3 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
5 жыл бұрын
8 жыл бұрын
8 жыл бұрын
8 жыл бұрын
8 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@KelvinJoseph-t1t 12 күн бұрын
Perfect👍
@us_saint4807 15 күн бұрын
Thanks
@ehhhhh.........3249 16 күн бұрын
Bro's saving lives by explaining concepts in separate videos 🗣
@dsharpness 19 күн бұрын
Oh, heardsaid, electron fields never end too...😮
@shawnheneghan4110 21 күн бұрын
Like anyone in Brazil would notice - they speak Portuguese
@tonyduncan9852 22 күн бұрын
Wow. Sixty years ago, Just like yesterday. 😎
@DavidKim408 24 күн бұрын
Thanks for the post. Now I can tell what a gangster fraud Richard Feynman was. If it weren't so mk-ultra serious, RF would be a clown. Telling more Babylonian slave culture fairy tales. ---- from RF's wiki Feynman played an important role on the Presidential Rogers Commission, which investigated the 1986 Space Shuttle Challenger disaster. He had been reluctant to participate, but was persuaded by advice from his wife.[182] Feynman clashed several times with commission chairman William P. Rogers. During a break in one hearing, Rogers told commission member Neil Armstrong, "Feynman is becoming a pain in the ass."[183] During a televised hearing, Feynman demonstrated that the material used in the shuttle's O-rings became less resilient in cold weather by compressing a sample of the material in a clamp and immersing it in ice-cold water.[184] The commission ultimately determined that the disaster was caused by the primary O-ring not properly sealing in unusually cold weather at Cape Canaveral.[185]
@pruephillip1338 26 күн бұрын
It seems we haven't moved much since Feynman's time in our understanding, have we?
@beenaplumber8379 16 күн бұрын
Are you kidding? We've got rudimentary quantum computing, measured gravity waves, detected the Higgs particle, observed galaxies formed just after the big bang, detected supermassive black holes at the center of nearly every galaxy we looked at, and made many more observations that tell us we don't know nearly as much as we thought we did about gravity on the galactic scale (and larger) or cosmology in general. A lot of theoretical work has been done in quantum physics (e.g., superstring and M-theory), but I don't think anything except quantum chromodynamics has really stuck since QED. But there's only one fundamental mystery left in quantum theory - gravity, right?
@richardpark3054 26 күн бұрын
What a giant! A human that makes me proud to be a human! Thank you, Dr Feynman!
@rav8149 26 күн бұрын
7.38 Higher generality over the laws themselves .. this was epic and deep in itself
@darz3 27 күн бұрын
@46:50 , we are still searching for the unified theory
@billb207 27 күн бұрын
This lecture was presented on 9 November 1964, and was the first of six 'Messenger Lectures' given by Feynmann between 9-19 November 1964 at Cornell. The series was taped by the BBC. Feynmann was working at Caltech at the time and was yet to receive his Nobel Prize; this would be awarded the following year.
@Desertphile 26 күн бұрын
Thank you. Long, long ago I bought a set of red books that had his lectures in them--- $100 back in the 1970's was a staggering amount of money.
@brunojean8007 28 күн бұрын
Has anyone asked yet where the following lectures can be found ?
@Constantinesis 28 күн бұрын
I think it deserves an upscale?
@sonarbangla8711 28 күн бұрын
I wonder if Feynman could explain, if g=0 at the center of the earth, then why there is so much pressure there since P=mgh and not 0.
@cronistamundano8189 28 күн бұрын
Because the earth is not hollow. compared as you going deep in a pool and the hidrostatic pressure hurt your ears, the crust the mantle and all the layers are atracted to the center, and the pressure closest to the center increases. It is just the weight of the different layers. And although g is actually zero on the exact centre of the earth it increases acordinf to the mass, the density of the layers and the inverse square law as you go to the surface
@sonarbangla8711 28 күн бұрын
@@cronistamundano8189 I don't think Newton wasn't talking of a hollow earth, yet the logic leading to g=0 doesn't make any sense, as the center is like a singularity.
