14 сағат бұрын
21 сағат бұрын
Күн бұрын
14 күн бұрын
14 күн бұрын
21 күн бұрын
21 күн бұрын
28 күн бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@TheJestar30 Күн бұрын
Where can i buy one?
@futureenergytechnology Күн бұрын
Thanks for your interest! Currently, fridge-sized nuclear reactors, like microreactors, are still in development and not commercially available for individual purchase. They are primarily designed for industrial or remote applications and require strict regulations for use.
@TruckingVideos 11 күн бұрын
I think I must have missed the bit where they explained how tires are made in factories.
@futureenergytechnology 9 күн бұрын
Thanks for your comment! The video covers the tire-making process, but we understand it might not have been clear enough. Tires are made in factories through steps like material mixing, forming, curing, and inspection. We'll strive to provide more detailed explanations in the future!
@jaydavis4752 12 күн бұрын
Try telling that to the company in Korea whose Hydrgogen powered bus exploded 2 days ago
@futureenergytechnology 12 күн бұрын
Thanks for the update! In the news it is mentioned "it is too early to state anything conclusively, given that too little is known about the case.". So we should wait and see why did that explosion happen.
@jlindcary 13 күн бұрын
So much missing in this presentation. About 1/3 of the energy from a reactor derives from the U238 in the fuel being transmuted into plutonium which then fissions to yield energy. Nearly the entire presentation was unrevealing about the vast potential of fissionable fuel which is not utilized and is deemed waste. So much more can be said!
@futureenergytechnology 12 күн бұрын
Thank you for your detailed insights! You’re absolutely right-there’s so much more to the story of nuclear energy, including the significant role of U238 in producing energy through plutonium. The unutilized potential of fissionable fuel as "waste" is a critical topic worth exploring. We appreciate your comment and will consider expanding on these points in future discussions or presentations.
@ojpro274 17 күн бұрын
So can this process be used in cars.Like we give water to cars and then wind power elecrrolyzes H20 and use h2 in cars
@futureenergytechnology 16 күн бұрын
Thanks for your comment. Using wind power for on-the-go electrolysis in cars is highly impractical. Electrolyzing water into hydrogen requires significant energy, which would be challenging to generate reliably from wind turbines attached to cars. Instead, hydrogen is typically produced at centralized facilities and then stored in high-pressure tanks for vehicle use. This ensures efficiency and safety.
@martin6647 20 күн бұрын
Informative! Thanks!
@futureenergytechnology 20 күн бұрын
Thank you for your support!
@tjhero3243 23 күн бұрын
New subscriber here! Excellent video. Here are four fun and rememberable facts about Hydrogen: 1) Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe 2) Hydrogen is colorless (both gas and liquid) 3) Hydrogen is the smallest molecule 4) You can buy Hydrogen cars in the U.S., but only in California! Funny 30 second video about that here: kzbin.infotEriwOCwwos
@futureenergytechnology 23 күн бұрын
Thanks for your comments!
@믿음38 24 күн бұрын
자연에서 온것을 자연으로 돌려보낸다! Okey, Are will being that's right.
@futureenergytechnology 23 күн бұрын
Yes, you are right! Thanks for your comment!
@paillart527 25 күн бұрын
Pictures don't mach the narration......
@futureenergytechnology 25 күн бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! We'll review the visuals and ensure they align better with the narration in future content. Your input helps us improve!
@aeh8446 25 күн бұрын
Singus???
@futureenergytechnology 25 күн бұрын
Yes, Singas also is produced during this process.
@aeh8446 25 күн бұрын
Thank you, I should have clarified, my point was pronunciation "singus" vs singas syngas)... 😉😉
@futureenergytechnology 25 күн бұрын
@@aeh8446 Thanks for the point!
@Ronald-m4m8c 29 күн бұрын
Thanks for the breakdown! I have a quick question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How can I transfer them to Binance?
@futureenergytechnology 27 күн бұрын
It's great that you’re exploring crypto transfers, but we can’t provide financial advice or guidance on handling seed phrases. Please ensure your wallet is secure and consult SafePal or Binance's official support for step-by-step instructions. Stay safe!
@savannamc407 Ай бұрын
This REALLY helped me understand all of this SOO much better. Excellent video thanks!
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
Thank you so much for your kind words! We are thrilled to hear that the video helped you understand the topic better. Your feedback means a lot!
@savannamc407 28 күн бұрын
@futureenergytechnology Your personal response means A LOT as well!! Thank you 😁😁
@martin6647 Ай бұрын
Informative! Thanks!
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
Thanks for your support!
@zeroonetime Ай бұрын
Thoughts are Creative Entropy.
@zeroonetime Ай бұрын
Ai and Gi are of the same nature / Neutral Intelligence. i.e. Creation ~ Evolution / 01 Entropy.
