🔥THE TRINITY IS A LIE OF SATAN AND A FAILURE TO DECERN THE SCRIPTURES! My name is Mark, please hear me. The Trinity is a lie! Jesus is the Holy Spirit, who is our Father! Jesus, our Father, who is a Holy Spirit, came fashioned as a man. Until you know the Lord as one Lord, you don't know Him. That's why the first commandment is that the Lord is one Lord. Would you like to hear more? I can help you understand but only the Lord can reveal Himself to you and only if you seek Him as one Lord. If you don't know the Father/Spirit and Son/flesh as "HIM" you don't know "HIM". Jesus reveals by revelation the Father and Son as "HIM"-one person/Spirit who came fashioned as a man. If you don't know the Father/Spirit and Son/flesh as "HIM" you don't know "HIM". Trinitarian, repent from your false three-headed god, the Lord is One Lord! "All things are delivered to me of my Father: and no man knoweth who the Son is, but the Father; and who the Father is, but the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal HIM." -Luke 10:22 KJV "Will ye accept his person? will ye contend for God?" -Job 13:8 KJV God is a "Him", not them! One Spirit and One Body = One Lord! ONE SPIRIT- "God is a Spirit: and they that worship HIM must worship HIM in spirit and in truth." -John 4:24 KJV ONE BODY/Same person/Spirit as above known as "HIM". "The first man is of the earth, earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven." -1 Corinthians 15:47 KJV

I'm also Unapologetically Catholic

Amazing video

God bless you brother

The LORD Jesus Christ cannot be made precisely by human hands cause it was God who created man not the otherway around! God is a spirit he lives inside man and woman don't know about others but this much sense I have 😅 as far as I know Catholics should never worship any idol be it any idol for that matter it's just complete nonsense to worship a dead idol however on the other hand all the idols of this earth belongs to the LORD! We should never offer reverence and indulge in any forms of idol worship its bad and God can never tolerate such nonsense idols! Humans were created in the image and likeness of God when we drift away from this truth we end up being slaves to such demonic idols! Jesus Christ blood sets us free from idolatory once and for all.!

The correct order in the NT is _The first living creature was like a lion, the second was like an ox, the third had a face like a man, the fourth was like a flying eagle._ (Rev 4:7)

Nigel here from Vasco chapter❤ I had a question unrelated to the video Does making a statue of Jesus Christ considered to be idolatry?

Intelligent Design is definitely convincing. If we had evolved from monkeys then why do monkeys still exist?😊

Are u married?

Okay, dude, my ROMAN Catholic friend, are you going to answer these questions, or, like OTHER ROMAN Catholics, you're gonna wimp out? (if you have plans to become an Apologist, I don't suggest you quit your day job)

Man justifies himself, justifies his best friend, is justified in a court of law, and MAN JUSTIFIES GOD (Psalm 51). So, if you believe "to justifiy is to INFUSE or MAKE righteous" then YOU ROMAN Catholics believe that you INFUSE righteousness INTO God, or MAKE God righteous? Really????? :)

Man is NOT justified by works ( Romans 2, 3), but man IS justified by works (James 2), BUT NOT BEFORE GOD (ROMANS 4). So, if man is NOT justified by works, but IS justified by works BUT NOT BEFORE GOD, then who is doing the justifying in James 2?

The good works, and one's sanctification SHOWS they are justified, but this sanctification doesn't get the believer into heaven. True believers are justified because they are imputed with Christ's righteousness, as a result of union in Christ. Doe you disagree?

In Luke 18, when the Lord discussed the faith of the Pharisee (who thought he was right with God because of his obedience ), and the Tax Collector who knew he was a sinner AND ASKED FORGIVENESS with no pretense of giving anything to God. So which one WENT HOME JUSTIFIED according to the Lord? You believe in faith + COOPERATION, faith + GOOD WORKS to increase in justification, no? So then, you believe that God OWES YOU because of your faithfulness?

Did Paul teach JUSTIFICATION by faith alone ? 1 Cor 15:1-4, Eph 2:8-9, Gal 2:16, Rom 3:24-28, Rom 4:5-8. Did Paul teach a believer can lose their justification ? If yes then please show verses.

