Love listening to him talk. His books are amazing. RIP
@treflatface2 ай бұрын
Thanks for creating and sharing this!
@AdamChmurzynski-rk9lw4 ай бұрын
Where can the full interview be found?
@urbanology3 ай бұрын
The original tape had many technical problems, so I won't upload the whole thing. The one long section left involves a particular housing project at the University of Oregon. I'm making a video that will incorporate that material.
@urbanology3 ай бұрын
There is another snippet from this interview here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/kHW4nXpseph_ptk
@AdamChmurzynski-rk9lw3 ай бұрын
Just wanted to say that I'm making my way through the Nature of Order (on Book 2), I feel very touched by this work and this family of ideas, I think what you're doing is very important.
@DrosIntentions5 ай бұрын
🤔
@MIGrecordz9 ай бұрын
Hello Greg! Do you happen to know anything about the books Christopher Alexander was working on before he sadly passed away? I've heard something about that, but very very little, that he was working on some unpublished books that go way beyond the initial ideas he established in the 4 volumes of Nature of Order. Thanks!
@urbanology7 ай бұрын
There are many other drafts, papers, explorations, and projects ... but 'Battle' (2012) was his last focused statement. He poured everything into it. Highly recommended. Other material and research will slowly emerge from The Archive Project, and other outlets like this one and www.buildingbeauty.org/ , www.patternlanguage.com/ , and beautiful.software/ ...
@raghavendras40979 ай бұрын
Thank you for interviewing him and publishing this video
@filiscode Жыл бұрын
Amazing work done on this channel. Thank you
@kateshoemakerqigong Жыл бұрын
“Which picture best represents your true self?”
@TheUltimateGeminiHasSurvived Жыл бұрын
RIP GOAT
@elelaluz4921 Жыл бұрын
This is a gem
@nakedflames Жыл бұрын
I feel as if I'm hopelessly in love with this video
@lizvalente58172 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Thank you!
@paolaveronicadellaira42132 жыл бұрын
please can I know who is the interviewer? Is this a lesson or what ? It seems a a countdown. And he seem very young. what date?
@urbanology2 жыл бұрын
The year is 1995, when David Heine and Greg Bryant were collaborating on a documentary about Christopher Alexander. Some of the original tapes were lost, and only copies with 'time codes' remain, like this one. This is Alexander responding to David Heine, who asked about the origin of the material in 'The Nature of Order'.
@mjantunezl2 жыл бұрын
First, I really appreciate the work you have been doing sharing this knowledge... I have been wondering, if there is a repository of unfolding sequences for the construction of different things, like the unfolding sequence for a Japanese Tea Ceremony Building described in the Nature of Order (I felt that was a particularly powerful example).
@urbanology2 жыл бұрын
I'm still working on putting a wide range of unfolding sequences into a genuinely useful and sensitive online experience. About 20 years ago we gave it a few tries, and started to publish experiments, some finished, some not, on various sites. Quite a few of the gadgets don't work any longer, but there's still very good sequence material here: www.patternlanguage.com/sequences/sequences.html www.livingneighborhoods.org/ht-0/generative.htm
@tedchu88882 жыл бұрын
People can see but unaware what they see ...
@mauropainter2 жыл бұрын
Get a feel for what seemed to be the right thing to do here Only thing one was aware of Bricks Size is phenomenally I wasn’t interested because it was traditional Those bricks had feeling and other bricks don’t It’s meant to look pretty but it doesn’t because it’s all wrong It had disappeared why you would bother to do it It doesn’t have any thing to do with anything historical If you’re going to build a wall out of this stuff that’s what you do to make sense out of it The bricks need to be a more pure color When you try to do things the right way A way that has actual feeling in it I suppose you end up in a place That either is traditional or has the real character of tradition
@mauropainter2 жыл бұрын
What this is is perfectly harmonious with the sheep and the trees and the grass
@mukeirabluetemple69502 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for uploading this. Incredible
@AnnMedlock2 жыл бұрын
Delighted to find this. I spent five years working with Chris to build a house in the 80s, before he did the Sussex project. It was a treat to listen to his thoughts again, in this video.
@mmendi1114 Жыл бұрын
I'm in awe that you got to work alongside such an individual and the experience and memories gained....
@niliportugali22252 жыл бұрын
soooooooooo correct of what Chris is pointing out.
@olgavolchkova82093 жыл бұрын
Thank you Urbanology! More videos please!
@alexandernazarenko47473 жыл бұрын
Amazing! Thank you!
@krisang_co3 жыл бұрын
Such a profound thinker. Even today, very few understand the depth and the impact of pattern language could have on architecture.