@zeroonetime Ай бұрын
Artificial I.S. not True other than beingTrue artificial. 010
@zeroonetime Ай бұрын
Think of it as a Binary -- Biological robots.
@zeroonetime Ай бұрын
Neurometric ~ Quantum telepathy ~ 010 is here to stay.
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
Yes! You Are right!
@zeroonetime Ай бұрын
@@futureenergytechnology i am right, So R U, The future is already energetic technology... X Nihilo
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
@@zeroonetime Thanks for your comments!
@jdmjoseduarte Ай бұрын
Great video! Thank you!!!!
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
Thank you so much for your comment!
@johno4521 Ай бұрын
Local trains and buses simply don’t cover enough miles for hydrogen to have any advantages. As an operator, all you get is a vehicle with higher maintenance costs and a safety problem in your depot
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
Hydrogen may not suit short-distance applications like local buses and trains due to higher maintenance costs and depot safety considerations. However, its advantages in long-range travel, quick refueling, and reduced emissions make it valuable in specific contexts like regional and intercity transit.
@johndunbar7504 Ай бұрын
@@futureenergytechnology H is best for all applications because it is the only alternative to fossil fuels that ` closes the carbon gap '. That enables us to completely solve the climate change issues. There are no safety problems with hydrogen. Its production and distribution has been going on successfully for well over a century.
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
@@johndunbar7504 You are right. Thanks for your comment.
@meeranraees3183 Ай бұрын
Nuclear fusion renewable energy production energy efficiency solar energy earth to sun 186000 miles per second travelling
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
Your comment touches on key concepts like nuclear fusion, renewable energy, and solar power, but could you clarify your point or specific question? It seems like you're linking these ideas-are you referring to their efficiency or a comparison?
@gamingchair7757 Ай бұрын
Thx but can we do it with microwave? Or I’ll build this in my home
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
Thank you for your comment! Microwaves and nuclear reactors operate on entirely different principles. A microwave can't replace a nuclear reactor for energy production. If you're considering building a power solution at home, safety and regulations are critical-nuclear technology requires strict expertise and authorization. Always consult experts and follow safety laws!
@hsteven1110 Ай бұрын
Until all other forms of heat, i.e. fossil fuels, are replaced by hydrogen, why not use all sources of hydrogen instead of bad mouthing them?
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
You make a good point! While green hydrogen aims for sustainability, other hydrogen sources can still play a role in reducing fossil fuel dependence as we transition. Embracing multiple hydrogen sources may support progress until green hydrogen becomes more accessible and efficient on a large scale.
@hsteven1110 Ай бұрын
@@futureenergytechnology - petroleum is better used for plastics, rather than burning it, which will deplete the supply eventually.
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
@@hsteven1110 Good point! Using petroleum for durable goods like plastics could conserve resources and reduce the environmental impact of burning it as fuel. By reserving it for essential materials and finding alternative energy sources, we could make better use of petroleum while supporting a sustainable energy transition.
@mike160543 Ай бұрын
No. It is a stupidly wasteful way of using electricity. It would be more sensible to make ammonia as a means of storing and transporting electricity generated by solar and wind when there is no demand for it
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment. It is true that green hydrogen production is currently energy-intensive, and ammonia does have potential as an alternative energy carrier, especially for easier storage and transport. While hydrogen is promising for decarbonization, maximizing efficiency and minimizing waste are essential to make green hydrogen more viable. Ammonia is indeed being explored for its storage potential, but both methods will need advancements to be truly sustainable options for large-scale use. For more information, please watch this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gWG3apmodr-mp7c
@mike160543 Ай бұрын
@@futureenergytechnology I have seen the video. Until the first law of thermodynamics is repealed making fuel from water will always be energy intensive. If the solar farm is thousands of miles from the consumers it will have to make hydrogen. To transport it the most logical way is to make ammonia. Ammonia is made from nitrogen and hydrogen. There are already designs for ammonia plants that can run intermittently. It can be stored at room temperature at a pressure of 10 bars, or as a liquid at -33OC. In 2023 world production of ammonia was 150,000,000 metric tons, almost all from fossil fuels. There are facilities for transporting it all over the world. “green” ammonia could displace most of this. Another possibility is to install small ammonia plants next to solar and wind farms. This ammonia would be used for direct application to the soil.
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
@@mike160543 Thanks for sharing your thoughts! You’re absolutely right-the energy intensity of water-splitting is a critical challenge, and ammonia’s established infrastructure offers a practical solution for storing and transporting hydrogen-based energy. Local ammonia production near solar and wind farms could indeed support both energy transport and agricultural applications, making green ammonia a promising addition to the clean energy transition.
