Biden. You can see my prediction on my Facebook page. I called it for Trump in 2016. You can read about it here: www.westernsiderealastrology.com/trump-election-news

I don't consider Ophiuchus as a sign because almost all of it is very far north of the ecliptic, that is to say, far outside the bounds of the zodiac The southernmost part of it does graze the ecliptic but covers almost entirely the same territory as Scorpio in right ascension. The argument has sometimes been advanced that most of Scorpio is south of the ecliptic, which the proponents of Ophiuchus contend contravenes the north-south argument; but most of Scorpio is much closer to the ecliptic - though south of it - than Ophiuchus, which is radically north of it. Scorpio has the brighter stars as well, among the stars nearest the ecliptic, which easily trumps Ophiuchus . One of the stars in Ophiuchus (the theta star in Ophiuchus, called Garafsa rendered as 26° Scorpio 40' in terms of SZ reckoning) was part of the Babylonian pantheon because it's close to the ecliptic with only 1° S 50' 38" of south celestial latitude, but it was not accorded sign status. When the Babylonians were laying out the zodiac toward the end of the 2nd millennium BCE, constellations that were more equatorial than elliptical were dropped as astronomical/astrological emphasis shifted from the equator to the ecliptic, which, until the Babylonians, nobody had really mapped out or worked out.

GET A GRIP

Since I'm an obvious leftie, which you note in my video, I would display bias if I found some excuse to overlook glaring symbolism to predict a Biden win.

@@kennethbowser6783 Biden is classified as Centre Right by Political Scientists. Folks left of centre vote Green, although one can argue 'tactical voting' is valid here.

They are going to be in all probability

RFK only takes votes from Biden. He may be strong in the polls, but my impression is that he's not nearly strong enough to get major traction. Too many people think he's either weird or nuts. The last third party candiddate who got significant traction was Ross Perot in 1992 who got 19% of the vote, which made it possible for Clinton to beat Bush.

It's hard to understand for me too since Trump is so awful in every way. You have to leave all that at the door, however, when you interpret symbolism.

THANK YOU

Thank you.. sadly you have confirmed my own conclusions.

There is no better candidate among the Democrats. Biden hasn't muscled out anybody who has a reasonable chance. It's just regreattable that he's so old.

Cyril Fagan said this was the date of consecration of the temple of Navu in Babylon.

This has been handed around for years but it's a lot like whether Shakespeare's great plays were written by Francis Bacon: interesting and tantalizing but nothing is there. The most modern and complete work on Napoleon that I've read, "Napoleon," by Andrew Roberts (New York: Viking- Penguin, 2014) makes no mention of this rumor in 926 extraordinarily detailed pages, although it mentions in excruciating detail all sorts of minutia regarding his family life, personal life and military exploits that I was surprised to see. I didn't take issue with Worsdale's base time (9:45 am), that I think he rectified, but privately I do. That is, he rectified it to 9:51:40 am, but I think the 9:45 time was also doctored. I think Napoleon was probably born between 10:12 and 10:13 am, maybe 10:13:30 because his primary directions work so well then. For example, the neighborhood of that time makes his Jupiter rise by primary direction for 18th Brumaire when he secured control of the government of France in 1799, at the age of 30, which is outrageous and unheard of in a modern bastion of high civilization like France. For the primary direction to Neptune you get his defeat in Russia in 1812 with subsequent trouble at home; and for the primary direction to Mars in 1815 you get his defeat at Waterloo and subsequent trouble afterward. Primaries have great power for about six months; some people think longer. For a 10:13 am birthtime you get a RAMC of 7h 49m 13s. Spica, the alpha star in Virgo, rose with 7h 49m 20s. Spica is a massively auspicious star. The major point I wanted to make with this video is that Napoleon had two close paran squares between the Sun and Jupiter AND another close one between Jupiter and the Moon. I didn't carry on about the birth time because the point was somebody born that morning (8/15/1769) at Ajaccio, Corsica has those things and somebody born in mid-morning as per the Worsdale time has a close Moon-Jupiter situation in mundo; and since there is no Moon-Jupiter situation in zodiaco then, it tends in my mind to narrow the time, and the primaries and Spica narrow it still more. Alpheratz, the alpha star in Andromedae, another distinctly lucky star, set with a RAMC of 7h 49m 40s at Ajaccio that day. He was described as gloomy and morose by his teachers but brilliant as one might expect with Saturn at the midheaven and Virgo rising. Sidereal Virgo, in my experience, has by far the strongest intellect of all the signs, followed by Gemini. There is also a rumor that Napoleon consulted an astrologer in 1812 before he left for Russia and that she warned him that whatever he had in mind to reconsider it because, in her opinion, it was ill-advised. That sounds reasonable and mysterious in a tantalizing manner, but I put it in the same category as the rumor that his birth data are not 8/15/1769. K.B.

@@kennethbowser6783 was there any mention about Napoleon celebrated his birthday on August 15th?