Two interpretations of Gilbert’s plural-subject account Giulia Lasagni

Good stuff. For all its attempts, Sociology still doesn't have a core, agreed ontology which really pisses me off so I made one up to use in everyday life and business. Hopefully this new subject can do a better job than me and offer some core agreement across the social sciences :)

I really appreciate g. Lasagnis work and find her practice at the EUF truly amazing. Thank you for your time being at the EUF!

Great video❤

I remember when studying philosophy the mystery how humans go from subjectivity to intersubjectivity. I still find it a fascinating subject. I think I will study phenomenology again and do a masters.

Can we have the references, please? :)

I thought more emphasis should be placed on essence or the core of human existence, if the distinction from appearance can be justified, in terms of how an essential reality describes relations. The series of questions was difficult to place in a 'core reality' context.

I was surprised that you spent most of the time on 'facts' and seemed to use the term 'object' objectively instead of as values. But, mostly I was surprised that you did not mention norms or rules. Don't you finding using a term like metaphysics too ontological or as a subjective assertion? I think of social facts as the rules, - the rules are the social facts. The emphasis is on 'social.'

this is just beautiful

This is a very, very thoughtful and thorough overview, thank you so much.

great intro!

Excellent project and excellent content. However, I did miss the mention of precursors and research outside the very limited world of anglosaxon philosophy.

Loved this, very informative and broke down the concepts well for the layperson

Excellent introduction to social ontology. This has really whet my appetite to learn more about this branch of philosophy.

Excellent video !