@martin6647 Ай бұрын
❤❤❤
@VickChan-o4x Ай бұрын
Great content, as always! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
Thank you for reaching out! While we can’t provide financial advice, here’s a general tip: to transfer USDT from SafePal to Binance, you’d typically go to SafePal’s transfer option, enter your Binance USDT deposit address, and follow the wallet's prompts. For security, double-check addresses and transaction settings and refer to both SafePal and Binance support if you need detailed guidance. Always keep your seed phrase safe and secure.
@jusupdjidjimidjimilovic3677 2 ай бұрын
These are not Trump's energy and environmental policies, it is Koch's family policies, and other from big-oil cartel.
@futureenergytechnology Ай бұрын
It’s common to see debate around the influences shaping energy policies, especially when it comes to fossil fuels. Under President Trump, policies did favor deregulation and expansion of fossil fuel production, which aligns with big-oil interests. However, these policies also supported U.S. energy independence and job growth in the oil and gas sectors, reflecting both industry priorities and Trump’s focus on U.S. energy dominance. Different perspectives may interpret these influences in varied ways, but the policies had tangible impacts on U.S. energy output and emissions trends.
@martin6647 2 ай бұрын
Informative. Thanks ❤
@futureenergytechnology 2 ай бұрын
You're welcome 😊
@HankusSpankus 2 ай бұрын
About forty years left according to oil studies independent of big oil . How the powers that be recklessly waste it depends how stupid the public is that won’t compromise thier lifestyles . Ideally leaving some for future generations in case a mini ice age ever happens .
@futureenergytechnology 2 ай бұрын
You're right about the need for careful resource management. With limited oil reserves, how we choose to use or conserve these resources today will impact future generations, especially as we adapt to changing environmental conditions. Prioritizing sustainable energy sources and mindful consumption could make a big difference for the future.
@Fishlover125 2 ай бұрын
How does it work?
@futureenergytechnology 2 ай бұрын
An artificial photosynthesis system typically uses a photoelectrochemical cell or similar structure with specialized catalysts. Sunlight powers the cell, which splits water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen gases. The hydrogen produced is captured for use as fuel, while any carbon dioxide can be converted into synthetic fuels. These systems involve multiple components that work together under sunlight to efficiently convert solar energy into chemical energy, allowing for potential large-scale, renewable energy storage.
@Fishlover125 2 ай бұрын
@ omg tysm for ur reply!!! I was wondering you knew what the water oxidation catalyst and proton reduction catalyst is
@futureenergytechnology 2 ай бұрын
@@Fishlover125 In artificial photosynthesis, common catalysts for water oxidation include ruthenium-based complexes (such as Ru(bpy)₃²⁺) and manganese oxides, while proton reduction catalysts often use platinum or nickel-based compounds. These catalysts help drive the reactions needed to split water and generate hydrogen fuel effectively.
@Fishlover125 2 ай бұрын
@ tysm I subscribed u
@futureenergytechnology 2 ай бұрын
@@Fishlover125 Thanks
@Fishlover125 2 ай бұрын
This helped me for school….ur the best
@futureenergytechnology 2 ай бұрын
You are most welcome. Thanks for your support.
@Fishlover125 2 ай бұрын
Tysm
@martin6647 2 ай бұрын
Informative! Thanks!
@futureenergytechnology 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your support.
@muhammadsabir8631 2 ай бұрын
Hello Professor, please provide information about the wire you wrapped around the quartz tube. In my case, I am using aluminum foil around the tube but after some time when it gets heated up, it's difficult to remove the foil from the tube. Thank You
@futureenergytechnology 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your question! The wire around the quartz tube helps with heat distribution and is easier to remove than aluminum foil when heated. You might consider using a different material, like high-temp insulation tape, which could be more manageable.
@rogerfroud300 2 ай бұрын
Everyone says that Hydrogen can be made from renewable energy, while failing to say that it's far less efficient than just charging a battery in a car with it directly. To say that Hydrogen cars are efficient is deliberately misleading. Each process has inefficiencies that have to be added up, and these include everything from Hydrogen production, compression, delivery and finally usage. When you add all of those together, you find that it's roughly one third as efficient compared to just storing and retrieving the electricity in a battery. This is a dead end technology. It's irrelevant whether tailpipe emissions are just water, that's just a distraction. Poor overall efficiency and complication overall dooms this technology. Hydrogen as a way to transport energy make no sense.
@futureenergytechnology 2 ай бұрын
You make a valid point about the inefficiencies in hydrogen production and usage compared to direct battery charging. While hydrogen has potential for specific applications, like heavy transport, the efficiency concerns you raise are significant and should guide our energy strategies moving forward.
@perlishaedwin5991 2 ай бұрын
Cool.oh,oh I'm the first one to comment!
@futureenergytechnology 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment! First is the best!
