15 жыл бұрын
15 жыл бұрын
15 жыл бұрын
16 жыл бұрын
16 жыл бұрын
16 жыл бұрын
16 жыл бұрын
16 жыл бұрын
16 жыл бұрын
16 жыл бұрын
16 жыл бұрын
16 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@dystopic6245 3 ай бұрын
Nakedness is not equal to adultery. Nakedness is something that is shameful. Like marrying someone who belongs to someone else, like incest, whoredom and whoremongering, homosexuality, cross dressing, idolatry, and all forms of illicit behaviors. Interpreting first century Christian beliefs filtered through third century Talmudic renderings misses the whole point. Jesus was correcting the scribes and Pharisees’ false interpretations that not only barred the way for themselves, but for others from heaven.
@playmobible 2 ай бұрын
See use in Lev 18.8 etc, etc. Nakedness included adultery, and all forms of sexual immorality.
@jenniferwarhawk7301 5 ай бұрын
I wish I'd seen these videos years ago. I stayed so long because i didn't think I could divorce my verbally, emotionally, and mentally abusive and emotionally neglectful husband. And my church confirmed that I couldn't. Shame on them! I'm free now though, thankfully.
@playmobible 3 ай бұрын
A simple explainer is available here in Facebook if needed: facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10150719309401023&set=a.6461266022.19186.533841022
@playmobible 3 ай бұрын
Here's the quick guide to the interview also: Quick Summary: The Four Causes of Biblical Divorce by Dr David Instone-Brewer in Playmobil kzbin.info/www/bejne/ooPMdGOCetR3l68 #1 Introduction to Biblical Research on Divorce in Cases of Abuse or Neglect kzbin.info/www/bejne/gXfTZX2HdtOsmKM #2 The First Ground of Divorce Given By God in The Old Testament (Deut. 24.1) kzbin.info/www/bejne/ganHlpuAmpaspMk #3 The Other Grounds of Divorce Given by God in the Old Testament (Exodus 21.10) kzbin.info/www/bejne/b3fVpmCCr7p2qrM #4 God the Reluctant Divorcee (Jeremiah 3.8) kzbin.info/www/bejne/i17EZX5rZ8Zli8k #5 God's Divorce Warning to Judah (Jeremiah 3:8) kzbin.info/www/bejne/e33GiZ2XZ6djptU #6 The Grounds of God's Divorce (Ezekiel 16) kzbin.info/www/bejne/maXRnYqajtGap7s #7 How can God divorce if "he hates" it? (Malachi 2.16) kzbin.info/www/bejne/sH_Xp4ltg6aUfNU #8 The 'Any Cause' Divorce in the 1st Century B.C. kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYqqqXWdfaaJbrc #9 What Kind of Divorce were They Asking Jesus About? (Matthew 19:3) kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z5LGmWWsmbyhbtk #10 How Else do We Know the Pharisees are Asking Jesus About Deuteronomy? (Matthew 19) kzbin.info/www/bejne/gKXLnnWEoLijf6c #11 What did Jesus Say in Reply? (Matthew 19) kzbin.info/www/bejne/rpbTkpSVmsSHkLM #12 The Pharisees Strike Back! (Matthew 19) kzbin.info/www/bejne/qXakaaWKbN-Vqqs #13 Did Moses Permit Divorce or did God and Moses Permit it? (Matthew 19) kzbin.info/www/bejne/eF6vXolonZ15iKs #14 Jesus' Final Conclusion on Divorce (Matthew 19) kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4KnmZyMaJmAoNE #15 The Scandal of Jesus' Conception kzbin.info/www/bejne/i32oeIprhbSNiZY #16 Are all Mentions of Divorce in the Gospels Saying the Same Thing? (Luke 16:18) kzbin.info/www/bejne/laW8ZnSkrdRpl6s #17 Jewish Women and Divorce in the 1st Century (Mark 10:12) kzbin.info/www/bejne/h3iqloqHjtyji8U #18 Is Divorce for Neglect or Abuse in Exodus 21.10-11 mentioned in the New Testament? (Eph. 5.28). kzbin.info/www/bejne/onWXm2ZjjdeqhNU #19 Is divorce for Neglect or Abuse in Exodus 21.10-11 Mentioned Elsewhere in the New Testament? (1 Cor. 7:5) kzbin.info/www/bejne/f4XVXouka8mKpdE #20 Roman Divorce in the First Century A.D. (1 Corinthians 7:10) kzbin.info/www/bejne/d6eylI2GjMufp6c #21 Remarriage in the 1st Century kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWLanYp9jtBll7c #22 Bound to Her Huband as Long as He Lives? (1 Corinthians 7:39) kzbin.info/www/bejne/g56shpydqt2eaMk #23 Are God's Divorce Laws Good? kzbin.info/www/bejne/eZfdiHyfZdpkpZI #24 The Final Conclusion on Biblical Divorce in cases of Abuse and Neglect kzbin.info/www/bejne/n6KkeGOiiM9jd7M #25 What is the Purpose of Deuteronomy 24.1-4? kzbin.info/www/bejne/qp7WioaAaLJsf9k #26 Tour of Tyndale's Ancient Texts kzbin.info/www/bejne/g6HShJhrg7h2mMk
