Your videos are serious life savers!!!! ❤❤

Do you have a version of this annotated document i can download or look at?

Excellent

Whats the point of annotation if its just spoiling what you already know. If it werent for that knowledge you had first, you wouldnt be be able to get these subtle meanings.

Thanks so much for this, it has been very helpful.

Great video!

excellent

🥰

Gorjeos

these are honestly a lifesaver, can you do the rest of the play please?? This is so good and an incredible resource!

LOVE UR CONTENT AND ANALYSIS

So helpful, thank you so so much!!! ❤😊

Hi! Where can I find the document of this on your Facebook page?

amazing explanation

thank you

thank you miss,gcse in 2025

please do animal farm

I love your videos very much it helps me to understand the text better and also it helps me to annotate in my book which will help me in revision at the time of my actual gcse exams which will take place next year this time....Thank you for the videos....❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨

Yes mrs birling came up alongside inspector

Lmao u were close I used wwtp to compare to neutral tones

I hope its on love not relationships because id actually cry if it was climbing my grandfather💀😭😭😭 or like letters from yorkshire

if it’s eden rock i’m not doing the paper

Thanks

Thank you❤

Thanx let's hope these are right😊

Thank you!

Can you make one about love and relationship poems and AIC for AQA cause you did get the lady macbeth one right😊

I can't believe that you are the only one got it correct

What exam board is this for?

An inspector calls prediction??? A christmas carol predicted?? Romeo and juliet Power and conflict poetry predictions please

soo were the predictions rightt

i think the fact that lady Macbeth thinks that being full of human kindness is bad also links to the fair is foul and foul is fair as the logic is now reversed as the good are thought of being a disadvantage and a bad thing. just a random thought lmk if you agree with me :)

omg this is so much more useful than some of the big channels out there

Love your annotations, keep it up

could we also say that banquo is a foil of macbeth?

Hi, do you think you could do some similar videos for An inspector calls

Can’t see the quotes

could you say that he wouldnt look into uttersons face because of the shame for exposing his master. the theme of reputation being shown here - he's exposing jekyll and practically ruining his reputation or his facade that he has put on for the world and in front of mr utterson. He's essentially ruining the reputation his master has built and exposing his weakness which links to the theme of duality, hes supposed to be hiding his true, ugly side and show casing the side that he belives ppl should see. (ps, sorry for the grammar)

I think poole won't look utterson in the face because it brings him thoughts of the terrible events that have took place surrounding Jekyll, and how he is in deep fear. If you look at 'Remarkable incident of dr Lanyon' we see the quoatation'I beg that you will spare me any allusion to the one whom I regard as dead'. I did some research and found that 'allusion' means 'an expression designed to call something to mind without mentioning it explicitly', The expression in Lanyon's case, being the mere mention of jekyll, given that it reminded Lanyon (unknown to the audience at the time) of the transfromation he saw Jekyll undergo, perhaps linking to the context of reputation and how Victorian males of upper class were very closed minded and did not want to acknowledge things that seemed extraordinary or unusual. This situation links to the one in chapter 8 with Poole. Poole cannot look Utterson in the face possibly because he is involved in helping a man who he cannot understand or explain (especially when he hears a different voice from Jekyll's room) and is therfore possibly feeling guilty because his upper-middle class position would not like to be associated with something that could ruin their reputation. We see an example of this in the quotation 'except for the moment when he had first announced his terror, he had not once looked the lawyer in the face.' In my opinion, I feel like the verb 'announced' and the abstract noun 'terror' contrast each other in the sense that 'annouced' has very regal and upper class connotations whereas 'terror' is often associated with something vile and distateful, and this repetated use of contrast and juxtaposition throughout the novella (and chapter 8 alone) could hint at the duality of man, and how Stevenson believed every person has a good side and a more evil side to them, the latter of which was being hid behind repression.

I think Utterson begins to leave the case given that repression and reputation gives him very little options of what he can do without being seen as lower status or class. Maybe Utterson is the embodyment of all of the typical and stereotypical values of a Victorian male, and hence feels as if continuing with the investigation would mean that he would have to break typical societal rules to get any further. He lacks confidence to express deeper emotions and empathy which could have allowed him to uncover more information (' Cant I do anything? enquired the lawyer' shows Utterson's lack of ability to read why Lanyon is so distressed about his death, and instead tries the more practical approach of asking how he can help rather than having a meaningful conversation with him), lacks the open mind shown in characters such as Guest, due to his upper-class lifestyle limiting his exposure to more walks of life and possibilities to what happened (such as how in chapter 5, guest is the only one who draws the connection between both letters due to his more outside-the-box thinking), and would be breaking down his reputation if he chose either the religious or scientific approach to the mystery (was the cause of all the previous events due to a higher being or purely a matter of science) due to the fact that he would be dishonoring either Lanyon or Jekyll, and this could potentially spread into a rumor that Utterson is being impolite, less like an upper-class member of society or not worthy of his high reputation. I think all of these factors added together is begining to fatigue Utterson as he relentlessly tries to solve the case, even to the extent of sleeping in the laboratory, but knows that if we were to make any major advancements such as open a letter early or attempt to follow Hyde, his reputation would be messively affected, whhich could cost him his role as a detective altogether. This big idea of fatigue and Uttersons mental battle of mystery vs repression could be emphasised in the quotation 'he was out of spirits, he had grown very silent'. I think the double meaning of spirit draws connotations to both gin (the alcoholic drink utterson is implied to like but doesnt drink due to repression) and spirits in terms of ghost (which draws on religious connotations and maybe even death) really shows how fed up utterson has become, even to the point of deathly/ghostly descriptions just like Lanyon, and the reference to the drink almost shows uttersons frustrated nature, given that alcohol is often used by people in tense or stressful situations to provide temporary relief. I'm really sorry if this is all ramble, I got a bit carried away lol

Could you do some Macbeth theme planning? Possibly manipulation?

