Sounds as if the speaker was bored reading the text - understandable, as the content sounds quite dry. It can be written in a more appealing way and also read with better emphasis on certain words, in general with more effort put into this type of video.
@elffrynas4305 Жыл бұрын
YO MY FRIEND SAID THAT SHE LOVES YOU BRO
@envereren0 Жыл бұрын
begum anani skm
@pauldirac13672 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the good explanation
@WolfieNamira2 жыл бұрын
This is an amazing video, I love podzol!
@ananyasharma12982 жыл бұрын
Very helpful, thank you
@anesiaandrews2143 жыл бұрын
This was really helpful for my upcoming geography exam.
@hawarabdulrazaqsadiq30553 жыл бұрын
Great
@jenna93004 жыл бұрын
I’ve been watching lots of videos on soil testing, and this is the best example of real world “how to”, it’s easy to understand, and shows consistent testing techniques. Thank you!!!
@andreabalbona30734 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@evazhang32324 жыл бұрын
Thank you professor for taking us to the filed to see how those samples were collected. I was wondering how from last video. It was fascinating to me.
@carlosguerrero1474 жыл бұрын
Very interesting video and a great teacher
@macsheadroom32094 жыл бұрын
You should explain the Nastapolka arc, until that is explained everything else is bunk
@macsheadroom32094 жыл бұрын
What about atomic weight and we can only assume that the Earth has had many many large tidal washes, stratified by weight
@obsidiantechi4 жыл бұрын
How did I even get put into this class
@theoriez89423 жыл бұрын
well said
@CryingMansbrother Жыл бұрын
Blud wanted to be in a different class 💀
@hockeyfan12334 жыл бұрын
Really well explained vid. Thank you, Grade 9 Drama Student
@CryingMansbrother Жыл бұрын
Well said
@chandanchoudhary71534 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much
@frndusbambulius17094 жыл бұрын
I'm confused. On one slide, it says that old institutionalism looks at informal structures, while neoinstitutionalism focuses on inter-organisational and formal structures. Yet on the next slide, it says that old institutionalism looks at inter-organisational treaties. Then, it says that old looks at organisations as embedded in communities while new looks at organisations as embedded in their fields. Aren't community and field sort of the same thing? Correct me if I'm wrong, but in my understanding, neoinstutionalism still looks at both formal and informal structures, it just opposes the idea that organisations are influenced merely by existing institutions. But most importantly, it brings in new concepts, such as isomorphism; formal structure as rationalised myth; organisations behaving in a way to gain legitimacy, reflecting socially constructed reality; decoupling; or organisational/issue/institutional field as a unit of analysis.
@jollyjokress38525 жыл бұрын
Wow very clear explanation :)
@Robsay015 жыл бұрын
This is sociological institutionalsm
@suryangshumitra16615 жыл бұрын
U r the real teacher. U know how to learn us. 😄 Thank u
@UNDERST0RY5 жыл бұрын
Under 50 cm or under 50 mm?
@sikandersingh6365 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@Nico26255 жыл бұрын
Good piece
@samusamu15865 жыл бұрын
Thank u sir
@Homemade-Adventure6 жыл бұрын
Great stuff! Thank you.
@rowanshole6 жыл бұрын
Best explanation I've found. Any advice on how to ameliorate this soil for rangeland use? I've got a couple of hundred acres of it and am letting a lot go back to forest but would like 40-50 acres of pasture in the valley floor. At present it's 150 y.o. degraded pasture that's compacted, degraded and very very weedy. St Jon's wort, Echium plantagineum, foxglove (?) and BlackBerry in the wetter areas. Our Australian native tufties do well in the very moist areas I'd like to turn back to swamp Merry christmas
@maidhcilbrimigen65426 жыл бұрын
I thought in a forest the iron, aluminium and calcium is taken up by the trees? And that causes the soil to become acidic, resulting in podzol with no iron pan? In open heathland or moorland, or upland bog rainfall leaching out metals does the same thing but in that case an iron pan does form.