A shame what happened in the end. Tsar Nicholas II and his wife really were just incompetent, and very unlucky. Thing is, the Russians ended up even worse off after the Aristocracy was removed, ironically enough.
@ai-past-seeker7 күн бұрын
Sure, they are now a big mess.
@thalmoragent93447 күн бұрын
@ai-past-seeker Yep, Russia really is just tragic now. Gotta have their military disbanded and their politics completely rearranged at this point 😮💨
@meekomiles154922 күн бұрын
Unspoken history is right. Unspoken by a person, AI voice crap.
@ai-past-seeker22 күн бұрын
Facts are facts.
@baronwarborn910722 күн бұрын
Ironically Richard II of England and all the English kings before him could not speak English only French. They were all very much French. Henry IV 1399 was likely the first to speak English to differentiate England from France. Alot happened between Crecy and Joan D'Arc. She was vert intelligent and logical and saw military tactics using traditional methods that didn't work or were outdated. She could simply point this out and the French army were able to adjust and win. I'm really enjoying this video especially the AI images. I can't stop laughing on how inaccurate they are.
@MissSiobahnMaebh23 күн бұрын
I believe that Atlantis was a real place with a socially sophisticated but not necessarily a technologically advanced civilization. The fact that we have no remnants of Atlantean technology seems to indicate this point.
@ai-past-seeker22 күн бұрын
Just thoughts, nobody knows really...
@brianallsopp6925 күн бұрын
That's some mad AI going on I was waiting for a dragon 🐉 😂
@lindsayjc10026 күн бұрын
Half the video is listening to what the video will be......someday
@AirDOGGe25 күн бұрын
A.I. created I bet.
@MissSiobahnMaebh26 күн бұрын
Another well-done video. 🙌
@ai-past-seeker25 күн бұрын
Thanks! I'm glad you enjoyed it!
@LoisThiessen26 күн бұрын
With Edward VIII, the greatest stike against him was his Nazi sympathies. He did the British Empire a huge favour by stepping aside.
@metoo755726 күн бұрын
3:53 is when the video starts saying something more than the title.
@OnnikaJeffryes-m2m28 күн бұрын
70 THOUSAND
@jimberley634129 күн бұрын
This is probably the worst AI slop I've ever seen on KZbin and that's saying alot. The thumbnail doesn't even have a guy holding the rifle he's shooting. The opening graphics say "War of Jehnnin's Ear" AI helps you do things faster but you still need to make an effort. Take a little pride in your work please. I would be embarrassed putting out a piece of garbage like this.
@ai-past-seeker29 күн бұрын
@@jimberley6341 Noted. Sometimes it slips.
@ai-past-seeker29 күн бұрын
I have taken your feedback positively actually. Thank you.
@MissSiobahnMaebhАй бұрын
Well done!
@MsUnderstood224Ай бұрын
Love the animations
@ai-past-seekerАй бұрын
Thank you
@MissSiobahnMaebhАй бұрын
The mythology of Tyndareos and Leda is quite interesting. Zeus seduced Leda in the guise of a swan. After a suitable period of time, she gave birth to two mortal children: Clytemensta and Castor; and laid two eggs which hatched as Helen and Polydueces (Pollux). The eggs hatched first. Thus, Helen is the elder daughter. Castor and Polydeuces are killed. This makes Helen the heiress of Tyndareos. Although she cannot rule Sparta, her husband can through her inheritance as a quasi-regency for Helen's son who inherit as a direct descendent of Tyndareous. Hence, whoever is Helen's husband rules Sparta and sires her son. She is important to the Trojan War cycle not as a major player but as a conduit of inheritance.
@MissSiobahnMaebhАй бұрын
Excellent montage. Kudos.
@willyjefferson7346Ай бұрын
That's why they taught us religious beliefs and their culture and traditions but they want to study our ancestors.. they will never get it
@joserosas399Ай бұрын
Very interesting
@MissSiobahnMaebhАй бұрын
Excellent reporting.
@kevinjewell233Ай бұрын
The greatest Angevin rivalry wasn"t between Richard the Lionheart and his brother John, it was between Richard the Lionheart and his Mother Eleanor of Aquitaine vs Richard & John's father Henry II. Von Bismarck was not a Royal, he was a General, and a damn good one.... There was no internal conflict within the Bourbon family- there was several years of bad weather thus terrible crops and agricultural output, famine, taxes, and the rivalry of anarchists and those demanding democracy led to the blood drenched Revolution and the reign of terror until Napoleon took commandf orcing downfall of the absolute monarchy that had been established over 100 years earlier by Louis XIV, thus creating the Empire of France. You need to stop watching tv and movies and read non-fiction history....
