Doesn't the center of pressure move when the rocket burns up its propellant? Can the CP move back so far it will become unstable at higher attitudes?
@labratscientific112721 күн бұрын
The rocket aerodynamic configuration does not change as fuel is burned so the CP stays the same, but the rocket's CG does change. For a rocket using a solid fuel rocket motor, the CG generally shifts forward as the rocket motor gets lighter. This tends to increase the stability since the CG moves farther away from the CP. As the air thins as the rocket ascends the fin lift tends to decrease and the rocket becomes less stable.
@richardchambers25620 күн бұрын
@@labratscientific1127ok great, thanks for the clarification.
@keywestskokoАй бұрын
Can you explain how you arrived at a Gravity constant of 1.41e15 ft^3/s^2? I cannot verify that value for G anywhere?
@joseluisayerbe4537Ай бұрын
Interesting for children, but tell they must develope this object for astronautics purposes, not as weapons ...
@LovelyNature-yv5op2 ай бұрын
Great sir
@shanepiantek2 ай бұрын
Is there a specific lenght for the rope or how do you know your rope is long enough for the spin test
@paulorocha78012 ай бұрын
Congratulation. This is the best explanation i found in internet.
@zzuraish2 ай бұрын
Why I just found ur channel 5 years later, u should have more subscriber, sad seeing that ur last upload was 5 years ago 😭
@dj-no2 ай бұрын
what just happened
@TuyenNguyen-zf3sn2 ай бұрын
Thank you very much. Great experiments. Very educational. I hope you continue your work to share your knowledge
@alans1722 ай бұрын
5 minutes was enough to determine that this is not worth any more of my time. He doesn't realise that a wing does not operate in a tube. Or that his acknowledged concern about the incompressibility of air is indeed a show stopper. Conservation of mass in a tube has absolutely nothing to do with the generation of lift.
@Polypythat2 ай бұрын
This is a terrible take. The first 5 minutes are spent demonstrating that people's knowledge isn't flawed, but rather air can act in different ways in different circumstances. He caps it off by stating that in open circumstances pressure and velocity can adjust to allow density to remain constant, therefore incompressible. Conservation of mass absolutely is applicable to lift generation, as an airfoil relies on it to generate differential velocities and therefore pressures on the upper and lower surfaces, which is the basic principle behind lift generation. I'd genuinely recommend taking another watch, this video is significantly better at explaining the principle, supported by experimentation, than any of my previous education.
@alans1722 ай бұрын
@@Polypythat You do yourself no favours by being an apologist for this nonsense. Conservation of mass in an ideal fluid, (incompressible, inviscid etc.) led Bernoulli to his now famous but poorly interpreted principle. Bernoulli's principle states that in a moving fluid, (and he only worked with water) a change in flow rate is always associated with a pressure change. What the principle doesn't say is that a change in pressure in air (the highly compressible form of a fluid) is always associated with a change in flow rate. A change in pressure in air can be associated with a change in flow rate, but a change in pressure in air can also be associated with a change in volume (by evacuation or compression) or a change in temperature. It's a case of A always results in B but B is not always associated with A. All dogs are animals, but not all animals are dogs. A change of pressure in air does not have to be associated with momentum, velocity or acceleration: think about your tyre pump. Think about heating a container.
@arnulfolopez80153 ай бұрын
Thank you
@kareemsalessi3 ай бұрын
12:00 great, but once it launches and loses mass from the bottom up, how is CG-CP balance maintained???
@fahimnabeel60620 күн бұрын
Oooo that's a good question
@schwarzk64163 ай бұрын
Thanks! Helped a lot with understanding truss problems
@nightshadows38853 ай бұрын
this is just me changing orbit in ksp no ifs ands or buts this is all i use when prograde and retrograde
@titusrider79484 ай бұрын
Agree with another viewer's request to see and understand how the wind tunnel works ?
@titusrider79484 ай бұрын
Outstanding analysis and video quality ! Your serious about this hobby, terrific explanation 😊
@titusrider79484 ай бұрын
Excellent video lesson ! Not only a great video on what is center of pressure but also why it is important to the flying characteristics 😊
@rodrigopropp22144 ай бұрын
thank you it helped a lot
@aszasq31504 ай бұрын
F(ab) goes down right? it is already proven in this equation 6:49 so why does you calculate it goes up in the other equation? 7:35
@gastonbarouille7674 ай бұрын
Best teacher I ever saw on YT! Few resources and tangible explanation makes invaluable information transfer to everyone! Thank you so much for sharing!
@RICREYNOLDSMUSIC4 ай бұрын
By the way, thank you. Just a thought though, would it not make sense to take away weight to enforce the center of gravity instead of adding? That would help for speed.
@RICREYNOLDSMUSIC4 ай бұрын
I am a distant relative of the Lee family from the same area. Most of my family on that side lost their lives in Coal mines. I have fought, starved, and survived that life to work in the aerospace and military supply area. I was on the Trident missile program and Raytheon missiles. A late starter at age 32, I am a living example you never give up and fight until your last breath. I am now with a a break-off company from Raytheons best inventors to help with innovation and new future ideas. We are part of our ancestors and though we improve on those characteristics, we should still be thankful for the sacrifice they made.
