Best tutorial I have seen in wall mounts very informative ❤❤❤❤
@J-Rock46210 ай бұрын
How do you clean the IQ Sensors inside the wand?
@aybukexx4758 Жыл бұрын
Is v15 submarine heavier than v15 without submarine attachment? Because gen5 is too heavy for me, v15 is more ideal for weight while vacuuming.
@Top5Products Жыл бұрын
the V15s is about a pound and a half heavier.
@patrickthilly1894 Жыл бұрын
Denon 👍
@Juana-d2x Жыл бұрын
Hi can you leave links
@donbustoarigato29974 жыл бұрын
Budget receivers. A reasonable selection of the affordable. Too bad Harman Kardon no longer makes the 3390 and 3490. On sale you could get those discounted by $100 or more. So $269-$299. Those were great buys! Good power, decent DAC in the 3490, phono stage, etc. Yeah, HK still makes a stereo receiver but they've cheaped out on these previous class A/B units. The sound on the new pieces is thin, not as powerful or musical. So what else is NEW? Give people a cheap DAC and some bluetooth and who cares what it sounds like, lol! Then again, you could buy a Marantz in the $400-$500 range that isn't bad?
@H888-v3l4 жыл бұрын
Dont buy sony
@BrljoMrljo3 жыл бұрын
Why? I have 10 year old model Sony STR-DE197 and it works flawlessly. Granted it is not top pick but very nice entry level reciver. So is new model as I hear. My experience tells me that most of us have some bad experiences with some gear
@Shanonmcnab5764 жыл бұрын
I'm not sold. I still believe Nad is the way to go if we are talking music only, anything more then that we're talking AVR. Stay clear of Onkyo as they suck if I had to buy another AVR I'd go with a Denon and for just stereo a Nad with a Crown amp.
@muddyriverdogz3 жыл бұрын
Those Crown Amps Rock ! Specially for the price !
@H888-v3l4 жыл бұрын
Dont buy sony. Yamaha sound is better then sony.
@Rulo139785 жыл бұрын
Denon ?????
@beatlebuick5 жыл бұрын
Why would I connect a 5.1 or 7.1 Blu Ray player to a Stereo Receiver ? Defeats the purpose of surround.
@musicman82705 жыл бұрын
I have quite a few high Q audio Blurays, concerts, etc, and a few DVD'S with high quality LPCM, and a Bluray player plays CD also.
@tapemaster82525 жыл бұрын
Great choices for the price point, this is for non audiophile easy to satisfy listeners
@mikeharrison46595 жыл бұрын
These receivers are not worth the asking price....sound cheap even with very good speakers($1000.00 and more)...stick with harmon/kardon or marantz...the older models if possible.....
@donaldduck28014 жыл бұрын
I had the Marantz cr 511 network player...Junk first Class id did not work at all Marantz brought a not working device on the Market that even Marantz did not understand what they build. It was made in CHINA . Marantz build great and beautifull devices as far it is not internet, bluthoot or computer related devices.
@richardmolnar39095 жыл бұрын
Pioneer is best!
@chriss8810005 жыл бұрын
Onkyo is pioneer.
@buttonman18315 жыл бұрын
I have owned dozens of stereo systems including some very high end gear. I have a small Yamaha receiver in my shed with a Yamaha sub which I paid 30 dollars for and I really enjoy it when I work around the yard. Simple little system, but it is bullet proof, loud, and sounds pretty damn good.
@hansmestdagh38145 жыл бұрын
I'd have an onkyo tx nr414, bought in 2014 for around 220€, broken in 2017. Send it to a repair center, the motherboard processor was broken sir.....Cost price aprox 370€!!!!! No more onkyo!
@kelosburn4 жыл бұрын
Same experience with Onkyo. Swore off that brand and will stay loyal to my bullet-proof Yamaha and Pioneer equipment.
@jamesvw7695 жыл бұрын
I have heard several of these 2 channel stereos and they are total garbage. Even with very good speakers they sound lifeless and castrated. Pure junk.
@chriss8810005 жыл бұрын
But u get more for the money with 2 channel today. All This other bullshit u get with other sorround receivers.
@alexvideoslocos5 жыл бұрын
Yamaha 👌👍
@H888-v3l4 жыл бұрын
Yamaha have powerfull bass.
