1.3487° N, 103.8152° E

By the way if you wanna search for it go ahead i guess.

thanks...got it..

they must be there for the gold HAHAH

Me too

NEA has took the gold already. There's no gold anymore.

@@V.T.J.L. same here lol i just read it and didnt know it was recent.Welp i guess its not worth the risk.

Yes, the Japs did it.

I guess they don't want anyone to access the gold

Firstly, it's in a natural reserve. And secondly the Japanese occuption had been a dark and painful part of our history. Any attempt to benefit it through tourism will be disrespectful to the victims of the war.

@@LuchesChan i do have to agree with the first one tho since if its given to tourism its gonna lose its value.

Nope @byam79, nothing so far.

Many of them had professional working lives when they were younger, paid into their CPF, only to lose access to their money as it was remade into a Ponzi scheme with continually skyrocketing Minimum Sums. Without rich children to support them, these Singapore Pioneer Generation members are left to fend for themselves when those responsible for leading us tell them "you die, your problem!" How to help older Singaporeans? The post-PAP Government _must_ institute a nationwide pensions program for all Singaporeans over 55, or those younger who cannot work due to their health and have insufficient family resources to support them. This would be paid for out of the existing CPF slush fund: the gap between the 2% we're paid on our OA and the actual yields from investing that are instead used to finance the most highly-paid Government in human history. We can do better. We can start in 2016, and we'll finish the job by 2021. Unfortunately, that won't help many of the over-70s now, who have to suffer as victims of National Narcissism until we can make things right. For that enduring shame, we owe our Pioneers the most heartfelt apologies and determined action that we can muster.

Jeff Dickey That may not be true for all cases. Say for one true case on the ground. The children can still manage to give the parent an amount enough to cover the basic food and lodging monthly. But the parent is very greedy and keep asking for all the money intending on leaving the children with no savings. So in this case I feel having the CPF is a good thing to make those greedy ones save some money. But it is a two sided blade that make those who are really in need fall out of its helping range.

unteroffizier There are always exceptions to every generalisation; that doesn't make the plight of the vast majority any less dire. It merely requires that we exercise more sympathetic tact and less ham-fisted paternalism than _this_ Government have in recent decades.