@cronistamundano8189 28 күн бұрын
@@sonarbangla8711 A singularity would be if g was a negative number. if there was a hollow "ball" with the same mass of the earth and same diameter, the gravity it would pull would still be the same, the center would stil have g=0 but there would be no pressure on the way down, thats what I meant. The earths centre has no g because it is just a point. however, it has mass. every centimeter away from that point is atracted to that mass by newtons law and increases up to the g on the surface. The same happens on the moon (since the distance and mass are smaller the g on the surface is smaller) and on any rocky planet, for sure. dont know about the gas plates but the same principle would apply. If you dont believe me ask Chat GPT
@sonarbangla8711 28 күн бұрын
@@cronistamundano8189 A BH isn't hollow, Newton isn't talking about BH. only earth. It seems a singularity and the center of earth is mixed up.
@beenaplumber8379 16 күн бұрын
@@sonarbangla8711 An object at the center of the earth is experiencing gravity from the entire planet, only that gravity is pulling outward from the object with nearly equal force in every direction because that's where the planet's mass is. In this case, g ~0 because it represents the sum of gravity in all directions. That outward pull would of course be resisted by the extraordinary pressure. To understand the pressure, consider that the gravitational force on an object at the center is not only pulling that object outward in all directions (a 3D stretching), but the object at the center is also pulling the planet onto itself, and so are all of the objects within the area. The sum of that gravitational attraction toward the inside of the planet (toward the barycenter) is where the huge pressure comes from. The formula: Did you mean p = ρgh? That is for pressure resulting from a column of fluid. (I think mgh is potential energy.) The variables are for the column above you - its density, its gravitational acceleration (toward the center, if it could fall), and its total height, none of which are zero.
@chrisguffey7991 29 күн бұрын
Dr. Keith Honey. WVIT. Small town, no one has heard of, tiny class of three. Similar lectures. Epic.
@clairaut Ай бұрын
It goes back and forth too much. It makes my head spin.
@realmtraveller Ай бұрын
The students who were fortunate enough to study under this man, truly never knew how lucky they were till much later.
@gaggleweed Ай бұрын
That is what I thought but then I realized most of them will be dead and I'm still here and able to view his lectures thanks to the BBC.
27 күн бұрын
Feynman considered the course a "failure".
@leonardobrunorende5363 Ай бұрын
Final minutes... no, professor, no... gravity is far, very far from silmpe, has a tremendous complexity compared to quantum mechanics, such that can not be unified.
@marksoffian5568 Ай бұрын
I didn't know that Ed Norton knew Science
@costrio Ай бұрын
The "tremendous number, remains a mystery?" (with 42 digits) Wow! He just discovered the answer to "life, the universe and everything" according to the HHGTG. Feinman is "Deep Thought?"
@NuttyforNissan 21 күн бұрын
Yeah saw that. :)
@dsharpness 19 күн бұрын
wait...42 degrees is the angle we see Rainbows...wait again...42 digits, Feynman is on about...not degrees...the Rainbow degree is a spread, like 42-51...yet, side by side patterns are how these discoveries came about...😊
@costrio Ай бұрын
Mr. Feynman was a fine man who drove a fine van painted with Feynman Diagrams. So cool. Are there any videos of him playing drums, I wonder.
@tinnderbox3410 Ай бұрын
For bongo's, yes: kzbin.info?search_query=feynman+bongo
@TGoat123 Ай бұрын
Surely you're joking Mr Feynman.
@thornsaresharp Ай бұрын
F*** the law of gravitation. What is gravitation??
@grahamblack1961 Ай бұрын
In the 60s they had Feynman. Now we have Neil deGrasse Tyson. Hmmm.
@beenaplumber8379 16 күн бұрын
Tyson is a great explainer, but that's his main focus. He meets people where they're at. He doesn't sit at the university or planetarium waiting for people to come to him. Feynman was a brilliant physicist. He pushed the frontiers like few others have. He made sense out of quantum electrodynamics, along with being a co-discoverer. He was also a brilliant explainer, but he didn't do the kind of public outreach that Neil dGT does. His public talks were amazing though. Physicists today work in huge collaborations. Any discovery that might have some meaning will be published in a paper with 30+ authors, not one rock star. (The paper announcing the discovery of the Higgs boson had over 5,000 authors!) We've got brilliant scientists today doing brilliant science, but they tend to focus more on the science than the personalities, with the exception of those who have made a career of communicating with the public, which I think is also a noble calling in science. (Sean Carroll is my favorite science communicator today. If I can follow one of his talks, I feel like I've earned another degree! 🙂 Of course Sagan was the GOAT.)