You are using eisegesis to interpret Eph. 2:10 in a manner which _contradicts_ the explicit statement made in verses 8 and 9. This is horrible hermeneutics. Let Scripture interpret Scripture. Harmonize all of God's written word so the verses _agree,_ not contradict. Eph 2:4 But God, _being rich in mercy,_ because of the great love with which he loved us, Eph 2:5 _even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ- by grace you have been saved-_ Eph 2:6 _and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus,_ Eph 2:7 so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. Eph 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, Eph 2:9 not a result of works, so that no one may boast. We are saved by grace through faith, and not through works, as an act of God's love and mercy; God has "raised us up and seated us" with Christ. Does it sound as though there is anything we _must do_ to _earn_ salvation or _to prove ourselves worthy?_ No. *We're already there.* We've been given salvation _as a gift._ The very meaning of "grace" is _undeserved, un-earnable favor._ Once we have come to a living faith in Jesus Christ, there is nothing we can do to _get_ or to _merit_ or to _retain_ salvation. That is the nature of a gift: it's totally free of charge! Now, the letter continues: Eph 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them. In the context of what we've previously read in verses 4-9, we can see that our being "created for good works" means that the works God has pre-planned for us to do _are NOT prerequisites, sine qua non, for salvation._ Rather, they are the *consequential response* of the spiritually regenerated, HolySpirit-indwelt and Spirit-led follower of Christ. As saved, redeemed, justified (by the gift of God's grace) Christians, we are filled with the joy, peace, and LOVE of God, and we desire to show our love through obedience. Thus, as the Spirit of God _guides us and enables us_ to do good works, we joyfully respond in our new-found liberty in Christ. We are called to fulfill duties, but those duties are not salvific; our salvation does not depend upon how well we _perform_ in love and obedience, because _we already have received the solemn promise that we HAVE eternal life._ God's love and Spirit motivate us to feed the hungry, visit the sick, etc. John 6:47 Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever believes has eternal life. 1Jn 5:13 I write these things to *you who believe* in the name of the Son of God, that *you may know that you have eternal life.* The "more abundant life" which Jesus came to bring to us is already living in us, and He (the Holy Spirit) is the "guarantee" (or one might say, "down payment") of our redemption. Eph 1:3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places... Eph 1:7 In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of his grace, Eph 1:8 which he lavished upon us, in all wisdom and insight... Eph 1:11 In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him who works all things according to the counsel of his will, Eph 1:12 so that we who were the first to hope in Christ might be to the praise of his glory. Eph 1:13 *In him you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit,* Eph 1:14 *who is **_the guarantee of our inheritance_** until we acquire possession of it,* to the praise of his glory. Without a doubt, the most definitive instruction in the Bible on the subject of our justification (the gift of God's righteousness to us) is found in Romans 3:10-5:19. I urge you to read that portion of Scripture several times this week. For now, look at this excerpt: Rom 3:10 as it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one... Rom 3:19 Now we know that whatever the law says it speaks to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God. Rom 3:20 For by works of the law no human being will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin. Rom 3:21 But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it- Rom 3:22 _the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe._ For there is no distinction: Rom 3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, Rom 3:24 and are _justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus,_ Rom 3:25 whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. Rom 3:26 It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus. Rom 3:27 Then what becomes of our boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? By a law of works? No, but by the law of faith. Rom 3:28 For _we hold that one is justified by faith apart from works of the law..._ Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? *“Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness.”* Rom 4:4 Now to the one who works, his wages are not counted as a gift but as his due. Rom 4:5 And *to the one who does not work but believes in him who justifies* the ungodly, *his faith is counted as righteousness,* Rom 4:6 just as David also speaks of the blessing of _the one to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:_ Rom 4:7 “Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven, and whose sins are covered; Rom 4:8 blessed is the man against whom the Lord will not count his sin.” Rom 4:23 But the words “it was counted to him” were not written for his sake alone, Rom 4:24 but for ours also. It will be counted to us who believe in him who raised from the dead Jesus our Lord, Rom 4:25 who was delivered up for our trespasses and raised for our justification. Rom 5:1 Therefore, _since we _*_have been_*_ justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ._ Rom 5:2 _Through him _*_we have also obtained access by faith into this grace in which we stand,_*_ and we rejoice in hope_ of the glory of God. We are counted (imputed) as fully righteous by the gift of God's grace, through faith, _apart from works._ We who trust in Christ's propitiation "have been justified" (past tense, it's a "done deal") through faith, and that is how "we have peace with God" and have "obtained access" into "grace in which we stand" right now. It doesn't depend on our performance review. It doesn't depend on how well sanctified we become in life or on how successfully we cooperate with God; if it did, grace (a gift) would no longer be a gift of grace (Romans 11:6) because it would be contingent upon our actions (our works). Do not conflate justification with sanctification! Justification is counted to us _all at once_ when we come to living faith in Christ; sanctification is a non-salvific _life-long process._ Now, we have established the fact that we are justified _in the eyes of God_ through faith apart from works. But James 2 says that we are justified _in the eyes of men_ by our works. This is because faith without works cannot be _seen_ (it's invisible). Jas 2:22 You _see_ that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by his works; Jas 2:23 and the Scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham *believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness”* -and he was called a friend of God. Jas 2:24 _You see that a person is justified_ by works and not by faith alone. How do we *see* (perceive) that a person is justified? By looking at his works. We can't *see* it by faith alone, since faith is invisible. Notice that Paul and James _both quote the same O.T. Scripture as authoritative proof that _*_faith_*_ is what God counted (imputed) to Abraham for righteousness. Not works. Not circumcision. Faith!_ James and Paul actually show agreement that we are counted righteous through faith, and that living faith _will result in consequential_ works. (This is how we properly harmonize Scripture to agree with Scripture, and allow Scripture to interpret Scripture, as opposed to "verse mining" and pulling certain verses out of context. James cannot be refuting Paul, and Paul cannot be refuting James, or else we have blatant lies in Scripture.) As Chrysostom wrote, "So also is the declaring of His righteousness not only that He is Himself righteous, but that He doth also make them that are filled with the putrefying sores of sin suddenly righteous...For when a man is once a believer, he is straightway (i.e., immediately) justified." By the way, even though demons "believe" (actually they KNOW) that Jesus is the Savior, no demon can believe that Jesus died to redeem any demon, because He didn't! Jesus died and rose only for mankind; the fallen angels are beyond redemption, and they know it. "Trust in the LORD with all your heart." Peace.

