I love how the previous Ones all returned to the Source while they were inside the Matrix. Neo went to the Source in the real world. I believe the choice he made in The Architect's room was the moment that he truly became The One.
@davidmackie34972 күн бұрын
repetitive, disjointed, and goes nowhere. downvote.
@connectingthesciences2 күн бұрын
Its a very important video but if you dont understand it maybe you could ask
@TineFangaming2 күн бұрын
What are you afraid of? You're correct Smith, you always correct It's inevitable
@jakeg31263 күн бұрын
Now like most suicide missions, did Neo even actually know that he actually saved mankind?
@connectingthesciences2 күн бұрын
I might make another video explaining that
@jakeg31262 күн бұрын
@ ok, thanks.. I’ll look for it.
@plrc45933 күн бұрын
Nice explanation.
@BenJehovah69695 күн бұрын
Smith is nothing but sum of all fears Anderson had before he became what he is now. It is his old self's last stand that cannot understand why he took this new path. Hence the name, Neo. It is his choice to engage in this internal battle that ony he can win by being persistent, and not answering the call to run from his old self, facing it head on.
@cdtv36026 күн бұрын
😎 did you wish to know? 🥹 no but i believed!
@predalf9 күн бұрын
It is inevitable! It is done!
@radagastaddams370317 күн бұрын
these 3 movies man.. they're something special 🐇🐇🐇
@ph4ntym20 күн бұрын
Mr, Anderson thats the sound of your death..
@connectingthesciences28 күн бұрын
Hydro dynamics of the fluids are controlled by the autonomic through the manipulation of the cardiovascular
@habibmahmood2079Ай бұрын
Amazing initiative Mr. Anthony. I really like this idea and I wish you all the best for it!
@DatSimple3 ай бұрын
hahahahaaaaaa i love this!!! 📚 📖 ✏️
@2lit20034 ай бұрын
Damn
@Gr8FullyDead4204 ай бұрын
Except evolution is as close to proven as something can get in science, whereas young earth creationism has been demonstrably falsified multiple times, sometimes by accident. In order for the Bible to be literally true, reality would have to be wrong. Evolution on the other hand is observably true and both modern biology and medicine are based on evolution. If evolution was wrong, modern medicine wouldn’t work, nor would our understanding of biology.
@achingbach29044 ай бұрын
"Because it matters". Yes sir. It's not selfish, don't get too self deprecating bro. It matters. And being a little selfish matters too, your first responsibility is your own heart mind soul and body. You matter. Take care of yourself, and keep up the good work.
@connectingthesciences4 ай бұрын
Thanks I really appreciate that
@Lurply5 ай бұрын
Whats crazy is that when timeline 2 Summer shoves timeline 2 Morty she gets back in to place and syncs up with timeline 1 Summer making both timelines 1 and 2 Summer able to see timeline 2 Morty but as soon as timeline 2 Morty shoves timeline 2 Summer they unsync making Timeline 1 Summer only able to see Timeline 1 Morty because he’s not synced with Timeline 2 Morty (it’s a lot just for some simple scene)
@connectingthesciences4 ай бұрын
Yeah they really put some thought into it. Nice catch
@pittchow6 ай бұрын
Tweekin
@davidadebowale44228 ай бұрын
Hum, yep. I've been following you on LinkedIn for a long time now and it's nice connecting with you here
@connectingthesciences8 ай бұрын
Thanks for the follow, I appreciate that.
@thetelescreen3729 ай бұрын
so the "super possition" is just the schrödinger equation or the Dirac equation if you include special relativity. if this is BS and just made up then why do they perfectly predict the emission lines for all of the elements?
@connectingthesciences8 ай бұрын
It's not just arbitrarily made up its constructed on known information/variable. For example, things like constants can be created based on specific experimental conditions used to create formulas that work In these narrow conditions.
@thetelescreen3728 ай бұрын
@@connectingthesciences the conditions aren't narrow tho, there are very few places where QFT fails and none of them fail in our everyday lives
@Mark-fc7tu11 ай бұрын
Or, you can have fun watching the story of a 'smart' man trying to shoot his alternate self because he thinks his alternate self is trying to shoot him first and vice versa.