@GlenNeilson-o4cАй бұрын
This is propaganda
@GlenNeilson-o4cАй бұрын
Stop talking shit about my friends. Hes all good now anyway
@williethomas5116Ай бұрын
Henry VI was not the beginning of the war of the roses. His grandfather, Henry IV, was. This conflict began when Henry of Bolingbrook usurped the throne from his cousin Richard II. The issue was according to the will of Edward III, Henry was next in line, but according to actual rules of primogentiture Edmund Mortimer was. The conflict came when Edmund's nephew Richard Duke of York asserted this claim. Henry was descendant of Edward's 3rd son, John of Gaunt. Richard Duke of York was descendant of his Edward's second son Linonel of Antwerp.
@MuhammadAhmad-mm8pdАй бұрын
The battles should have been narrated in a chronological order, for better communication and understanding.
@sharioverend1618Ай бұрын
Is it this AI effect? It makes everything boring.
@Indy44636Ай бұрын
The two biggest bitter feuds were anne boylen with henery the 8th and diana and charles Diana and anne were from an aristocratic families .both loved their husbands who cheated on them and both quarled with their man . We know diana did it via fashion and we know their were fights thanks to Paul burrell ,Ken wolfe. Diana is believed to of been murdered by her husband much like how anne was beheaded
@elruddyy7Ай бұрын
those were imaginitve thoughts of twat priest burning people alive at the time bc he couldnt believe how "barbaric" these people looked or resembled compared go to where they came from. since he thought he was doing Gods work by enslaving women and children bc they killed the men. Oh wait forgot how mexicans became a thing.
@altacalifornio5375Ай бұрын
They ate dogs too, just throwing it out there
@ai-past-seekerАй бұрын
Haha, Quite some absurd things. Dogs are still eaten today in China
@maryannschlear51612 ай бұрын
Still going on in ABORTION !
@Subby8082 ай бұрын
The U.S. is feared, because it's filled with morons. #MAGA_IS_A_CULT
@keithtaylor33472 ай бұрын
I often wonder if we're looking at all these ancient practices from the right perspective. We moderns are so proud of this attribute we have labelled "morality", so that we are horrified by what could have been very practical solutions to certain problems. Problems like babies born with physical deformities or later displaying mental insufficiency. Perhaps our ancestors simply used these "sacrifices" to weed them out in an effort to stop them passing their inadequacies on to future generations. Don't we send our finest and best young men off to wage wars, only for them to be mentally or physically harmed or even removed from the gene pool, so that only the literal dregs remain to continue our species? In the words of the artilleryman in Jeff Wayne's "War of the Worlds": "Take a look around you at the world we've come to know. Does it seem to be much more than a crazy circus show?" Just a thought.
@reynolddsouza43572 ай бұрын
Human sacrifice: It was only in 2014 that the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) of India started collecting data on human sacrifice. The statistics with the bureau reveal a disturbing picture: there were 51 cases of human sacrifice spread across 14 states between 2014 and 2016. Activists stress that this number is a gross under-representation of the actual number of cases. Several famous temples from Goa to Assam have hoary histories of nara-bali or human sacrifice behind them. In some places, like the Kamakhya temple in Assam, human sacrifice continued well into the 19th century, and there are intermittent demands to reinstate the practice every now and then.
@ai-past-seeker2 ай бұрын
This is very informative. Thank you
@BACurious12 ай бұрын
First of all, I hate that AI is being used to produce this content. You can always tell because they can´t pronounce words correctly. Also, I believe this an intended misdirection because this is still a practice being done today, It´s just been hidden because as a society we don´t accept it and can´t believe that anyone would. Go look at the symbolism use by many famous people including politicians, actors and musicians. Its in your face and if you have the eyes to see it, you will understand they are telling you what they are practicing.
@ai-past-seeker2 ай бұрын
AI is just a helper in this, not entirely what produced the content.
@marciabyers-lq8fd2 ай бұрын
What do u call abortion.,.....child sacrifice 😮
@PatriciaJackson-j3t2 ай бұрын
Why y'all keep going back to this mess . Y'all waste y'all life live for them demons. God 🙏 don't care he made them and he can make them again.
@bobbymeyerti93002 ай бұрын
Wait, do you see the Jeffrey Epstein Island list and all the corporate heads and congressmen and senators judges power elite their names are on there the Jeffrey Epstein list🤬🤬🤬 talk about child sacrifice
@historicalowl-n2m2 ай бұрын
The impact of the discovery of archaeological remains of child sacrifice on our conception of ancient civilizations.