🕋No where in quran is it mentioner that the Gospels of ISA (Injeel) was corrupted. 🕋Quran makes no mention about the 3 persons of the trinity. It does mention about Allah summon ISA, Marym and ask them if ISA asked christians to worsip Allah, ISA and Marym. No christian sect ever worshipped mary or considered Mary equal to Jesus, Father, Holy spirit. 🕋The trinity that quran mentions is 5:73 : Trinity is 1 of 3, meaning each of the 3 persons is 1/3 of GOD which is not what Christian trinity is. 🕋Since Quran makes no mention about 3 persons of a trinity, and does not affirm corruption of Injeel, quran indirectly confirm the Bible we have is indeed true. Quran 10:94, 21:7 clearly asks Mohammad to get quranic revelations verified with christians and jews. 🕋Quran 36:13-16 Speaks of ISA apostles Simion Peter, John, Paul as prophets send by ISA to spread the Gospels.

A person (muhmmad) born in 570 AD, never met jesus or his deciples says something, and millions of dumb people believing in it. Quaran is just a dirty book don't compare it with bible.

Jesus the son of The living God

I think 💬 bible Says like me onther Jesus is there but he's a devil don't fall in he's trap and he also come to earth like me but later real Jesus will come so pin me so can anyone see this comment

Jesus is messenger of allah and he is the son of maryam GOD IS GOD BRO 🎉 Jesus is just messenger of GOD 🎉

Please tell me how to use this background music

Go purifie yourself with scholar Zakir Nayak one of the meaning full explanation, you can see his debating with scholar priest, definitely you will learn bro, lots of different scholars don't miss it or u will miss. Thanks

God bless you dear brother☦ can't believe you don't have a million subscribers already You got +1 in me though!!