@kingki195311 ай бұрын
This is when uncertainty principle happen in human scale. Here's how i get it. Man, i am not physict so i just use easy languange. 1) Definition change Every decision that make the result happen simultanously in same time and exist in the same universe. Usually it take different universe based on decision result you take. But because they are on uncertainty universe, it happen. In outside, there's only one cat but you see, lot of cats was outside. It's because every decision that cat make create different position. But that cat still don't see his different result, but every cats has their own choice and mind. 2) Split impulse and timing break Every condition has initial and result, uncertainty happen when a condition split by initial condition. It can take different result. This happen because there's burst choice by Morty that (uncertainty) choose to ask/don't ask and their reality split by Morty. 3) Self authored They are 3d being but the crystal that Rick has is 4d dimensional crystal. That means the only reality thay split only do in 3d dimension and Rick can choose another himself using his time crystal. It can effect the 4d dimensional being too. 4) Leap of faith Here's the funny part. The reason that 4d being is defeated is because every choice that exist in same time and place choice simultanously, every Rick and his grandson/daughter figth him. For 4d dimensional being, he can see and feel all the choices that exist. I am not scientist nor physicst but a 3d human being that understand 4d.
@kingki195311 ай бұрын
Bro, you don't explain anything. I can't read red word and there's no single explanation why.
@KiraraEnjoyer Жыл бұрын
Great vid men
@connectingthesciences Жыл бұрын
Thanks
@achingbach2904 Жыл бұрын
Interesting idea.
@connectingthesciences Жыл бұрын
Thanks
@ToneX-hj6ki Жыл бұрын
I remember experiencing something like what your explanation was but at the time I was hallucinating off of laced marijuana back in mid 94
@connectingthesciences Жыл бұрын
When I was talking about time?
@zackmendax8002 Жыл бұрын
Nice
@connectingthesciences Жыл бұрын
Thanks it's been hell fighting these corporations though. They keeping putting crap on my computer and doing everything to keep me from getting stuff out
@melisentbuttz2203 Жыл бұрын
'Promosm' ☹️
@achingbach2904 Жыл бұрын
There are humans incapable of empathy. They literally don't care if their decisions don't make sense, they have power and love using it. Aliens? Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't change the problem. You only have so much time here. Your plans and efforts will succeed best when you have your own physical and mental health at maximum! Prioritize you, for a little while. You'll be able to see more clearly, and make your plans more thorough. The brain needs the happy chemicals and growth hormones that come from working out and putting on muscle. I know this sounds out of left field, but think about it: if I'm off base, you'll have good reasons to ignore this advice. But you were speaking some of the same things I have in my head, so I want you to know some of the stuff I found out. Wish you well bro. Health and prosperity to you!
@connectingthesciences Жыл бұрын
Thank you, I think you are correct but I'm currently pressed for time. I spend some time meditating outside everyday but I don't know if now is the time to prioritize myself. I could spare a day at most but I'm not sure that's enough to have the effect you are speaking of. I will add some body weight exercise in more frequently, I already do but I haven't made it a habit yet like I need to. Thanks again
@connectingthesciences Жыл бұрын
Also I have verifiable evidence anyone can reproduce (10~30s shutter need a stand, low iso:50~200, aim into darkness their should be nothing visible on screen, Raw unprocessed photos 12~24mbs ) that space looks nothing like what we are shown. I found objects that prove there is far more up there, although I'm beginning to believe the source of our problems come from psychopaths walking around us freely using the Americana culture (fake smiles/greetings, mocking subjective reality and focusing on money: no intrinsic value) to hide in the open.
@achingbach2904 Жыл бұрын
@@connectingthesciences I appreciate your response! And do what you gotta do, I know there's lots of people who are in pretty tough situations and can't adjust their schedule at will. Things will fall into place though, and you will find opportunities. There are principles that are true and reliable at every level of analysis. In a simulation, in unlimited realities, in a world ruled by lizard people or aliens or time travelers: right is right and wrong is wrong. I can't trust that any theory is absolutely correct; but I don't really rule any of them out either. And the fact of the matter is, we might not even have conceived of what the full context of this reality is. We have what we know, and we know that there is a lot we don't know. This means that our own individual lives matter even more in the grand scheme, because in order to work out a reliable pattern for the macro, we have to develop a reliable and true pattern in our own microcosm. This way, anything that gets revealed in the future doesn't entirely undermine the core of our understanding; we have to be adaptable. The value of what you discover in the universe is huge: but you yourself are of a more paramount, more absolute value. I look forward to watching more of your videos, I am subbed and in a position to spend a little time every now and then on the internet 😁 Take care. And prepare. Whatever the world's issues are, we have real and important work to do.
