Oh and Nice vid

You kinda sound like trump

If we consider a point D on the line segment AB (not mid of the line segment ) then a point P eqidistant from the end points of the line segment is joined with D that is PD is not the pëpendecular bisector of AB .

Please record the video proprely but v.good teaching

Thanks :)

can you prove the statement without an indirect proof argument/proof by contradiction?

thank you so much

The two triangles are SIMILAR. NOT CONGRUENT If they were congruent you would have a equality of line segments and not equality of product of line segments !

👋

on the contrary , say we bisect angle A till D, and we make a straight line from B to C which would make so that AD is perpendicular to BC, and therefore angle, ADB = ADC and as 1 and 2 are already equal by angle sum property the other two are equal and both the triangles are congruent by AAA criteria

thank you!!!

very clear and simple

thank you

ehheehe

is AE = AE really necessary?

THIS IS WRONG. How could you substitute DF with AY? There is no information saying that the ratios are the same. 😅

THANK YOU SO MUCH I was learnign this and I couldn't grasp my hand around why the products were the same. Thank you for clearing the confusion.

👌👌👌👌👌

Thanks

thanks,btw 9 years past are you alive?🤔

Are you from khan academy??

helpfull video

wonderful!

thank you so much!

You just saved an 8th Grader from failing math PEPE SADGE

I was looking for a video like this explaining this property! Thank you!

Thanks جزاك الله خيرا ❤

i think this is the first ever comment that i am leaving on a video, but you have taught me so much more than my upper division math professor has so far this quarter. Bless your soul

Dad here who finds himself having to help with homework. Just a note to say I appreciate you being able to explain this clearly in under three minutes. If you find yourself in the Detroit area I owe you a beer.

I highly doubt I will get a reply on this, but what does the reason for statement 7 say?

Nice video! Very helpful.

Discovered this channel cause I needed math help. So damn wholesome that this guy posted all of these.

Thank you so muchhhh

Nice sir

In reason 5, should the reason be the theorem, if ANY two lines are cut by a transversal such that the alternate interior angles are congruent, THEN the lines are parallel? It looks like you are saying since the lines are parallel then the angles are congruent. Sorry for the clarification, you did a great job laying out the proof in a clear and straightforward way.

Sada video

How do we prove this in vectors?

thanks ! helped a lot !!

Thank you so much! I needed this.

your hands are red

it cant be read your handwritten, it was too hard to understand

Very useful thanks

Thank you

My teacher has been teacher for well over 20 years and has been very vague in explaining anything related to proving these geometric theorems. She still gives us a plethora of homework including proof of objectives she did not teach. Long story short, thank you. 🙏🏻

To prove this properly, take the common side of the two right angle triangles, plus the two radii (by definition equal), and then use the Pythagorean theorem to show that the two distances to that single point must be equal.

Bullshit

this is so helpful

Thanks for the video. Quick and well explained.

Can a Rhombus be a kite?

Thank you that is really helpful but a better penmanship will help thx