Is, was and always will be God. Jesus Christ my lord and my saviour.

It's been a while since I've seen a video with a less convincing argument than this. I know others have tried to argue it but Dawkins really isn't committing the genetic fallacy here at all. He's not saying you shouldn't believe in the god of Christianity simply because you learned about it from you parents and community. He would say the reason he doesn't, and others shouldn't, believe is that there is no evidence for the existence of a god (which is what you say he should focus on - read his books and listen to him speak - he says this repeatedly so you and he actually agree (except on the issue of whether there is evidence)). Here, he was answering the question, "what if you're wrong and God does exist?" and his reply was "what if you're wrong and the great Juju" exists to highlight how the questioner could just as easily ask themselves the same question they think is solely relevant to an atheist. He is also pointing out that the implied surprise at his comfort in disbelief shouldn't be surprising at all as the Christian questioner very comfortably disbelieves literally hundreds of other gods that millions of other people believe in. Putting aside your incorrect characterisation of Dawkins statements, your consideration of it all is very superficial and you don't in fact dispel the problem raised by the fact that one's religious belief is enormously determined by where you were raised. Prima facie that is actual evidence that there is not some universal power speaking to people but that it is an inculcated set of cultural beliefs created by people, not a god or gods with power over the entire universe. Which version of reality fits best with the patterns that we see in the world? Your uses of the words "truth" and "believe" are so ill defined and variable as to be meaningless and the attempt to argue by analogy with cultural values misses the point that religions usually ask us to believe that a supernatural being exists and has created the universe. These are very different types of claims to "do you believe in freedom of speech". The cartoon analogy also completely misses the point. It is ironic that you choose an astronomical fact given that that is the kind of thing we know through the method of science, while religion would have told us something very much at odds with that and your starting point is that we should believe what religion teaches us. That is peripheral to the point though that: of course how you come to believe something is important for assessing how reliable that belief should be considered. To state otherwise is to show complete ignorance as to how a rational human should determine the appropriate level of confidence in a given belief.

Brother make some content in Konkani language. Our Konkan belt people, especially the elderly could relate and open eyes.

I don't know where you are getting this genetic fallacy argument but what he said was you religion is mostly due to the culture and teaching you were exposed to, like even in india a Muslim will follow islam because of the exposure to islamic teaching, a child born in Christian family will have Christian influence. It's not some fitted in mechanism by birth that you keep a child isolated from any religion and he will pick Christianity due to some default setting. Its just depend on how you were raised and wht you are exposed to, because thats how some change religion willfully you expose yourself to something new and you change your belief either an athiest or some other faith but that is not that prominent mostly the long exposure to a belief since childhood stays.. And now simple question if jesus was born to spread the worship of Christian GOD then why that God chose such ineffective way of depending on a human, that even after 2000 yrs only 30.74% are Christian? If we take Christian world view in consideration shouldn't a test be perfect for deciding the fate for eternal hell and heaven, but billions have died without worshipping Christian god, if a product fails 69.26% of times will you blame the consumer or the manufacturer. If the rules were so black and white regarding worship or god shouldn't the world too should have followed same black and white structure, like why physically and mentally challenged people who can't worship why children dying and reaching haeaven easily, while others risk to do some sin, why gays and poor when we know social and economic influence can affect behavior and that is a proven scientific observation, the test should have been perfect without inaccuracies and unfair advantages or disadvantages..We dont see world black and white like that..

people believing in the religion and claiming theirs is the true religion is THE GENETIC FALLACY not the people pointing "hey look !! different people different culture have different & opposing views and they all claim they are the only true one".

it's not about core teaching , every religion get's that right, murder theft bad etc etc, it was about diff religion having diff views and claiming their's is the true one while they just happen to be born in that religion. if i'm born in india i'm hindu and eating beef is sin for me, but if i was born in middle east it's pork. so which one is it? is eating beef wrong or eating pork wrong that depends on your birth demographic and culture. you don't get to choose your religion, 99% people take birth and die believing in same religion claiming it's the only true religion.