Do i need to annotate everything that you do?

one other thing I noticed which is unrelated to the question but I thought might be worth pointing out is the contrast in speech towards each other between Guest and Utterson. Utterson almost seems to talk down to guest, as if he is insignificant, despite his evidently more critical and analytical thinking which actually provided a great deal of help towards utterson trying to find the truth in the mystery. We see an example of this in the quotation 'only an invitation to dinner. why? do you want to see it?' where Utterson appears to be very skeptical and cautious about Guests actions, questioning his descision to analyse both letters, as if it is something that is wrong given that an upper class gentlemen would never have accused another upper class gentleman of a crime as that might have damaged their reputation in victorian England. This adds on to Uttersons very limited and biased way of thinking, which was touched on in noelcarter9329 's analysis. In contrast, Guest speaks to Hyde in a very upper class and respectful manner, highlighting him as a much less self-entitled character. we see this with the repetition of 'sir' which could be re-enforcing the strict societal standards in victorian england. Not once does Utterson refer to Guest as 'sir', and perhaps this repetition of this title alone could be emphasising the inescapable wealth divide and how the upper class were more concerned about upholding their reputation than doing more important things such as hlping Guest with the analysis of the letter or actually being more thoughtful when it comes to solving the case, rather than rushing the case and making mistakes such as how Utterson risks the danger of association now that he has taken all the weight off of Jekyll's back.

I think Guest can more easily identify the difference betweenthe two letters due to his difference in class. He is implied to be less wealthy due to Utterson being the 'master', and this could imply that Guest has had more of an exposure to the areas of London that were mainly inhabited by the lower class, such as soho, and therefore is not as oblivious, blind, and scared by the lower class and there actions, allowing him to have a more open mind about the case and identify the letters more clearly. Uttersons inexperienced and shielded nature is further advanced in in his nightmare during 'The search for Mr Hyde' where Hyde is moving 'even to dizzyness' suggesting that Utterson cannot comprehend the lifestyles, atitudes (and even handwritings) of those living in poverty or lower class areas. This contrasts with Guests calm nature when analysing the letter, brushing off any fear or suspicion surrounding Hydes frightening behavoiur, emphasised in the quotation 'not mad: but it is an odd hand' which shows his more analytical and critical way of thinking, most likely due to his exposure to lots of different classes and types of people, many of which would not have been involved in repression.

is there an act IV scene 2? i cant seem to find it

for thr second question, I feel like Stevenson is trying to reflect the gradually increasing chaos within the minor charcters, as they gradually become frustrated with the societal standards, and relieve this repression with the hope for and enjoyment in anything to do with violence shown in some of the characters. It could potentially link to Stevenson's own feelings of frustration and lack of freedom from his past, how Stevensons dad was addement that he took up engineering but Stevenson went to law school and engaged in certain 'rebellious' activities during and ater this time period starting around the early 1870s. This is also backed up by the use of the adverb 'odious' in the quotation 'a flash of odious joy appeared on the womans face' according to its dictionary definition, odious is to be extremely unplesant and repulsive, but this may shock the reader given that a smile usually has connotations of joy and positive emotions, but in this context is being used to describe the women as a wicked character, and this may be linking to during this period of lack of mental and activity freedom,where even the simple notion of a smile could be percieved as unruly and unproffesional if it was associated with anything that could ruin a reputation.

One reason Stevenson does not provide a clear physical description of Mr. Hyde is to enhance the mysterious and eerie atmosphere of the story. By leaving the appearance of Mr. Hyde ambiguous, Stevenson allows readers to use their imagination, contributing to the sense of horror and suspense. The story is presented from the perspective of Mr. Gabriel John Utterson, a lawyer and friend of Dr. Henry Jekyll. Utterson gradually unravels the mystery surrounding the dual nature of Jekyll and Hyde through a series of documents and testimonies. The lack of a detailed physical description of Mr. Hyde allows readers to project their fears and apprehensions onto the character, making him a more potent symbol of the darker aspects of human nature. Furthermore, the ambiguity surrounding Mr. Hyde's appearance serves the thematic purpose of highlighting the duality of human nature. By not explicitly describing Hyde, Stevenson underscores the idea that Hyde represents the hidden, uncontrollable, and darker side of Dr. Jekyll. The absence of a clear physical description allows readers to focus on the psychological and moral dimensions of the characters' struggle.

thnx your video is so useful and can you tell me what's the app you use it to take notes

i hope you realise how helpful these videos are, i have my mocks soon and i’m looking at every single one of ur videos and ur analysation and explanations are so good i love it 😁😁😁

Thank you very much, it was useful keep doing more please, you've earned a subscriber