Great channel. Subscribed. Could you make a video about the history of the German WWII torpedos, including the acoustic torps?
@SubmarineHistory2 күн бұрын
Thank you for subscribing and Yeah I will cover torps. I've got plans already for two more briefings for this year (Nov and Dec) but maybe early next year we can start on torpedeos. Probably a series of briefings.
@b.griffin3172 күн бұрын
14:00 Interesting that there are more than twice as many "ober-" machinengefreiter as ordinary ranks. Why the doubling of the higher ranks?
@SubmarineHistory2 күн бұрын
I'm going to say it's because of the additional training required in the U-boat service, people are going to have a little more time in service so higher in rank and you probably wanted more senior people since U-boats are complex to operate and maintain.
@b.griffin3172 күн бұрын
7:05 So this is the minimum number of crew to operate the boat? Anyone else onboard was in a sense optional?
@SubmarineHistory2 күн бұрын
That is the minimum number of personnel for a Type II. Could you have an engineering officer training assigned for a patrol to get experience? Possible but more likely in a Type VII or IX. The range was so short and they operated close enough to Germany you didn't have a need for ersatz crew or specialists like doctors.
@b.griffin3173 күн бұрын
Where was depth measured? If at the center of the boat parts of the bow or stern could be considerably deeper if diving or ascending and thus experiencing different depths. How was this factored in?
@SubmarineHistory3 күн бұрын
In general you didn't want to dive at more than a 30 degree angle, otherwise you'd start losing water from the batteries. So assuming a Type VII U-boat made a dive at 30 degrees, the bow is going to be about 17 meters (56 feet) lower than the center of the boat. They would know that and factor that into their depth calculus. Probably less important for crush depth and more important to make sure you don't hit the seabed.
@b.griffin3173 күн бұрын
"Diving depth would be verified at the dock." How would it be verified? It obviously couldn't be tested to this depth at the dock. Would the captain sign off on this number before departing? What exactly is meant by this?
@SubmarineHistory3 күн бұрын
The shipyards had pressure cylinders sitting in floating dry docks that were big enough they could slide a U-boat into them. Once inside, they would seal the cylinder and increase the pressure inside to simulate water depth. They could do at least 10 atmospheres - which is about 100 meters (normal diving depth). The Captain and Engineering Officer who were going to receive the U-boat were inside while it was being pressure tested, so they could confirm integrity before acceptance.
@deckape7143 күн бұрын
Whats with the edelweiss logo no time 4 U
@markdavis24754 күн бұрын
Apparently the workers welding the hull sections together had to keep working even during air raids.
@SubmarineHistoryКүн бұрын
Without reviewing the literature, I'm skeptical that workers would have kept working on U-boat assembly during an air raid beacause an air raid is relatively short and the risk of losing your skilled workers is so high.
@markdavis2475Күн бұрын
@SubmarineHistory I'll have look for the reference.
@Bigrednumber775 күн бұрын
I love that you post your references! Makes reading to understand your perspective so much easier.
@SubmarineHistory5 күн бұрын
Thanks, I'm always trying to make sure I'm getting the information right.
@friedtomatoes49465 күн бұрын
I would love to know how the aip with system worked on those boats even if it was never produced
@SubmarineHistory5 күн бұрын
We'll get there soon, thanks for watching!
@dafyddllewellyn66365 күн бұрын
I think you will find that the end of the 2nd "Happy Time" corresponds with the introduction of 3 cm wavelength "H2S " radar on allied aircraft searching the mid-Atlantic gap. The Type XXI U-boat never got used in any quantity, because British Bomber Command made sure that the Mitteland and Dortmund-Ems canals were bombed whenever they contained enough water for the pre-fabricated components of the U-boats to be shipped to the coast for assembly; also the Baltic Sea was so thoroughly mined that it could not be used to train U-boat crews.
@shaunmcclory81175 күн бұрын
Raeder needed radar on his raiders😊
@SubmarineHistory5 күн бұрын
He did!
@hazchemel2 күн бұрын
He donated doughnuts to Doenitz.
@naughtiusmaximus8306 күн бұрын
I’m convinced mis-management of the BF-109 fleet led to this and lost the war.
@brianswan35596 күн бұрын
The only real outcome from the Fairlie ASW trials of Sept 1944 was the recomendation by the RN for the Allies to immediately bomb the type XXI assembly yards as at that stage there was no other effective means to counter the threat. The type XXI was the first modern attack submarine and Cold War SSK combining sophisticated sensors, weapons and an enhanced underwater performance. HMS Seraph was the very same submarine as per Operation Mincemeat and portrayed in the movie "The Man That Never Was."