@kh40yr4 ай бұрын
So, build your rocket, with everything that you want it to fly with and in the approximate location of where you want your items to be. Then "teeter-totter"(highly scientific) static balance it on the table, and mark that spot. Take your string and tie it to that balance point, and give it a swing. If it swings straight into the airflow,,your getting closer to flight. Once that's set,, start moving the string back(twoards the fins) until the model goes unstable to see where the CP is to make sure you have the body tube diameter margin away from the CG. Yes??.
@lr216435 ай бұрын
What effect do the walls of the tunnel have on tests like these? I recall that the NACA* guys had some way to compensate when testing airfoils, but I don't know what it was. *Before NASA. Lots of great info dug up by them.
@larsolsen76985 ай бұрын
Just look how the post starts wobbling when the string is pulled in. Angular momentum is clearly transferred from the ball to the setup. Conservation of angular momentum is only conserved in an isolated system.
@CraftedChannel6 ай бұрын
Come back. Come back from wherever you are.
@sm15226 ай бұрын
But how are you supposed to calculate when it breaks ??? Ive been searching all day. I need to calculate when it will break
@Dooley135 ай бұрын
This will depend on the materials you use (as well as how you connect your members together). A given material will have a tension member capacity and a compression member capacity -- these known values tell you how much force, in tension or compression respectively, a member can sustain before failure.
@princedemiterios24886 ай бұрын
That's a very infirmative and educative ,all the best Sir , Thank you .
@richsummers54926 ай бұрын
One body diameter is the go to number for Stattic Margin, but why one diameter? I understand the math, I'm quite certain a Static Margin of .2 would be unstable. But why was 1 diameter chosen?
@maxivy6 ай бұрын
Sir why did you stop uploading these videos. I guarantee you will be successful on KZbin if you cracked the algorithm a bit better
@Workerbee-zy5nx7 ай бұрын
Airplanes use cg and cp also..
@BlueMoonshine7 ай бұрын
This is so dumb. First of all, the axle needs to be stiff, not a ridiculous wobbly piece of wood that changes all the physics. We don't see any actual measurement being made. You are simply using the argument of authority, which is just pseudo-science. Here is a real experiment done with actual measurements directly visible on the video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/l5PYgX2bqLyEiLs
@canalfutebolraiz7 ай бұрын
Nice video! Brasil
@slow-mo_moonbuggy7 ай бұрын
I remember when I believed in space travel.
@mustafaerdem18627 ай бұрын
Ggggoooood
@dolorescunningam92627 ай бұрын
Clearly, you are a crackpot who doesn't understand basic physics: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iHaQZ6Znd5KfmZo
@Splattervision-qh1sd7 ай бұрын
So it’s not the expulsion of mass exiting the nozzle (action-reaction) as much as it is the pressure acting on the front of the motor?
@jeffcauhape68807 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@santosoabimayu8 ай бұрын
Soo in conclusion, we need to make rocket lenght 2x max lenght of solid sugar motor?
@AzubuikeEbube-tw8rj8 ай бұрын
thanks for this , was very helpful
@OngoGablogian1858 ай бұрын
The slow-mo of you swinging the cylinder around your head was Hollywood-level. A true work of art. You looked like a majestic and benevolent lion, taking a well-earned day off from mauling zebras to enjoy a day in the park.
@hassannawaz48428 ай бұрын
awesome
@zsphantom52719 ай бұрын
So when the mass is increased with a constant parachute area and shape the drag coefficient should decrease? the greater the mass the higher the terminal velocity since terminal velocity is squared and is inversely proportional the drag coefficient should decrease right?
@parthsuyal58799 ай бұрын
Can this method be used to measure MOI of an asymmetric complex object by keeping the strings at a equal distance from centre of mass ???
@ekulda9 ай бұрын
my favourite subject. rocket science. Thank you, i learnt so much today. what about fuel distribution. Weight pay.load capacity? great teacher you are Sir. simple and to the point.
@TheBobbykey9 ай бұрын
your test are for a horizontal flying rocket like an air plane but rockets fly vertically
@labratscientific11279 ай бұрын
For wind tunnel testing the horizontal or vertical orientation doesn't matter. What does matter it that the test object is in the right orientation with respect to the "relative wind". For the rocket, the nose needs to be pointing into the relative wind - the wind generated by the wind tunnel. As far as the rocket is concerned, there is no difference whether the test is done vertically or horizontally as long as the rocket is pointed into the airflow - the stability dynamics are the same. All pitch/roll/yaw dynamics act about the CG and the CG does not change for the vertical or horizontal direction. All NASA rocket wind tunnel tests are performed horizontally. In addition, it is much easier to build a big wind tunnel in the horizontal plane rather than the vertical. Hope this helps...
@parampatel31989 ай бұрын
it was really helpful sir...keep up with such content. Thank You
@edgarguinartlopez83419 ай бұрын
Thank you, professor. Rockets are a fascinating matter.