@williamfitzpatrick63695 жыл бұрын
I'm happy with my Son of Ampzilla and Thalia, thank you very much.
@kohnfutner96375 жыл бұрын
I think the emotiva a100 would wipe the floor with this junk.
@buckfutter994 жыл бұрын
Kohn Futner ok... do you get paid to think?
@TADDs1013 жыл бұрын
You are correct about the Emotiva 👍
@kohnfutner96373 жыл бұрын
@@buckfutter99 what do you think?
@buckfutter993 жыл бұрын
@@kohnfutner9637 I don’t need to think about this, I’m not getting paid. I’m partial to Klipsch and Cambridge components because I own them. I like music. Junk is subjective as my stereo is expensive for me but junk compared to say my fathers... non of it wipes anything. They are inanimate objects powered by coal to move air.
@kohnfutner96375 жыл бұрын
Really an Onkyo? I've not heard anything good about Onkyo's sound quality for music.
@henrytran84005 жыл бұрын
I collected them every visit time
@henrytran84005 жыл бұрын
All bought from Goodwill store
@henrytran84005 жыл бұрын
My musical bar just costs $ 100 but karaoke very great with a cheap costing
@jailanimajid33166 жыл бұрын
HDMI input for 2 channel receiver.(Onkyo) Watching Blu-ray movies on 2 channel receiver. Not fun. HDMI is best for playing Blu-ray movies or 4k movies in multi-channel audio. Just imagine watching 4k movies in 2 channel receiver. Yuck. Basically, 2 channel receiver is playing audio only.
@jon47155 жыл бұрын
Jailani Majid not true, a lot of us prefer the simplicity of a 2-channel in an apt
@stancedtaco5 жыл бұрын
@@jon4715 Couldn't agree more! Almost everyone who commented and said "garbage" are either teens who have no idea how to configure audio, or they're just expecting way too much. Shit, there's all kinds of professionals all around the globe using these same exact receivers.
@grosh_borhbag6 жыл бұрын
In my view when it comes to digital inputs the thing is much pricier
@pay90116 жыл бұрын
I guess limiting them to 2.0 systems equates to entry level. I have the Yamaha model. It's ok but nothing special at all. I bought it for the bluetooth and it's cheap price. I rarely use it but no complaints so far. The connectors are pretty limited but the bluetooth connects well.
@scottyo646 жыл бұрын
I wouldnt use any of these for 2 channel.
@jeffkelly59724 жыл бұрын
why not ? What would you use if you want to listen to music but do not have a large budget ?
@timkole20026 жыл бұрын
Ik have more than 100watt per channel
@bertiidol766 жыл бұрын
Only shiet !!!! Yamaha very bad onkyo its a same pioneer not it all !!!! The old hifi is too better.
@passqualecaiazza77285 жыл бұрын
You are right. I have a newer sony, ok for tv. But, when it comes music nothing in my opinion beats my old antilog Pioneer sx 626 from 1971 and my Realistic from 1981, except maybe another old school receiver. Couple that with a good old school turntable . They put the soul back into the music
@dennisduran85006 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know of any receivers with a midrange tone control?
@EXTRA300s6 жыл бұрын
Every good receiver, but it's not a dial, but you adjust every speaker true adjust the range in Hrz, frequency adjustable. That means you have roughly 3 ranges, bass speakers, mid range speaker and the tweeters. Wen you don't know what I am talking about, you better go to a good Hi-Fi forum and start reading, I think there's going a other world to be opened for you. Most receivers are more capable than most people imagine ;) I wish you luck, and it would be nice to hear from you. I got the Onkyo TX-NR5010 (2012) This is a monster and I think you can buy it for very cheap. My recommendation to you buy a good one, and you be happy for at least 10 years! A lot of power and for a 6 years "old" receiver a dream for every music and movie fanatic!
@bobspringer53705 жыл бұрын
Josla you seem to be parroting words you've seen on the internets but in a random fashion. Nothing you said makes any sense. So no thanks for your input.
@EXTRA300s5 жыл бұрын
@@bobspringer5370 I am not parroting words, I know my English is not good, but I just want to explain something and help him out. Thank you for bullying me.