@exharkhun56056 күн бұрын
Is it Electro-boot month already? I've watched an Electro-baby-boot (type xxiii) video barely a few days ago, and while I was watching this video a notification of a Drachinifel video about Walter- and Electro-boots popped up. Why the sudden Electro-boot-tsunami? (Not that I mind)
@SubmarineHistory6 күн бұрын
I've noticed that too... Drac must be running out of material to cover because he's been doing more submarine stuff lately.
@jesusbauer88616 күн бұрын
You can only use the Type XXI class sub in Silent Hunter II & III afaik.
@Blackstarr2236 күн бұрын
Why dont we see "Walter Drives" get prevalent development post-war by the allies? Is it due to the volatile nature of the fuel, akin to Me163 Komets? Ive only done bare surface research, but they just feel like October caterpillar-drive levels of quandary. Where/how does the turbine exhaust exit if its a sub-surface drive..
@SubmarineHistory6 күн бұрын
I believe the form of hydrogen peroxide that was being used for the Walter AIP system was very volatile. I haven't done much reading on the Walter AIP, but Eberhard Roessler in his book "The U-boat" he covers it in detail. When I talk about the Walter boats, that will be the primary reference I use.
@markdavis24754 күн бұрын
The British built two Walter powered boats, post war. One got the nickname HMS Exploder, enough said 😂
@UboatCrewInterrogationReports6 күн бұрын
I approve of this. 😁
@SubmarineHistory6 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@Rokaize8 күн бұрын
This sounds like a great idea. I’m on board with this. Also, I am gay
@craigklein556312 күн бұрын
Us submarines could dive just as deep as any German U-boat. Germans just had a higher risk tolerance as compared to safety policy with us submarines. The USS Tang proved this by diving so deep it went over the 600 ft depth gauge.
@wntu419 күн бұрын
A note. The surviving crew of U 64 formed the core crew of the later (in)famous U-505.
@wntu427 күн бұрын
Apparently bigger boats had actual physicians assigned as crew. I found this out in reading the book on U-505 (A type IX) written by one of the crew. This is the sub that ended up captured and is now at the Chicago Museum of Science.
@thebarronflights29 күн бұрын
I only want to know one thing. Type 9 Uboat, what is inside the conning tower or sail. I have watched May videos and not one shows what is inside the conning tower.
@SubmarineHistory29 күн бұрын
Inside the conning tower, you have a periscope, controls for the torpedo data computer (TDC), input controls for manuvering and a few other things. The captain would conduct submerged attacks from inside the conning tower. You never see this in movies because the space is so small you couldn't get cameras up there to film. Pretty sure you can't get into the conning tower of any museum subs because it's such a confined space. If you play computer games like Silent Hunter 3 (SH3), you can go into the conning tower and look around.
@SaraNormandCavalieri29 күн бұрын
Hello! I'm wondering if you know about the land-based DF's used in China during WWII. My grandpa was an operator at Yunnanyi, and I'm trying to get a sense for what exactly he did when planes were lost. I.e., did planes call in when they were in trouble? Or would he have just been monitoring airwaves? Is the oscilloscope where you actually see the bearing? Apologies if these are stupid questions! The War Department book / manual I have about it is for Radio Set SCR-291-A if that helps.
@SubmarineHistory29 күн бұрын
Great question! Let me dig around a bit and I'll get back to you.
@SubmarineHistory29 күн бұрын
Do you know the dates when your grandpa served over there?
@longtabsigo29 күн бұрын
I was an item manager for communication systems for several years. As someone pointed out “AN/XX” the AN is for ArmyNavy. During the R&D for the new survival radio, the Navy kept hammering that the radios must be waterproofed to 2Atm, 66ft. I was tired of this as it was YEARS to the procurement. One “all users” conference at the Boeing HQ in Anaheim. I was really frustrated and did some math, I came up with the figure of 550,250,333. My higher HQ Rep asked what that was, I told him that was how many heavy duty ziplock bags we could buy each year to put the SEALs radios in to waterproof them to 66 ft. I asked “are they going to try to use their radios under water?” If not, they didn’t need to be $8,000-22,000 MORE PER RADIO to meet that 2atmosphere “requirement”. I was reassigned from that program soon after. AN/PRC112’s.