@daynehaworth9258 7 ай бұрын
Why is this kept silent 😲🙆🏻♂️ I have gone through divorce and felt so condemned. But God experienced divorce
@torylynne 9 ай бұрын
💖💖💖
@playmobible 9 ай бұрын
See full version at www.PlaymoBible.com with detailed footnotes. If you would like to see my in-depth interview with Dr. Instone-Brewer, with original manuscripts and 1st-century marriage certificates, see kzbin.info/aero/PL7740BFE40202311E
@stevecamo1 Жыл бұрын
Thank you gentlemen for the good that you do and for making the light of Christ shine brighter. Cheers from Australia 2023
@playmobible 9 ай бұрын
Here's the quick guide to the interview: Quick Summary: The Four Causes of Biblical Divorce by Dr David Instone-Brewer in Playmobil kzbin.info/www/bejne/ooPMdGOCetR3l68 #1 Introduction to Biblical Research on Divorce in Cases of Abuse or Neglect kzbin.info/www/bejne/gXfTZX2HdtOsmKM #2 The First Ground of Divorce Given By God in The Old Testament -- Deut. 24.1 kzbin.info/www/bejne/ganHlpuAmpaspMk #3 The Other Grounds of Divorce Given by God in the Old Testament -- Exodus 21.10 kzbin.info/www/bejne/b3fVpmCCr7p2qrM #4 God the Reluctant Divorcee (Jeremiah 3.8) kzbin.info/www/bejne/i17EZX5rZ8Zli8k #5 God's Divorce Warning to Judah (Jeremiah 3:8) kzbin.info/www/bejne/e33GiZ2XZ6djptU #6 The Grounds of God's Divorce (Ezekiel 16) kzbin.info/www/bejne/maXRnYqajtGap7s #7 How can God divorce if "he hates" it? (Malachi 2.16) kzbin.info/www/bejne/sH_Xp4ltg6aUfNU #8 The 'Any Cause' Divorce in the 1st Century B.C. kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYqqqXWdfaaJbrc #9 What Kind of Divorce were They Asking Jesus About? (Matthew 19:3) kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z5LGmWWsmbyhbtk #10 How Else do We Know the Pharisees are Asking Jesus About Deuteronomy? (Matthew 19) kzbin.info/www/bejne/gKXLnnWEoLijf6c #11 What did Jesus Say in Reply? (Matthew 19) kzbin.info/www/bejne/rpbTkpSVmsSHkLM #12 The Pharisees Strike Back! (Matthew 19) kzbin.info/www/bejne/qXakaaWKbN-Vqqs #13 Did Moses Permit Divorce or did God and Moses Permit it? (Matthew 19) kzbin.info/www/bejne/eF6vXolonZ15iKs #14 Jesus' Final Conclusion on Divorce (Matthew 19) kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4KnmZyMaJmAoNE #15 The Scandal of Jesus' Conception kzbin.info/www/bejne/i32oeIprhbSNiZY #16 Are all Mentions of Divorce in the Gospels Saying the Same Thing? (Luke 16:18) kzbin.info/www/bejne/laW8ZnSkrdRpl6s #17 Jewish Women and Divorce in the 1st Century (Mark 10:12) kzbin.info/www/bejne/h3iqloqHjtyji8U #18 Is Divorce for Neglect or Abuse in Exodus 21.10-11 mentioned in the New Testament? (Eph. 5.28). kzbin.info/www/bejne/onWXm2ZjjdeqhNU #19 Is divorce for Neglect or Abuse in Exodus 21.10-11 Mentioned Elsewhere in the New Testament? (1 Cor. 7:5) kzbin.info/www/bejne/f4XVXouka8mKpdE #20 Roman Divorce in the First Century A.D. (1 Corinthians 7:10) kzbin.info/www/bejne/d6eylI2GjMufp6c #21 Remarriage in the 1st Century kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWLanYp9jtBll7c #22 Bound to Her Huband as Long as He Lives? (1 Corinthians 7:39) kzbin.info/www/bejne/g56shpydqt2eaMk #23 Are God's Divorce Laws Good? kzbin.info/www/bejne/eZfdiHyfZdpkpZI #24 The Final Conclusion on Biblical Divorce in cases of Abuse and Neglect kzbin.info/www/bejne/n6KkeGOiiM9jd7M #25 What is the Purpose of Deuteronomy 24.1-4? kzbin.info/www/bejne/qp7WioaAaLJsf9k #26 Tour of Tyndale's Ancient Texts kzbin.info/www/bejne/g6HShJhrg7h2mMk
@FallaciesDetective Жыл бұрын
This is great and important - we should all share this !