0:40 fun fact the guy who played the skeleton guy was actually the same guy who made Undertale

Bro your religion cant be true. Your book is not holy at all but even it is, bible changed by the Constantine the Great. You arent believing to the gods religion, you are believing in Constantine’s religion. By the way Jesus were not god in original bible, its alsı changed by Constanitne, in Council of Nicaea. They voted for Jesus. is he god or a human? They chose Jesus as god. thanks

You were born because your parents had a good time.

Technically no the Bible by itself is not good enough, but what is good enough is reading the Bible with An open heart, always ready for the Holy Spirit to change you. God's word is good enough to change you. If you let the holy spirit, do it. God bless

So the point of this video was to say that people can change their idea/beliefs on something even though they were rised to have such idea/beliefs. No shit sherlock. 🤦 As you rightfully said, the problem is not 'what you believe' but 'why do you believe it'. if the sole source of your belief is your geographical location and culture of the same, then those beliefs have NO ground to stand on.

that was the most annoying 5 mins on my day just hearing you talk... please stop for the sake of people's fertility

There is a fundamental misunderstanding in the argument. You see, the genetic fallacy can be brought up in any case EXCEPT God. Why? Because by your religion, everything that happens is overviewed and caused by your just and good God, who happens to have changed the chances of you believing the truth and being saved based on region (assuming Christianity is the truth). How can a just God allow this? If you were born in India, you're more likely to be a Hindu than a Christian. Did God intentionally want to damn 80% of Indians? and Buddhists, who reject a creator God, and form the majority of the population of Thailand. Did God intentionally damn them? The argument doesn't question the truth of the religion because it's affected by region, because that's under the genetic fallacy, but questions if a just God would allow the majority of the people he loves to suffer eternal damnation just based on region.

Ok its not universally true, but only 95% true, that your culture determins your religion

people born in a particular family gradually inherits a religion, and most of the people later realize their religion is only true religion without reading other's scriptures. this is a very common thing happens in every religious family despite what their religion is. now let talk about the legitimacy of religious evidence : Jews believes Jesus is not god neither son of god nor the messiah Christians believes Jesus is the god and son of holy father, who died for our sins Islam says Jesus was not God, he was the Messenger of Allah (The only true god as per Muslims), And Jesus never died, Allah took him back to paradise. Mandaeans believe Jesus to be a false prophet. Hindus says Jesus has Spent few years in India and got enlightenment, so he can be god because we believe god is everywhere and every creature is part of god, but if Jesus is not god then also it doesn't matter, We have well established ecosystem of gods for every thing. Buddhist and Jains says : Jesus? Who? Sumerians, Egyptians, Indus Valley Civilization, Çatalhöyük, Mississippians, Norsemen says " Don't ask us, We are already because of our sins dead thousands of years ago before knowing Jesus" Its all about believes, Comfort and personal experiences NOT EVIDENCE. You can believe anything, You can believe god farted and Universe came to existence but you are not comfortable to say that so you choose to say GOD CREATED THE UNIVERSE. So there is no credibility of the religious Evidence or better to say religious claims. And here Richard Dawkins argument perfectly fits. This is Not Genetic fallacy.

So whats your explanation of the fact that people born in the Punjab province of India are far more likely to be Hindu or Muslim and not Christian?

Hi. How many raped children would it take for you to walk away from the Catholic Church? Why does your God watch children being raped?

Bhai tu naya naya Christian bana hai isliye abhi teri ek do peedhi jyada uchhlengi 😂

First of all genetics has nothing to do with it. What Richard Dawkins and other atheists point out is that "the truth" (as claimed by various religious followers) has a suspiciously geographical distribution. In other words your religious "truth" seems to be dictated more by where you were born and grew up than anything else. It's cultural, not genetic.