@nicholasw8193 Жыл бұрын
A process cannot be understood by stopping it. Understanding must move with the flow of the process, must join it and flow with it.
@natethegrate253 Жыл бұрын
The key to life is to do difficult things
@connectingthesciences Жыл бұрын
Who would have known that that's where meaning comes from and meaning is the only source of true happiness. Everyone's chasing happiness directly turns out you're supposed to chase a struggle. Like teaching a kid how to overtake someone on the highway by putting his car in reverse.
@GaryFMoody Жыл бұрын
Best kickstarter communication by an inventor ever! Thank you!
@TonyMountjoy Жыл бұрын
I love the creative process. It's fun to watch others go through it! Keep it up!
@gessie2 жыл бұрын
Universities certainly are becoming increasingly corrupt due to the inclusion of opinion-based fields into their curriculum (from women's studies to clinical psychology), but I might be missing the greater point here since those fields weren't the focus of these snippets. Is your point that quantum theory hasn't found useful applications? Guess I'm not understanding the emphasis on physics here, given that the corruption is so easily demonstrated by viewing the pathetic success rates of clinical psychologists, and the fact that they're completely unwilling to compare their own success rates to conversations with random friends.
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
Sorry for the late response kzbin.inforLMEF8T_gFQ?feature=share
@stevenstewart34142 жыл бұрын
What does it mean Mr. Natural?
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
Corruption.
@117simracing8 Жыл бұрын
?
@117simracing8 Жыл бұрын
@@connectingthesciences ?
@MrLordCanti2 жыл бұрын
You clearly don't fully understand the math that you are criticizing. I'll believe everything you say as soon as you can show the math is wrong. You're feelings that something is wrong means nothing.
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
If you are willing I would like to video chat with you for a video I would upload here. I don't just study this math I actively use it. I will not only run the numbers with you (1)Pen and Paper and verify (2)any software calculators (3) Live physical examples that you(or anyone) can reproduce that will cover some of the BS that you have so much faith in. You could also be more specific about what math/physics you believe is in error and why im wrong.
@karlottepolovoy86042 жыл бұрын
☹️ ρгό𝔪σŞm
@DoNotComplyWithGlobalism2 жыл бұрын
Your so smart but you still think we are spinning and wobbling through space. If we are on an elliptic think about the centrifugal force we would feel as we speed up around the bend. Do the math of curvature. We are lied to and told the ship disappeared over the curve of the horizon strait ahead yet we we see no curvature from side to side.
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
I don't believe I said anything about orbit in this video.
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
I touch on orbit a little in this video. Go to the section labeled "missing mass" and "Orbital Mechanics book" let me know what you think kzbin.info/www/bejne/rl7TqZqVoql0mdU
@cryptosaiyan13912 жыл бұрын
From Canada and the only thing I gotta say is I agree with you.
@datum_geek2 жыл бұрын
Nice, bonne continuation Anthony.
@jaredj6312 жыл бұрын
How did this video come up on my recommended? I even have it downloaded? Weird
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
I think it has to do with what KZbin wants. The second part to this video is not my best video by far ( my opinion) but it has the most views compared to all my other videos because KZbin gave it a lot of impressions. Im happy for the views I just wish they pushed my better videos as hard as they did this and the second part.
@an.rchist36812 жыл бұрын
we need another boston tea party
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
We definitely need some kind of civil disobedience. We just need people to come together instead of fighting with one another.
@h.dejong25312 жыл бұрын
1:50 NASA isn't switching off instruments to 'conserve power' in the sense this phrase is usually used. You're right: RTGs don't work that way: you can't make the device last longer by switching off devices. It's the other way round: the output power of an RTG reduces over time, so they have to switch off instruments to keep the power draw of the spacecraft within the available power of the RTG. You can still call that 'conserving power' in the sense that the remaining amount of power is made available to some instruments by switching others off. 2:27 Popular science writers called it a wall, which is a bit hyperbolic. The actual science papers are more prosaic and describe the findings accurately: a temperature of 50,000 K (which is higher than expected) and a density of ~1 atom/cm3. So you seem to be arguing about semantics and third-party embellishment rather than finding inaccuracies in anything NASA's saying.