@n.c.1201 2 жыл бұрын
You mention not one jot nor tittle of the law would be changed.... I was under the impression that it was "the Word" that would not be changed. Do you have any commentary on this at all by chance?
@playmobible 2 жыл бұрын
Here's a very small section from David Instone-Brewer's book on the importance of Exodus 21.10 (a NT researcher at Tyndale House) on the issue which may be helpful (Chapter 4): “There are three main ways by which we can decide what parts of the Old Testament laws still apply to Christians today. The most common method is to say that the New Testament has left behind the ceremonial laws (such as sacrifices, food laws and cleanliness issues), while it has inherited the moral laws (such as the Ten Commandments and the other moral demands of Moses and the prophets). The rationale for this difference is the death of Christ, because the ceremonial law was completely fulfilled by his sacrifice. This tidy division between moral and ceremonial law is a good rule of thumb, but it is sometimes difficult to know into which category a particular law fits. For example, many believers would regard tithing as a moral principle, although very few apply the Old Testament stipulations about tithing one tenth for religious workers (the Levites, as in Num. 18.20-24) and a second tenth for celebrating religious festivals and for the poor (as prescribed in Deut. 14.22-29). Similarly, the details of punishments for disobeying principles should be ignored, such as…executing a [destructive] rebellious son who is a glutton and a drunkard [through the courts] (see Deut. 21.18-21). Another method is to say that Christians should follow the moral principles in the Old Testament but not the details -the quantities, dates and punishments that belong to a former age. As we will see, Jesus applied the principles rather than the details of Old Testament law, so this method could be said to be following his example. A third method is to say that Christians should ignore any Old Testament laws that are not specifically mentioned in the New Testament. Such an argument from silence, as we will see in chapter seven, should be used only when a silence is surprising. For example, it is not surprising that the New Testament should fail to repeat every moral command contained in the Old Testament, because the Old Testament is much longer than the New Testament and because it has a lot more passages relating to moral behavior. Therefore most Christians conclude that we have inherited all the Old Testament moral principles that are not specifically denied in the New Testament. The two Testaments are also different in style: the commands contained in the Old Testament are mainly laws and religious rules, whereas the New Testament's commands concern mainly moral and guidelines for living. This is because the Old Testament was largely written by law makers and prophets for the guidance of a nation, whereas the New Testament was written for churches and individual believers who needed guidance about how to live within the laws of whatever nation they found themselves in. This difference has made some people see the religion of the Old Testament as legalistic and mainly concerned with punishment and see the New Testament as full of grace and forgiveness. This is nonsense, of course, because God has not changed: he was no less forgiving in the Old Testament than he is now, though the basis of his forgiveness-the death of Jesus-is a New Testament event.”
@n.c.1201 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so very much for all of your time into these studies & taking the time to share them worldwide!
@maunder01 4 жыл бұрын
Brilliant. Thank you.
@maunder01 4 жыл бұрын
I praise God for these video's. God bless you.
@davidvaldez2346 4 жыл бұрын
Awesome video, thank you
@g.practicainvestments6712 5 жыл бұрын
Great job, thank you so much.
@g.practicainvestments6712 5 жыл бұрын
The best scholarly work yet on this subject. Thank you!!
@rockxhero 5 жыл бұрын
Interesting clarification that we don't OWN the body of our spouse, but we OWE our body to our spouse!
@rockxhero 5 жыл бұрын
Wow, the revelation that Jesus's hometown attributed his birth to Joseph, or out of wedlock, gives me a whole new perspective when reading scripture!
@O12345Dan 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this. There are so many that try to say domestic violence is not grounds for divorce. And like you said, God even was divorced.
@nr1785 6 жыл бұрын
But if Jesus said that you could only divorce for adultery, surely that nullifies this divorce cause of neglect?