@generativeresearch3 жыл бұрын
What a brilliant man
@mariahelenapereira50213 жыл бұрын
Olá tem um perfil falso usando teu nome dizendo q vc e um soldado americano para enganar as pessoas .ok
@georgecharalambous23493 жыл бұрын
Thank you for uploading. It would be great if the background noise is removed 😊 let me know if you need help with it
@william_022 жыл бұрын
I like it. It’s nostalgic
@thomaswidera5223 жыл бұрын
He should have done it. He was the one who would have done it the best
@Mohsenyazdani3 жыл бұрын
Such a great and thoughtful man.
@orglancs2 жыл бұрын
Yes, it's tragic that his work is so little known, especially in the UK. Hardly anyone has ever heard of him here. One of his other books, The Timeless Way of Building is truly inspiring and goes much further than just 'pattern language'.
@MichaelHrostoskiCreates3 жыл бұрын
This is exactly what I was looking for. The intersection of beauty and software. I just came across Christopher Alexander's work through a search for "pattern recognition." Thank you Greg.
@urbanology7 жыл бұрын
Here's a natural science perspective on investigating the objectivity of perceiving 'life': www.rainmagazine.com/archive/2015/living-structure-and-cognition
@urbanology7 жыл бұрын
The notions of 'objective' and 'subjective' are heavily discussed in the natural sciences. People are often surprised to learn that these are not technical terms, but rather considerations to be grappled with. Originally, an object is something seen, and a subject is someone seeing. But isn't a feeling or thought something real, that we can study objectively? Don't our subjective biases interfere with experimentation and observation? If I observe my own experience, is that subjective or objective? If someone reports their experience to me, isn't their report subjective, but the report's existence is objective, and my interpretation of it is subjective? Clearly we need to agree upon criteria for making progress in any complex scientific endeavor of this sort. Is it an objective or a subjective experience when I look into a light and have an afterimage on my retina? No one else can see the afterimage on my retina, but we assume that the experience exists, that it has a cause, that we can build enlightening theories about the experience and test them, and further investigate them. The study of all psychological phenomena must consider these issues if they are to make any progress, and many of the natural sciences need to constantly consider the influence of the observer on the observed. So Alexander is assuming that when someone says that something has 'life', or 'feeling', we can first assume that their experience is definitely real. Secondly, the stimuli that result in those experiences are definitely real. So the system that we're studying is the 'impression'. The structure of the stimuli, and the structure of the innate and developmental faculties in the brain that are responding, are then subjects of research. He found that, under particular conditions, the use of these descriptors in particular impressions is consistent with high correlation. This opens more questions, of course. This is a complex topic.
@carlemory61882 жыл бұрын
I know Im randomly asking but does someone know a method to get back into an Instagram account?? I somehow forgot my login password. I would love any tips you can give me!
@santiagoluca81832 жыл бұрын
@Carl Emory instablaster =)
@carlemory61882 жыл бұрын
@Santiago Luca I really appreciate your reply. I found the site thru google and Im trying it out now. Takes a while so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
@carlemory61882 жыл бұрын
@Santiago Luca it did the trick and I finally got access to my account again. I'm so happy! Thanks so much, you saved my account !
@santiagoluca81832 жыл бұрын
@Carl Emory Happy to help xD
@donokeefe39607 жыл бұрын
"It was very objectively visible" that is was not harmonious? No, it wasn't. You cannot prove it, therefore it is not objective. Try this one: "Everyone at the community meeting agreed that Picasso was a bad artist. They said that he was bad because paintings should be realistic. That wasn't a good reason, but they were still right, but it was "very objectively visible" that he was bad." The reason people try to come up with bogus reasons which sound objective is because our society increasingly recognizes the value of empiricism. Christopher Alexander is a philistine.
@Tidnull7 жыл бұрын
When Alexander refers to qualities of harmony, order, and wholeness in buildings and man made things, I think he means that the objectivity is derived through consensus of human opinion. On the contrary, empiricism is based on experimental verification, correct?
@evanhadkins55325 жыл бұрын
If something is observed, it is observed by a subject. Subjective and objective are analytical.
@seanankerr28645 жыл бұрын
"the wise man bowed his head solemnly and spoke: "theres actually zero difference between good & bad things. you imbecile. you f***ing moron""
@carrottoponcrak5 жыл бұрын
Don O'Keefe. haha, you obviously didn't read his books
@myotherusername9224 Жыл бұрын
@donokeefe3960 what is your definition of 'philistine' and how does that fit CA ?