Generally becoming religious despite the background, is smth for people who have friends fromthat religion, who communicate with them regularly. It's still part of the environment. Other than that, you'd find the spreadth of judaio christian belief to be based on colonial history. The reason why you believe in religion despite it disagreeing with all evidence and being the exact expected works of someone from the culture of the time that religion was created, and in spite of it being extremely anthropocentric and having lots of other biases, is indeed because you are a human being with the same corresponding biases due to the way the brain works, and the specific religion is indeed due to your environment, whether its a specific environment of christian belief inside a muslim country, or the internet environment (ytb or twitter or whatever) that believes in hinduism despite you being born in a judaiochristian country. The fact that it's in contradiction with the general religion of a country isn't very solid as an argument, but the strong argument proposed is that indeed even people with right beliefs and even atheists have to be in the middle of an atheist environment for them to become so. The only proposed difference by the atheist side is that different widespread religions correspond to the specific region's culture and general beliefs, and you could trace the spreadth using colonial history and the development of the religious ideas throughout history like the idea of heaven and hell and good light people and bad fire people qnd darkness, and the idea of sacrifices going from volcanos to crucification to sacrificing animals. But again, most religions are very common in their ideas and religious arguments and beliefs. It's common for example to notice the gigantic anthropocentrism in all religions. So ye the difference between religions isn't really that strong to just use it as the only argument. Again, i'm trying to argue gaainst this argument specifically and not to give other arguments (i could give many). The argument presented isn't one of the most solid ones. Sorry if you felt that i went out of subject

No need to apologize for being Catholic, just turned to God and repent and ask him to save you and become a real Christian and for sake your heresies, and he will receive you receive Able, but if you will sacrifice your own works in the place of Christ at the door and show you and drag you to hell like Cain of old!

When Able offered the correct sacrifice a lamb without Flemish, which represents the finished work of Christ on the cross. Christ himself said upon the cross before giving up the ghost that it is finished, yet Kane offered his own produce the work of his hands as a sacrifice which got rejected. Christ is the only sacrifice for sins. You cannot add your own works to. It is the work of God it is perfect. You need to rest in it like the Sabbath, not add to it your own works, and put yourself to death. God warned Kane that at the door because he insisted on his own, works being a sacrifice for sin rather than the sacrifice which God is appointed likewise in the garden of Eden when Adam and Eve covered themselves with big leaves and their hands got rejected of their hands and gave them lambkins which implies that a lamb was slaughtered representing Christ, who God gave for the sin of the world go read Ephesians and Galatians, and you will understand that if you try to mix your own works with the salvation of God, which is finished by Christ you make the work of Christ of not effect and you will not be saved. again, it is written a little leaving at the lump and if it priest take that would just clean and put it with that which is unclean shall it be clean? God has said no he rejects all your work. There is menstruous rags before him ,filthy rags.!

So if every word is inspired of God and the scripture, and it says you are saved by faith alone, not of works less any man should boast then it is true, and if you persist and resisting and fighting against it, adding cotton to the wall covering he has given you Mixing your works with that of Christ then he will judge you by your own and not the finish of Christ and you will be damned.

2 Timothy 3:12-17 12 Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. 13 But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived. 14 But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them; 15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. 16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

King James Bible Rev20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. Oh, the dead are judged out of the things written in the Bible, according to their works well the saved Christians are judged according to the work of Christ and accordance with his gospel, which is also written in the books.

You say the early Christians did not interpret… Prove it with facts what is your source.? The problem is that the Bible itself says two things firstly that we will all be judged out of the things written in the books. Books means Bible. Secondly, the Bible itself states that everything needed for salvation, sanctification, godly, living, etc. can be found in the Bible alone. Solar script is taught in the Bible and by extension Salvation by faith and justification by faith alone without work S another words when the protestants broke away from the Catholic Church it was because the Catholic Church was heretical. And we can prove that by the Bible. This is why the Catholics depend on tradition because the Bible contradicts their claims. They will tell you that they gave you the Bible, but 66% of it, the incarnation of Christ and their way of viewing scripture is different from the Hebrews who view it as in Aaron just like the protestants. What happened was a Demedici Bankster took over the church using money and corrupted it because the church taught falsely that the church was incorruptible refused to deal with either biblical truth or the historical fact that the Catholic Church is corrupt and has been for sometime. How many kids have to be raped and priest have to be moved around by higher clergy before some idiot realizes that is church has run by pedophiles and is corrupt and is not of God ?