הוא לא זקוק "להגנה"....יש לו את שרה!!!

Kadima!!

Just Another Day at the Office!

Great video

Very good

Israel all the way!

❤EXCELLENT ❤

PA?

Aluf

They put the US Secret Service to shame 😂

CHINA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Notice the level III jacket 😉..details my friend.. Am Yisrael Chai

I would not do better😅

Lost Running everywere

ZxYxCxLxOxN B

Billco👀... Yallaaaa

The biggest load of horse shit. Worst training I’ve ever seen.

Commando from thailand

🌌🏛😎👨‍🎓👌🇬🇷🇮🇱. !😎👌גם שלומי טוב

Ok, I'm not seeing the connection between elite protection and jumping your dumb ass out of a helicopter into a big ditch filled with what looks to be contaminated with Monsanto 3toe runoff? Not impressed! This is Florida! Hillsborough Pasco &Polk county residents heard your chopper 5 miles before you got to the jump. Thisvideo is a waste of time and a waste of fuel.

They don't F around. They pack enough firepower to suppress fire for a while.

good job👍👍

Bad assery

God bless Israel 🙏🏼🇮🇱❤️🕊️

Man this looks fun!

Лец го лец гоу..... Как дал бы леща этому инструктору

You need someone to splice you explaining whats wrong with the clip before playing the video and splice them together

How does this compare to other schools.

Simply: Amazing!👌🏽🔥

Always PROUD of this school!❤🔥

Neatly done 👍🏽

How can I be part of your training

EXCELLENT!!!!!

❤

How much is the school house to get certified

😂 🤡

00:15-00:23 dude what the FUCK was that? Just stop, this is super cringey to watch

Avante Bibi

Bendiciones

🇾🇪🇾🇪🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇾🇪🇾🇪

🔥 💯

Hey guys. This is all my life. Close protection officer

OSS

not done. just indecent

Nicely done ✅

The traditional approach to close protection emphasizes evasion, discretion, and avoidance of threats. This method aims to minimize risk to the client by preventing confrontations. However, some security teams have considered shifting towards more aggressive tactics, including ground assaults and high firepower maneuvers, similar to military operations. While this might sound effective in theory, it often proves impractical and potentially hazardous in the context of close protection for several reasons. ### The Shift to Aggressive Tactics: Analysis and Examples In scenarios where a security team transitions from an evasive approach to employing tactics like fire and movement, the nature of operations changes fundamentally. For instance, while securing a door to keep an exit route open for the client ('off the X') is a standard practice in protective services, turning a situation into a firefight requires a significantly different setup and risk assessment. An example of this would be the deployment of a Quick Reaction Force (QRF) or a Counter Assault Team (CAT). While having enough firepower to support such teams suggests the ability to handle an escalated threat, it also implies having the resources to quickly move the client away from the area of operation. This is not only resource-intensive but also demands clearances and coordination that go beyond standard protective services. ### The Argument Against Ground Assault in Close Protection 1. **Visibility and Exposure**: Utilizing high firepower and ground assault tactics increases the visibility of the operation, potentially escalating situations that could have been defused quietly. It attracts unwanted attention and can make the protected individual a more obvious target. 2. **Resource and Asset Requirements**: Effective ground assault operations require significant assets, including personnel trained in advanced combat tactics, support for heavy weaponry, and logistical support to manage these operations. Most close protection details do not have access to such extensive resources. 3. **Legal and Ethical Constraints**: Engaging in aggressive military-style tactics can lead to complex legal issues, especially in foreign jurisdictions or urban areas where collateral damage and civilian safety become concerns. The legal ramifications of using such force can be profound, affecting not only the immediate operation but also the long-term reputation and operation of the protective service. 4. **Operational Practicality**: The primary objective of close protection is the safety and security of the client, which is typically best achieved through minimization of conflict and exposure. Ground assaults contradict this principle by potentially increasing the risk of harm. In conclusion, while the idea of incorporating ground assault and high firepower into close protection might seem to offer an added layer of security, the practicalities and risks associated with such tactics often make them unsuitable. The focus should remain on strategic planning, threat avoidance, and minimal force application, aligned with the core objectives of close protection.

Israel! Treine seus parceiros estratégicos do mais simples ao mais complexo setor e de pessoas. Ensinem a se defender com armas e forma sutis a completas situações. Aprendam e o resto cumprirá

Cuidando das autoridades e o povo de Israel.. treinem seu exércitos e eu treino você.

Dope stuff