@jeff5101 2 ай бұрын
A college project of mine in 1989 was a feasibility study of this, ME program. It was a computer simulation course. Too many unknowns to draw a conclusion but it was an interesting assignment. The gov't can make anything "successful" by subsidizing it.
@futureenergytechnology 2 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for your comment!
@luren6840 2 ай бұрын
nice video
@futureenergytechnology 2 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for your support.
@ctcboater 2 ай бұрын
So many errors... kzbin.info/www/bejne/marLqGeCjNF9o8U
@billybobjones4317 3 ай бұрын
Hydrogen is like the Snake oil sold by con artists in the Wild West and no more useful, so many lies and fraudsters in the Hydrogen camp, they even lie about the fact that Hydrogen is not pollution free as all fuels burnt under compression will create Hydrogen oxides as the air used in combustion is 70% Nitrogen, same as the air we breath and I don't understand why people are so stupid to not understand this, the only way that Hydrogen doesn't cause this is if it is burnt with no compression and then it does nothing as far as an engine goes, unless you want to go back to Steam engines and use the Hydrogen to boil the water lol. People need to stand up and make any Politician that invested our taxpayer monies into Hydrogen to pay it back out of their own pockets. If politicians are as stupid as those that invested in Hydrogen, how did they ever manage to get through school or even get their own shoes on the right feet? I expect a Labour Government to be filled with Union mongrels with barely more than a Monkeys intelligence, but the Liberals allowed a leader as dumb as Scott Morrison to be in that position, it seems that neither party has a brain between them anymore.
@MrDudulex 3 ай бұрын
You forgot to mention that the combustion of ammonia produces nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas much worse than CO2.
@futureenergytechnology 3 ай бұрын
You're right! The combustion of ammonia does produce nitrous oxide, which is a significant concern for greenhouse gas emissions. The negative effects of NOx on the global warming is 320 times more than CO2. Thanks for pointing that out!
@gadabout694 3 ай бұрын
Have you been lied to? Have you ever asked how much the sea level has actually risen? Let's ask Google The answer is less than 3 millimeters per year... Here is the Proof look up your own location .. look at “NOAA tides and currents sea level trends”
@gadabout694 3 ай бұрын
Now Ask: what's the cost to reach NETZERO? Ans: $4 trillion a year for the next 30 years or $120 trillion.
@futureenergytechnology 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing your perspective! While it's true that the U.S. alone can't solve global warming, the global transition to net-zero, including hydrogen fuel, is about collective action. Small yearly changes add up, and reducing emissions benefits future generations and global ecosystems. Climate solutions are also about improving air quality, public health, and driving clean energy innovation. Every step counts in addressing the bigger picture.
@gadabout694 3 ай бұрын
@@futureenergytechnology Have you ever how much Canada contributes to global warming? answer 1.5% Now ask how much will it cost to reach NETZERO ? Answer 5.2 trillion dollars or $118,000 per houshold.. source Financial post 5//15/24
@futureenergytechnology 3 ай бұрын
@@gadabout694 Thank you so much for the information.
@gadabout694 3 ай бұрын
Have you been lied to? Just how much can WE change Global Warming? Let’s do the calculations! Have you ever asked, “How much global warming has there been since the START of the industrial revolution?" Ask Google, Ans from NOAA: “1°C since 1750? So how much change is that a year in °F 1.8F/272 years = 0.0066°F /year How much is actually caused by the USA? OK let's ask Google, Ans: 27% So the USA has caused (27%) * .0066° /year or .0017° F /year. Have you ever asked what is the half-life of CO2 in the atmosphere? Ans: 120 years WOW!! By using NOAA’s historical records after reaching NETZERO in the USA, the MAXIMUM change expected in global warming is -.0017°F /year And it will take an additional 120 years to realize an actual reduction of -.00085 °F
@futureenergytechnology 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment. Please check our reply to your next comment.
@chea18z 3 ай бұрын
YA
@futureenergytechnology 3 ай бұрын
Definitely!
@SankarDuguay 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for the forecast! 📊 I have a quick question: 🤷♂️ I only have these words 🤔. (behave today finger ski upon boy assault summer exhaust beauty stereo over). What should I do with this? 🤷♂️
@futureenergytechnology 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment! It seems like you have a random collection of words there.
@Usmankhichi-ve7il 3 ай бұрын
What is this
@futureenergytechnology 3 ай бұрын
This video is about Ammonia (NH3)! The details are explained in the video!
@rashmitapadhy7986 3 ай бұрын
The first co
@futureenergytechnology 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment!
@P.Thirunavukarasu 4 ай бұрын
Crude oil
@futureenergytechnology 4 ай бұрын
Yes! Crude Oil!
@Lyulff 4 ай бұрын
AI slop
@futureenergytechnology 4 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment!