I think now they are being more sought after, since a couple of years

I had a crt had very good blacks and better contrast playing my ps3 look better than my lcd tv

Not really

Funnily enough, it is claimed that the Pod Racer sound its a mixture of jet engines, Champ Car/Indy Car and F1 sounds

Where do you think they got those sounds from dude

i feel you tycheese5

according to google search Tim Cook started at Apple in 1998; and steve jobs visited Xerox in 1979

yeah

you have just decided you dont like Elon, which is fine, but hes smart, WAY smarter than Steve Jobs ever was, but Steve was a very WISE man, smart aswell but Elon is another caliber of smart, hes just not as wise as Jobs (though sometimes Elon can be wise aswell) and yes Elon is very enthusiastic maybe thats why hes very successful aswell.

​@@Aloolol FYI to save embarrassment out in the real world: 'aswell' isn't a word... It's always 'as well'.

@dna9838 sure, thank you. I'll never be embarrassed by spelling wrong in English since it's not my first language, I feel like you tried to imply that I should be ashamed of it?

@@Aloolol hopefully not, there's no need. I make mistakes too and appreciate when people help me by pointing it out.

@@Aloolol such a clueless comment omg alolol

His point is that you don't conceive the bicycle without taste. Functionality and productivity come after using science & engineering, etc.

Until Jobs died, his contributikn wasnt about just taste. The Machintosh was the combination of parts that define the personal computer. The iPhone is the right combinatiln of parts that today define phones. That liberal arts attitude is what gave us that. A narrower view would have taken an earlier rendition of a computer or phone and just ramped it up, so is more.powerful for the narrow band of people who could use it, but apple's approach during Jobs' life was to develop things everyone could relate to Today, there isnt a Steve Jobs driving that kind of innovation. People deride it as purely marketing, but it is true innovation because the combination of ideas that created that product wasnt just from the tech, but the philosophy of who could use it and how. Today our phones are more powerful but havent evolved past iPhone 1's core role. And our computers literally still use the interface Machintosh pioneered almost 40yrs ago. That's the taste problem

@@maishadigital8410 Yeah, but the Machintosh quite a failure compared to the PC. I'm a developer and still find the PC significantly easier to use, and much higher performing dollar per dollar. The iPhone / iPad on the other hand, it the clear winner in the mobile space. It is the best platform out there clearly. Apples computers are not. The Mac's OS looks better, but really isn't easier to use in my opinion. They try to hide things like the file system which makes it harder to use if you need access to files, etc... And performance is really poor (this may actually be intentional throttling on older machines by Apple which they did with the iPhone and got sued). You have to spend about 3X on an apple computer to get the same performance as an equivalent PC. But I will hand it to them on their phones. But their "walled garden" approach is a real pain for developers and makes software much more expensive to develop. Its still worth it, but they could do much better to open their platform up in my opinion.