@TheSimCaptain Ай бұрын
Amazing how science hit a dead end after scientists like Feynman. We're still trying to find a quantum theory of gravity some 70 years later.
@beenaplumber8379 16 күн бұрын
Dead end? Science??? This is an acceleration of accomplishments: The Human Genome Project, observing gravity waves, AI, quantum computing, detection of the Higgs particle, studying the atmospheres of planets orbiting other stars, etc. Gravity is the last piece of physics not accounted for by quantum mechanics. We have never understood gravity, and now we realize we're farther away than ever from that understanding. Is it surprising that the one scientific near-miracle you would like to see hasn't yet been performed? Science is thriving! We just have a lot more work than we previously thought. We need to deal with this dark energy thing...
@davidseed2939 Ай бұрын
6:10 start
@georgen9755 Ай бұрын
Stanford appointment letters in harvard ? University is smart that appointment letters are not directly forwarded to the candidates .....so guys are smart to support pictures of another university of the candidate ....... Fake jobs Fake system of addressing the public .... Why god created prettier people to plunder the not so good looking .... Afterall nobody graduates or post graduates to be absorbed in research ..... Research funds are distributed .......so .........the recipients were prettiest ........... Peculiar management Banker promptly giving debit cards .......without appointment letter .... Only one researcher in physics , chemistry , architecture , english , music ..........??? Same bank same Debit card? Same researcher without appointment ??? Deceit at its peak !?
@davidfoster5906 Ай бұрын
The Art Carney of physics
@kn9ioutom Ай бұрын
UNDEFINED !
@eeroiiskola5942 Ай бұрын
They speak portuguese in Brazil.
@peterhickey1218 Ай бұрын
That's why everybody laughed.
@tinnderbox3410 Ай бұрын
But of course when Feynman learned some Spanish he didn't know he would be lecturing in Brazil many years later. In fact he tells the story that he almost went for Portuguese because a very beautiful girl was attending that course too. Then he corrected himself because he felt it was a poor motivation for a decision, and went for Spanish after all. Which turned out to be the poorer decision in the end...
@Resiprocity1 Ай бұрын
“Gravitation” should be re-named to “Attraction” because at the end of the day the behaviors observed are akin to 2 magnets with like ends, like orientated. This would make the concept much more understandable.
@misterphmpg8106 Ай бұрын
More understandable but wrong, since the force between magnets is completely different from gravitation.
@prasoonjha6314 Ай бұрын
No, because gravitational attraction is not the only kind of attraction there is.
@anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858 Ай бұрын
No; in space-time, gravity works through _attraction;_ in time-space, gravity works through _repulsion._ See Dewey Larson. The guy who discovered the unified theory mainstream science claims to be searching for.
@beenaplumber8379 16 күн бұрын
@@anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858 Oh gawd, another junk science author? Don't fall for them! "Mainstream science rejected my theories, so they must be valid!" That logic promotes paranoid ignorance and book sales, not scientific advancement. Spacetime is the set of the four known dimensions. The order in which you list them (time-space) does not alter the composition of the set, nor does time hold any special significance among the four. It's not like a mathematical reciprocal (unless you reverse the direction through which you're observing time). When a consensus of scientists rejects a theory, there's nearly always a good reason for it.
@TLH442 Ай бұрын
Gravity, just got the idea of what it is. Surplus electrons or their absence. What is the net charge of a planet as opposed to a newton star with its degenerate electrons that help support it against collapse? Gravity is proportional to mass but something is wrong. Think of a dielectric effect that mass has on the electric permittivity of free space. Gravity is weak but it could still be a just a weakened electrostatic or dynamic force. There are examples of sub atomic particles where laws of attraction are not 1/R^2. Feynman said something and I immediately agreed and started typing this. To conclude, mass is not the cause of gravity even though its true that its a straight linear relations ship. It's the residue of electric and magnetic fields of each object causing the attraction. The spooky forces of attraction are what make physics so hard to comprehend as Dr. Feynman has noted. Observation with cause and effect are not usually truth about why it is the way it is. It's like mass is the dark area of the Mandelbrot set, an infinite set of points completely is disconnected from the other infinite domain of points in color. We have photons and kilograms. One collects spontaneously, the other is doing its best to never rest for a nanosecond at least until it get's too close to a nucleus, neutron star or black hole. Is it not rational to think that if energy wants to scatter then mass will respond by collecting. It's a balance between potential and Kinetic energy's.