@longtabsigo29 күн бұрын
Communication plans are tough, I will give away my job with the following two RULES. 2 is 1 1 is none. Why? Shit happens. All good common sense plans follow this acronym. PACE. Primary Alternate Contingency Emergency It is CRITICAL to always rehearse “Actions at the Objective.” Writ Loud Market Garden.
@sboppleАй бұрын
Thanks!
@JackSmith-jj3biАй бұрын
My deepest respect to and for the Navajo Code Talkers. One of my father’s brothers serviced with the Army in the South Pacific. So many times he would tell us kids about the code talkers and the lives that were saved because of them.
@hansla8608Ай бұрын
It really shows the challenges of requirements development and acquisition, especially when operating jointly. I had forgotten that the “AN/…” stood for Army/Navy, which is still applied to equipment today.
@lesmoore6443Ай бұрын
Very interesting aspect of the "difficult" operation at Betio. Well done.
@jimsteele4017Ай бұрын
@11:30 on the LEFT you see the original walky-talky. You could walk around and talk on the two-way radio with the SCR-300. The SCR-536 radio set on the right was called the HANDY-TALKY, a phrase that never really caught on. It is however the prototype of what would in popular parlance become the "walky-talky."
@peterdalton4370Ай бұрын
Thank you for a most interesting video. I am a communications guy and I lived on Tarawa for three years 1992-1995. Unfortunately this lesson in pre-battle planning probably came at a high cost for the men who had to do the fighting. Even during my time on the island there was still a lot of military scrap metal littering the lagoon side beaches down at the Betio end of the island.
@vcv6560Ай бұрын
That firing the guns would knock out the vacuum tube radio equipment doesn't surprise me, it (I believe) happened on the Bismark too. The specialty tubes constructed for the proximity fuse (5 in) AA were not used on the general communication gear.
@SubmarineHistoryАй бұрын
I think with the Bismark it's radar system was knocked (probablay radios too) out when they fired their guns in the opening battle. Thank you for the comment!
@AnnaSteffnerАй бұрын
Excellent video. Can you recommend anyone from the list who is a skilled researcher in WW2 Navy/ Marine Corps record groups?
@SubmarineHistoryАй бұрын
I'm not sure I understand the question, can you re-phrase?
@mr50sagain55Ай бұрын
Thank you for this awesome video…what a great topic!...as a radio hobbyist, I have often wondered how the WW2 era radio technology fared in combat realizing that specifics on failures would likely be difficult or impossible to find…your video does a great job of pulling together scenarios which certainly could have occurred on other battlefronts!!...motivated me to search for other examples and did find interesting info on Battle of Arnhem!!!...BTW…love your submarine content too!!!!
@SubmarineHistoryАй бұрын
Thank you for the kind words, 73!
@surferdess494Ай бұрын
well done Haiku...i was on a geekiness low. i sure needed this. Mahalo Braddah
@AM-el4ivАй бұрын
Thanks for mentioning the notable submarine escapes. Looked them up and are extremely interesting cases.
@RyanN880EPАй бұрын
Cool and informative video! I've collected a few WW2 relics over the years, and I've got a U boat emblem pin, of U201, the Snowman. Some of the paint has flaked off but I believe the pin dates back to WW2. Would you know the purpose of these pins? Souvenirs maybe? I've always been kinda curious. Thanks for any info. Ryan H.
@SubmarineHistoryАй бұрын
Give me a little bit of time to look into that. If you don't hear back from me in a week or so, send me email, it's on the channel page. And thanks for watching and the comment, it's appreciated!
@SubmarineHistoryАй бұрын
If you can send me a picture of the emblem pin that would be helpful.
@richardschaffer5588Ай бұрын
As simulations become more ‘real’ our realizations become more false. We end up in fantasyland which we believe is reality.
@abousamah1967Ай бұрын
موضوع جميل جدا كنت اتسأل دائما ماهي التقنية المتطورة في البطاريات المستعمله للوحوش الالمانيه التي ارعبت السفن في الاطلسي
@Bingo551Ай бұрын
Metros.. Biscayne cross..
@RalfP-v3sАй бұрын
wwII Bombers youtube channel , you will find there tons of statistics
@SubmarineHistoryАй бұрын
Yeah I know the channel, it's great.
@grandaddyoe1434Ай бұрын
Very relevant to this issue was the mid-1943 withdrawal of U-boats from Atlantic patrols. Flak and other 'improvements' were precursors to the re-introduction; the narrative ignores this policy.
@grandaddyoe1434Ай бұрын
Please control your sniffing . . . . thanx
@grandaddyoe1434Ай бұрын
Two and a half minutes of wittering before it really begins.