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
I have no argument for first part. You understand that 1 atom/ cm^3 isn't very dense at all and the only reason it could theoretically stay as hot plasma is because it would have no ability to transfer heat. Our inner solar system is just slightly denser as at about 5 atom /cm ^3 this means an RTG would not be very effective because it needs to have a cool side to radiate heat to. If plasma can remain as hot as it is for as long as it has done so than how would you get an RTG to put out that kind of power, especially one made in the 70s?
@h.dejong25312 жыл бұрын
@@connectingthesciences The temperature of the heliosheath is maintained by collisions. You have the solar wind going outward, and cosmic rays coming in. There's enough radiation to heat up the very thin plasma, not enough to heat up solid objects like Voyager's RTG. The RTG loses heat through radiation.
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
@@h.dejong2531 First do you understand that the collisions from the solar wind are just part of the electromagnet spectrum and lose energy following the inverse square law meaning that we here on earth would be subject to far more (by several magnitudes). These particles collide with the earths upper atmosphere all the time and don't have that level of energy. Also the radiation for the RTG to cool still needs particles/mass to radiate that heat to. You can just radiate heat into nothing, this is the basics of conservation of energy. This means that when it traveled from 5atom/cm^3 to 1atom/cm^3 its power should have dropped drastically just because it has far less mass to radiate heat to. Couple the lower density environment with over 40 years PuO2 decay and the numbers claimed don't even come close to lining up.
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
Also to your first point at 1:50 im not trying to fight Nasa I love nasa, im just trying to fight false information. Some of the personnel and departments at nasa push false information. This accounts for a percentage of Nasa not the whole organization. I believe most of nasa is an amazing organization trying to do what's right
@h.dejong25312 жыл бұрын
@@connectingthesciences Heat transfer by radiation is described by the Stefan-Boltzmann law. This law shows that the energy you lose by radiation is independent of the ambient temperature. You do have to account for energy coming in; in Earth orbit that's about 1300 W/m2 on the sunlit portions of the RTG. The shadowed portions of the RTG are warmed up only by the occasional collision with particles (5 per cm3, i.e. negligible). The radiators are built to provide enough cooling for full performance in Earth orbit. As you get farther away from Earth, that margin starts to grow.
@owllaxe67852 жыл бұрын
the voyager is lasting very long because it has most of it's instraments turned off to save power and it has a larger nuclear reactor than the perseverence rover. A lot of these claims dont have controlled variables.
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
I never said anything about how long it lasted. Also turning off instruments to preserve power does not matter when you use an element that is decaying over time. These elements have a half life which cannot be conserved simply by turning off instruments. The element once unstable will begin its decay and continue at a constant rate regardless of the power you consume. This is even how we date objects on earth based on the elements known decay rate.
@beronk66722 жыл бұрын
LOL
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
Great argument!
@OskarCzechowicz-OmniMusician2 жыл бұрын
Dunning-Kruger effect at its best. Landing on a foreign planet is harder than a fly-by, because one needs to lose momentum. The hardest object to land on is the Sun, because of how fast we're going relatively to it. Landing on Mars intact (or any other planet) is harder than slingshoting. Mars rovers need a big and effective power supply to move at all, Voyager needs only to slowly generate energy from its radioactive load. Didn't watch further.
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
Your notice how half your argument supports my statement. If it needs less power why does it have almost 4x the power available?
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
When I talk about landing im considering mass of the payload, dV(t)/dt(t) and flow rate over density at time. Not just the difficulty of software, electronics, and algorithm efficiency . Basically how much payload did we get to some distance over time.
@mrbubbarosa2 жыл бұрын
ya ever take a picture at night? I suppose not...
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
I literally made a video about taking pictures at night. Maybe you can learn something. kzbin.info/www/bejne/m5DPaZaEdr-pga8
@mrbubbarosa2 жыл бұрын
this is stupid... why would you put 480 watts on a rover that needs only 125?
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
The rover could use more power which it why it has batteries and a battery management system all adding mass and cutting efficiency just so it can run higher power operations for a shorter period of time.
@chuckcrizer2 жыл бұрын
Lots of false assumptions and twisted facts.
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
Like what?
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
@Corsham Viton Im an atheist but I don't judge people who believe in deities unless they make assumptions that don't follow the reality of testable results. So if im honest I judge most of them lol
@connectingthesciences2 жыл бұрын
@Corsham Viton I believe there is more out there that we don't fully understand but I don't know what that would be. I think its unlikely some random guy made all this but if someone has evidence im open to hearing their reasoning if its logical. Some people think this is agnostic but I don't live my life that way so I would call myself atheist.