@peterhickey1218 Ай бұрын
Mmm, Interesting; let me think about it.
@TheSimCaptain Ай бұрын
That's what flat earthers believe. Just ground yourself electrically, and you'll find that you will still fall.
@throckmortensnivel2850 2 ай бұрын
Feynman had a curiousity. He wanted to know how everything worked. He wasn't only a theorist. He loved tinkering. And, as has been noted, he was an excellent communicator. Wish there were more of him around.
@aboundlessworker.mazhar 2 ай бұрын
I am too much dopaministic😢 but i love physics😅
@kadhir5738 2 ай бұрын
Wow thanks
@dieterdreier7109 3 ай бұрын
He is the king of the Bongo,he could be the king of the Congo and all girls from Katongo... we save him..
@guntherirlbeck8631 3 ай бұрын
We still avalaching in high speed..in the 60's it was true...nowadays Physics is in trouble. We do need new Feynmans and Einsteins...
@beenaplumber8379 16 күн бұрын
Don't confuse physics for quantum theory. (That's nearly complete.) Have you seen what's been happening at CERN? LIGO? JWST? The Higgs particle detected, gravity waves measured, images captured of the universe <1 billion years after the big bang - We're living in amazing times in physics!
@guntherirlbeck8631 16 күн бұрын
You are right..but the problems are huge: Dark Matter und Dark Energy.
@just_one_opinion 3 ай бұрын
Pissant raping his students.
@jacque4697 3 ай бұрын
Sounds Like a con artist. That’s how most of these so called scientists sound.
@chrimony 3 ай бұрын
Found the flattard.
@lunam7249 2 ай бұрын
"so called" hahahaha!🎉😂❤🎉😂❤ this man is prolly the greatest scientist and human mind to have ever existed, created "feyman" diagrams
@ChandrasegaranNarasimhan 3 ай бұрын
I have been to America. They never criticize you. May be I am different. Coming back to feynman's lecture, it lacks quantitative aspects. I really do not know why. Btw: 38:31 attracted to me vs interested in me-> man's problems.
@stanbest3743 3 ай бұрын
This was for a lay audience. Feynmans ability as a theorist was legendary but he judged this perfectly so they learned and stayed engaged. He managed this without being patronising.
@angelaslaney1514 3 ай бұрын
In this day and age, is it not possible to up-scale 360p to something actually watchable?
@misterphmpg8106 Ай бұрын
Nope
@ronaldradford3971 3 ай бұрын
That was informative
@ronaldradford3971 3 ай бұрын
Ralph about to yell from the crowd, lol
@ronaldradford3971 3 ай бұрын
Art Carney comment hammered it, lol
@yohanannatanson4199 3 ай бұрын
Absolutely fascinating...
@Giani369 3 ай бұрын
😊😊😊😊😅😅 🎉
@michaelgonzalez9058 3 ай бұрын
Can a spectogram capture a numerical sequence of the forces of a ship going to orbit -from earth too the space station 😢😢
@AppleVsGravity 3 ай бұрын
I don't see any wokies! The good ol' days.
@tmviberater3405 2 ай бұрын
the good old days were ruined by y'all lol. Reagan and his trickle down economics ruined everything
@willo7734 3 ай бұрын
If there was one scientist from history that I could meet then kick back and have a beer with it would be Mr Feynman. i wish he could come back and teach some science to the flat earth people.
@beenaplumber8379 16 күн бұрын
If flat-earthers and other conspiracy adherents were receptive to reason, they wouldn't need Feynman's help. As they're not, I don't think Feynman could make a difference, nor would it be a good use of his time.