@playmobible 5 жыл бұрын
That question is covered later in the interview, but here is the quick version: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ooPMdGOCetR3l68&lc=UgzvUNfs0hpvg2daxA94AaABAg
@revmikealdred 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for showing the interlinear translation. I always find that very helpful.
@MrsLovedays 7 жыл бұрын
Very helpful. Thank you.
@jojoquigley7741 7 жыл бұрын
Very interesting for me, a non-scholar. Thnx for uploading.
@alanchipopwe4708 8 жыл бұрын
This is indeed great work. Most people take a simplistic way of insisting that the Bible does not allow divorce. You have wonderfully explained it all. is it possible for me to get some books or book that i can study this subject?
@playmobible 8 жыл бұрын
See David Instone-Brewer's books here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/n6KkeGOiiM9jd7Mm9s . 'Marriage & Divorce in the Bible' is the detailed version with footnotes and translated Hebrew and Greek, and is substantial. 'Marriage and Divorce in the Church' is the much easier version, and suitable to send to a friend in desperate need.
@angelfernandez7711 9 жыл бұрын
great work Dr.
@supercarrot3000 9 жыл бұрын
Amen!
@revmikealdred 9 жыл бұрын
A great video. This is a difficult topic to approach, but I appreciate its balance of Biblical content and light-hearted format. Thank you.
@revmikealdred 9 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your work and intelligible insight into this very difficult and sensitive topic.
@caelachyt 9 жыл бұрын
Well stated.
@playmobible 13 жыл бұрын
@Krissy19731 Actually it is standard policy for a lot of Churches now. Old (unbiblical) traditions die hard though.
@xxpowwowbluexx 13 жыл бұрын
Another excellent resource for biblical languages is the Biblical Language Center (biblicallanguagecenter . com). Learn Easily • Progress Further • Remember for Life
@playmobible 13 жыл бұрын
In fact, God's divorce from the Northern Tribes of Israel was permanent. It is against God's own law to remarry a bride once he had divorced her (Deut.24.4). That is what is so amazing about the prophesy of Northern Israel's return as a virgin bride. This impossible return did happen - in Christ - we Jews, Israelites, and Gentiles become a "new creation", a bride without spot or wrinkle and part of a brand new betrothal arrangement with the bridegroom, the Messiah.
@playmobible 13 жыл бұрын
@meg2393 Joseph was a righteous man and chose to divorce his wife Mary (Adam, an unrighteous man, chose to stick with eve, his wife, and be divorced by God). God himself is a righteous divorcee from his 'eternally covenanted' wife in Jeremiah 3.8. If you condemn all divorcees, you condemn God himself, and all those who divorce righteously like him. The scriptures make perfect sense, without twisting the Greek. The word of God is so beautiful and sets the captives free.
@playmobible 13 жыл бұрын
@meg2393 Why are “fruit” and “apples” used as two separate words when they can mean the same thing? Because that is how the English and Greek language works. We can't change the meaning 1st C Greek to suit us. You have to realise where this Catholic theory first appeared 20 years ago. It was based on only one single passage, a particularly difficult one, in the Damascus Document, & scholars have since concluded that the early interpretations of this passage were badly mistaken.
@playmobible 13 жыл бұрын
Meg, what you are trying to suggest (to put it in English) is that when the British use the word “fruit”, they are really secretly referring to only apples!? The fact is they have a general word “fruit”, & also the specific word for each kind of fruit. If they were using the word “fruit” in the context of vineyard, “fruit” would mean grapes. When Biblical Greek talks about “Porneia” (a general word for sexual immorality) &“moicheia” (specifically adultery) it is the same a "Fruit" vs "Apples".
@playmobible 13 жыл бұрын
@meg2393 Paul begins by quoting the slogan of someone who is anti-sex (not anti-marriage). The first half of Chapter 7 is addressed to those who are married (vv. 1-17) and in the second half (vv 25-40) Paul talks to various types of unmarried people, including virgins, those 'released' from marriage and those promised in marriage, till finally in v.39, those who are widowed.
@playmobible 13 жыл бұрын
@meg2393 This interpretation is important for Catholic scholars because it means that Jesus did not allow any divorce after marriage. However, most New Testament scholars agree that ‘porneia’ is a general term for sexual sin, as seen in the New Testament itself. It is used for visiting a prostitute (1 Cor.6.13-15, 18), incest (1 Cor.5.1), general sexual sin by a married person (1 Cor.7.2), use of cultic prostitutes (Rev.2.20-21) and the sin of the ‘whore of Babylon’ (Rev.17.2, 4; 18.3; 19.2).