / 0 100 / 120 / 6 / 14 / 0 100 / 100 / 9 / 13 / 0 Having figured this out made me a bit sad, but even though it made it seem like many Invizimals are not really usable, the types of attacks and everything does make it more ambiguous as to who is the best Invizimal (i.e. the 5th strongest on paper might actually be better than the strongest simply because the supposed strongest has a heavy attack that is absorbed by the 5th strongest). Could include Flameclaws stats as 14 base attack is really relevant but 5 base recovery and 2 wasted points in armor does suffer him quite a bit. This is why Salma is a lot better on paper. Therefore the best basic Invizimals, on paper, are: - Rattleraptor - Salma - Tunderwulfe - Tigershark However, other stat variations can be beneficial. E.g. Zaphyra having 160 base stamina is relevant, though it is probably better if 1 or 2 of them points were elsewhere. Other honorable mentions might be, on stats alone, Bratbat, Moonhowler (even though wasted armor stat), Metalmutt, Skytalon, Mobula. I used to love Icelion as a kid and considered him the strongest (never even remembered Salma), but the 2 wasted points in armor hurt him like Flameclaw. Probably each as good as each other though. Wrote all this for my own enjoyment and maybe some nerds find it interesting.

OMG! I remember playing Disney Friends game on DS. I remember the Stitch one from Lilo & Stitch. This brings back so many memories!

i like your vlog style content that mixes with yugioh

Antares: gets decapitated Also Antares : -_-

20:49

es que es perfecto

all characters are : Sol Badguy and Sol Notbadguy

LMAO the fact that you defeated Bargle the Mage with ONE magic attack after he eas talking aboutbhow magic isnt for the weak minded LMAO I am deceased!💀

The third is the hardest

😂

I love victory theme after defeated

Megaseadramon and Waruseadramon

The BGM is super good❤

Even if you buy all skins you still have 4 titanium bolts. What can you use them on?

Man, I remember being a latchkey kid gathering around the one computer with the other kids watching people try and beat the last boss. We all thought it was impossible cuz no one could do it.

I think ur games having a seizure

First

Pin me pls

What was the first one?

What version of the game is this?

At least in this game doesn't have multiplayer in one map unlike Sparking Zero

You’ve just unlocked a childhood memory I always asked my sister if I could play this all the time

Click. "Save". FAVORITES." :)

I remember being 5 and playing this at my grandmom's house. She passed way two years later from cancer, I remember playing computer games with her and how much she enjoyed watching me learn and "blow through games and books so easily". Somehow she always had a way of making me feel smart and loved. I wish she was here today. If the medical industry wasn't corrupt, she would be. So many people should still be alive 💔 Ivermectin people, Ivermectin. I wish we would've known back then, it makes me sick how simple the cure was and she's gone 😢

Ambil kado tiap lewat. Biar lawan pd kena.

16:32 - 16:42 Joannie, that so got smacking her butts all of time 😂😂😂😂 so frickin hilarious.

Just asking can you play the incredibles and the incredibles rise of the underminer on the playstation 3 backwards compatible console 60gb because I am planning to get this console next year

Откуда У Yeti Project Redux две Дубинки

I remember this game! It was my first video game I ever owned. I love this so much...

Catched 2009.. fuck me this cant be that long... wtf

did u know about goblin from chocobo series?

MY CHILDHOOD!!!!!

As a kid, I never paid that much attention to the voice and was more focused about listening to his lecture about the bugs. Now, as an adult, after realizing it was Charles Martinet, this sounds almost like Super Mario teaching us about bugs.

26:11 😂😂😂😂😂 oh damn!

20:18 😂😂😂😂 oh crap!

Rahkshi in this game are 6"0 vs 5"9

How to get sinister serpent dungeon worm and trent

I’m just going to say it Amy’s Riders outfit is better than her standard modern outfit

Cubix Robots for everyone is my childhood. I remember when I first played this game. I found out about Cubix because it aired on Saturday mornings 4Kids Entrainment. The TV show was pretty cool. They outta bring back this series. Both the show and the games. I'll never forget how much I enjoyed playing these games as a child. The way they did the combat in it was unique using a red and blue spinning wheel was very unique and interesting. We need a reboot/remake of Cubix with updated animation and voices.

Some parts of this game would scare me because of how liminal it was, especially the simba maze and the pooh game

Why just ppgs z???

Wtf was that scream ☠️

2:18 Hailey : play that song shake your groove thing and release the disco ball 🪩 baby because now it’s time to party 💃

Yeah, I really try to digi

Denkou (Ciel) looks like a character of Walt Disney.

My favorite Transformers game

DCFDTL

I was playing it when i was younger and i had a great time

man wish we could see every care from the movie even the rally cars as there where so many cool designs